Business
Disney scrambles as young men reject DEI-filled franchises
Quick Hit:
A new op-ed argues Disney’s progressive push has driven away the very audience its biggest franchises should naturally attract: young men. Writer Zachary Faria says the company is now scrambling to undo the damage caused by years of prioritizing “diversity, equity, and inclusion” over storytelling.
Key Details:
- Zachary Faria of the Washington Examiner writes that Disney has made its blockbuster franchises “toxic to young men” through DEI-driven changes.
- Faria cites examples across Marvel, Star Wars, and Indiana Jones where traditional heroes were replaced, demeaned, or sidelined in favor of “ideological propaganda.”
- He argues Disney has “no one to blame but itself” for alienating its male audience and is now considering original films to try to win them back.
Diving Deeper:
In a blistering critique published in the Washington Examiner, columnist Zachary Faria argues Disney’s embrace of progressive politics has caused the company to alienate one of its most natural audiences: young men between the ages of 13 and 28. “Disney’s progressive ideology has alienated young men. The company now recognizes that its own franchises are toxic to that audience,” Faria wrote.
Disney executives are reportedly brainstorming ways to bring young men back to theaters, despite owning some of the most male-oriented franchises in modern history. “You would think that this wouldn’t be very difficult: Disney owns Marvel, Star Wars, and Indiana Jones, among other franchises that should all naturally appeal to a younger, male audience,” Faria observed.
Instead, he says the company has used those franchises as vehicles for divisive politics. “Marvel went from being defined by Iron Man, Captain America, and Thor to being defined by mediocre Disney+ series mired in DEI propaganda,” Faria noted. He pointed specifically to the Iron Heart series, where “a young black girl (who is also a criminal) [becomes] the new Iron Man, as she dismisses her predecessor as being nothing more than a privileged rich man.”
The same pattern, he argues, can be seen in Lucasfilm and Indiana Jones. Harrison Ford’s iconic hero was supplanted by a female co-star “who the latest bomb of a film positions as morally superior to him.” Meanwhile, The Acolyte turned the Jedi into villains while portraying “the heroic lesbian space witch cult at the heart of the movie.”
For Faria, this strategy is backfiring. “With those brand names in its pocket, Disney should have been playing on easy mode when it came to winning over young male viewers. Instead, Disney has made those franchises so toxic that it is reportedly looking for original film concepts to win over young men,” he wrote. He added that it is now “easier to come up with a completely original story that will appeal to young men than it is to appeal to them with a Star Wars film.”
Faria concluded with a sharp comparison between the entertainment giant and the political left: “Disney, much like the Democratic Party, has embraced an ideology that belittles and ostracizes young men, and is now facing the reality that young men no longer want anything to do with its brand. Disney is trying to figure out how to win over the people it purposefully alienated over the last several years, and it has no one to blame but itself.”
“Disney+ Day” by Anthony Quintano licensed under (CC BY-SA 2.0)
Business
Liberal’s green spending putting Canada on a road to ruin
Once upon a time, Canadians were known for our prudence and good sense to such an extent that even our Liberal Party wore the mantle of fiscal responsibility.
Whatever else you might want to say about the party in the era of Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin, it recognized the country’s dire financial situation — back when The Wall Street Journal was referring to Canada as “an honorary member of the Third World” — as a national crisis.
And we (remember, I proudly served as Member of Parliament in that party for 18 years) made many hard decisions with an eye towards cutting spending, paying down the debt, and getting the country back on its feet.
Thankfully we succeeded.
Unfortunately, since then the party has been hijacked by a group of reckless leftwing fanatics — Justin Trudeau and his lackeys — who have spent the past several years feeding what we built into the woodchipper.
Mark Carney’s finally released budget is the perfect illustration of that.
The budget is a 400 page monument to deficit delusion that raises spending to $644.4 billion over five years — including $141.4 billion in new spending — while revenues limp to $583.3 billion, yielding a record (non-pandemic) $78.3 billion shortfall, an increase of 116% from last year.
This isn’t policy; it’s plunder. Interest payments alone devour $55.6 billion this year, projected to hit $76.1 billion by 2029-30 — more than the entire defence budget and rising faster than healthcare transfers.
