Automotive
World’s first all-electric bus fleet shut down due to breakdowns and expense

From Heartland Daily News
Electric Buses Not a Panacea
Last week, the city of Seneca, South Carolina decided to shut down the Clemson Area Transit System, which served Seneca and nearby Clemson University. Once touted as owning the world’s first all-electric bus fleet, just a few years later two thirds of its expensive electric buses had broken down, the company that made them went bankrupt, parts were no longer available, and the city can’t afford to buy replacement buses.
Seneca is not exactly a major metropolis. But Clemson Area Transit isn’t the only transit agency to have trouble with electric buses. Just the day before Seneca decided to shut down its transit system, Austin’s Capital Metro announced that it was giving up on its plan to electrify its bus fleet by 2030. Electric bus technology, said the agency, simply hasn’t progressed far enough to replace Diesels.
California’s Foothill Transit, one of the first agencies to use rapid-charge electric buses in 2010, has also had problems. Like Austin, the agency had hoped to completely electrify by 2030. Instead, by 2020 most of the electric buses in its fleet were out of service. In 2021, the agency decided to return the buses even though doing so would require it to pay a $5 million penalty to the Federal Transit Administration, whose grant initially paid most of the cost.
The Southeast Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) may be the largest agency to have practically given up on electric buses. It pulled its 25-bus electric fleet out of service in 2021 when the buses were just five years old. The buses had suffered cracks in their chassis, but it appears that problem was only the straw that broke the omnibus’s back. “We do not feel the current [electric bus] technology is a good investment at this time,” concluded SEPTA’s general manager.
Transit agencies in Asheville, Colorado Springs, and several other cities have reported similar problems. Albuquerque completely gave up on its electric buses and returned them to the manufacturer, a Chinese company called BYD.
Electric buses cost 50 to 100 percent more than their Diesel counterparts. A 2019 study by US PIRG predicted that such buses would nevertheless save transit agencies $400,000 apiece over their lifetimes due to lower fuel and maintenance costs. US PIRG relied on four “success stories” to justify this conclusion. Success story number one was Seneca, South Carolina.
The report acknowledged Albuquerque’s problems but blamed them on the city’s hills and high temperatures. Compared with Austin, Albuquerque is practically flat and its temperatures are nowhere near as extreme. If electric buses can’t work in Albuquerque, they aren’t going to work in a lot of other cities.
Other than Albuquerque, one thing many of these failures have in common is electric buses manufactured by Proterra, one of four major electric bus manufacturers that have recently sold buses in the U.S. and the only one to actually be a U.S. company. In 2023, it claimed that COVID-related supply-chain problems had driven it into bankruptcy. The company’s three divisions — transit buses, batteries and drive trains, and charging systems — were sold to three other companies to pay Proterra’s debts and none of the buyers are supporting Proterra’s buses or even making similar buses. In view of the many problems transit agencies were having with its buses before 2023, it seems likely the supply-chain explanation was just a dodge for Proterra’s shoddy design and workmanship.
One reason for that may simply be opportunism on the part of bus manufacturers, including both Proterra and BYD. Before passage of the 2021 infrastructure bill, the federal government was paying 80 percent of the cost of Diesel buses but 90 percent of the cost of electric buses purchased by transit agencies. For a transit agency, that meant that an electric bus could cost twice as much as a Diesel bus without costing local taxpayers an extra dime. Bus manufacturers thus felt free to increase their profits by raising the price of their electric buses and, having done so, may have compounded the problem by cutting costs.
Beyond manufacturing defects, electric buses have several generic problems. First, while a Diesel bus can operate all day, an electric bus can operate only a few hours on a single time-consuming charge. Proterra claimed to have solved this problem with a rapid-charge system, but that didn’t prevent Foothill Transit from suffering enormous problems with its electric buses. This probably is particularly serious on long bus routes: Austin’s Capital Metro estimates that today’s electric buses could satisfactorily serve only 36 percent of its routes.
Second, the batteries needed to power electric bus motors are heavy, which is probably why SEPTA’s buses suffered cracks in their chassis. Supposedly, the frames on SEPTA’s Proterra buses were made of “resin, fiberglass, carbon fiber, balsa wood, and steel reinforcement plates,” which almost sounds like a joke. But making frames strong enough to support the batteries means adding even more weight to the buses, which shortens their range and adds to wear and tear on other parts of the buses.
Third, electric buses are not necessarily climate-friendly enough to justify their added cost. In Washington state, where most electric power comes from hydroelectric dams, switching from Diesel to electric buses will definitely reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But most other states, including New Mexico, South Carolina, and Texas, get most of their electricity from fossil fuels and thus electric buses may not reduce greenhouse gas emissions at all when compared with Diesels.
