Crime
The first accused Islamic terrorist to illegally cross the southern border and shoot an American for jihad

Sidi Mohammad Abdallahi shot by Chicago Police
From the Center for Immigration Studies
First Blood: Anatomy of Border-Crosser’s Chicago Terror Attack
“I can tell you the threats that come from the other side of the border are very much consuming FBI field offices, not just in border states.” – FBI Director Christopher Wray, November 2023 testimony before the House Homeland Security Committee
(Part 1 of 3)
CHICAGO, Illinois – Since October 26, 2024, was Saturday, the mandatory Jewish day of rest when the orthodox may not drive, the orthodox Jewish man woke early to walk the mile to his suburban Chicago synagogue.
But his wife and children decided to stay home, a rare exception, while he went alone to weekly morning service at KINS of West Rogers Park synagogue, the second largest synagogue in Chicago. Their choice may have been divine providence for them all, he and his wife later recounted to the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) in late December.
Wearing religious garb – a yarmulke for his head and a clear plastic prayer shawl bag over a shoulder – that readily identified him as a Jew, the 39-year-old man headed out on the 20-minute walk through West Rogers Park, his predominantly Jewish upper-middle class suburban neighborhood where crime of any sort is virtually unknown.
He recalls “just walking, like spacing out,” nodding good morning to other walkers. Suddenly, a noise that sounded like a lightning bolt strike yanked him from the reverie.
“I like felt something hit my shoulder, and I fell,” the man recalled in a December interview at his house in his first and only interview, given to CIS on condition that identities remain undisclosed for fear of future targeting.
“I thought like some lightning crashed and hit a tree branch and that it fell on my shoulder. I wasn’t aware that the sound I heard was a gunshot.”
As he scrambled to his feet, he looked down to see a bloody hole in his suit lapel and realized his arm had gone numb. He turned in time to see a young man wearing a green workman’s safety vest – a clothing item common among pro-Hamas demonstrators worldwide – running away with a pistol in one hand, looking back at him. In that split second, the bleeding Jewish man spoke to his assailant.
“Did you just shoot me?!!?”
The assailant responded by turning around and chasing after his victim. He fired twice more to finish the job but missed. The assailant’s gun then jammed, authorities later said, giving the victim a chance to sprint for cover.
“I just ran. I thought he was still chasing me. I was screaming, ‘help!’ and just ran down the street.”
But that was just the beginning of an unprecedented life-threatening storm of violence that would go on to wrack this peaceful neighborhood for another 20 minutes in what state prosecutors would later deem a full-fledged planned terror attack. Thunderous, echoing gunfire gripped the upper middle-class residential area in white-knuckled fright, leaving shell casings strewn across streets, blood stains on sidewalks, bullet-riddled vehicles, and residents cowering with children and pets inside their homes.

Sidi Mohammad Abdallahi
“Allahu Akbar!” Sidi Mohammad Abdallahi screamed the notorious Islamic terrorist war cry as he fired, including yet a third time at his first victim.
Police would finally arrest Abdallahi, after trading fire with him and critically wounding him on a sidewalk between manicured lawns of the leafy neighborhood. Neighborhood children later found the reflective safety vest he discarded in someone’s back yard. Later, in a hospital, the Jewish victim would find himself waiting next to his terrorist assailant in triage, separated only by a thin sheet.
But unlike most Islamic terror attacks, such as the New Years Day ISIS-inspired vehicle-ramming attack by a U.S.-born citizen in New Orleans, one circumstance about the one in Chicago elevates its national security and political significance to a different plane.
The Chicago shooter – a 22-year-old Mauritanian national – had illegally crossed into the United States through Mexico in 2023 and joined some 50,000 other border-crossers who arrived in Chicago since 2022 and whose deportations under the coming Trump administration are about to become subject of a heated national political conflict.
The distinctive border-crossing aspect that made the Chicago attack possible benchmarks it as the first terror attack by a border-crossing Muslim extremist who drew blood from an American victim. And that key enabling element matters because it brings to fruition fears expressed with increasing frequency by homeland security professionals that migrants prone to act on Islamic extremist beliefs would come in on the historic mass migration tide of millions illegally crossing the Southwest border from around the world.
