Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

Alberta

How 5G Could Launch a Dystopian Future

Published

4 minute read

In current times where the internet and the use of online resources is extremely prevalent it is important to keep up with the ever-changing rules and speculation of the morality within the internet. While one might assume there’s more freedom of speech than ever, most websites and media outlets are monitored by larger corporations or government agencies, meaning there’s more censorship of opposing opinions.

Government bodies and second party donors are making examples of individuals such as Dr. Rashid Buttar, an American osteopathic physician and author best known for his views on Coronavirus and how it has been managed. Buttar posted a video on YouTube discussing COVID-19 and criticizing how nations have been handling the pandemic. At 9 Million views, the video was taken down for violating YouTube’s community guidelines.

This begs the question, is free speech still actually free? 

Community guidelines can be re-written and updated to reflect third party sponsors’ opinions and business plans, meaning there is no longer a free market of opinions. On websites such as YouTube, Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook there is close monitoring of posts and comments for anything that violates the rules and regulations put in place, but there isn’t always a definitive line between right and wrong. Hate speech, bullying, and forms of discrimination are often left unchecked, causing many issues surrounding social media. Problems lie within posts that are considered opinion.

Political and economic views on accounts can lead to unsavory behaviour from other personal accounts who have opposing opinions, but people can’t face physical retaliation through a screen.

The introduction of 5G could change that.

5G (fifth generation technology) has become more developed, but the 5G cellular data network is still in its infancy stages in Canada. 5G is meant to be a quicker, more advanced way to harness the internet and stay connected, but there are many concerns with the idea. 5G allows larger amounts of data to travel more quickly than was possible with 3G and 4G. Being able to access information faster might sound like a good idea at face value, but researchers believe that 5G might be an easy target for hackers, or could even lead to governments using it to monitor their own people.

Companies such as Huawei have already begun launching phones with 5G technology, and there is speculation from the United States that the Chinese government is using their products to collect private and personal data from the public. A poll done by the Angus Reid Institute shows that 56 percent of Canadians want Huawei 5G products banned in Canada. 

Although the American government is primarily worried about the Chinese government using 5G technology to collect metadata, Rep. Jim Himes, Chairman of Strategic Technologies and Advanced Research says that it might become necessary to use this technology. “We would find ourselves at a disadvantage relative to our opponents around the globe if we didn’t adopt and adapt.”

If the government can monitor your private life, companies and employers can access this information and turn you away if your views don’t match up with establishments’ stance. 5G could be the start of a new dystopian world where government bodies use the network as a way to closely watch and keep civilians subdued.

5G and its connection to health issues could be a conspiracy not yet proven, but the privacy rules this affects are topics that must be heavily considered when allowing outsider companies access to Canadian servers.

For more stories, visit Todayville Calgary.

Alberta

Alberta extracting more value from oil and gas resources: ATB

Published on

From the Canadian Energy Centre

By Will Gibson

Investment in ‘value-added’ projects more than doubled to $4 billion in 2024

In the 1930s, economist Harold Innis coined the term “hewers of wood and drawers of water” to describe Canada’s reliance on harvesting natural resources and exporting them elsewhere to be refined into consumer products.

Almost a century later, ATB Financial chief economist Mark Parsons has highlighted a marked shift in that trend in Alberta’s energy industry, with more and more projects that upgrade raw hydrocarbons into finished products.

ATB estimates that investment in projects that generate so-called “value-added” products like refined petroleum, hydrogen, petrochemicals and biofuels more than doubled to reach $4 billion in 2024.

Alberta is extracting more value from its natural resources,” Parsons said.

“It makes the provincial economy somewhat more resilient to boom and bust energy price cycles. It creates more construction and operating jobs in Alberta. It also provides a local market for Alberta’s energy and agriculture feedstock.”

The shift has occurred as Alberta’s economy adjusts to lower levels of investment in oil and gas extraction.

While overall “upstream” capital spending has been rising since 2022 — and oil production has never been higher — investment last year of about $35 billion is still dramatically less than the $63 billion spent in 2014.

Parsons pointed to Dow’s $11 billion Path2Zero project as the largest value-added project moving ahead in Alberta.

​​The project, which has support from the municipal, provincial and federal governments, will increase Dow’s production of polyethylene, the world’s most widely used plastic.

By capturing and storing carbon dioxide emissions and generating hydrogen on-site, the complex will be the world’s first ethylene cracker with net zero emissions from operations.

