Bruce Dowbiggin
Trump 2.2: The Vengeful Left Gets Its Wish

The best lack all conviction, while the worst/ Are full of passionate intensity.— WB Yeats, 1919
In the weeks after Donald Trump’s inauguration in 2017 we were playing golf with a couple from the D.C. suburban area. Liberal Americans were still shocked by the election of Trump and the stinging rebuke to the Hillary Clinton Democrats. When we asked the woman’s reaction to the sonic boom going through U.S. politics she became agitated.
“I’ve never been a political person before, never gotten involved” she replied. “But I will do everything in my power to ensure that he is never elected again. I will go door-to-door to see this doesn’t happen again.” Her fire-breathing reply echoed the stunned reaction of the DC establishment— both Democrat and Republican.
Because it showed there was to be no reflection on the surprise outcome. No soul searching. What could they have done better? No, the American people had let down their betters. The election of the louche real estate developer was an affront to cozy UniParty. Business like VPOTUS shaking down foreign governments for bribes would have to be put aside while revenge was exacted on Trump and anyone who perpetrated this affront.
After all, DEM Senate leader Chuck Schumer had said that the deep state had six ways to Sunday to get back at anyone who challenged them. And, boy, did they. The seven years after that conversation has been an endless show trial for Trump World. From phoney Russian dossiers to the Mueller investigation to drinking bleach… you know the script… the tools of the state were used to upend a legal election the DEMs felt entitled to.
Even when he agreed with them— Covid— he was attacked. Then, in the 2024 presidential election run-up, there was an avalanche of indictments for political crimes launched simultaneously against Trump and his associates, all designed to put POTUS 45 in jail before he can make a salami sandwich out of a senile Joe Biden in the election. Coincidence? Hardly.
So, how did the people who voted for Trump in record numbers in 2016 and 2020 react? They reacted as if a slight on Trump was a slight on them. His defiance was their defiance. Despite a pallid record of working on their issues as president (hello border wall?) and miserable coat tails in the 2018/ 2020/ 2022 elections his burden became their burden. They flocked to him despite— or maybe because— of his targeting. Plus, he holds all the cash.
Trump’s crushing win in the Iowa caucus this week reflected what polls have said since the U.S. Justice Department took to charging Trump with questionable real estate estimates to hiding secret documents to getting the January 6 folks riled up. (In Georgia, the DA Fani Willis followed suit, hiring her lover to prosecute Trump for questioning the integrity of the state’s 2020 elections.)
But there are voters besides Trump loyalists and Racial Maddow mouth breathers. And they will be the kingmakers if the two septuagenarians can stagger to the polls this November. For all the “swing-state” polls showing a decisive Trump win, these people are neither koo-koo for Orange Man Bad nor sold on Joe. They haven’t made any final decisions (other than disgust at the options).
Veteran GOP pollster Henry Olsen, who’s worked every election since Ronald Reagan in 1980, says that the only election he’s called wrong in his career was the 2022 midterms. As he explained to Ann Coulter, all the polls showed a GOP wave. Then, in the final 48 hours before election day, something happened, says Olsen.
As voters entered the polling booth— even those who’d told pollsters they’d vote GOP— the spectre of Trump loomed. Suddenly the binary choice between chaos agent Trump and semi-coherent Biden tilted toward Corn Pop Joe. And just like that, Trump choices across America like Kari Lake (AZ), Dr. Oz (PA) and Herschel Walker (GA) went down in flames. Turning the GOP tidal wave into a trickle.
It was an extension of every election with Trump as incumbent or kingmaker. And, suggests Olsen, it is likely to replicate itself again in November as Trump-as-Hitler and other MSNBC/ CNN narratives give independents pause before they hand over government to the Trump Revenge Tour.
On that assumption, Democrats seeing disaster are once more blackening his reputation— and thus making Trump World double down on a losing proposition. Yes, Biden’s a liability, but we’ll do some stand ups with Obama and then put Joe in a trunk till mid-November.
To help Trump out with his base here’s MSNBC’s Frau Farbissina, Racial Maddow, announcing with a straight face and a heavy heart that her network will not show Trump speeches because of Disinformation. Comedy gold.
Megyn Kelly then reminded Racial that she had promised to show the famous Trump Russian pee tapes within 24 hours in 2017. Still waiting. And that he never paid his taxes. Then she announced he’d paid $37 million in one year. Or when she gave full voice to Trump lawyer Michael Cohen. Who was then convicted of perjury. We’ve got plenty more.
Naturally, disaffected Trumpers like Coulter, Bill Barr and Ron DeSantis see the DEMs strategy in making Trump the GOP leader again. Especially after 93 percent of Iowa Republicans did not turn out to vote for Trump in the caucus. Still, party leaders like Ted Cruz are now urging a united front behind Trump. Cruz?
Here he is on Trump in 2016: “This man is a pathological liar. He doesn’t know the difference between truth and lies. He lies practically every word that comes out of his mouth…A narcissist at a level I don’t think this country has ever seen…The man is utterly amoral.”
What could possibly go wrong? As Napoleon once said, “Never get in the way of your enemy as he’s making a fatal mistake.” The Dems should take heed.
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, he’s a regular contributor to Sirius XM Canada Talks Ch. 167. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his new book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
Bruce Dowbiggin
Kirk’s Killing: Which Side Can Count on the Military’s Loyalty Now?