“I think greater fidelity about who is coming into this country and how they are getting in is essential,” FBI Director Christopher Wray testified to Congress in November 2023, when asked about terrorist border crossings nearly a year before Abdallahi’s attack. “I can tell you the threats that come from the other side of the border are very much consuming FBI field offices, not just in the border states…threats that come from the other side of the border are affecting every state, yes.”
But if seeking “greater fidelity” about how terrorists enter the country was important to Wray, the FBI oddly kept an arms-length distance from the Chicago case for reasons that no one has demanded, while quickly taking charge of the New Years attack in New Orleans and the Tesla truck bombing in front of Trump’s Las Vegas hotel.
Instead, Illinois State’s Attorney prosecutors were left to charge the wounded Abdallahi with terrorism under the state’s anti-terrorism statute after local police detectives found he methodically planned his attack on Jewish targets, inspired by Hamas’s tactics in its war on Israel and Jews. His online searches, they said, showed Abdallahi had probably planned to attack Jews as they prayed inside Chicago’s metro synagogues but opportunistically shot the Jewish man walking to one, sparing the lives of many.
Abdallahi’s online search history showed he’d researched two West Rogers Park synagogues and an area gun store. His recovered cell phone brimmed with violent jihadist, pro-Hamas, anti-Semitic murder propaganda, prosecutors and police disclosed. And there was the vest indicating solidarity with pro-Hamas demonstrators worldwide.
“This was not anything but a planned attack…an attempted assassination of these people,” Assistant State’s Attorney Anne McCord Rodgers said during Abdallahi’s arraignment on terrorism and other charges. “This was a calculated plan, on a public street…and attempted slaughter of that person and law enforcement officers.”
But the attack won’t make it to trial; nor will further details become known of the sort that, normally, the FBI, counterterrorism intelligence professionals, and elected leaders would rigorously study to prevent more attacks by those who have already illegally crossed the southern border and are here: On November 30, Abdallahi hanged himself in Cook County jail, robbing all of a potentially illuminating trial.
The prospect of lingering unanswered questions and “greater fidelity” about how this one happened prompted CIS to travel to Chicago in a quest to learn more about the attack and to emphatically remind the country that a border-crossing terrorist – a scenario often disparaged as hypothetical fantasy – has drawn first blood.
Overlooked terror attack with national security and political significance
Public and media attention to the October 26 attack quickly receded amid national preoccupation with the impending November 5 presidential election and its aftermath of Donald Trump’s victory, which was largely based on his promise to end a four-year mass migration crisis created by his predecessor. Throughout the campaign, Trump and his surrogates had often cited the terrorist infiltration national security threat posed by open-border policies he intends to reverse.
Yet the Chicago attack somehow has defied wide acknowledgement or any public sign of attendant introspection. In one of his final campaign rallies, in North Carolina on November 4, Trump did introduce the Chicago terror attack as a new justification for his plans to deport the illegal aliens who entered during the Biden-Harris border crisis of 2021-2024 in large numbers.
“Only days ago, an illegal alien from North [Africa] – and this was a rough one,” Trump began. “Just happened days ago, who Kamala Harris let into the country with her horrendous open border – just a dangerous, horrendous situation – traveled to a Jewish neighborhood in Chicago and tried to execute a Jewish man on the street, shooting him in the back as he walked to synagogue.”
Trump went on to describe the rest of the attack and drew resounding applause when he noted that Chicago police shot Abdallahi and “ended his rampage.”
No media outlet quoted Trump’s new line about the attack, which he hasn’t mentioned again.
The Abdallahi attack, however, warrants the same dedicated attention and study as all other terror attacks, for lessons and tactics used that might help authorities prevent future ones by other illegally present border-crossers from Muslim-majority countries of terrorism concern. The Border Patrol has apprehended more than 400 migrants on the FBI’s terrorism watch list since 2021, in addition to hundreds of thousands “special interest aliens” from 26 countries the U.S. deems a national security threat, according to an October 2024 House Judiciary Committee report.
Beyond FBI Director Wray’s testimony about the need for “fidelity” about terrorist travel over the border, the Chicago attack gives life to recent public U.S. intelligence community warnings about the vulnerability. In both its 2024 and 2025 annual Homeland Threat Assessments, the Biden administration’s Department of Homeland Security warned that migrants with terrorism connections and interest have and will continue to “exploit our border” amid historic mass “migration trends that complicate our ability to identify and interdict these threats.”