Under the 2021 infrastructure law, the federal government is handing out close to a billion dollars to buy electric buses. Advocacy groups such as US PIRG want transit agencies to “commit to a full transition to electric buses on a specific timeline.” Such funding and commitment may be premature, however, if electric bus technology is not capable of equalling Diesel buses, will cost agencies more in the long run, and won’t do much to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.
Originally published by The Antiplanner. Republished with permission.
Automotive
Major automakers push congress to block California’s 2035 EV mandate

MxM News
Quick Hit:
Major automakers are urging Congress to intervene and halt California’s aggressive plan to eliminate gasoline-only vehicles by 2035. With the Biden-era EPA waiver empowering California and 11 other states to enforce the rule, automakers warn of immediate impacts on vehicle availability and consumer choice. The U.S. House is preparing for a critical vote to determine if California’s sweeping environmental mandates will stand.
Key Details:
-
Automakers argue California’s rules will raise prices and limit consumer choices, especially amid high tariffs on auto imports.
-
The House is set to vote this week on repealing the EPA waiver that greenlit California’s mandate.
-
California’s regulations would require 35% of 2026 model year vehicles to be zero-emission, a figure manufacturers say is unrealistic.
Diving Deeper:
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, representing industry giants such as General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Hyundai, issued a letter Monday warning Congress about the looming consequences of California’s radical environmental regulations. The automakers stressed that unless Congress acts swiftly, vehicle shipments across the country could be disrupted within months, forcing car companies to artificially limit sales of traditional vehicles to meet electric vehicle quotas.
California’s Air Resources Board rules have already spread to 11 other states—including New York, Massachusetts, and Oregon—together representing roughly 40% of the entire U.S. auto market. Despite repeated concerns from manufacturers, California officials have doubled down, insisting that their measures are essential for meeting lofty greenhouse gas reduction targets and combating smog. However, even some states like Maryland have recognized the impracticality of California’s timeline, opting to delay compliance.
A major legal hurdle complicates the path forward. The Government Accountability Office ruled in March that the EPA waiver issued under former President Joe Biden cannot be revoked under the Congressional Review Act, which requires only a simple Senate majority. This creates uncertainty over whether Congress can truly roll back California’s authority without more complex legislative action.
The House is also gearing up to tackle other elements of California’s environmental regime, including blocking the state from imposing stricter pollution standards on commercial trucks and halting its low-nitrogen oxide emissions regulations for heavy-duty vehicles. These moves reflect growing concerns that California’s progressive regulatory overreach is threatening national commerce and consumer choice.
Under California’s current rules, the state demands that 35% of light-duty vehicles for the 2026 model year be zero-emission, scaling up rapidly to 68% by 2030. Industry experts widely agree that these targets are disconnected from reality, given the current slow pace of electric vehicle adoption among the broader American public, particularly in rural and lower-income areas.
California first unveiled its plan in 2020, aiming to make at least 80% of new cars electric and the remainder plug-in hybrids by 2035. Now, under President Donald Trump’s leadership, the U.S. Transportation Department is working to undo the aggressive fuel economy regulations imposed during former President Joe Biden’s term, offering a much-needed course correction for an auto industry burdened by regulatory overreach.
As Congress debates, the larger question remains: Will America allow one state’s left-wing environmental ideology to dictate terms for the entire country’s auto industry?
Also Interesting
Top Used Ford SUVs for Families and Adventurers

Finding the perfect SUV that balances comfort, safety, and adventure-ready performance can be a challenge, but Ford’s lineup of used SUVs offers some of the best options available. Whether you need a spacious vehicle for your growing family or an all-terrain companion for weekend getaways, there’s a Ford SUV to match your lifestyle. Let’s explore the top choices that deliver reliability, versatility, and affordability.
What to Look for in a Used Ford SUV?
Before diving into specific models, it’s essential to know what features matter most when shopping for a used Ford SUV. Here are key factors to consider:
● Safety Features – Look for models equipped with Ford Co-Pilot360, which includes automatic emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, and adaptive cruise control.
● Reliability and Maintenance Costs – Research common issues and ensure the SUV has a solid maintenance history.
● Fuel Efficiency – Choose a model that aligns with your commuting or road trip needs.
● Cargo and Passenger Space – Ensure the SUV has enough room for your family, gear, and pets.
● Off-Road Capability – If adventure is your goal, opt for models with all-wheel drive (AWD) or four-wheel drive (4WD).
If you’re ready to explore available options, check out https://stampedeauto.com/used-ford/ for a selection of quality used Ford SUVs.
1. Ford Escape – The Compact Family Favorite
The Ford Escape is a practical, fuel-efficient SUV perfect for small families and urban explorers. With a history of strong safety ratings and a spacious interior, it strikes a balance between convenience and performance.
Why Choose a Used Ford Escape?
● Fuel Efficiency – Older models with the 1.5L EcoBoost engine offer up to 30 MPG highway.