Other major value-added examples include Air Products’ $1.6 billion net zero hydrogen complex, and the associated $720 million renewable diesel facility owned by Imperial Oil. Both projects are slated for startup this year.

Parsons sees the shift to higher value products as positive for the province and Canada moving forward.

“Downstream energy industries tend to have relatively high levels of labour productivity and wages,” he said.

“A big part of Canada’s productivity problem is lagging business investment. These downstream investments, which build off existing resource strengths, provide one pathway to improving the country’s productivity performance.”

Heather Exner-Pirot, the Macdonald-Laurier Institute’s director of energy, natural resources and environment, sees opportunities for Canada to attract additional investment in this area.

“We are able to benefit from the mistakes of other regions. In Germany, their business model for creating value-added products such as petrochemicals relies on cheap feedstock and power, and they’ve lost that due to a combination of geopolitics and policy decisions,” she said.

“Canada and Alberta, in particular, have the opportunity to attract investment because they have stable and reliable feedstock with decades, if not centuries, of supply shielded from geopolitics.”

Exner-Pirot is also bullish about the increased market for low-carbon products.

“With our advantages, Canada should be doing more to attract companies and manufacturers that will produce more value-added products,” she said.

Like oil and gas extraction, value-added investments can help companies develop new technologies that can themselves be exported, said Shannon Joseph, chair of Energy for a Secure Future, an Ottawa-based coalition of Canadian business and community leaders.

“This investment creates new jobs and spinoffs because these plants require services and inputs. Investments such as Dow’s Path2Zero have a lot of multipliers. Success begets success,” Joseph said.

“Investment in innovation creates a foundation for long-term diversification of the economy.”

Continue Reading

Alberta

Alberta government must restrain spending in upcoming budget to avoid red ink

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Tegan Hill and Milagros Palacios

Whether due to U.S. tariffs or lower-than-expected oil prices, the Smith government has repeatedly warned Albertans that despite a $4.6 billion projected budget surplus in 2024/25, Alberta could soon be in the red. To help avoid this fate, the Smith government must restrain spending in its upcoming 2025 budget.

These are not simply numbers on a page; budget deficits have real consequences for Albertans. For one, deficits fuel debt accumulation. And just as Albertans must pay interest on their own mortgages or car loans, taxpayers must pay interest on government debt. Each dollar spent paying interest is a dollar diverted from programs such as health care and education, or potential tax relief. This fiscal year, provincial government debt interest costs will reach a projected $650 per Albertan.

And while many risk factors are out of the government’s direct control, the government can control its own spending.

In its 2023 budget, the Smith government committed to keep the rate of spending growth to below the rate of inflation and population growth. This was an important step forward after decades of successive governments substantially increasing spending during good times—when resource revenues (including oil and gas royalties) were relatively high (as they are today)—but failing to rein in spending when resource revenue inevitably declined.

But here’s the problem. Even if the Smith government sticks to this commitment, it may still fall into deficit. Why? Because this government has spent significantly more than it originally planned in its 2022 mid-year plan (the Smith government’s first fiscal update). In other words, the government’s “restraint” is starting from a significantly higher base level of spending. For example, this fiscal year it will spend $8.2 billion more than it originally planned in its 2022 mid-year plan. And inflation and population growth only account for $3.1 billion of this additional spending. In other words, $5.1 billion of this new spending is unrelated to offsetting higher prices or Alberta’s growing population.

Because of this higher spending and reliance on volatile resource revenue, red ink looms.

Indeed, while the Smith government projects budget surpluses over the next three fiscal years, fuelled by historically high resource revenue, if resource revenue was at its average of the last two decades, this year’s $4.6 billion projected budget surplus would turn into a $5.8 billion deficit. And projected budget surpluses in 2025/26 and 2026/27 would flip to budget deficits. To be clear, this is not a far-fetched scenario—resource revenue plummeted by nearly 70 per cent in 2015/16.

In contrast, if resource revenue fell to its average (again, based on the last two decades) but the Smith government held to its original 2022 spending plan, Alberta would still have a balanced budget in 2026/27.

Bottom line; had the Smith government not substantially increased spending over the last two years, Alberta’s spending levels today would align with more stable ongoing levels of revenue, which would put Alberta on more stable fiscal footing in the years to come.

Premier Smith has warned Albertans a budget deficit may be on the way. To mitigate the risk of red ink moving forward, the Smith government should show real spending restraint in its 2025 budget.

Tegan Hill

Director, Alberta Policy, Fraser Institute

Milagros Palacios

Director, Addington Centre for Measurement, Fraser Institute
Continue Reading

Trending

X