“Over the next year, we expect some individuals with terrorism ties … will continue their efforts to exploit migration flows and the complex border security environment to enter the United States,” the 2025 public report stated.
Beyond the chance for improved preventative measures that might detect and deport other illegal alien border-crossers from Muslim-majority nations, the Abdallahi attack warrants attention in time for an almost certain national political battle now ginning up nationwide – but with an epicenter developing in Chicago – over Trump plans to mount more aggressive interior deportations.
Democratic Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has repeatedly vowed to defy Trump’s deportation program and protect every illegal immigrant from ICE agents, presumably to include largely unvetted border-crossers from special interest Muslim-majority nations like Mauritania. Trump’s appointed “Border Czar” Tom Homan, who visited the city in December, swore to outmaneuver its leaders.
“The mayor of Chicago, not a real bright guy, says Tom Homan isn’t welcome to Chicago,” Homan said recently in a speech in Phoenix. “Well guess where Tom Homan’s going to be on day one? Chicago, Illinois! You don’t want me there, come get me! The people of Chicago have already spoken.”
If Chicago becomes a political epicenter for this legitimate partisan policy argument, discussion of the Mauritanian’s attack in the city would serve an obvious public interest by introducing a citable fact on the ground.
But to collect the public interest benefits of improved counterterrorism and fuller discourse about Trump’s deportation program in resistant interior cities, the public must know what happened. And as Trump described, the life-threatening attack on Jews, police, and paramedics more than qualified as “a rough one”, even though only two were injured, including the shooter, and no one died.
True terror in an attack
After he was shot through the shoulder, the Jewish man fled down the street looking for someone to let him in.
Resident Ken Boggs was just backing his car out of his driveway to go to a wedding when the wounded man suddenly pounded on his driver-side window.
“I’ve been shot!” Boggs recalled the man telling him through the closed window. “And I was like, ‘what do you mean you’ve been shot?’ I was kind of taken off guard but then he pulled his jacket open and I could see the blood and was like, ‘okay you’ve been shot.’” Boggs called 911 from inside his car but before he could act further, other neighbors across the street pulled the victim into the home of a woman who worked as a nurse, who began treating him indoors. An ambulance soon pulled up, and Chicago Fire Department paramedics began prepping him for the ride to a hospital.
None of them were safe yet.
This all occurred during what would turn out to be about a 15-minute lull in Abdallahi’s attack. Chicago police and the Illinois State Attorney’s Office declined to discuss the case, but the following account of the attack was pieced together based on police reports, witness testimony, and police body cam video released after CIS filed a Freedom of Information Act request.
After his gun jammed, Abdallahi disappeared into an alley and, rather than flee and disappear, began moving from back yard to back yard preparing to attack again.
Some 15 minutes later, when police were surveying the original crime scene for evidence and the paramedics were working on the first victim in the nurse’s home, Abdallahi was in Malka Reich’s backyard preparing to attack them all. An Orthodox Jewish homemaker and mother of four, Reich was home alone that day with her youngest, a baby. She’d been reading upstairs near a window while the baby slept, heard the initial shots just outside a quarter block away and heard the victim screaming for help. She looked outside and saw the gunman running.
Once the police arrived a few minutes later, curious neighbors began to venture outside.
“Women were pushing strollers, like life was back to normal,” she said.
Reich’s doorbell camera videotaped her a few minutes into the ensuing lull stepping out on her front porch – a large Israeli flag hanging from it next to an American flag and identifying her home as Jewish — to ask a dog-walking neighbor on her lawn if he wanted to take shelter inside. The neighbor declined and walked toward where police were taping off the crime scene and gathering evidence.
But seconds later, she saw through the doorway Abdallahi suddenly appear exiting her very own driveway from her backyard, gripping his pistol in his right hand. Her door camera videotaped it.
Extreme fright overtook her.
“This is a terrorist on my property.” Reich recalled thinking. “When he came back, I realized that this was terrorism. I needed to take this seriously. I felt like I needed to protect my baby.”
She saw Abdallahi turn left from her driveway on the sidewalk, raise his gun, and trot toward the police officers and the dog walker. Her doorbell camera clearly captured Abdallahi shouting “Allahu Akbar” and then he fired, she said, on the dog-walking neighbor to whom she’d just offered shelter. Next came dozens of deafening gunshots as Abdallahi opened fire on the officers, and they returned it amid much unintelligible shouting and screaming.
