Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

COVID-19

Dr. McCullough’s powerful new documentary exposes systemic medical tyranny during COVID

Published

5 minute read

From Peter A. McCullough, M.D., MPH of Courageous Discourse

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, Clifton Dawley, a beloved father and grandfather, tragically succumbs to the virus under mysterious circumstances. His son, Stephen Dawley, embarks on a relentless mission to uncover the shocking truth about his father’s death.

Do No Harm: The Clifton Dawley Story is a gripping and eye-opening documentary that takes viewers on an emotional journey through the heart of a medical conspiracy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Directed by Clover Carroll, this compelling film, offered in full length on Courageous Discourse, exposes the harrowing truth behind one family’s quest for justice and the untold stories of suffering that transpired in the healthcare system.

READ: Rand Paul blasts lack of COVID-19 accountability in hearing on virus origins

Synopsis

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, Clifton Dawley, a beloved father and grandfather, tragically succumbs to the virus under mysterious circumstances. His son, Stephen Dawley, embarks on a relentless mission to uncover the shocking truth about his father’s death. What follows is a jaw-dropping revelation of medical tyranny, corporate greed, and the brave fight for accountability.

Narrated by Clover Carroll, the host of The Liberty Call, and guided by the insights of renowned medical expert Dr. Peter McCullough, Do No Harm delves into the dark underbelly of the American healthcare system. This powerful documentary combines personal tragedy with expert analysis to shed light on the failures that occurred when patients needed help the most.

Key highlights

  • Unveiling a nationwide medical conspiracy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Stephen Dawley’s relentless pursuit of justice for his father, Clifton.
  • Expert commentary from Dr. Peter McCullough, a leading medical authority.
  • Narration by Clover Carroll, the host of The Liberty Call.

Do No Harm: The Clifton Dawley Story transcends its role as a documentary; it is a poignant call to action for transparency, accountability, and systemic reform. Through intimate interviews, emotional testimonials, and expert commentary, the film navigates the complex terrain of medical tyranny and advocates fervently for patient rights and informed consent. As audiences bear witness to Clifton and Clover’s heartbreaking stories, they are compelled to join the movement for change and prevent future tragedies.

Director’s statement

Clover Carroll, the director of Do No Harm: The Clifton Dawley Story, states, “This documentary is not just about one family’s tragedy; it’s about a world-wide concerted effort to promote fear, suffering, isolation, hospitalization and death. It demands our attention. It’s a call to action for accountability, transparency, and change within the healthcare system. We hope this film wakes up the sheep and inspires a movement to fight tyranny.”

Viewing information

Do No Harm: The Clifton Dawley Story is shareable with this Vimeo link. Don’t miss the opportunity to share this compelling exploration of a family’s fight against medical tyranny.

About the director

Clover Carroll is the CEO of New Story Media, an award-winning production company that has produced for National Geographic, The Discovery Channel, The Learning Channel, and Investigate Discovery. Clover’s mission is a tribute to his mother’s memory, propelled by an unwavering commitment to truth and justice.

About Dr. Peter McCullough

NEWS

COVID-19

Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich to face sentencing July 23

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich is slated to be sentenced on July 23.

In a recent update by The Democracy Fund, the group noted that “Sentencing for Ms. Lich is scheduled for July 23rd and 24th before Justice Perkins-McVey in Ottawa.”

In April of this year, Lich and Chris Barber were found guilty of mischief for their roles as leaders of the 2022 protest and as social media influencers. The conviction came despite the non-violent nature of the popular movement.

TDF also noted that the full 108 page judgment of Justice Perkins-McVey’s ruling is now available online.

According to TDF, the “Court determined that both Ms. Lich and Mr. Barber were leaders of the Freedom Convoy 2022 movement and were involved in organizing and leading trucks and other vehicles from western Canada.”

“While there was no evidence that Ms. Lich owned a vehicle emitting fumes or honking, or that she blocked access to buildings, the Court noted her creation of the Freedom Convoy 2022 Facebook page, which gained a large following, and her involvement in setting up the GoFundMe and later GiveSendGo fundraising pages,” noted TDF.

