Alberta
LISTEN: My date with self-isolation amid the Covid 19 scare – J’Lyn Nye Interview

I was happy to join J’Lyn Nye today on 630 CHED to discuss this. Here is a link to the interview.
It’s funny how these things go. I don’t buy lottery tickets so it’s only fitting that I would be one of the 4.5 million Albertans who may have come into contact with one of Alberta’s seven confirmed cases of Covid 19 (Coronavirus Disease). You can do the math if you’re an oddsmaker.
It started with a phone call late yesterday afternoon from a nurse in the contagious disease unit at AHS. She informed me that a person who had tested positive for the virus had been at a place of business in Leduc at the same time I had been there for an appointment.
After asking a number of questions about how I was feeling, she told me that they’d like me to “self-isolate” for 14 days. During that time, I should take my temperature twice a day and if I develop any symptoms, to call and they’d arrange for a test. There really is no treatment at this point as a vaccine is yet to be developed and will likely be another 12-18 months away from widespread use.
So here I sit. Do I self-isolate? Do I go about my business? I’m a healthy guy. I’ve only had the flu once in my lifetime that I can remember, so what are the chances that I might test positive for this? Again, I’m not an oddsmaker, and certainly not a doctor. In fact, it’s not like the flu at all so that’s a useless comparison. The chances are probably slim. So I look at my calendar. Reality is that I’m lucky. I operate a digital media platform and literally 100% of my work can be done online if needed. I work from home 80% of the time, leaving the house for various business appointments and social events. Luckily my calendar is light with nothing that can’t be moved or dealt with online.
There is one niggly thing though. A recording session this coming Sunday with a band I sometimes play guitar with in Central Alberta. By Sunday, I should be virtually good to go, that being day 12 after my potential contact. It took a lot of schedule bashing to pull everyone together to do this session. Maybe I should just risk it and not tell anyone. And then I think about that … none of my bandmates are getting any younger, in fact, if I’m facing reality, we’re probably all in that age sweet spot where we’re most-susceptible.
Ok, decision made. Postpone the session. Schedule is now clear except for a couple of sundry tasks that can be accomplished with limited help from some friends.
But … then I think about if I worked at a job where I don’t get paid unless I show up to work. Maybe I’m a contractor. Maybe I have a family and am the sole income earner, or I’m a single parent working two part time jobs. I’m not sure I would make the same decision. I mean, seriously, I feel fine. Not even a sniffle. Would I stay home? Or go make some money to pay my monthend bills? I’m happy I don’t have to make that decision.
“… Another thing I’ve thought quite a bit about is toilet paper…”
I’ve now had 18 hours to process all of this and think it through. I must admit, I’ve never really thought that much about how a disease spreads, other than notionally knowing it happens through various forms of contact, and I think is more prone to spread in certain environments; heavily populated, warm, humid conditions, etc. A scientist I am not.
My date with self-isolation has given me a very real opportunity to reflect on my own travels and interactions since having potentially being exposed to the virus eight days ago. With this newfound time in my schedule, I’ve had a chance to think this through. Since yesterday afternoon, I’ve taken myself out of circulation. I have eliminated my risk to others. With luck I won’t test positive, and everyone in my circle will be spared from self-isolation. I will pull out a guitar and work on the material for the session we postponed. Overall, I’m starting to feel pretty good about my decision.
“…I wonder, can our system possibly get on top of this? It feels like a hopeless task, yet we have to try, right?…”
But what if, just what if, I become Positive Confirmation #8 in the province? Suddenly, everyone I’ve been around since March 3rd becomes of interest. Is Arnie at risk? I attended the Power of Success show last Thursday in Edmonton with Arnold Schwarzenegger and Friends. Lucky for them I couldn’t afford the Platinum ticket that would have given me the opportunity shake Arnie’s hand and get my picture taken with the man himself. I’d certainly have been within 2 meters, and I know we would have had a proper and firm handshake.
“…There will no doubt be businesses that close as a result of this- some for good…”
Oh. Something else … the long-term care home I where I visited my Dad and his wife this past Sunday? That could get messy, considering I also spent time with his doctor, one of the few in the area.
Or the auto repair shop I limped my sick car to yesterday morning after taking out both rims on the right side Sunday when I tangled with one of the ridiculously large and dangerous potholes at 110 kph on Highway 43. (That’s a whole other rant!)
The list goes on. As I think of the permutations and potential for chaos, it’s sobering. How quickly this can spread here is yet to be seen. It doesn’t spread through the air like measles, but it does spread through contact, or droplets generated by a sneeze or cough, and can live on surfaces we touch. Washing hands and cleaning surfaces is critical to helping stop the spread, and that’s just basic common sense anyway.
“However, it can spread person to person by larger droplets, like from a cough or sneeze, or by touching contaminated objects, then touching your eyes, nose or mouth,” says Dr. Deena Hinshaw, Alberta’s chief medical officer of health.
