Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

Business

“SCAM OF THE CENTURY”: Trump vows to replace unreliable renewables with real energy

Published

3 minute read

MXM logo MxM News

Quick Hit:

President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that his administration will block new wind and solar projects, arguing that “green energy” has driven record-breaking electricity cost hikes and vowing that “the days of stupidity are over.”

Key Details:

  • Trump vowed to block new wind and solar projects, calling them unreliable, expensive, and harmful to farmers.
  • Electricity prices have risen sharply this year, with spikes of 36.3% in Maine, 18.4% in Connecticut, and 15.2% in Utah.
  • His administration has already eliminated the federal solar tax credit, frozen Biden’s “Solar for All” program, and slapped 50% tariffs on wind turbine imports.

Diving Deeper:

President Trump’s latest move signals a full-scale reversal of Biden-era energy policy, with the White House framing renewables as a costly mistake rather than a solution. Trump blasted states that leaned heavily on wind and solar, pointing to what he described as “record breaking increases” in electricity costs. The president promised that under his administration, the federal government will no longer approve projects that “destroy farmland” and saddle taxpayers with subsidies.

The sharp rise in electricity prices adds weight to Trump’s argument. According to the Energy Information Administration, bills are climbing at the fastest pace in decades, with American households expected to pay an average of $1,900 annually by the end of 2025—up $219 since 2022. While industry experts note that AI-driven data center growth, aging grid infrastructure, and rising natural gas prices are also driving up costs, Trump insists that subsidized renewables are exacerbating the problem.

Trump has already taken action to roll back renewable incentives. His “One Big Beautiful Bill,” signed on July 4, eliminated the 30% solar tax credit for homeowners. He also froze the $7 billion “Solar for All” program, halted new wind and solar permits on federal land, and canceled offshore wind leasing entirely. In August, his Commerce Department ramped up tariffs on imported wind turbines, imposing a 50% rate across more than 400 new product categories.

The policy shift has delivered major setbacks to projects such as Idaho’s Lava Ridge Wind Project and New Jersey’s Atlantic Shores development, both now stalled by new permitting requirements. Trump’s team has signaled that even approved projects may be subject to review or revocation, creating uncertainty across the renewable energy sector.

While the wind and solar industry warns these measures could cost thousands of jobs and slow clean energy growth, Trump remains unmoved. He has consistently argued that America must prioritize reliable, affordable energy sources that don’t rely on foreign imports or government subsidies.

Business

Trump Warns Beijing Of ‘Countermeasures’ As China Tightens Grip On Critical Resources

Published on

 

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By Melissa O’Rourke

Despite their strategic significance, the U.S. imports 80% of the rare earths it consumes, primarily from China, which dominates global production and controls roughly 92% of the world’s refining capacity.

President Donald Trump on Friday threatened China with a massive tariff hike and hinted his upcoming summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping could be canceled as a result of Beijing’s latest escalation in trade hostilities.

China ramped up its economic pressure campaign this week, first by imposing new export controls Thursday on rare earth minerals critical to the production of vehicles, weapons systems, and other advanced technologies. On Friday, Beijing escalated further, announcing new port fees on American ships and launching an antitrust investigation into U.S. tech giant Qualcomm.

In response to what he described as “great trade hostility,” Trump said there was “no reason” to meet with Xi in South Korea later this month.

Dear Readers:

As a nonprofit, we are dependent on the generosity of our readers.

Please consider making a small donation of any amount here.

Thank you!

“Dependent on what China says about the hostile ‘order’ that they have just put out, I will be forced, as President of the United States of America, to financially counter their move. For every Element that they have been able to monopolize, we have two,” the president posted on Truth Social.

Trump announced later on Friday that the U.S. would impose a 100% tariff on China starting Nov. 1, in addition to existing levies, and implement export controls on “any and all critical software.” He added that the tariffs could go into effect sooner, “depending on any further actions or changes taken by China.”

Despite their strategic significance, the U.S. imports 80% of the rare earths it consumes, primarily from China, which dominates global production and controls roughly 92% of the world’s refining capacity.

Under the new rules, foreign suppliers must obtain Beijing’s approval to export any product made with Chinese rare-earth processing technology or containing rare-earth materials that comprise as little as 0.1% of the item’s value. The restrictions also extend to the export of technology used in rare-earth mining, smelting, and magnet manufacturing, and add five more rare-earth elements to China’s existing control list.