As for Barber, his sentencing has been further delayed. The delay in his case follows an update he gave earlier this month in which he announced that the Crown wants to jail him for two years in addition to seizing the truck he used in the protest. As such, his legal team has asked for a stay of proceedings for the time being.

The Lich and Barber trial concluded in September of 2024, more than a year after it began. It was only originally scheduled to last 16 days.

Lich and Barber were initially arrested on February 17, 2022, meaning their legal battle has lasted longer than three years.

The actions taken by the Trudeau government were publicly supported by Mark Carney at the time, who won re-election on April 28 and is slated to form a minority government.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

Vaccines: Assessing Canada’s COVID Response

Published on

The Audit David Clinton's avatar David Clinton

I planned to be “first in line” for the shots as soon as my age cohort became eligible. By early March however, COVID itself dropped by the house, leading to the most uncomfortable (although non life-threatening) week of my life.

It’s been five years since COVID hit and one part of me wants to stuff it all in a closet somewhere and forget about it. But perhaps certain events – and especially government errors and overreach – should be documented. So this post will identify actions at all levels of government from those early days that, given our understanding of the threat available through the benefit hindsight, were both misguided and damaging.

I haven’t completely forgotten the mood through the early months in 2020. Politicians faced near-unanimous public demand for an aggressive response. Much of that sentiment was the result of messaging coming from foreign governments (mostly in the U.S.). But the local sentiment was definitely there.

To be fair, Governments got some things right and, taking into account the chaos and uncertainty of those early months, even some of their mistakes were understandable. But it’s the job of government to lead. And to avoid making choices – even popular choices – that will lead to predictable harms.

Vaccine mandates starting in 2021 were a case in point. Federal authority largely stemmed from the 2005 Quarantine Act and the Contraventions Act that allowed officials to issue tickets for non-compliance with the Quarantine Act. Provincial mandates were based on laws like Ontario’s Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act. The question isn’t whether the mandates and their enforcement were legal, but whether they caused more harm than good.

As the first vaccines started arriving in Canada around February 2021, I planned to be “first in line” for the shots as soon as my age cohort became eligible. By early March however, COVID itself dropped by the house, leading to the most uncomfortable (although non life-threatening) week of my life.

After recovering, my family doctor advised me to wait three months before getting the shots so my body could get back to normal. During those months, I got access to preprint results from the Israeli study into natural immunity which showed that:

Natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity

Those results were later confirmed by CDC and NEJM studies, among others.

Given that context, I didn’t see any justification for exposing myself to even minimal health risks associated with vaccines. Which meant that, despite demonstrably posing no threat to public health, I would (at various times) be unable to:

  • Board domestic commercial flights, VIA Rail, Rocky Mountaineer trains, and cruise ships within Canada
  • Board international flights or trains departing Canada
  • Freely return to Canada through an overland point of entry
  • Upon return to Canada, bypass the 14 day quarantine under the Quarantine Act
  • Upon return to Canada via air, bypass the three day quarantine in (expensive) government-approved hotels
  • Engage in ‘non-essential” activities like restaurants, gyms, events (details varied from province to province)
  • Enter Parliament
  • Seek employment in federally regulated air, rail, and marine sectors

What should Canadian governments have done? Remove restrictions on individuals with natural immunity, obviously. Which, by the way, would have come with the valuable bonus of entirely avoiding the truckers protest and consequent confrontations.

If authorities were reluctant to take us at our word on immunity, they could have followed the European Union’s lead by emulating their Digital COVID Certificate for proof of recovery. Were they worried about people without immunity creating fake certificates? Hard to take that one seriously. There were more fake vaccine passports littering the streets of Ontario than abandoned Toronto Maple Leafs car window flags in a normal early May.

In the end, my own suffering was negligible. I didn’t really want to visit family in the U.S. all that much anyway. But for millions of other Canadians, the real-world stakes were far higher. And all that’s besides the billions of dollars wasted during those years’ government policies.

To be sure, resisting unscientific street-level calls for vaccine mandates would have required courage. But shouldn’t acts of courage be a source of pride for public officials?

Subscribe to The Audit.

For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Continue Reading

Trending

X