An Orthodox Jew well-schooled in the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack that butchered 1,200 Israelis in and around their own homes, Reich’s thoughts raced straight to “This is like October 7. How am I going to save my baby?”
She grabbed a kitchen knife and retreated with the child to a back bedroom to hide behind furniture as the gun battle raged outside. But she was tormented by second guessing if this was the correct tactical move.
Maybe a better move, she thought, clutching the knife, would be to hide the child in the attic so that the terrorists would go after her instead. Maybe she could open a window upstairs and leap when they came in like some Israelis did. Except that she knew Hamas terrorists shot and burned others who’d also tried that escape.
“You’re thinking, ‘so many people tried to survive in so many different ways’” during the October 7 massacre, she recalled. “Some people hiding got burned alive. Some people hid and survived. Some people jumped out of a window and got shot. And you just wonder what do you do in this situation?”
Non-Jewish neighbors also went into survival mode when they heard and saw the confusing gun battle between police and Abdallahi, whom they saw fire, then retreat and pop out elsewhere to start firing again.
“It was terrifying. It was just terrifying,” recalled another woman who requested anonymity. After that first lull ended and new shooting began, she grabbed their 7-year-old daughter and hid with her husband in the bedroom furthest from the street.
“The shooting was just constant. It was a volley, back and forth, back and forth. You didn’t know where it was, where it was moving to, where the shots were being directed. We heard lots of yelling. The police were yelling.”
An elderly woman retiree who lives across the street from the Reich family said she opened her front door during the lull and spotted Abdallahi standing facing the other way wearing “this very bright vest” and holding a gun, probably on the Reich property.
“I saw him run that way, and I don’t know anything more except the gunshots started and I hid on my bathroom floor with my dog,” said the woman who declined to identify herself. “The police were firing in this direction. I know my neighbor has a bullet in the back of his car.”
In all, the second phase of the attack lasted nearly four minutes. Five police officers took fire and fired back, police reports and released body cam video show.

Sidi Mohammad Abdallahi shot by police
The Chicago Police Department declined CIS requests to interview any of the officers or to speak about them or the case, as did a spokesman for the Fraternal Order of Police association.
Doorbell camera video shows one of the officers, from behind the brick cover of a porch stoop, shooting Abdallahi down as the gunman moved toward him on a sidewalk, just feet away. Other body cam video released December 19 in response to a CIS open records request shows highly stressed officers with weapons raised advancing on Abdallahi, yelling at him to put down his weapon and firing.
Abdallahi did not just fire on police. He went for his original victim a third time as two Chicago Fire Department paramedics were loading him onto Ambulance 13. A video shows the gunman firing at it as it raced past him with sirens blaring. Firefighters at the station where Ambulance 13 is assigned refused a CIS interview request.
The victim, whom neighbors had taken into their home for field treatment, recalled that paramedics who showed up to help had him on a gurney and were loading into the ambulance when gunfire raked them all. Rounds were hitting the ambulance.
“The paramedics were like, ‘did they shoot at the ambulance?’ They [the paramedics] told me to duck but there was nowhere to duck,” the shooting victim said, noting that he couldn’t duck being on a gurney. “They were scared. The paramedics were absolutely scared. They were like, this has never happened. They, like, didn’t know what to do. They’re like, let’s just get out of here! Let’s go!”
Door camera video shows the gunman continued firing at the ambulance as it sped down the street past him. In the moment, he was unaware that rounds had hit the vehicle.
After about four minutes, police finally were finally able to shoot Abdallahi down, although he continued to rise and point his gun until he simply no longer could.
From her living room windows, one woman videotaped a police officer just outside on the sidewalk feet away, gun drawn and pointed, shouting and advancing on Abdallahi and then Abdallahi himself.
“They just shot some guy right in front of our house,” she said, before moving to another window and seeing Abdallahi. “My God, there are police everywhere.”
“huuuuhh! Oh my God. Oh my God. Oh my God. What the hell,” was all the woman could muster as she trained her camera through the window down onto Abdallahi sprawled out on her sidewalk. A man’s voice beside her said “Oh shit. He’s dead.”
He wasn’t, of course, not yet. But he would soon hang himself in jail, an incident about which virtually nothing is publicly known.
