Bruce Dowbiggin
Institutional Neutrality is Dead. Long Live Chaos

Sign up today for Not The Public Broadcaster newsletters. Hot takes/ cool slants on sports and current affairs. Have the latest columns delivered to your mail box. Tell your friends to join, too. Always provocative, always independent. https://share.hsforms.com/16edbhhC3TTKg6jAaRyP7rActsj5
Liberals believe that everyone is entitled to an opinion. Just so long as it’s the same opinion as theirs.— P.J. O’Rourke
Have you ever ordered from Skip The Dishes and then greedily savoured the taste of your food as it made its way to your house? And then, when the food arrived, the salad was wilted, the fries were mushy and the burger was overdone?
That’s probably how Republicans in the U.S. feel in the wake of the much-touted midterm elections on Tuesday. They ordered a mouth-watering portion of crushing Joe Biden’s Democrats. When their order was tossed on the stoop it proved a nothing burger.
Yes, the GOP appear to now (barely) control the House, which is no small thing. Biden’s legislative agenda goes through them. But the promised triumph in the Senate likely comes down to a woeful Herschel Walker winning a runoff in December with the incumbent Raphael Warnock to simply maintain a 50-50 status quo.
The GOP’s caviar dreams and champagne wishes were stoked by pollsters and TV pundits who promised revenge for two years of Biden calling them Nazis. Instead they got a cadaverous husk named John Fetterman, rendered non compes menses by a stroke, schooling TV doc Mehmet Oz in Pennsylvania’s Senate race. Go figure.
The only upside was in Florida where governor Ron DeSantis led a true red wave, swamping the DEMs across the board in governor, senate and House elections en route to historic gains in the Sunshine state. The DEM drubbing was what had been promised— and never materialized— elsewhere.
Now, Republicans are left with the scenario none of them wants. The Mara Lago whale Donald Trump— whose wonky endorsements in the midterms face-planted in important races— stands as GOP kingmaker. He largely withheld his huge war chest from candidates who wilted against DEM media blitzes. And he has a fanatical base.
He believes he has the road open to a 2024 presidential nomination. Indeed, he thinks opposition to him would be disloyal to a former president. The only thing standing in his way will be fellow Floridian DeSantis, the favourite of those who live in a real world. Their clash— if DeSantis is willing— promises to be bloody. And highly entertaining for DEMs.
What leads conservatives in the U.S. to most despair in this conflict is the urgency of a cultural moment Trump introduced in 2016— a moment he seems to have allowed to pass in place of a cult of personality. As Pedro L. Gonzalez describes in in Chronicles Magazine: The Trump moment was a repudiation of the status quo through a legitimate democratic process. By subsequently denying that option to people through force and fraud, the establishment effectively removed a pressure relief valve.
It’s hard to explain what a disaster this is for the establishment… They had to radicalize the people who are most patriotic about this country and most reverent of its myths, symbols, and founding documents: Middle Americans. People no longer believe in institutional neutrality. That is bad for the regime. But it’s good for Americans who needed to be disabused of that illusion.
The abuses of the establishment against Americans have all but guaranteed the rise of a force that will be as bad or worse than what they pretended the first iteration of Trumpism was. It’ll be good and necessary when it comes.”
It’ll be good for Canadians, too, when Jagmeet Singh, the Happy Squanderer, does his democratic duty bringing down the Trudeau Tower. Read the previous quote and insert the Canadian establishment where Gonzalez referred to its American counterpart and the observation applies to Singh, Trudeau and the insatiable apparatus of the Capital Region.
As we have seen in the ongoing Emergency Measures finger pointing, institutional neutrality in Canada is mort. The entire exercise on display in Ottawa has seen the Usual Suspects demonizing working-class’ complaints as white supremacy. They are saying they have nothing to learn from their fellow citizens. Anything but blaming themselves for allowing the Convoy to metastasize on the steps of Parliament Hill.
The recent government disgorgements to failing traditional media— abated by the corrosive Bill C-18— make clear that the ruling elite in Ottawa think they have bought off dissent. Trudeau has an open field to dabble in his vanities.
[If you want to sample the self-absorption vibe, here’s Trudeau’s wife Sophie nuzzling with Meaghan Markle on her podcast: “This wasn’t our day of being the wives and moms, all perfectly coiffed with updos and pearls and demure smiles,” said Markle. “This was the other version of us both with wild curly hair and swimsuits and loose linen and huge belly laughs. Big cuddles with our little ones, quiet whispers of girl talk on the terrace, giddy like absolute schoolgirls.”
The only resistance to this twaddle— Sophie G. greeted Markle with the chummy African term “ubuntu”— remains social media, and the Trudeau government is moving quickly to head off that outlet, too, with C-18.]
The presumption being he can turn off all the pressure valves for opponents and ride out the storms of his corruption. As in, the Global News investigation of Canadian intelligence briefs alleging that China’s Toronto Consulate covertly funded a clandestine network of CCP-affiliated candidates in the 2019 federal election. A scandal that Trudeau let lie for 22 months while he told the UN that Canada is a genocidal state.
He needs to bear in mind Gonzalez’s prediction of “a force that will be as bad or worse than what they pretended the first iteration of Trumpism was”. While Ontario is still content to colour within the lines, a combination of western provinces is willing to provoke the biggest constitutional crisis since his Papa repatriated the constitution in the early 1980s.
Tread lightly, M. Trudeau. Skip The Dishes can’t save you now.
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster (http://www.notthepublicbroadcaster.com). A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, he’s a regular contributor to Sirius XM Canada Talks Ch. 167. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his new book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best, and is available via http://brucedowbigginbooks.ca/book-personalaccount.aspx
Bruce Dowbiggin
Kirk’s Killing: Which Side Can Count on the Military’s Loyalty Now?