● User-Friendly Technology – Equipped with Ford SYNC infotainment and smartphone connectivity.
● Versatile Cargo Space – Fold-flat rear seats provide ample room for groceries, sports equipment, or luggage.
● Best Model Years to Buy – 2018-2021 models have modern safety features and improved fuel economy.
2. Ford Edge – The Perfect Mid-Size Balance
For those who want more space without stepping into full-size territory, the Ford Edge is an ideal midsize SUV. It offers a roomy two-row layout, strong engine options, and a smooth ride.
Why Choose a Used Ford Edge?
● Spacious Cabin – More rear legroom than many competitors.
● Powerful Engine Choices – Available 2.0L EcoBoost and 2.7L V6 for extra performance.
● Advanced Safety Features – Includes lane-keeping assist and pre-collision assist in newer models.
● Best Model Years to Buy – 2019-2022 models offer a modern design and strong reliability.
3. Ford Explorer – The Ultimate Family SUV
If you need three rows of seating without sacrificing performance, the Ford Explorer is a top contender. It’s an excellent SUV for large families and those who need extra passenger capacity.
Why Choose a Used Ford Explorer?
● Seating for Up to Seven – Third-row seats offer flexibility for larger families.
● Strong Towing Capacity – Can tow up to 5,000 lbs when properly equipped.
● Powerful Yet Efficient – The 2.3L EcoBoost engine delivers a balance of power and fuel savings.
● Best Model Years to Buy – 2017-2022 models feature advanced driver assistance and improved comfort.
4. Ford Expedition – The Full-Size Powerhouse
For those who need maximum space and towing capability, the Ford Expedition is a standout choice. It’s built for large families, cross-country road trips, and hauling heavy loads.
Why Choose a Used Ford Expedition?
● Room for Eight – A full-size SUV with unmatched passenger space.
● Towing King – Can tow up to 9,300 lbs, ideal for boats and trailers.
● High-Tech Features – SYNC 3 infotainment and multiple USB ports keep everyone connected.
● Best Model Years to Buy – 2018-2022 models have turbocharged efficiency and refined interiors.
5. Ford Bronco Sport – The Adventurer’s Compact Choice
For outdoor enthusiasts, the Ford Bronco Sport is a rugged compact SUV designed for off-road fun while still being a practical daily driver.
Why Choose a Used Ford Bronco Sport?
● Trail-Ready Performance – Standard AWD and off-road modes for different terrains.
● Compact Yet Spacious – Clever storage solutions for camping and gear.
● Turbocharged Engines – 1.5L and 2.0L EcoBoost options for strong performance.
● Best Model Years to Buy – 2021-2023 models provide the latest tech and rugged styling.
Before purchasing a used Ford Bronco Sport, be sure to check for any recalls. For example, certain Ford Bronco Sport and Maverick models have been recalled to fix faulty batteries. To learn more about this, visit Consumer Reports’ coverage on the recall.
Buying Tips: How to Get the Best Deal on a Used Ford SUV
● Certified Pre-Owned (CPO) Options – Ford’s CPO program includes extended warranties and inspections.
● Check Vehicle History Reports – Avoid SUVs with major accidents or unresolved recalls.
● Test Drive and Inspection – Always inspect brakes, transmission, and suspension.
● Compare Prices – Look at local dealerships and online marketplaces for the best deals.
● Negotiate Smartly – Research market value and be prepared to walk away if needed. It also helps to choose a used car dealer with transparent pricing and a solid reputation.
Conclusion
Choosing the right used Ford SUV depends on your specific needs. If you want fuel efficiency and city-friendly size, the Escape is a great choice. For those needing extra space and towing power, the Explorer or Expedition are top contenders. If adventure is a priority, the Bronco Sport
offers unbeatable off-road capability.
No matter which Ford SUV you choose, you’ll get a reliable vehicle that blends comfort, technology, and performance—without the high price tag of a new model. Start your search today and find the perfect used Ford SUV for your family or next adventure.
-
2025 Federal Election1 day ago
In Defeat, Joe Tay’s Campaign Becomes a Flashpoint for Suspected Voter Intimidation in Canada
-
Automotive2 days ago
Major automakers push congress to block California’s 2035 EV mandate
-
Mental Health2 days ago
Suspect who killed 11 in Vancouver festival attack ID’d
-
Alberta1 day ago
Premier Danielle Smith responds to election of Liberal government
-
COVID-191 day ago
Freedom Convoy leaders’ sentencing judgment delayed, Crown wants them jailed for two years
-
Banks24 hours ago
TD Bank Account Closures Expose Chinese Hybrid Warfare Threat
-
2025 Federal Election23 hours ago
Post election…the chips fell where they fell
-
Alberta23 hours ago
Hours after Liberal election win, Alberta Prosperity Project drumming up interest in referendum