Aftermath
The bullet had gone clean through the victim’s shoulder blade, tore some nerves and clipped his clavicle. There’d been a lot of blood. But two months later, the man reported full use of the numbed arm and that he was feeling physically fine.
A week after the terror attack, he decided to walk to synagogue again. More than 200 people joined him along the way in a show of defiant support, ringed by state and local police.

Chicago Rabbi Leonard Matanky
In part because Chicago had become a hotbed of pro-Hamas, anti-Israel demonstrations, a brief controversy rose and fell when the Jewish community noticed that politically liberal state and local officials in line with demonstrators downplayed the attack and omitted the fact that a Muslim extremist had attacked a Jewish neighborhood out of terroristic animus. The spat was largely resolved when state officials added the terrorism charges.
But there was no denying that Abdallahi’s wild melee shook Chicago’s Orthodox Jewish community, which already had security measures in place against anti-semitic mischief related to the war in Gaza, Rabbi Leonard Matanky of Congregation KINS told CIS.
“A person who I care about was hurt. A family had to endure a trauma that they shouldn’t have had to endure, and a community was made to feel unsafe,” he said, inside a Jewish day school that flies a large Israeli flag outside. “Can a person be shot now? It’s shifted a sense of what’s within the realm of possibility in my world. Just as October 7th was a global shift on Jews in the world, this was a shift on the Jewish community in the city of Chicago.”
Few in the community seem more hostile about illegal immigration now than before the attack, Rabbi Matanky indicated, even though it clearly played a role on October 26 and could again at any time. That’s in part because of a long history when Jews around the world had to emigrate away from various persecutions.
But Matanky also said he personally supported Border Czar Tom Homan’s plan to rid Chicago of illegal criminal aliens.
“I would hope that the law enforcement government would be able to get all of the criminals out of every community.”
And Abdallahi’s suicide in jail has left him with a great many questions about how and why he was able to cross the southern border.
“Why did he come to Chicago? How did he come to Chicago. What was his goal in coming to Chicago? Was it to find a Jew and kill him?”
Next: What we know and don’t know about Abdallahi.
2025 Federal Election
Nine Dead After SUV Plows Into Vancouver Festival Crowd, Raising Election-Eve Concerns Over Public Safety

Sam Cooper
In Vancouver, concern about public safety — particularly assaults and violent incidents involving suspects previously known to police — has been a longstanding civic and political flashpoint
In an evolving mass-death investigation that could have profound psychological and emotional impacts on Canada’s federal election, Vancouver police confirmed Sunday that nine people were killed Saturday night when a young man plowed a luxury SUV through a festival block party in South Vancouver, leaving a trail of instant deaths and horrific injuries, with witnesses describing convulsing bodies and wounded toddlers in the aftermath.
The driver, a 30-year-old Vancouver resident known to police, appeared to be shaken and apologetic, according to eyewitness accounts and video from the scene. Authorities stated the case is not being treated as terrorism.
Late Saturday night, Vancouver police confirmed at a news conference that the man, who was known to police “in certain circumstances,” had been arrested.
The incident occurred around 8:14 p.m. during the annual Lapu Lapu Festival, a celebration of Filipino Canadian culture held near East 41st Avenue and Fraser Street. Thousands of attendees had packed the area for cultural performances, food stalls, and community events when the luxury SUV entered the closed-off area and accelerated into the crowd. Photos of the vehicle, with its doors ajar and a crumpled front end, indicate it was an Audi Q7 with black tinted windows.
In Vancouver, concern about public safety — particularly assaults and violent incidents involving suspects previously known to police — has been a longstanding civic and political flashpoint. Saturday’s tragedy sharpened those anxieties, potentially influencing the attitudes of undecided voters in a federal election that has focused on social disorder and crime framed by the Conservative side, with the Liberal frontrunners countering that firmer sentencing laws would undermine Canada’s Charter of Rights.
Witnesses to Saturday’s tragedy described scenes of chaos and terror as the SUV slammed into festival-goers, accelerating through the crowd.
“I thought it was fireworks at first — the sounds, the screams — then I saw people flying,” one witness told reporters on the scene.
Authorities have launched a full criminal investigation into the suspect’s background, including previous interactions with law enforcement.
The tragedy unfolded during the final, high-stakes weekend of Canada’s federal election campaign, throwing public safety and political leadership into sharp relief.
