Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

Energy

Carney’s energy superpower rhetoric falls flat without policy certainty

Published

6 minute read

This article supplied by Troy Media.

Troy Media By Bill Whitelaw

Carney’s talk of energy superpower status rings hollow without the policy stability needed to back it up

As Canada continues to slip in global economic rankings, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s ambition to position the country as an “energy superpower” feels increasingly disconnected from reality.

The idea is rooted in recent political rhetoric suggesting that Canada’s energy sector, particularly oil and gas, can drive national prosperity. But
rhetoric alone won’t get us there. Without a clear, workable policy—particularly in how the energy sector is regulated and supported—the path to global energy leadership remains blocked.

Canada has the third-largest proven oil reserves in the world, abundant natural gas and vast renewable resources. Its energy sector supports hundreds of thousands of jobs and contributes significantly to gross domestic product (GDP). Yet despite this foundation, Canada has struggled to translate its natural advantages into sustained global leadership.

The last mandate letter (2021) from former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to his minister of energy and natural resources focused not on developing Canada’s energy potential, but on dismantling it. The directives prioritized capping oil and gas emissions, eliminating fossil fuel subsidies and accelerating a shift to green alternatives—signalling a clear intention to phase out traditional energy in favour of an ideological climate agenda, rather than supporting Canada’s role as a global energy leader.

Trudeau’s 2021 mandate letter should serve as a cautionary example. These letters, public documents from the prime minister outlining a minister’s responsibilities and policy priorities, must offer more than lofty ideals. If Carney is serious about making Canada an energy superpower, he needs to reflect that ambition in the letter he gives to his minister of energy and natural resources. It should clearly lay out a credible path to unlock energy investment, boost competitiveness and reassert Canada’s global standing.

Canada doesn’t lack ambition. What it lacks is a clear, practical policy framework linking energy—especially oil and gas—to national economic performance. Trudeau’s mandate letter was full of ideals but short on actionable steps. It overlooked the vital role energy plays in growth and prosperity.

Canada’s energy policy landscape is marked by excessive complexity, overlapping regulations and a level of uncertainty that discourages investment. For an industry that operates on long timelines and high capital demands, clarity and certainty are not optional—they are essential.

Without that stability, energy companies can’t plan or invest with confidence. And without robust investment, Canada cannot expect to lead in innovation or longterm economic strength.

The consequences of poor policy are not theoretical. Investment capital has flowed to jurisdictions with clearer rules and faster approvals. Projects that could have created high-paying jobs, increased tax revenues and improved energy security have been delayed or shelved entirely. Canadians are left with higher costs, slower growth and fewer opportunities.

Too often, the connection between energy development and economic strength is treated as secondary when it should be front and centre. This must change. Energy policy should reflect economic realities, not ideological narratives or performative environmentalism.

A better path forward starts with clear priorities grounded in pragmatism. It also demands genuine engagement with industry—not as an afterthought, but from the outset—to ensure policy reflects operational realities on the ground.

This is not a call to surrender oversight to corporate interests. It’s a call to recognize that effective policy requires collaboration with those who drive the economy. A constructive, transparent partnership will better position Canada to meet its environmental goals while advancing energy development.

Reclaiming energy leadership will also require broader alignment across parties, provinces and sectors. Energy policy must outlast political cycles and reflect  national interests, not shifting ideological trends. Only then can Canada speak with a credible voice on the world stage.

Clarity and certainty remain the cornerstones of any credible strategy to elevate Canada’s energy leadership. Without them, the superpower narrative is little more than political theatre.

Bill Whitelaw is a director and advisor to many industry boards, including the Canadian Society for Evolving Energy, which he chairs. He speaks and comments frequently on the subjects of social licence, innovation and technology, and energy supply networks.

Troy Media empowers Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in helping Canadians stay informed and engaged by delivering reliable content that strengthens community connections and deepens understanding across the country.

Business

Trump reins in oil markets with one Truth Social post

Published on

MXM logo MxM News

Quick Hit:

President Trump on Monday warned oil producers not to raise prices in the wake of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, cautioning that a spike would benefit America’s enemies. “EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I’M WATCHING!”

Key Details:

  • Trump posted on Truth Social: “YOU’RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON’T DO IT!”

  • Oil prices fell after the post, with Brent Crude and West Texas Intermediate both slipping by about one percent following earlier gains driven by Middle East tensions.

  • In a follow-up message, Trump told the Department of Energy: “DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!”

Diving Deeper:

President Donald Trump issued a blunt warning to oil producers Monday morning following a weekend of U.S. military action against Iran, urging them to keep prices under control amid rising geopolitical tensions. His message, posted on Truth Social, was clear and emphatic: “EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I’M WATCHING! YOU’RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON’T DO IT!”