We can’t discount the possibility that this will lead to a downgrade of our credit rating, which will significantly increase the cost of borrowing and of doing business more generally.
Numbers this big start to feel very abstract. But think of it this way: that is your money they’re spending. Ottawa’s wealth is made up entirely of our tax dollars. We’ve entrusted that money to them with the understanding that they will use it responsibly. In the decade these Liberals have been in power, they have betrayed that trust.
They’ve pursued policies which have made life in Canada increasingly unaffordable. For example, at the time of writing it takes 141 Canadian pennies (up from 139 a few days ago) to buy one U.S. dollar, in which all of our commodities are priced. Well, that’s .25 cents per litre of gasoline. Imagine what that’s going to do to the price of heating, of groceries, of the various other commodities which we consume.
And this budget demonstrates that the Carney era will be more of the same.
Of course, the Elbows Up crowd are saying the opposite — that this shows how fiscally responsible Mark Carney is, unlike his predecessor. (Never mind that they also publicly supported everything that Trudeau did when he was in government.) They claim that Carney shows that he’s more open to oil and gas than Trudeau was.
Don’t believe it.
The oil and gas sector does get a half-hearted nod in the budget with, for instance, a conditional pathway to repeal the emissions cap. But those conditions are important. Repeal is tied to the effectiveness of Carney’s beloved industrial carbon tax. If that newly super-charged carbon tax, which continues to make our lives more expensive, leads to government-set emissions reductions benchmarks being met, then Ottawa might — might — scrap the emissions.
Meanwhile, the budget doubles down on the Trudeau government’s methane emissions regulations. It merely loosens the provisions of the outrageous Bill C-59, an act which should have been scrapped in its entirety. And it leaves in place the Trudeaupian “green” super structure, which has resource sector investment, and any business that can manage it, fleeing to the U.S.
In these perilous times, with Canada teetering on the brink of recession, a responsible government would be cutting spending and getting out of the way of our most productive sectors, especially oil and gas — the backbone of our economy.
It would be repealing the BC tanker ban and Bill C-69, the “no more pipelines act,” so that our natural resources could better generate revenue on the international market and bring down energy rates at home.
It would quit wasting millions on Electric Vehicle charging stations; mandating that all Canadians buy EVs, even with their elevated cost; and pressuring automakers to manufacture Electric Vehicles, regardless of demand, and even as they keep closing up shop and heading south.
But in this budget the Liberals are going the opposite direction. Spend more. Tax more. Leave the basic Net-Zero framework in place. Rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic.
They’re gambling tomorrow’s prosperity on yesterday’s green dogma, And every grocery run, every gas fill-up, every mortgage payment will serve as a daily reminder that we are the ones footing the bill.
Once upon a time, the Liberals knew better. We made the hard decisions and got the country back on its feet. Nowadays, not so much.
Business
Carney doubles down on NET ZERO
If you only listened to the mainstream media, you would think Justin Trudeau’s carbon tax is long gone. But the Liberal government’s latest budget actually doubled down on the industrial carbon tax.
While the consumer carbon tax may be paused, the industrial carbon tax punishes industry for “emitting” pollution. It’s only a matter of time before companies either pass the cost of the carbon tax to consumers or move to a country without a carbon tax.
Dan McTeague explains how Prime Minister Carney is doubling down on net zero scams.
-
Business2 days agoParliamentary Budget Officer begs Carney to cut back on spending
-
Business2 days agoWill Paramount turn the tide of legacy media and entertainment?
-
Alberta2 days agoFederal budget: It’s not easy being green
-
Health15 hours agoLack of adequate health care pushing Canadians toward assisted suicide
-
Addictions2 days agoCanadian gov’t not stopping drug injection sites from being set up near schools, daycares
-
Energy2 days agoA picture is worth a thousand spreadsheets
-
Energy1 day agoIt should not take a crisis for Canada to develop the resources that make people and communities thrive.
-
Dr John Campbell1 day agoCures for Cancer? A new study shows incredible results from cheap generic drug Fenbendazole