On Saturday night, before news of the Vancouver incident broke, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre posted a message on X at about 10 p.m., declaring, “This election comes down to one word. Change. Our Conservative plan will bring home an affordable life and safe streets — For a Change.”
Meanwhile, Liberal leader Mark Carney, campaigning in the Greater Toronto Area, posted at roughly the same time, “Dropped in on dim sum today in Markham. The best part of this campaign has been meeting Canadians in their communities — and hearing how excited they are about our future.”
As the scale of the tragedy became clear, both leaders shifted sharply in tone.
Poilievre posted again around 1 a.m. Sunday, writing, “I am shocked by the horrific news emerging from Vancouver’s Lapu Lapu Day Festival tonight. My thoughts are with the Filipino community and all the victims targeted by this senseless attack. Thank you to the first responders who are at the scene as we wait to hear more.”
Carney, who had posted shortly before midnight that, “We don’t need anger. We need to build,” followed with a direct statement on the Vancouver attack around 2 a.m. Sunday morning, writing, “I am devastated to hear about the horrific events at the Lapu Lapu festival in Vancouver earlier this evening. I offer my deepest condolences to the loved ones of those killed and injured, to the Filipino Canadian community, and to everyone in Vancouver. We are all mourning with you.”
Online, the tragedy quickly reignited concerns about violent crime, bail, and the rights of offenders — issues that have increasingly polarized Canadian political debate.
In response to Carney’s statement, a comment from an account named Willy Balters reflected the growing anger: “He’ll be out on bail by morning right?”
Another commenter, referencing past political controversies over judicial reform, posted to Carney, “You stood behind a podium and declared murderers’ Charter Rights can’t be violated.”
The raw public sentiment mirrored broader criticisms that Canada’s criminal justice system — and its perceived leniency toward repeat offenders — has failed to keep Canadians safe.
Just days prior, a different incident tapped into similar public anger. B.C. Conservative MLA Elenore Sturko posted, “A visitor to Vancouver was brutally attacked by a man only hours after he was released on bail for assaulting police and uttering threats. @Dave_Eby — is this the kind of welcome visitors to FIFA will have to look forward to? BTW, this violent man is out on bail AGAIN!”
That incident continued to draw heated social media on Sunday, with David Jacobs, a well-known conservative-leaning commenter, posting, “A man, while out on bail for assaulting a peace officer, violently assaulted a woman. He’s out on bail again. The Liberals put criminal rights far ahead of victim rights and community safety. Stop the insanity. Vote for change!”
The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.
To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Invite your friends and earn rewards
2025 Federal Election
Police Associations Endorse Conservatives. Poilievre Will Shut Down Tent Cities

From Conservative Party Communications
Under the Lost Liberal decade, homelessness has surged by 20% since 2018 and chronic homelessness has spiked 38%. In cities like Nanaimo, Victoria and London, the number of people living in tents and makeshift shelters has exploded. In Toronto alone, there were 82 encampments in early 2023—now there are over 200, with an estimated 1,400 in Ontario.
Yesterday, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre received the endorsement of the Toronto Police Association, the largest single association of its kind in Canada, representing approximately 8,000 civilian and uniformed members.
This follows the endorsement by the police associations of Durham, Peel, Barrie, and Sault Ste. Marie of the Conservative plan to stop the crime and keep Canadians safe, after the Liberal government’s easy bail and soft-on-crime policies unleashed a wave of violent crime.
“These men and women put their lives on the line every day to keep our streets safe,” Poilievre said. “Our Conservative team is honoured to have their support and will back them up with laws to help them protect all Canadians.”
Poilievre also announced that a new Conservative government will ensure that police have the legal power to remove dangerous encampments to end the homelessness and the mental health and addiction crisis that has trapped thousands in dangerous tent cities and make life unsafe for law-abiding Canadians who live near them.
“Parks where children played are now littered with needles. Small businesses are boarded up and whole blocks of storefronts are shuttered because their owners can’t afford to deal with constant break-ins and vandalism,” Pierre Poilievre said. “Public spaces belong to everyone, but law-abiding citizens, especially families and seniors, are being pushed out to accommodate chaos and violence.”
