Bruce Dowbiggin
Suffer The Little Children: Getting Kids to Snitch Against Parents

The issue of trans rights has run red-hot for the past year. Pride Month (remember war veterans get only one day a year) has been a Trans festival of guilt and recrimination gleefully exploited by merchants of social reconstruction. Naked bikers, phallic symbols and raving advocates of gender dysphoria have been ubiquitous.
The peak may have come in NYC’s Pride Parade when some of the more militant began chanting “We’re here, we’re queer, we’re are coming for your children!” All in the service of the blend of self-pity and Marxist ideology that animates the Left these days.
Witness Star Trek’s @GeorgeTakei rationalizing naked bike riders approaching children in public— which used to get men arrested. “Even if there were no naked guys on bikes this year, the (Right) would find picture or generate them and push the same agenda anyway. There’s no ‘fixing’ this by calling for self-censoring.” Get out of jail free card.
Lost in this lecturing is the actual size of the @LGBTQ2 community— then and now. Polls show five percent of American adults under 30 now “identify” as trans. But five years ago, 0.6 percent of 18-29 year olds said they were trans. (Proving that claims people are born trans need updating.)
While trans theory is now gospel in North America, “in the last two years, England, Sweden, and Finland have all conducted rigorous scientific reviews of pediatric gender medicine and concluded the opposite,” says Compact magazine “… These countries—every one of them liberal—responded to their independent reviews by shuttering pediatric gender clinics, curtailing the availability of these medicines, restricting them to experimental settings, or banning them entirely.”
Not enlightened North Americans. Perhaps the most nefarious development in the trans hysteria gripping people (whose sophistication on trans issues five years was Priscilla Queen of the Desert) is the pressure to distance reluctant parents from decisions over the future of their children’s gender. In California a new bill directs family court judges to award custody based in part on “a parent’s affirmation of a child’s gender identity”.
Translation: if divorced parents disagree about a child’s genetic disposition judges are commanded to give custody to the parent who’s down with the gruesome butchery of “gender-affirming medicine”. So the California mania appoints teachers, sociologists and surgeons— not parents—as the ultimate decision-makers in the child’s development.
U.S. president Joe Biden paused long enough from his descent into senility to emphasize the state’s role. These are “not somebody else’s kids; they’re all our kids,” he said. This is the 2020s version of Hillary Clinton’s famous, “It takes a village to raise a child”. The message is not subtle. To the contemporary state, parents who reject gender ideology are abusers of children- and should be banished .
Children are being led to believe by schools and teachers unions that they can’t trust their parents with their personal decisions. Advocates of splitting the nuclear family cite a range of statistics on everything from parental abuse to incipient racism in the modern family that can only be rectified by a wise and politically correct adult.
But the debate over trans kids keeping secrets from parents hides the larger agenda. Namely the movement to create a snitch culture among the young who are being taught that you can’t trust parents. Trans is Step,1. Barring an unforeseen collapse of this hysteria, within five years progressive politicians and judges doing their bidding will be begging kids to rat out the folks on any number of issues.
Samples: “What did Mommy and Daddy say at dinner last night about the prime minister?” “What now-disgraced music and books (Huckleberry Finn/ Little Women) might they be keeping in your home?” “Do they harbour forbidden attitudes on race and gender?” Call 1-800-SQUEALING.
If all this seems dystopian, recall that Mao, revered by the Left, used children to create the Great Leap Forward in China. Children indoctrinated in state schools via Mao’s Little Red Book turned in (or killed) recalcitrant parents and leaders in an effort to purify the state. When that was done, an estimated 30 million were dead and the society was destroyed. The totalitarian regime in Cambodia also employed the naïve to root out anyone with views abhorrent to the state.
Tyrants like Mao and Pol Pot knew that someone who has faced down their fears is a threat to the state. That’s why One World apostles like Justin Trudeau keep launching a steady stream of crises— from trans to climate to COVID to rez school graves— to retain the whip hand. Self reliance— a free people— is their kryptonite.
So they’ll use almost anything— yes, the childhoods of innocent kids— to create social chaos. The only positive development: trans may be the breaking point, even for liberal wine moms who soaked up all the SJW manipulations so far. Splintering within the #LGBTQ movement suggests that perhaps the trans promoters have overreached. After their hard-won feminist gains, lesbians like Naomi Wolf and Martina Navratilova resent taking a back seat to the much-smaller trans part of their acronym.
The blowback against Bud Light, Target stores or Blackrock Investments hints at a sea change. Blackrock’s Larry Fink, the most aggressive CEO on ESG for corporations, had his fingers burned in Florida, losing $2 billion in a fight over state pension money with governor Ron DeSantis. So he’s now switching acronyms and looking for cover.
“The pendulum swung too far,” said Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.), arguing that asset managers have been too responsive to pressure from the left in recent years. He’s hoping all CEOs will see the light before the madness goes too far. Already the number of anti-ESG resolutions on corporate ballots between January 1 through May 31 rose by more than 400 percent from 2020 to 2023.
Good, because there’s not much time left before the forces of social craziness come for the children.
Sign up today for Not The Public Broadcaster newsletters. Hot takes/ cool slants on sports and current affairs. Have the latest columns delivered to your mail box. Tell your friends to join, too. Always provocative, always independent.
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, he’s a regular contributor to Sirius XM Canada Talks Ch. 167. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his new book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via http://brucedowbigginbooks.ca/book-personalaccount.aspx
Bruce Dowbiggin
Kirk’s Killing: Which Side Can Count on the Military’s Loyalty Now?