“After every armistice, you want to put us away in mothballs, like the fleet. When it comes to a little dying you’ll be sure to put us in a uniform…” Seven Days in May
In the 1964 political film Seven Days in May, a rogue Director of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff conspires to launch a coup against a failing president who’s just signed a nuclear disarmament treaty with the Soviets. The plot is uncovered by a Marine Corps colonel, and the coup is barely averted with all the conspirators apprehended.
In 1964 the notion that the loyalty of the military/ intelligence services might be compromised was a hot topic in the days afterJFK’s assassination. After calming down in the Reagan days— remember Woody Allen’s revolution spoof Bananas?— it has now returned.
How likely is a military/ intelligence coup? Loyalty of troops has been crucial in many coups and insurrections around the world. Famously the socialist regime of Salvador Allende was crushed in 1973 when the Chilean military staged a bloody coup. Allende and thousands were murdered as General Augusto Pinochet took over the country.
Still, the conceit in Western nations has always been “It can’t happen here”. The institutions of government are believed too strong and independent to allow themselves to be taken over by their militaries. The chattering classes prefer to see their military as Stanley Kubrick did in Dr. Strangelove— bumbling buffoons, lackeys led by General Buck Turgidson.

Certainly in Canada, where successive Liberal government culminated with Justin Trudeau, the Kubrick model is closer to reality. DEI hiring, cuts to budgets and a slavish reliance on America to protect Canada for free have produced a Canadian military with more in common with HMS Pinafore than Vimy Ridge. From the world’s third-largest navy in 1945, Canada is now a boat that can’t float.
But something seems to have changed with the Tuesday murder of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. It seems a massive provocation by people who want to destroy the American society. It’s not helped by the voices on the Left claiming he brought it on himself with hate speech. @punishedmother “Maybe Charlie Kirk shouldn’t have spent years being a hateful demagogic fascist and this wouldn’t have happened. Maybe he should take some personal responsibility.It will take careful leadership to prevent this boiling over.”
This growing intolerance between the political sides exposed yet again by Kirk’s assassination has made people consider the Armed Forces’ loyalty in a crisis. As in, who has it? (In pacifist Canada the current clash of cultures is that support of the military might be necessary in resisting the conservative right. Despite Bill C-23 disarming Canadians the unarmed Left might face a large, well-armed rightwing population brandishing weapons.)
In a divided America think of Tom Cruise’s JAG character in A Few Good Men confronting hardened Marine commandant played by Jack Nicholson— and you have the conflict. “You can’ t take the truth!” Fighting generals are a thing of the past when Democrats are in power. Successive presidents have used DEI to create desk generals and commanders who reflect good taste over good planning.