Canadian cities have a mixed record of dealing with encampments in public places, with some not acting because they don’t believe they have the legal authority to remove the camps. Conservatives will work with provinces and ensure law enforcement has the clear legal tools they need to remove encampments and give Canadians back the safe streets and public spaces they deserve.
A Poilievre-led government will do this by reversing the Liberals’ radical pro-drug policies and by:
- Amending the Criminal Code to give police the tools to charge individuals when they endanger public safety or discourage the public from using, moving through, or otherwise accessing public spaces by setting up temporary structures, including tents.
- Clarifying in law that police can dismantle illegal encampments and ensure individuals living in them who need help are connected with housing, addiction treatment, and mental health services.
- Giving judges the power to order people charged for illegally occupying public spaces with a temporary structure and simple possession of illegal drugs to mandatory drug treatment.
- Returning to a housing first approach to homelessness, ensuring people get off the streets into a stable place to live with the support they need to rebuild their lives.
Under the Lost Liberal decade, homelessness has surged by 20% since 2018 and chronic homelessness has spiked 38%. In cities like Nanaimo, Victoria and London, the number of people living in tents and makeshift shelters has exploded. In Toronto alone, there were 82 encampments in early 2023—now there are over 200, with an estimated 1,400 in Ontario.
These encampments are a direct result of radical Liberal policies such as drug decriminalization and unsafe supply. They are extremely dangerous for the people trapped in them, who endure overdoses, assaults, including sexual assaults, human trafficking, and even homicide, as well as the community around them.
Under the Poilievre plan, tent cities will no longer be an option—but recovery will be. Conservatives will give law enforcement the tools they need to help clean up our streets, deal with chronic offenders, and provide truly compassionate recovery and treatment where it is needed.
“Instead of getting people the help they need, the Liberals abandoned our communities to chaos,” Poilievre said. “Leaving people trapped by their addictions to live outdoors through Canadian winters, sick, malnourished, cold, wet and vulnerable is the furthest thing from compassionate.”
A Conservative government will also overhaul the Liberals’ dangerous pro-drug policies that have led to over 50,000 overdose deaths over the Lost Liberal Decade. Instead of flooding our streets with taxpayer-funded hard drugs, we will invest in recovery to break the cycle of despair and offer real hope.
Conservatives will allow judges to sentence offenders to mandatory treatment for addiction, and we will fund 50,000 addiction treatment spaces, ensuring that those struggling with substance use get the support they need to recover—because real compassion means helping people get better, not enabling their suffering.
In addition to these measures, Poilievre has a plan to end the soft-on-crime approach of the Lost Liberal Decade, end the chaos, and restore order and safety across Canada:
- Three-Strikes-and-You’re-Out Law: Individuals convicted of three serious offences will face a minimum prison term of 10 years and up to a life sentence, with no eligibility for bail, probation, parole, or house arrest.
- Mandatory Life Sentences: Life imprisonment for those convicted of five or more counts of human trafficking, importing or exporting ten or more illegal firearms, or trafficking fentanyl.
- Repeal of Bill C-75: Ending the Liberals’ catch-and-release policies to restore jail, not bail, for repeat violent offenders.
- New Offense for Intimate Partner Assault: Creation of a specific offense for assault of an intimate partner, with the strictest bail conditions for those accused, and ensuring that murder of an intimate partner, one’s own child, or a partner’s child is treated as first-degree murder.
- Consecutive Sentences for Repeat Violent Offenders: So there will no longer be sentencing discounts for multiple murderers.
Canadians can’t afford a fourth Liberal term of rising crime and chaos in our streets. We need a new Conservative government that will end the chaos, restore order on our streets and bring our loved ones home drug-free.
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
In Defeat, Joe Tay’s Campaign Becomes a Flashpoint for Suspected Voter Intimidation in Canada
-
Alberta2 days ago
Premier Danielle Smith responds to election of Liberal government
-
COVID-192 days ago
Freedom Convoy leaders’ sentencing judgment delayed, Crown wants them jailed for two years
-
Banks2 days ago
TD Bank Account Closures Expose Chinese Hybrid Warfare Threat
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Post election…the chips fell where they fell
-
Duane Rolheiser2 days ago
Carney Wins: What now Alberta?
-
Alberta2 days ago
Hours after Liberal election win, Alberta Prosperity Project drumming up interest in referendum
-
COVID-191 day ago
Canada’s health department warns COVID vaccine injury payouts to exceed $75 million budget