International
Trump says he’s spoken to China’s Xi Jinping about imprisoned businessman Jimmy Lai

From LifeSiteNews
By Michael Haynes, Snr. Vatican Correspondent
‘I didn’t say 100% I’ll save him,’ Trump claimed on a Fox News interview last week about imprisoned Jimmy Lai. ‘I said 100% I’m going to be bringing it up, and I’ve already brought it up.’
As the trial for imprisoned businessman Jimmy Lai draws to a close, President Donald Trump stated he has “already” discussed the plight of Lai with China’s President Xi Jinping.
“I didn’t say 100% I’ll save him,” Trump claimed on a Fox News interview last week, referencing prior comments. “I said 100% I’m going to be bringing it up, and I’ve already brought it up [with President Xi Jinping], and I’m going to do everything I can to save him.”
The pro-democracy activist, businessman, and former newspaper owner Jimmy Lai remains behind bars still as his trial under Hong Kong’s draconian National Security Law (NSL) hears closing arguments.
Lai – a 77-year-old British national – was sentenced to a six-year jail term in December 2022 on the charge of “fraud.” According to news outlet Hong Kong Free Press (HKFP), at Lai’s 2022 sentencing, the judge also imposed “an eight-year disqualification order to Lai and ordered the media tycoon to pay HK$2 million in fines.”
But his current trial is for separate charges of “collusion with foreign forces” in violation of the draconian NSL that Beijing imposed on the island to suppress dissent against the Chinese authorities, under which he could face a life sentence. The trial has faced numerous delays by the Chinese authorities, but now – after being further pushed back last week due to a typhoon and over concerns about Lai’s health – closing arguments are being heard after proceedings commenced in December 2023.
The trial has been widely labelled as a show trial, including by his lawyers, with Human Rights Watch calling the charges “fabricated.”
An open letter from Doughty Street Chambers in 2023 described the “fraud” charges against Lai as “spurious,” and added that his arrest under the NSL was simply for “peaceful pro-democracy campaigning and his work at Apple Daily.”
Lai himself has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. If the court – which comprises hand-picked judges rather than a jury in a notable break from precedent – finds him guilty, he could face life in prison.
A guilty verdict is seen by many as highly likely.
The businessman was brought into the Catholic faith by fellow Hong Kong resident Cardinal Joseph Zen, and is a strong and vocal critic of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its measures against freedom.
He founded the pro-democracy tabloid Apple Daily in 1995, which published criticism of the CCP that earned it the ire of the communist authorities. The newspaper became one of the leading outlets in Hong Kong prior to its forced closure by the authorities.
Prosecutor Anthony Chau has previously said that “this case is about a radical political figure … who conspired with others to bring into hatred and stir up opposition to the government and the central authorities.”
“He’s a respected guy, he’s a good guy. You can also understand, President Xi would not be exactly thrilled by doing it,” added Trump to Fox News about Lai, regarding his championing Lai’s cause to the Chinese.
Continuing, the president stated:
It was a very nasty period of time in the history of China. With all of that being said, his name has already entered the circle of things that we’re talking about, and we’ll see what we can do.
Trump made much stronger promises last year prior to his election victory when he stated that, should he win the U.S. presidential election, he would speak to China’s Xi Jinping about brining Lai out of the country. “One hundred percent, yes. I’ll get him out. He’ll be easy to get out. But we don’t have people that even talk about it.”
His latest remarks appear to downplay the certainty of his actions regarding Lai’s future.
The condition’s of Lai’s time in prison have led to international concerns about his health. Even three months prior to the start of this trial, Lai already marked 1,000 days behind bars. Now, he is approaching nearly 1,700 days.
Since his August 2020 arrest, Lai has been spending around 23 hours of every day in solitary confinement, in conditions which violate those laid out by the United Nations for the treatment of prisoners. On his brief 50 minutes allowed out of the cell, Lai is accompanied by guards in a separate pen, in contrast to other prisoners who are allowed to mix with each other or play sports.
Despite the extreme humidity and heat of Hong Kong in the summer, Lai’s cell is not fitted with any air conditioning.
Now Lai is described as having to wear a heart monitor in court following heart palpitations in recent days.
China experts and Hong Kong activists have vocally championed the cause of Lai on the international stage, as have a number of prominent Catholic clergy such as New York’s Cardinal Timothy Dolan. Shortly prior to the NSL trial starting, a number of prominent prelates called for Lai’s immediate release.
Human Rights Watch stated last Friday that the authorities should “drop the baseless charges against Jimmy Lai.”