“After every armistice, you want to put us away in mothballs, like the fleet. When it comes to a little dying you’ll be sure to put us in a uniform…” Seven Days in May
In the 1964 political film Seven Days in May, a rogue Director of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff conspires to launch a coup against a failing president who’s just signed a nuclear disarmament treaty with the Soviets. The plot is uncovered by a Marine Corps colonel, and the coup is barely averted with all the conspirators apprehended.
In 1964 the notion that the loyalty of the military/ intelligence services might be compromised was a hot topic in the days afterJFK’s assassination. After calming down in the Reagan days— remember Woody Allen’s revolution spoof Bananas?— it has now returned.
How likely is a military/ intelligence coup? Loyalty of troops has been crucial in many coups and insurrections around the world. Famously the socialist regime of Salvador Allende was crushed in 1973 when the Chilean military staged a bloody coup. Allende and thousands were murdered as General Augusto Pinochet took over the country.
Still, the conceit in Western nations has always been “It can’t happen here”. The institutions of government are believed too strong and independent to allow themselves to be taken over by their militaries. The chattering classes prefer to see their military as Stanley Kubrick did in Dr. Strangelove— bumbling buffoons, lackeys led by General Buck Turgidson.

Certainly in Canada, where successive Liberal government culminated with Justin Trudeau, the Kubrick model is closer to reality. DEI hiring, cuts to budgets and a slavish reliance on America to protect Canada for free have produced a Canadian military with more in common with HMS Pinafore than Vimy Ridge. From the world’s third-largest navy in 1945, Canada is now a boat that can’t float.
But something seems to have changed with the Tuesday murder of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. It seems a massive provocation by people who want to destroy the American society. It’s not helped by the voices on the Left claiming he brought it on himself with hate speech. @punishedmother “Maybe Charlie Kirk shouldn’t have spent years being a hateful demagogic fascist and this wouldn’t have happened. Maybe he should take some personal responsibility.It will take careful leadership to prevent this boiling over.”
This growing intolerance between the political sides exposed yet again by Kirk’s assassination has made people consider the Armed Forces’ loyalty in a crisis. As in, who has it? (In pacifist Canada the current clash of cultures is that support of the military might be necessary in resisting the conservative right. Despite Bill C-23 disarming Canadians the unarmed Left might face a large, well-armed rightwing population brandishing weapons.)
In a divided America think of Tom Cruise’s JAG character in A Few Good Men confronting hardened Marine commandant played by Jack Nicholson— and you have the conflict. “You can’ t take the truth!” Fighting generals are a thing of the past when Democrats are in power. Successive presidents have used DEI to create desk generals and commanders who reflect good taste over good planning.

