Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

Health

Trump’s surgeon general pick is a threat to Big Pharma, not medical freedom

Published

4 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By John Leake

Dr. Casey Means has faced backlash for spotlighting America’s metabolic crisis and pushing for reform of junk food production and marketing instead of the hyper-vaccination problem.

“You are what you eat,” as the old saying goes.

Anyone who visits a U.S. airport and looks around can see that something has gone terribly wrong with the metabolic health of the American people. It’s therefore an astonishing fact that President Donald Trump’s new pick for Surgeon General, Casey Means, has come under fire from all quarters for suggesting that there is something wrong with our food supply that needs to be investigated and corrected.

I get it, it’s up to the individual to avoid eating junk food. Nevertheless, it is still perfectly sensible public policy to ascertain how the American food industry deliberately engineers and encourages the consumption of junk food, especially among the young.

A thorough investigation of the American food industry could also yield sensible strategies for investing in higher quality food production. This, in turn, could revitalize America’s moribund agricultural sector. There’s a lot of talk of “bringing jobs back to America.” How about jobs producing high quality food in local markets all over the country?

I am aware of the suspicion within the medical freedom movement that Casey Means is controlled opposition for changing the subject from the real enemy of public health – namely, the hyper-vaccination of children, which is doing Lord knows what to their gastrointestinal, neurological, and metabolic health.

Though I appreciate the fact that the Vaccine-Industrial Complex is skilled at changing the subject to divert critical scrutiny away from vaccines, I have not seen any evidence that Casey Means is serving the Vaccine Cartel with her stated objective of scrutinizing the food supply.

Some of my readers have pointed out that Casey’s father, Grady Means, worked in President Gerald Ford’s administration as an assistant to Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, and that this should be regarded as evidence that she is serving undeclared interests. One should remember that it was the Ford Administration that quickly pulled the Swine Flu vaccine off the market after reports that about 25 people had died after receiving the shots and a few hundred developed Guillain-Barre.

Moreover, the fact that one’s family has worked for U.S. government institutions is not evidence that one is compromised by nefarious interests. A notable example of this was young Tyler Shultz, who blew the whistle on Theranos, even though his grandfather – former Secretary of State George Shultz – was an investor in the bogus blood testing company and was extremely unhappy about his grandson’s decision.

Secretary Kennedy supports her, and he has done more than anyone in the public forum to raise concern about vaccine safety.

People frequently ask me why Secretary Kennedy isn’t working faster to counter the unwarranted influence of Vaccine-Industrial Complex. This strikes me as the equivalent of complaining that Indiana Jones didn’t escape from the Well of Souls fast enough.

Secretary Kennedy has entered one of the largest dens of venomous serpents ever erected. It’s going to take him a while to slash through it.

Reprinted with permission from Focal Points.

Great Reset

The WHO Pandemic Treaty could strip Canada of its ability to make its own health decisions

Published on

This article supplied by Troy Media.

Troy Media By Cosmos Voutsinos

Don’t let Ottawa sign away our sovereignty to the WHO, placing power in the hands of unelected global officials

U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent call for Canada to become the 51st state rightly triggered national outrage. Yet while many were offended by his
provocative remarks, a more real and insidious assault on our sovereignty is unfolding in Geneva, where the World Health Organization (WHO)
Pandemic Treaty threatens to shift power from democratic nations to unelected global bureaucrats.

The Treaty, under negotiation, is aimed at strengthening global health responses to future pandemics. While proponents argue it will improve global preparedness, critics warn it will undermine national sovereignty, giving the WHO the power to impose sweeping health measures—lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and travel restrictions—without consultation or approval from elected governments. The treaty empowers the WHO director-general to declare a global health emergency, effectively bypassing national decision-making and subjecting countries to externally imposed mandates.

The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), established by the WHO to draft a new international pandemic agreement, concluded its 13th meeting on April 16. The final proposed treaty will be presented for consideration and adoption at the 78th World Health Assembly, scheduled to begin on May 19.

While global cooperation on public health is essential, Canada’s health decisions should remain in Canadian hands. The treaty gives the WHO significant authority to mandate health responses, potentially overriding local decisions made by Canadian experts and governments. This could mean that Canada’s ability to make pandemic decisions based on local context and need could be compromised by a centralized, unelected body, which Canadians never voted to give power to.

This is not just a health care issue—it is a fundamental challenge to democratic governance. The treaty lays the groundwork for digital health passes and surveillance systems that could weaponize personal health data, as we saw during the trucker protests in Ottawa. Do Canadians want a future where personal freedoms are tied to health status and tracked globally?

There are also serious financial implications. The treaty introduces a “Pathogen Access and Benet Sharing System” with undefined costs, potentially saddling Canada with an ongoing financial burden to fund global health initiatives. Earlier drafts proposed that countries contribute five per cent of their health budgets, a clause that has been removed but replaced with new, opaque financial obligations that could lead to billions in taxpayer dollars being diverted to the UN.

The United States has already initiated its withdrawal from the WHO, raising important questions about how Canada will coordinate cross-border policies and maintain its trading relationship with our largest neighbour during future health crises.