Trump warned that Beijing’s move could “clog” global markets and “make life difficult for virtually every country in the world.”

“I have always felt that they’ve been lying in wait, and now, as usual, I have been proven right! There is no way that China should be allowed to hold the World “captive,” but that seems to have been their plan for quite some time,” the president wrote.

“But the U.S. has Monopoly positions also, much stronger and more far reaching than China’s. I have just not chosen to use them, there was never a reason for me to do so — UNTIL NOW!” Trump said.

The Chinese Transport Ministry also said it will begin collecting port fees on vessels owned by U.S. companies or individuals — and even those built in America — starting Oct. 14. The rollout overlaps with Washington’s plan to impose new charges on large Chinese vessels docking at U.S. ports the same day.

The president also noted that Beijing’s timing was “especially inappropriate,” noting that it coincides with the peace deal he helped broker between Israel and Hamas to bring the two-year conflict to an end.

Continue Reading

Automotive

Governments continue to support irrational ‘electric vehicle’ policies

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Kenneth P. Green

Another day, another electric vehicle (EV) fantasy failure. The Quebec government is “pulling the plug” on its relationship with the Northvolt EV battery company (which is now bankrupt), and will try to recoup some of its $270 million loss on the project. Quebec’s “investment” was in support of a planned $7 billion “megaproject” battery manufacturing facility on Montreal’s South Shore. (As an aside, what normal people would call gambling with taxpayer money, governments call “investments.” But that’s another story.)

Anyway, for those who have not followed this latest EV-burn out, back in September 2023, the Legault government announced plans to “invest” $510 million in the project, which was to be located in Saint-Basile-le-Grand and McMasterville. The government subsequently granted Northvolt a $240 million loan guarantee to buy the land for the plant, then injected another $270 million directly into Northvolt. According to the Financial Post, “Quebec has lost $270 million on its equity investment… but still had a senior secured loan tied to the land acquired to build the plant, which totals nearly $260 million with interest and fees.” In other words, Quebec taxpayers lost big.

But Northvolt is just the latest in a litany of failure by Canadian governments and their dreams of an EV future free of dreaded fossil fuels. I know, politicians say that it’s a battle against climate change, but that’s silly. Canada is such a small emitter of greenhouse gases that nothing it could do, including shutting down the entire national economy, would significantly alter the trajectory of the climate. Anything Canada might achieve would be cancelled out by economic growth in China in a matter of weeks.

So back to the litany of failed or failing EV-dream projects. To date (from about 2020) it goes like this: Ford (2024)Umicore battery (2024)Honda (2025),General Motors CAMI (2025)Lion Electric (2025)Northvolt (2025). And this does not count projects still limping along after major setbacks such as Stellantis and Volkswagen.

One has to wonder how many tombstones of dead EV fantasy projects will be needed before Canada’s climate-obsessed governments get a clue: people are not playing. Car buyers are not snapping up these vehicles as government predicted; the technologies and manufacturing ability are not showing up as government predicted; declining cost curves are not showing up as government predicted; taxpayer-subsidized projects keep dying; the U.S. market for Canada’s EV tech that government predicted has been Trumped out of existence (e.g. the Trump administration has scrapped EV mandates and federal subsidies for EV purchases); and government is taking the money for all these failed predictions from Canadian workers who can’t afford EVs. It really is a policy travesty.

And yet, like a bad dream, Canada’s governments (including the Carney government) are still backing an irrational policy to force EVs into the marketplace. For example, Ottawa stills mandates that all new light-duty vehicle sales be EVs by 2035. This despite Canadian automakers earnest pleas for the government to scrap the mandate.

Canada’s EV policy is quickly coming to resemble something out of dysfunctional-heroic fiction. We are the Don Quixotes, tilting futilely at EV windmills, and Captain Ahabs, trying to slay the dreaded white whale of fossil-fuelled transportation with our EV harpoons. Really, isn’t it time governments took a look at reality and cut their losses? Canada’s taxpayers would surely appreciate the break.

Kenneth P. Green

Senior Fellow, Fraser Institute
Continue Reading

Trending

X