This DEI mission creep in the military was one of Donald Trump’s strongest planks in defeating hapless Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Canadian Liberals, meanwhile, managed to dodge their pathetic defence shortcomings only by making the 2025 election all about Trump and a 51st state, not defence or Chinese influence.
There has been evidence that some at the highest levels of the U.S. military, CIA and FBI have already shown a bias toward Democrats. In the waning days of Trump 45 Chief of Staff Mark Milley told the Chinese leadership— America’s No. 1 global rival— that he would personally tip them off if Trump launched a surprise attack on China.
In another time (or movie) Milley’s treachery would been seen as treasonous, punishable by a life in the stockade or, possibly, execution. In the hands of the DC Media Party, however, Milley’s partisan gambit was buried in the run-up to the 2020 election. As with the concurrent Hunter Biden laptop scandal, the story was made to disappear in a welter of Trump demonization and legal harassment
Now we must wonder again. Sadly for Harris, Milley and Team Obama, the Democrats were thrashed by the Trump agenda. POTUS 45—now 47— quickly began replacing lifetime loyalists in the military and bureaucrats, stifling for now the urge to purge,
Again this scenario was unthinkable a generation ago, a plot in a movie. But the governments of Barack Obama and Joe Biden (Trudeau in Canada) have created a social schism that has turned politics into a blood sport. As we know there were two attempts on Trump in the election campaign by deranged radicals. The defeated Democrats’ obsession over who controls the Supreme Court and Congress in Trump’s presidency, the repeated comparisions to Hitler, are producing greater and more strident anything-is-accepted calls from the radical Left to take to the streets and pursue civil disobedience.
In Canada Mark Carney’s Elbows Up gambit is dissipating rapidly since the election, producing active discussion of separation in Alberta and Quebec (again). This raises questions about what the military might do in the aftermath of a vote by either side to leave Canada. Might they intervene? Would they stand aside? Will tanks roll to protect a Carney Canada?
No doubt Charlie Kirk’s death will be mobilized by both sides in their appeals for the loyalty of the military should a civil war break out in the U.S. Get your generals in a row. MSNBC’s Jen Psaki has declared Trump’s tribute to Kirk “an escalation” Says legal expert Jonathan Turley, “We are already at political assassinations, so I am not sure how much more room for escalation there may be for Psaki or MSNBC.”
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, his new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
Bruce Dowbiggin
Ken Dryden: Hockey’s Diogenes. He Called Them As He Saw Them

There is much talk about the Canadian identity in these days of mass immigration , diversity and refusal to integrate. The 1970s were a simpler time for such rumination on culture, however. Riding the new global identity of Pierre Trudeau (soon to be regretted), the times were fired by the 1972 hockey summit win by Canada over the Soviet Union.
The series contained many of the self-held perceptions of the nation. Plucky underdog. Tenacious competitor in global affairs. Limitless possibilities. All seemingly rolled up into two weeks 53 years ago this month. Many of these notions were still manifest in the 2025 federal election when Boomers had a conniption fit over Donald Trump and withdrew into their Elbows Up phase.
So it should come as no surprise that one of the stars of that 1972 team was goalie Ken Dryden. While not being dominant throughout against the shifty Soviets, Dryden peaked at the right moments (in tandem with Tony Esposito) to snatch the eight-game series at absolutely the final possible moment.