This DEI mission creep in the military was one of Donald Trump’s strongest planks in defeating hapless Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Canadian Liberals, meanwhile, managed to dodge their pathetic defence shortcomings only by making the 2025 election all about Trump and a 51st state, not defence or Chinese influence.
There has been evidence that some at the highest levels of the U.S. military, CIA and FBI have already shown a bias toward Democrats. In the waning days of Trump 45 Chief of Staff Mark Milley told the Chinese leadership— America’s No. 1 global rival— that he would personally tip them off if Trump launched a surprise attack on China.
In another time (or movie) Milley’s treachery would been seen as treasonous, punishable by a life in the stockade or, possibly, execution. In the hands of the DC Media Party, however, Milley’s partisan gambit was buried in the run-up to the 2020 election. As with the concurrent Hunter Biden laptop scandal, the story was made to disappear in a welter of Trump demonization and legal harassment
Now we must wonder again. Sadly for Harris, Milley and Team Obama, the Democrats were thrashed by the Trump agenda. POTUS 45—now 47— quickly began replacing lifetime loyalists in the military and bureaucrats, stifling for now the urge to purge,
Again this scenario was unthinkable a generation ago, a plot in a movie. But the governments of Barack Obama and Joe Biden (Trudeau in Canada) have created a social schism that has turned politics into a blood sport. As we know there were two attempts on Trump in the election campaign by deranged radicals. The defeated Democrats’ obsession over who controls the Supreme Court and Congress in Trump’s presidency, the repeated comparisions to Hitler, are producing greater and more strident anything-is-accepted calls from the radical Left to take to the streets and pursue civil disobedience.
In Canada Mark Carney’s Elbows Up gambit is dissipating rapidly since the election, producing active discussion of separation in Alberta and Quebec (again). This raises questions about what the military might do in the aftermath of a vote by either side to leave Canada. Might they intervene? Would they stand aside? Will tanks roll to protect a Carney Canada?
No doubt Charlie Kirk’s death will be mobilized by both sides in their appeals for the loyalty of the military should a civil war break out in the U.S. Get your generals in a row. MSNBC’s Jen Psaki has declared Trump’s tribute to Kirk “an escalation” Says legal expert Jonathan Turley, “We are already at political assassinations, so I am not sure how much more room for escalation there may be for Psaki or MSNBC.”
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, his new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
Bruce Dowbiggin
Ken Dryden: Hockey’s Diogenes. He Called Them As He Saw Them

There is much talk about the Canadian identity in these days of mass immigration , diversity and refusal to integrate. The 1970s were a simpler time for such rumination on culture, however. Riding the new global identity of Pierre Trudeau (soon to be regretted), the times were fired by the 1972 hockey summit win by Canada over the Soviet Union.
The series contained many of the self-held perceptions of the nation. Plucky underdog. Tenacious competitor in global affairs. Limitless possibilities. All seemingly rolled up into two weeks 53 years ago this month. Many of these notions were still manifest in the 2025 federal election when Boomers had a conniption fit over Donald Trump and withdrew into their Elbows Up phase.
So it should come as no surprise that one of the stars of that 1972 team was goalie Ken Dryden. While not being dominant throughout against the shifty Soviets, Dryden peaked at the right moments (in tandem with Tony Esposito) to snatch the eight-game series at absolutely the final possible moment.