The timing of the post was significant. Over the weekend, U.S. forces struck three major Iranian nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—in a bold escalation that raised fears of a broader regional conflict and potential threats to global energy infrastructure. Initial market reactions were swift, with Brent Crude jumping over 5 percent and briefly breaking above $81 a barrel. West Texas Intermediate followed, climbing to its highest level since January.

However, after Trump’s post circulated Monday, both benchmarks began to pull back, each falling by about one percent. Traders appeared to interpret Trump’s comments as a call for restraint, especially as domestic producers weigh output decisions amid a softening price environment and a looser global supply picture.

While Trump didn’t name names, his message seemed clearly aimed at American oil companies, some of which have recently floated the possibility of scaling back production due to lower margins. Meanwhile, OPEC+ continues its efforts to bring previously curtailed output back online, further complicating the global supply-demand dynamic.

In a second post, Trump added: “To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!”

Despite the military flare-up, markets have largely stabilized, suggesting that investors are waiting to see how Iran will respond. Tehran’s parliament has called for the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil shipping, but such a move would require the approval of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

For now, traders appear cautious but unconvinced that supply routes will be disrupted in the immediate term. Trump, however, has made it clear that if oil producers try to capitalize on the crisis by raising prices, he’ll be watching—and he won’t be quiet.

Continue Reading

Business

The U.S. Strike in Iran-Insecurity About Global Oil Supply Suddenly Makes Canadian Oil Attractive

Published on

From Energy Now

By Maureen McCall

The U.S. strike on three nuclear sites in Iran is expected to rattle oil prices  as prices change to include a higher geopolitical risk premium.

Anticipated price rises range from a likely rise of $3-5 per barrel forecast by Reuters to predictions of a “knee-jerk” reaction price spike with  Brent crude, currently at $72.40, possibly rising to $120+ in a worst-case scenario, according to JPMorgan.


Get the Latest Canadian Focused Energy News Delivered to You! It’s FREE: Quick Sign-Up Here


Whatever the choice of action Iran will take in response- it is creating fears of reprisals striking U.S. oil infrastructure. Impacts on the Strait of Hormuz are feared as a senior Iranian lawmaker was quoted on June 19th as saying that the country could shut the Strait of Hormuz as a way of hitting back against its enemies.

In a recent interview, ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods said there is sufficient supply in the global oil market to withstand any supply disruption to Iranian exports.

“There’s enough spare capacity in the system today to accommodate any Iranian oil that comes off the market,” Woods told Fox News  “The bigger issue will be if infrastructure for exports or the shipping past the Strait of Hormuz is impacted.”

The Strait of Hormuz is considered the world’s most important oil chokepoint, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA).  Iran voted late Sunday to shut down the Strait through which about 20% of the world’s daily oil supply flows. The resulting oil supply risk leaves countries contemplating their options as they look for more long-term capacity.

We could be facing a return to the identification of “Conflict Oil”, a term Ezra Levant first coined in his book “Ethical Oil: The Case for Canada’s Oil Sands” to describe oil-producing countries with dismal human rights records, such as Iran. Conflict oil would now signify oil sourced from areas of the world subject to political conflict, instability and supply disruption. Levant used the term originally to argue that Canadian Oil Sands production should be considered a more ethical alternative to oil from countries with oppressive regimes. However, the argument could now be made that oil supply and pricing from conflict-free countries like Canada would be more reliable. Canadian oil could come into focus as conflict oil once again becomes a concern.

Katarzyna (Kasha)Piquette, CEO, of Canadian Energy Ventures

Katarzyna (Kasha)Piquette, CEO, of Canadian Energy Ventures (CEV), an organization formed to connect Canada’s energy with Europe’s growing needs in the face of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, foresees dramatic changes in global energy trade.

“The consequences of the US strike on Iran are a potential game-changer, not just in terms of pricing, but in how countries think about long-term energy security,” Piquette said. “In the short term, Canada can help stabilize supply to the U.S. and Europe as geopolitical risk premiums surge. But the long-term impact may be even more profound: countries in Asia are likely to deepen ties with stable, non-Middle East suppliers like Canada. This is an opportunity to position Canadian energy as a cornerstone of energy security in a more divided world, and we must act strategically to expand our infrastructure and secure that future.”

Piquette says CEV is hearing directly from buyers in Europe and Asia, at least half a dozen countries, who are urgently looking to secure long-term contracts with reliable, conflict-free suppliers.

“Canadian oil is back in focus, and not just for ethical reasons. With the Trans Mountain expansion now operational, we can access Asian markets directly through the BC coast, while the U.S. The Gulf Coast remains a viable path to Europe. Yes, transportation adds cost—but buyers today are willing to pay a premium for stability. This is Canada’s moment, but it requires Ottawa to deliver on its promises: we need regulatory certainty, investment in infrastructure, and export capacity that matches global demand.”

Maureen McCall is an energy professional who writes on issues affecting the energy industry.

 

Continue Reading

Trending

X