It’s hardly an exaggeration that, while a number of the Canadian players lost their minds in the tense fortnight, Dryden carried himself with cool dignity. There were no Phil Esposito jeremiads. Not Jean Paul Parisé stick wielding. No Bobby Clare two-handers to the ankles of his opponents. Just the emerging figure of the lanky goalie resting his chin on his stick as he waited in the net for Kharlamov and Yakushev.
For the generation that watched him develop he was likely the quintessential modern Canadian. Son of a charitable community figure. Educated in the Ivy League. Obtained his law degree. Served as a federal cabinet minister. Author of several definitive hockey books (The Game is perhaps the best sports non-fiction in the English language). Executive of the Toronto Maple Leafs. And more.
He was on the American telecast of the 1980 U.S. Miracle On Ice at Lake Placid. And the radio broadcast of the 1976 Canada Cup. Ubiquitous media source. Loyal to Canada. And crucially, a son, husband, father and grandfather. If you’d created a model for the citizen of Canada of his times it was Ken.
He could be cranky and verbose, yes. His books often took issue with the state of the modern game. Concussions. The Trap. Excessive goalie pads. But his defining moment may have come in 1973 when, upset with Sam Pollock’s contract offer, he left the Montreal Canadiens to finish his law degree in Toronto. It’s important to note that his reputation at the time was a goalie carried by the Jean Beliveau super teams. Yet the Canadiens allowed 56 more goals in the 1973–74 season than they had the year before with Dryden. Plus they lost in the semifinals after winning the Cup the previous spring. Karma.
When he returned the Habs ripped off four consecutive Stanley Cups. Phil Esposito praised him as that “f’ing giraffe” who stole at least two Cups from the Bruins. He retired for good in 1979, and the Canadiens didn’t win another Cup till 1986. Which enhanced his reputation. His combination of tenacity, independence and integrity made him many fans. And launched a generation of goalies who broke the mould.

So his passing in the year that Boomers exercised their cultural privilege one last time is a fitting codicil to an era that held so much promise and has ended in a lost culture and renewed talk of separation in Quebec and Alberta. Many have emotional memories of Dryden, and social media has exploded with them on the news Friday of his death at 78.
For us, our quintessential Dryden moment came in 2001 at the NHL Draft. We were working for the Calgary Herald, he was an executive with the Maple Leafs. As we arrived at the Miami airport in a torrential rainstorm who was standing in the car rental lobby but the unmistakable No. 29? As fellow authors, we’d met many times, and we had quoted him so often we can’t count the times. So there was no fan-boy encounter.
This day he was a lost soul whose car rental had fallen through. Could we give him a ride to the media hotel? Sure. The company was welcome. As we rolled along though the pelting rain, searching for the right highway (this was pre-Waze) we talked about family and background. How were my kids? How was his wife now that he was hearing it from Maple Leafs fans?
Above the machine-gunning of the rain we then pivoted to hockey. He wanted to know what was going on with the Flames (they were mediocre at the time). And he wanted to talk about the state of trap hockey which was then choking the art of the game. Where was the beauty, the artistry in a league dumbed-down by clutch ‘n grab?
After chatting and squinting through the sheets of rain for 45 minutes we finally arrived at the hotel in Sunrise. As we walked into the lobby Ken thanked us for the ride and gave us $40 for gas. Media colleagues watching the scene were flabbergasted. Ken had a reputation as being frugal, and here he’d readily given me $40! U.S.! What could this mean? Did we get as scoop they’d have to chase. Ken blandly shooed them away, saying he had to check in.
We didn’t get a hot tip on a story. But we did get several gems to use in our next book Money Players, a finalist for the 2004 Canadian Business Book of the year. We meant to thank him for the material. Somehow the moment was never right. Now we won’t get that chance.
We might say the same for Canada. Somehow the moment was never right. Now we won’t get that chance. RIP Ken.
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, his new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
-
Frontier Centre for Public Policy14 hours ago
Bloodvein Blockade Puts Public Land Rights At Risk
-
Business1 day ago
Deportations causing delays in US construction industry
-
Business2 days ago
Red tape is killing Canadian housing affordability
-
Health2 days ago
MAiD should not be a response to depression
-
Alberta18 hours ago
Parents group blasts Alberta government for weakening sexually explicit school book ban
-
International2 days ago
Trump to Confront Starmer Over UK Free Speech Laws During State Visit
-
Crime1 day ago
Canadian teacher showed Charlie Kirk assassination video to young students, said he deserved to die
-
Automotive1 day ago
Michigan could be a winner as companies pull back from EVs