From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By David Blackmon

Joe Biden and his appointees took an abundance of costly and damaging policy actions during his four-year term in office. Fortunately, that damaging agenda was limited to a single term presidency by voters last November who had grown weary of footing the massive bills for it all in the form of constantly increasing prices for all forms of energy.

Now the task of cleaning it all up and repairing the damage falls to President Donald Trump and his appointees. In another fortunate development for America, the President has chosen an eager and extremely talented array of energy-related appointees, including EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright.

One of the costliest actions taken by ex-President Biden related to U.S. national security came when he decided to raid the Strategic Petroleum Reserve by using it as a campaign tool to influence the 2022 mid-term elections. Early that year, Biden invoked a program to rapidly deplete the contents of the SPR, pulling 1 million barrels per day from the underground salt caverns which hold the crude for 180 days in hopes of lowering gas prices at the pump.

In an interview this week with radio host Glenn Beck, Secretary Wright revealed that, by drawing the volumes down so rapidly, Biden caused damage to the integrity of those salt caverns so severe that his Energy Department will now have to spend a big piece of its budget repairing the infrastructure before the caverns can be refilled. “[Biden] flooded the market with oil, reduced the price of oil in the short term but at the cost of U.S. strategic positioning, and they damaged the facilities in the Strategic petroleum reserve by draining them so fast,” Wright told Beck, adding, “We have to spend over $100 million to repair the damage of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve that wasn’t built for that.”

For readers who may not be aware, Congress and President Gerald Ford authorized the creation of the SPR in 1975 in the wake of the first Arab Oil Embargo of 1973-74 That embargo caused severe shortages of gasoline, along with price spikes across the United States. Congress intended the SPR as a tool whose careful deployment would enhance and protect national security in times of real emergencies, not one to be used for cynical political purposes.

“It’s for when a very bad day happens,” Wright put it to Beck. “The world literally runs on oil. If you don’t have oil, you’re screwed in everything you do – economics, defense, health care, anything.”

In March, Secretary Wright unveiled an aggressive plan to refill the SPR, estimating the cost of doing so at the $70 per barrel price that prevailed at the time to be about $20 billion. He also estimated it would take 4 to 6 years to complete the process due to the magnitude of Biden’s unwise withdrawals. Filling the reserve is not something that can be done all in a single transaction. Rather, it is a complex process governed by regulations which require DOE to solicit competitive bids for relatively small lots of crude.

“By design, it’s much slower to fill it than to drain it,” Wright told Beck. “It will take us, going flat out, four, five, six years to refill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. We are dead set committed to do it, but we’ve compromised our national security for years to get a little bit of an electoral advantage in 2022.”

It should be noted here that Wright would love to take advantage of current low oil prices, which have dropped to around $60/bbl today. Obviously, the same “buy low, sell high” philosophy followed by smart stock investors applies to buying and selling crude oil, too.

But DOE’s buyback program cannot begin until the damage caused by Biden’s careless disregard for national security has been repaired. Doing that will require months, during which time oil prices could rise or drop significantly.

“Energy is the infrastructure of life,” Wright reminded Beck. “You can’t use it for politics.”

But unfortunately for U.S. national security, Joe Biden did just that. The mess he left behind is Wright’s to clean up.

David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.

From LifeSiteNews

By Stephen Kokx

The fallout appears to stem from the US president’s dissatisfaction with the ongoing peace efforts in Gaza that continue to stall.

Multiple media outlets reported that there are serious frictions emerging between Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

In April, Trump welcomed the embattled leader to the White House. During a press conference in the Oval Office, he described Netanyahu as a “special” person.

The warm feelings seem to have subsided, especially after Trump fired National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, allegedly because he was working with Netanyahu to bully Trump into attacking Iran.

Trump is “frustrated” with Netanyahu, Jewish outlet Israel Hayom reported, citing two “senior sources close to the president.”

The apparent fallout also seems to stem from the president’s dissatisfaction with the ongoing peace efforts in Gaza that continue to stall due to Netanyahu’s seemingly purposeful intransigence.

Trump’s deal with Iran is also a sticking point. Trump has reportedly grown tired of the pressure campaign Netanyahu has been putting on him, so he has opted for bilateral talks directly in an effort to decouple the U.S.’s interests from Israel’s.

Even arch-Zionist Mike Huckabee, Trump’s ambassador to Israel, has said the U.S. “isn’t required to get permission from Israel to make some type of arrangement that would get the Houthis from firing on our ships.”

While Trump has certainly made some over the top comments about blowing Iran “to smithereens” if it doesn’t come to an agreement, he also has said he wants Iran to be “very successful.”

Trump is making a trip to the Middle East this week. A visit to Israel has not been scheduled. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth canceled a planned stop there, according to reports.

Rumors are also circulating that Trump might recognize Palestine as an independent state, a nightmare scenario for the Zionist lobby.

“There is a dawning realization in official Israeli circles that President Donald Trump may not be quite the pushover that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government had assumed,” wrote Dan Perry, an opinion columnist for the Jewish Forward newspaper.

“He’s skipping Israel on the first Middle Eastern visit of his new presidency and has reportedly stepped back from his once-close relationship with his Israeli counterpart.”

Others have expressed the same outlook.

“It’s clear Trump will take some big decisions unilaterally without significant consideration of Israeli interests when he wants to, like on Iran or Yemen,” Michael Wahid Hanna, director of the U.S. program at International Crisis Group, recently told Middle East Eye.

Will Trump continue to forge a true American-first foreign policy or will the likely coming media smears and pressure from groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) force him to reconsider his priorities to ensure Israel’s demands are placed before America’s needs? One can only hope he chooses the former.