“Holding the 77-year-old Lai in prolonged solitary detention while his health fails has been outrageously cruel,” wrote the group. “Concerned governments should press for Lai’s immediate release both for his sake and for the sake of media freedom in Hong Kong and China.”
International
Vienna court says Sharia law may be used in civil disputes, sparking outrage

From LifeSiteNews
An Austrian court upheld a Sharia-based arbitration ruling, prompting outrage from conservatives who warn it fosters ‘Islamic parallel societies.’
A court in Vienna has ruled that Sharia law may be applied in civil legal disputes between two parties in Austria.
The Vienna Regional Court for Civil Matters was concerned with a case between two Muslim men who had previously agreed to be judged by Islamic law in case of dispute.
This means that in the event of a dispute, the arbitration court – which rules according to Islamic law – can be convened. The dispute occurred, and the court ruled against one of the men and ordered him to pay a €320,000 ($372,000) fine.
However, the man sentenced to pay the penalty did not accept the ruling. He argued that the application of the law was arbitrary, as Sharia law could be interpreted in different ways. He furthermore claimed that invoking Sharia law violated the fundamental values of Austrian law.
The Vienna Regional Court ruled that the arbitration tribunal’s decision was valid. The court argued that the ruling did not contradict Austria’s fundamental values.
Islamic legal provisions, the regional court emphasized, could be “effectively agreed upon in an arbitration agreement” for property claims.
“There are no indications of a violation of public order or a possible arbitrary decision in this case, which is why none of the grounds for annulment that must be examined ex officio are present,” the court stated.
Conservative politicians and activists expressed their concern and outrage regarding the controversial decision.
Michael Schilchegger, constitutional spokesman for the Freedom Party (FPÖ), said the ruling fosters “Islamic parallel societies” and a weakens those “forces that do not want to submit to Islam.”
“If Austrian courts now also recognize arbitration awards based on ‘Sharia law,’ they are submitting to the will of fanatical Islamists,” he warned. He announced future legislative proposals to make it impossible for Austrian courts to recognize Sharia law in civil lawsuits.
Sharia law has “nothing to do with Austria and the principles of our constitution, and that’s how it should stay,” said Integration Minister Claudia Plakolm (ÖVP), who is part of Austria’s government coalition.
By the end of the year, the Ministry of Justice should draw up proposals “so that Sharia law cannot be applied in the future, for example in the area of civil marriage,” said Plakolm, who is confident “that we will receive the relevant proposals in a timely manner.”
Austrian anti-immigration activist and political commentator Martin Sellner said on X: “Under the guise of ‘private agreements,’ Sharia is entering the Austrian legal system.”
“Even though criminal aspects are excluded, this precedent opens the door to the gradual recognition of foreign legal systems,” he warned.
“For us, this means: remigration and the restoration of cultural sovereignty are more urgent than ever,” he concluded.
In recent years, uncontrolled mass migration has led to a significant increase in the Muslim population of Austria. According to a recent statistic, Islam is already the dominant religion in elementary and middle schools in Vienna. Approximately 41 percent of students in this age group are Muslim in Austria’s capital, while Christians only make up 34.5 percent (17.5 percent Catholic and 14.5 percent Orthodox).
Sharia law has also been recognized in other Western countries, such as the Canadian province of Ontario, where civil legal disputes may also be decided by Islamic law.
Business
A Nation Built on Sand: How Canada Squanders Its Abundance

By Garry Clement
Columnist Garry Clement, former RCMP anti–money laundering expert, argues Canada’s leaders have built prosperity on sand — leaving the nation exposed to collapse unless urgent reforms are made.
Canada is celebrated abroad as a safe, prosperous, and open society. But beneath the surface, a far more precarious reality is taking shape. The pillars of our economy — land, real estate, natural resources, and immigration — have been left vulnerable to foreign manipulation, criminal exploitation, and political negligence. The result is what can only be described as a sandcastle economy — striking at first glance, but fragile. Like the parable of the house built on sand, it is a foundation vulnerable to give way when the storm comes.
Investigative journalist Sam Cooper has long warned that foreign capital and organized crime have deeply infiltrated Canada’s real estate market. On Prince Edward Island, the Bliss and Wisdom Buddhist group quietly acquired swaths of farmland and property, raising questions about how religious fronts with Chinese connections gained such leverage in a province with limited oversight. In Saskatchewan, Chinese investors have been buying up valuable farmland, raising alarms about food sovereignty and the lack of restrictions on foreign ownership of agricultural land. Meanwhile in British Columbia, governments continue to downplay or outright ignore the extent to which transnational money laundering has fueled a housing market now completely detached from local incomes.