The WHO is not accountable to Canadian voters. It has no direct responsibility to our Parliament or provincial health authorities. It has a poor track record, failing to declare COVID-19 a pandemic in time, hesitating to challenge China’s handling of the virus, and offering shifting guidance that undermined public trust. Why should Canadians accept its authority without direct oversight?

Worse, Parliament will not be sitting during the critical window when the treaty will be presented and potentially signed. According to the House of Commons Sitting Calendar, Canadian Parliament is not scheduled to sit until May 26, 2025,  which is after the World Health Assembly concludes. This means decisions could be made behind closed doors with little public debate or political consequence.

The treaty’s implications go far beyond health and set a dangerous precedent that in the next crisis, Canadians may not have a say in how their government responds.

International cooperation should not come at the expense of our freedom and sovereignty. The WHO can offer advice, coordination, and resources but it should not dictate our national response. Canada’s government must reject this treaty, ensuring that any related commitments are brought before Parliament for full debate and approval.

Anything less would betray the trust Canadians place in their leaders. This is not just about public health—it’s about protecting our democratic rights, our sovereignty, and our freedom.

Cosmos Voutsinos is a retired engineer who has published multiple scientific papers that have garnered a total of 96 citations. He earned his Bachelor of Applied Science (BASc) at the University of Waterloo and his Master of Engineering (M.Eng) degree from McMaster University.

Troy Media empowers Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in helping Canadians stay informed and engaged by delivering reliable content that strengthens community connections and deepens understanding across the country.

Continue Reading

Health

Trump signs executive order aiming to slash prescription drug costs up to 90%

Published on

From The Center Square

By

“Most powerful executive order on pharmacy pricing and health care ever in the history of our nation.”

President Donald Trump hosted a press conference with Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and other health administration officials Monday morning formally announcing an executive order aiming to drastically reduce what Americans pay for their prescription drugs up to 90%, according to Trump.

The order seeks to reform how much the U.S. pays for pharmaceutical drugs compared to other countries. On average, Americans pay nearly four times more than other countries for their prescription drugs, effectively subsidizing pharmaceutical companies’ research and development costs for others around the world, according to the administration.

The order was immediately met with skepticism by some critics.

“If Trump is serious about making real change rather than just issuing a press release, he will support legislation I will introduce to ensure we pay no more for prescription drugs than people in other major countries,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., posted on X after the press conference, touting his own legislation and saying Trump’s order will be “thrown out by the courts.”

“If we come together, we can get it passed in a few weeks,” Sanders said.

Food and Drug Administration Commissioner and Johns Hopkins surgical oncologist Marty Makary was one of the officials who spoke at the press conference Monday morning.

“We didn’t take an oath to heal patients and then watch their life get ruined financially with their home, mortgage, retirement going down the drain with Go Fund Me campaigns, raising money from church communities and synagogues and friends they haven’t seen in 20 years to try to raise money – for what?” said Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary.

“For a system where Americans have been getting ripped off by 10, 12, 15 times higher prices than we see in other countries?”

Makary and others said the “fundamental problem” with American prescription drug costs is a lack of competition in the global marketplace, with Americans comprising only about 4% of the global population but supplying at least two-thirds of drug companies’ revenue globally.

“The fundamental problem in health care is that we’ve had non-competitive markets,” Makary continued. “We can do little things around the edges, or we can transform those markets into competitive markets, and that’s what this executive order does.”

The order intends to secure the “most-favored-nation” price for pharmaceutical drugs for the U.S., or the lowest price among its economic peer countries, through a series of actions. It instructs the U.S. secretary of commerce and the U.S. trade representative to “ensure” that other countries aren’t engaging in practices that “[force] American patients to pay for a disproportionate amount of global pharmaceutical research and development.” Kennedy is to work in coordination with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Administrator Mehmet Oz and others to develop most-favored-nation target pricing for pharmaceutical companies. It also directs Kennedy to devise direct-to-consumer purchasing programs for drug companies that abide by the president’s most-favored-nation pricing mandate for the U.S.

Oz called the order the “most powerful executive order on pharmacy pricing and health care ever in the history of our nation.”

If drug companies don’t comply, then the order directs Kennedy to create a rulemaking plan to impose the targeted pricing, or certify to Congress that the U.S. can import the drugs that remain too expensive under certain importation waivers. Certain drugs may even have their FDA approvals revoked by Makary.

Kennedy said some politicians, including Sanders, have been promising to “equalize” what the U.S. and Europe pay for pharmaceutical drugs for years, while knowing they can’t deliver on the promise because of the deep entanglement between the pharmaceutical industry and Congress. And even though he too has been promising to do something about the issue for years, he didn’t think he would see a solution emerge in his lifetime.

“I’m just so grateful to be here today. I never thought this would happen in my lifetime,” Kennedy said. “I have a couple of kids who are Democrats, who are big Bernie Sanders fans. When I told them what was going to happen, they had tears in their eyes, because they thought this was never going to happen in our lifetime.”

Kennedy and the other health administration officials who spoke praised the president for being willing to stand up to the industry and its powerful lobby, which has one to three times as many lobbyists in Washington as there are members of Congress and the Supreme Court, according to Kennedy.

“We finally have a president who’s willing to stand up for the American people,” Kennedy said.

Continue Reading

Trending

X