I wonder, can our system possibly get on top of this? It feels like a hopeless task, yet we have to try, right? Maybe geting on top of it isn’t possible. But can we slow the spread with a precaution like I’m being asked to take? Yes we can. But what else has to happen if we’re to make the mitigation effort as effective as possible?
There will no doubt be businesses that close as a result of this- some for good. Think about it. If I go for a coffee everyday at my favourite coffee shop, but because my employer has asked us all to work from home, that coffee shop owner is going to miss out on my $3 bucks a day. And let’s say that happens for 2 weeks. That’s ten cups of coffee, or $30 dollars. I’m not going to go in on the first day back and buy ten cups of coffee. No, I’ll buy one. That money is lost. Multiply that by 100 customers a day and the numbers can add up to a point where many small businesses can’t survive.
There needs to be programs to help them recover. Maybe there are already. What about for the wage earner who has to take time off work to self isolate and make the community safer for everyone else. Is there a program to help them reover their lost wages? How long will that take to put money back in their wallets should they make the sacrifice for the safety of the community? If we’re serious about mitigation, we will need to really think about how to deal with the downstream consequences.
This isn’t survival of the fittest. We need those employers and their employees to get through this and be there when this passes, or we’ll be in even worse shape.
Another thing I’ve thought quite a bit about is toilet paper.
Although this is a new virus and research is only starting to be evaluated, it appears to affect respiratory function more so than gastronomic function, though again, it’s pretty early to know for sure. But best I can tell, there is no way that I need to have a year’s supply of toilet paper on hand. I can see having more than normal, just in case things get out of hand. But to be hoarding it for some weird survivalistic reason, especially against a backdrop of short-term supply shortages exacerbated by recent rail blockages seems … well, just completely irrational to me. Settle down, there’s more coming! And hey, if you’re sick enough to go through that much toilet paper, there may be even more wrong with you and you’ll probably be in a hospital. Show a little kindness for the butts of your neighbours. Like that old joke “…Dick’s a hoarder. Don’t be a Dick…”
Seriously, take a moment and give this a bit of thought. This can change pretty fast, like it did for me. A phone call. And then you don’t go out again for up to 14 days. So think in terms of a 3 week supply of things you’ll need. If you’re alone and have nobody to help you, then you’ll need to be even more diligent in planning.
I’ll let you know how it goes. Hopefully I’ll see you in a couple of weeks!
Here is a link with helpful tips that will help you make an appropriate plan.
From the Government of Canada:
If COVID-19 becomes common in your community, you will want to have thought about how to change your behaviours and routines to reduce the risk of infection.
Your plan should include how you can change your regular habits to reduce your exposure to crowded places. For example, you may:
- do your grocery shopping at off-peak hours
- commute by public transit outside of the busy rush hour
- opt to exercise outdoors instead of in an indoor fitness class
Your plan should also include what you will do if you become sick. If you are a caregiver of children or other dependents, you will want to have thought ahead to engage backup caregivers.
You should also think about what you will do if a member of your family becomes sick and needs care. Talk to your employer about working from home if you are needed to care for a family member at home. If you, yourself, become ill, stay home until you are no longer showing symptoms. Employers should not require a sick leave note as that will put added pressure on limited health care services.
Your plan should include shopping for supplies that you should have on hand at all times. This will ensure you do not need to leave your home while you are sick or busy caring for an ill family member.
Your plan should build on the kits you have prepared for other potential emergencies. For more information on how to prepare yourself and your family in the event of an emergency, please visit getprepared.ca.
Read more on Todayville Edmonton.
This article was originally published on March 10th, 2020.
Alberta
Prominent conservative lawyer in Canada disbarred in ‘vindictive abuse of process’

In 2021, the Alberta Law Society expressly delegated disciplinary proceedings against Mr. Carpay to the Manitoba Law Society regarding a matter involving surveillance of government officials, including a Manitoba judge. The surveillance was performed in June 2021, for no other reason than to illuminate a legitimate public policy question: were politicians and judges complying with the stringent Covid restrictions that they themselves had imposed on the public?
Mr. Carpay acknowledged that including a judge in the surveillance was a mistake. He publicly apologized for his error in judgment in July 2021.
In August 2021, the Alberta Law Society explained in unequivocal language that it was delegating disciplinary proceedings to the Manitoba Law Society, and that the Alberta Law Society was closing its file and taking no further steps.
The Manitoba Law Society proceedings against Mr. Carpay concluded in August 2023. Mr. Carpay was ordered to pay $5,000 and to respect a lifetime ban on practicing law in Manitoba.
In October 2023, Manitoba Crown Prosecutors stayed all criminal charges against Mr. Carpay, who was innocent of any criminal wrongdoing.
In December 2023, Mr. Carpay submitted his letter of resignation to the Alberta Law Society.
However, the Alberta Law Society then refused to accept Mr. Carpay’s resignation, and commenced new disciplinary proceedings against him, regarding the same conduct for which Mr. Carpay had already been disciplined and punished by the Manitoba Law Society.
A hearing before the Alberta Law Society finally took place on May 28, 2025 – nearly four years after the incident had occurred.