It’s hardly an exaggeration that, while a number of the Canadian players lost their minds in the tense fortnight, Dryden carried himself with cool dignity. There were no Phil Esposito jeremiads. Not Jean Paul Parisé stick wielding. No Bobby Clare two-handers to the ankles of his opponents. Just the emerging figure of the lanky goalie resting his chin on his stick as he waited in the net for Kharlamov and Yakushev.
For the generation that watched him develop he was likely the quintessential modern Canadian. Son of a charitable community figure. Educated in the Ivy League. Obtained his law degree. Served as a federal cabinet minister. Author of several definitive hockey books (The Game is perhaps the best sports non-fiction in the English language). Executive of the Toronto Maple Leafs. And more.
He was on the American telecast of the 1980 U.S. Miracle On Ice at Lake Placid. And the radio broadcast of the 1976 Canada Cup. Ubiquitous media source. Loyal to Canada. And crucially, a son, husband, father and grandfather. If you’d created a model for the citizen of Canada of his times it was Ken.
He could be cranky and verbose, yes. His books often took issue with the state of the modern game. Concussions. The Trap. Excessive goalie pads. But his defining moment may have come in 1973 when, upset with Sam Pollock’s contract offer, he left the Montreal Canadiens to finish his law degree in Toronto. It’s important to note that his reputation at the time was a goalie carried by the Jean Beliveau super teams. Yet the Canadiens allowed 56 more goals in the 1973–74 season than they had the year before with Dryden. Plus they lost in the semifinals after winning the Cup the previous spring. Karma.
When he returned the Habs ripped off four consecutive Stanley Cups. Phil Esposito praised him as that “f’ing giraffe” who stole at least two Cups from the Bruins. He retired for good in 1979, and the Canadiens didn’t win another Cup till 1986. Which enhanced his reputation. His combination of tenacity, independence and integrity made him many fans. And launched a generation of goalies who broke the mould.

So his passing in the year that Boomers exercised their cultural privilege one last time is a fitting codicil to an era that held so much promise and has ended in a lost culture and renewed talk of separation in Quebec and Alberta. Many have emotional memories of Dryden, and social media has exploded with them on the news Friday of his death at 78.
For us, our quintessential Dryden moment came in 2001 at the NHL Draft. We were working for the Calgary Herald, he was an executive with the Maple Leafs. As we arrived at the Miami airport in a torrential rainstorm who was standing in the car rental lobby but the unmistakable No. 29? As fellow authors, we’d met many times, and we had quoted him so often we can’t count the times. So there was no fan-boy encounter.
This day he was a lost soul whose car rental had fallen through. Could we give him a ride to the media hotel? Sure. The company was welcome. As we rolled along though the pelting rain, searching for the right highway (this was pre-Waze) we talked about family and background. How were my kids? How was his wife now that he was hearing it from Maple Leafs fans?
Above the machine-gunning of the rain we then pivoted to hockey. He wanted to know what was going on with the Flames (they were mediocre at the time). And he wanted to talk about the state of trap hockey which was then choking the art of the game. Where was the beauty, the artistry in a league dumbed-down by clutch ‘n grab?
After chatting and squinting through the sheets of rain for 45 minutes we finally arrived at the hotel in Sunrise. As we walked into the lobby Ken thanked us for the ride and gave us $40 for gas. Media colleagues watching the scene were flabbergasted. Ken had a reputation as being frugal, and here he’d readily given me $40! U.S.! What could this mean? Did we get as scoop they’d have to chase. Ken blandly shooed them away, saying he had to check in.
We didn’t get a hot tip on a story. But we did get several gems to use in our next book Money Players, a finalist for the 2004 Canadian Business Book of the year. We meant to thank him for the material. Somehow the moment was never right. Now we won’t get that chance.
We might say the same for Canada. Somehow the moment was never right. Now we won’t get that chance. RIP Ken.
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, his new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
-
Alberta2 days ago
Parents group blasts Alberta government for weakening sexually explicit school book ban
-
Frontier Centre for Public Policy2 days ago
Bloodvein Blockade Puts Public Land Rights At Risk
-
International2 days ago
France records more deaths than births for the first time in 80 years
-
Business2 days ago
The Truth Is Buried Under Sechelt’s Unproven Graves
-
COVID-191 day ago
Freedom Convoy leader slams Canadian gov’t agency for praising its treatment of protesters
-
National2 days ago
Chrystia Freeland resigns from Mark Carney’s cabinet, asked to become Ukraine envoy
-
Energy1 day ago
A Breathtaking About-Face From The IEA On Oil Investments
-
COVID-1919 hours ago
Canadian gov’t to take control of vaccine injury program after reports of serious mismanagement