Energy
Carney’s energy superpower rhetoric falls flat without policy certainty

This article supplied by Troy Media.
By Bill Whitelaw
Carney’s talk of energy superpower status rings hollow without the policy stability needed to back it up
As Canada continues to slip in global economic rankings, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s ambition to position the country as an “energy superpower” feels increasingly disconnected from reality.
The idea is rooted in recent political rhetoric suggesting that Canada’s energy sector, particularly oil and gas, can drive national prosperity. But
rhetoric alone won’t get us there. Without a clear, workable policy—particularly in how the energy sector is regulated and supported—the path to global energy leadership remains blocked.
Canada has the third-largest proven oil reserves in the world, abundant natural gas and vast renewable resources. Its energy sector supports hundreds of thousands of jobs and contributes significantly to gross domestic product (GDP). Yet despite this foundation, Canada has struggled to translate its natural advantages into sustained global leadership.
The last mandate letter (2021) from former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to his minister of energy and natural resources focused not on developing Canada’s energy potential, but on dismantling it. The directives prioritized capping oil and gas emissions, eliminating fossil fuel subsidies and accelerating a shift to green alternatives—signalling a clear intention to phase out traditional energy in favour of an ideological climate agenda, rather than supporting Canada’s role as a global energy leader.
Trudeau’s 2021 mandate letter should serve as a cautionary example. These letters, public documents from the prime minister outlining a minister’s responsibilities and policy priorities, must offer more than lofty ideals. If Carney is serious about making Canada an energy superpower, he needs to reflect that ambition in the letter he gives to his minister of energy and natural resources. It should clearly lay out a credible path to unlock energy investment, boost competitiveness and reassert Canada’s global standing.
Canada doesn’t lack ambition. What it lacks is a clear, practical policy framework linking energy—especially oil and gas—to national economic performance. Trudeau’s mandate letter was full of ideals but short on actionable steps. It overlooked the vital role energy plays in growth and prosperity.
Canada’s energy policy landscape is marked by excessive complexity, overlapping regulations and a level of uncertainty that discourages investment. For an industry that operates on long timelines and high capital demands, clarity and certainty are not optional—they are essential.
Without that stability, energy companies can’t plan or invest with confidence. And without robust investment, Canada cannot expect to lead in innovation or longterm economic strength.
The consequences of poor policy are not theoretical. Investment capital has flowed to jurisdictions with clearer rules and faster approvals. Projects that could have created high-paying jobs, increased tax revenues and improved energy security have been delayed or shelved entirely. Canadians are left with higher costs, slower growth and fewer opportunities.
Too often, the connection between energy development and economic strength is treated as secondary when it should be front and centre. This must change. Energy policy should reflect economic realities, not ideological narratives or performative environmentalism.
A better path forward starts with clear priorities grounded in pragmatism. It also demands genuine engagement with industry—not as an afterthought, but from the outset—to ensure policy reflects operational realities on the ground.
This is not a call to surrender oversight to corporate interests. It’s a call to recognize that effective policy requires collaboration with those who drive the economy. A constructive, transparent partnership will better position Canada to meet its environmental goals while advancing energy development.
Reclaiming energy leadership will also require broader alignment across parties, provinces and sectors. Energy policy must outlast political cycles and reflect national interests, not shifting ideological trends. Only then can Canada speak with a credible voice on the world stage.
Clarity and certainty remain the cornerstones of any credible strategy to elevate Canada’s energy leadership. Without them, the superpower narrative is little more than political theatre.
Bill Whitelaw is a director and advisor to many industry boards, including the Canadian Society for Evolving Energy, which he chairs. He speaks and comments frequently on the subjects of social licence, innovation and technology, and energy supply networks.
Troy Media empowers Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in helping Canadians stay informed and engaged by delivering reliable content that strengthens community connections and deepens understanding across the country.
Alberta
Energy projects occupy less than three per cent of Alberta’s oil sands region, report says

From the Canadian Energy Centre
By Will Gibson
‘Much of the habitat across the region is in good condition’
The footprint of energy development continues to occupy less than three per cent of Alberta’s oil sands region, according to a report by the Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute (ABMI).
As of 2021, energy projects impacted just 2.6 per cent of the oil sands region, which encompasses about 142,000 square kilometers of boreal forest in northern Alberta, an area nearly the size of Montana.
“There’s a mistaken perception that the oil sands region is one big strip mine and that’s simply not the case,” said David Roberts, director of the institute’s science centre.
“The energy footprint is very small in total area once you zoom out to the boreal forest surrounding this development.”