The Alberta Law Society’s decision to refuse Mr. Carpay’s resignation, and to commence brand new disciplinary proceedings over the same issues after delegating the matter to the Manitoba Law Society, is a vindictive and petty abuse of process.
Mr. Carpay has not practiced law for years. He last appeared in court on behalf of a client in 2015. The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms has no staff lawyers, and all legal work is done by outside counsel.
All legal costs related to this matter have been and continue to be covered entirely by Mr. Carpay.
Tuesday’s decision does not impact the vital work of John Carpay or the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. We continue to defend the constitutional rights and freedoms of all Canadians.
Alberta
Teacher strikes should never happen in Alberta

From the Fraser Institute
In Manitoba, teachers voluntarily gave up the right to strike in the 1950s in exchange for binding arbitration. There’s no evidence this decision harmed Manitoba’s education system. In fact, salaries for Manitoba teachers are currently among the highest in the country.
Alberta students are back in school. But for how long?
That’s an open question, because Alberta teachers are currently in a legal strike position. In June, almost 95 per cent of public school teachers voted to authorize strike action. With talks breaking off recently between the Teachers’ Employer Bargaining Association (which represents school boards in the province) and the Alberta Teachers’ Association (which represents teachers in all Alberta public, separate and francophone schools), prospects for a negotiated settlement don’t look good.
The dispute between the two sides is mainly about money. According to the union, the Alberta government is woefully underfunding public education, teacher salaries are too low, classes are too big, and schools lack basic education supplies. The government, of course, disputes these claims and argues that school boards receive more than enough money to educate all students.
Which side is right?
It depends on how you interpret the numbers. While per-student spending in Alberta is lower than the Canadian average, student academic achievement in math, science and reading is well above the Canadian average. There’s no reason to assume that spending more money will automatically lead to better academic results.
Even so, neither side is likely to budge. That’s unfortunate because the people most impacted by a potential strike (students and parents) are without a voice in this dispute. Regardless of which side has the better case, students and their parents will suffer the most during a strike.
This is why Alberta public school teachers shouldn’t have the right to strike. Instead, unresolved labour disputes should automatically go to binding arbitration, where a neutral third party listens to both sides make their respective cases, and then draws up a new collective agreement. Throughout this process students would remain in class and their learning would continue.
Binding arbitration is already a widely accepted way to settle labour disputes. For example, essential workers such as police officers and firefighters regularly use binding arbitration to settle their labour disputes. Given the essential nature of educating students, it’s reasonable to add teachers to this list.
Significantly, there’s precedent for moving in this direction. In Manitoba, teachers voluntarily gave up the right to strike in the 1950s in exchange for binding arbitration. There’s no evidence this decision harmed Manitoba’s education system. In fact, salaries for Manitoba teachers are currently among the highest in the country. Instead of walking a picket line trying to pressure the provincial government to give in to their demands, Manitoba teachers—and students—remain in the classroom until binding arbitration produces a settlement.
In addition, binding arbitration can be used to address more than salary disputes. For example, after a bitter year-long series of intermittent teacher strikes and work-to-rule action, the Saskatchewan government and the Saskatchewan Teachers’ Federation (STF) agreed earlier this year to use binding arbitration to resolve the thorny issue of “classroom complexity”—essentially, how to support students with complex needs. The STF was happy when the Arbitration Board’s final decision placed specific requirements on the province to address the classroom complexity issue.
Imagine how much better it would have been if Saskatchewan students and parents hadn’t suffered a year of labour uncertainty prior to this decision. And of course, teachers lost pay because of the intermittent strikes. Had their labour dispute gone to binding arbitration right away, Saskatchewan teachers would have received reasonable salary increases and a framework for addressing classroom complexity, all without threatening to strike.
Back in Alberta, parents are scrambling to make contingency plans for how they will look after their children if public schools close because of a teacher strike. Alberta has an opportunity to learn from what has happened elsewhere. Students and parents deserve the certainty of knowing that schools will remain open. Teacher strikes should never happen in Alberta. The Smith government should classify teachers as an essential service, and unresolved labour issues should be sent to binding arbitration.
Michael Zwaagstra is a senior fellow with the Fraser Institute.
-
C2C Journal1 day ago
Canada’s Health-Care Monopoly is Killing Us
-
Crime2 days ago
U.S. Missile Strike on Alleged Narco-Boat Tied to Maduro and Ohio Indictment of Chinese Firms Signal Dramatic Escalation in War on Fentanyl
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day ago
Mic Drop: The Thought Police Are Coming To Take You Away
-
International1 day ago
US going back to the moon before Trump leaves office
-
International2 days ago
Australian woman faces $200k penalty for saying men don’t belong in women’s sports
-
Alberta1 day ago
Prominent conservative lawyer in Canada disbarred in ‘vindictive abuse of process’
-
National2 days ago
NDP seemingly learns nothing from electoral collapse as the party sets identity goals for leadership race
-
Alberta2 days ago
Teacher strikes should never happen in Alberta