All of this has unfolded against a backdrop of minimal transparency, weak beneficial ownership registries, and virtually no effective enforcement. The same blind spots that allowed casinos and luxury real estate in Vancouver to become laundromats for dirty money are now being replicated nationwide.
The most urgent threat tied to these financial blind spots is fentanyl. Canada has become one of the world’s top destinations for proceeds from synthetic drug trafficking — a crisis that has devastated families from coast to coast. Chinese triads, Mexican cartels, and local gangs launder profits through casinos, shell companies, and real estate deals. Yet federal legislation continues to lag behind, leaving law enforcement outgunned. Every toxic opioid death in Canada is not only a health tragedy, but also a reminder of how organized crime is exploiting our lax financial controls. While other countries have implemented tough anti-money laundering regimes, Canada remains dangerously complacent.
That same complacency extends to national security. Canada has repeatedly delayed designating Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization, despite overwhelming evidence of its involvement in financing terrorism and conducting influence operations abroad. Our allies — including the United States — have acted. Canada, however, remains an outlier, seemingly unwilling to confront the risk of Iranian proxy activity operating in plain sight within our borders.
Immigration policy reveals similar weaknesses. Foreign students, particularly from India, have become central to the financial survival of colleges and universities. Yet a growing number are not here primarily to study. Instead, education visas have become a backdoor into Canada’s workforce, particularly in industries such as trucking. The tragic Humboldt Broncos bus crash in 2018 exposed gaps in training and licensing in the trucking sector. Since then, reports have continued to surface of foreign students entering the industry without adequate skills — a risk not only to public safety but to the integrity of our immigration system. Ottawa has failed to adequately regulate this pipeline, preferring instead to rely on the tuition dollars and temporary labour it generates.
Editor’s Note: Forthcoming Bureau investigations, citing U.S. government sources, question how widespread fraud and Indian transnational crime capture of Canada’s commercial trucking industry have fueled the flow of fentanyl, cocaine, and methamphetamine — turning the country into a weak link for its international allies.
The threads running through these crises are clear: willful blindness, weak laws, and short-term political expediency. Land and natural resources are being sold without regard for sovereignty. Real estate markets are distorted by laundered money. Organized crime groups funnel fentanyl profits into Canada with ease. The IRGC operates without effective restriction. And the education system is exploited as a labour channel, with little oversight. Canada is, in effect, trading away its long-term security for short-term economic gains.
Politicians, bureaucrats, and regulators too often dismiss warnings as alarmist or xenophobic, when in fact they reflect real risks to the stability of the country. A sandcastle can stand tall on the shore, admired in the moment, but everyone knows what comes next. Unless urgent steps are taken — enforcing transparency in land ownership, restricting foreign control of farmland and resources, tightening anti-money laundering measures, confronting hostile foreign actors, and restoring integrity to the education and immigration systems — collapse is inevitable.
The signs are already here: families priced out of homes, farmers squeezed out of land, fentanyl overdoses climbing, and a public losing faith in the fairness of the system. Canada prides itself on being open and inclusive. But openness without vigilance is vulnerability. Like unwise stewards, our leaders have been gifted with a land of overflowing abundance, and yet they have squandered its potential through short-sighted choices. That failure must be corrected — immediately and wisely — if the nation is to not only thrive, but survive.
The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.
To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Former senior RCMP officer Garry Clement consults with corporations on anti-money laundering, contributed to the Canadian academic text Dirty Money, and wrote Canada Under Siege, and Undercover, In the Shady World of Organized Crime and the RCMP
-
International2 days ago
Trump holds high-stakes peace talks with Zelenskyy, European leaders
-
Artificial Intelligence2 days ago
Meta joins forces with conservative activist Robby Starbuck to keep woke bias out of AI
-
Alberta2 days ago
“Back in the saddle” Poilievre’s words after winning the Battle River-Crowfoot byelection
-
Agriculture1 day ago
Lab-made food won’t win over Canadian shoppers
-
Opinion1 day ago
When collective and individual rights clash, media must focus on holding the powerful accountable
-
International2 days ago
Putin, Zelenskyy to meet after ‘successful’ peace talks with Trump
-
Agriculture2 days ago
Canada should eliminate its supply management system—with or without Trump
-
International22 hours ago
Trump DOJ to share Epstein documents with House Oversight Committee this week