Between 2000 and 2021, the total human footprint in the oil sands region (including energy, agriculture, forestry and municipal uses) increased from 12.0 to 16.5 per cent.
At the same time, energy footprint increased from 1.4 to 2.6 per cent – all while oil sands production surged from 667,000 to 3.3 million barrels per day, according to the Alberta Energy Regulator.
The ABMI’s report is based on data from 328 monitoring sites across the Athabasca, Cold Lake and Peace River oil sands regions. Much of the region’s oil and gas development is concentrated in a 4,800-square-kilometre zone north of Fort McMurray.
“In general, the effects of energy footprint on habitat suitability at the regional scale were small…for most species because energy footprint occupies a small total area in the oil sands region,” the report says.
Researchers recorded species that were present and measured a variety of habitat characteristics.

The status and trend of human footprint and habitat were monitored using fine-resolution imagery, light detection and ranging data as well as satellite images.
This data was used to identify relationships between human land use, habitat and population of species.
The report found that as of 2021, about 95 per cent of native aquatic and wetland habitat in the region was undisturbed while about 77 per cent of terrestrial habitat was undisturbed.
Researchers measured the intactness of the region’s 719 plant, insect and animal species at 87 per cent, which the report states “means much of the habitat across the region is in good condition.”
While the overall picture is positive, Roberts said the report highlights the need for ongoing attention to vegetation regeneration on seismic lines along with the management of impacts to species such as Woodland Caribou.

The ABMI has partnered with Indigenous communities in the region to monitor species of cultural importance. This includes a project with the Lakeland Métis Nation on a study tracking moose occupancy around in situ oil sands operations in traditional hunting areas.
“This study combines traditional Métis insights from knowledge holders with western scientific methods for data collection and analysis,” Roberts said.
The institute also works with oil sands companies, a relationship that Roberts sees as having real value.
“When you are trying to look at the impacts of industrial operations and trends in industry, not having those people at the table means you are blind and don’t have all the information,” Roberts says.
The report was commissioned by Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance, the research arm of Pathways Alliance, a consortium of the six largest oil sands producers.
“We tried to look around when we were asked to put together this report to see if there was a template but there was nothing, at least nothing from a jurisdiction with significant oil and gas activity,” Roberts said.
“There’s a remarkable level of analysis because of how much data we were able to gather.”
Daily Caller
Misguided Climate Policies Create ‘Real Energy Emergency’ And Permit China To Dominate US

From the Daily Caller News Foundation
By Mariane Angela
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum warned on Fox Business Tuesday about America’s deepening energy shortfall and said that misguided climate policies could give China the upper hand in both the global energy race and artificial intelligence development.
House lawmakers voted 246-164, with support from 35 Democrats, to overturn a Biden-era EPA rule that lets California enforce a de facto national ban on gas-powered cars by 2035. During an appearance on “Kudlow,” Burgum said that U.S. energy shortfalls could allow China to outpace America in artificial intelligence and other power-hungry technologies.
“The real energy emergency that we have right now is that we don’t have enough energy in this country. We’re losing the AI arms race to China, and we’ve got to have more energy and more power right now in the country. And so that’s one of the things that we’re focused on right now,” Burgum told host Larry Kudlow.
Burgum blasted California’s aggressive emissions standards, which he said have effectively become national policy.
WATCH:
“Let’s start with California, Larry. That would be a great idea, because there’s 14 other states that followed California. So basically we’re stuck right now. Automakers feel like they’ve got to build two kinds of cars in America, one for California standards and one for the rest of the country,” Burgum said. “Of course, we know that the California standards are based on a bunch of falsehoods around emissions, because if we want zero carbon fuels, it’s much cheaper.”
Burgum took particular aim at electric vehicle subsidies, calling them a boondoggle built on climate ideology. He also called electric vehicle subsidies economically reckless since the cost of avoiding a single ton of carbon dioxide exceeds $900.
“It’s 10 to 15 times cheaper to have zero carbon liquid fuels than it is to subsidize EVs. The EV subsidies, where the real bank was, the thing that was really breaking the bank, over $900 for an avoided tonus of CO2, and all of that built around climate ideology,” Burgum said.
Republican Pennsylvania Rep. John Joyce introduced a resolution under the Congressional Review Act to stop California’s zero-emission vehicle mandate, which several other states have adopted. If the Senate doesn’t act, the Environmental Protection Agency would face a lengthy rulemaking process to reverse the policy that will allow California’s stricter standards to remain in effect for years.
The states that have opted in to California’s auto rules include Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
-
Alberta2 days ago
Alberta Accord: Premier Danielle Smith announces new relationship with Ottawa
-
Alberta1 day ago
Saudi oil pivot could shake global markets and hit Alberta hard
-
COVID-192 days ago
US Government ADMITS It Approved Pfizer’s COVID “Vaccine” Despite Knowing About a Long List of Trial Violations
-
illegal immigration1 day ago
New program offers illegals $1,000 and flights to self-deport
-
Business21 hours ago
Trump praises Carney at White House, says ‘never say never’ about 51st state
-
Artificial Intelligence2 days ago
The Responsible Lie: How AI Sells Conviction Without Truth
-
International1 day ago
Trump directs federal agencies to reopen Alcatraz
-
Business24 hours ago
Canada’s Election Is Over And Now The Real Work Begins