“After every armistice, you want to put us away in mothballs, like the fleet. When it comes to a little dying you’ll be sure to put us in a uniform…” Seven Days in May
In the 1964 political film Seven Days in May, a rogue Director of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff conspires to launch a coup against a failing president who’s just signed a nuclear disarmament treaty with the Soviets. The plot is uncovered by a Marine Corps colonel, and the coup is barely averted with all the conspirators apprehended.
In 1964 the notion that the loyalty of the military/ intelligence services might be compromised was a hot topic in the days afterJFK’s assassination. After calming down in the Reagan days— remember Woody Allen’s revolution spoof Bananas?— it has now returned.
How likely is a military/ intelligence coup? Loyalty of troops has been crucial in many coups and insurrections around the world. Famously the socialist regime of Salvador Allende was crushed in 1973 when the Chilean military staged a bloody coup. Allende and thousands were murdered as General Augusto Pinochet took over the country.
Still, the conceit in Western nations has always been “It can’t happen here”. The institutions of government are believed too strong and independent to allow themselves to be taken over by their militaries. The chattering classes prefer to see their military as Stanley Kubrick did in Dr. Strangelove— bumbling buffoons, lackeys led by General Buck Turgidson.

Certainly in Canada, where successive Liberal government culminated with Justin Trudeau, the Kubrick model is closer to reality. DEI hiring, cuts to budgets and a slavish reliance on America to protect Canada for free have produced a Canadian military with more in common with HMS Pinafore than Vimy Ridge. From the world’s third-largest navy in 1945, Canada is now a boat that can’t float.
But something seems to have changed with the Tuesday murder of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. It seems a massive provocation by people who want to destroy the American society. It’s not helped by the voices on the Left claiming he brought it on himself with hate speech. @punishedmother “Maybe Charlie Kirk shouldn’t have spent years being a hateful demagogic fascist and this wouldn’t have happened. Maybe he should take some personal responsibility.It will take careful leadership to prevent this boiling over.”
This growing intolerance between the political sides exposed yet again by Kirk’s assassination has made people consider the Armed Forces’ loyalty in a crisis. As in, who has it? (In pacifist Canada the current clash of cultures is that support of the military might be necessary in resisting the conservative right. Despite Bill C-23 disarming Canadians the unarmed Left might face a large, well-armed rightwing population brandishing weapons.)
In a divided America think of Tom Cruise’s JAG character in A Few Good Men confronting hardened Marine commandant played by Jack Nicholson— and you have the conflict. “You can’ t take the truth!” Fighting generals are a thing of the past when Democrats are in power. Successive presidents have used DEI to create desk generals and commanders who reflect good taste over good planning.

This DEI mission creep in the military was one of Donald Trump’s strongest planks in defeating hapless Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Canadian Liberals, meanwhile, managed to dodge their pathetic defence shortcomings only by making the 2025 election all about Trump and a 51st state, not defence or Chinese influence.
There has been evidence that some at the highest levels of the U.S. military, CIA and FBI have already shown a bias toward Democrats. In the waning days of Trump 45 Chief of Staff Mark Milley told the Chinese leadership— America’s No. 1 global rival— that he would personally tip them off if Trump launched a surprise attack on China.
In another time (or movie) Milley’s treachery would been seen as treasonous, punishable by a life in the stockade or, possibly, execution. In the hands of the DC Media Party, however, Milley’s partisan gambit was buried in the run-up to the 2020 election. As with the concurrent Hunter Biden laptop scandal, the story was made to disappear in a welter of Trump demonization and legal harassment
Now we must wonder again. Sadly for Harris, Milley and Team Obama, the Democrats were thrashed by the Trump agenda. POTUS 45—now 47— quickly began replacing lifetime loyalists in the military and bureaucrats, stifling for now the urge to purge,
Again this scenario was unthinkable a generation ago, a plot in a movie. But the governments of Barack Obama and Joe Biden (Trudeau in Canada) have created a social schism that has turned politics into a blood sport. As we know there were two attempts on Trump in the election campaign by deranged radicals. The defeated Democrats’ obsession over who controls the Supreme Court and Congress in Trump’s presidency, the repeated comparisions to Hitler, are producing greater and more strident anything-is-accepted calls from the radical Left to take to the streets and pursue civil disobedience.
In Canada Mark Carney’s Elbows Up gambit is dissipating rapidly since the election, producing active discussion of separation in Alberta and Quebec (again). This raises questions about what the military might do in the aftermath of a vote by either side to leave Canada. Might they intervene? Would they stand aside? Will tanks roll to protect a Carney Canada?
No doubt Charlie Kirk’s death will be mobilized by both sides in their appeals for the loyalty of the military should a civil war break out in the U.S. Get your generals in a row. MSNBC’s Jen Psaki has declared Trump’s tribute to Kirk “an escalation” Says legal expert Jonathan Turley, “We are already at political assassinations, so I am not sure how much more room for escalation there may be for Psaki or MSNBC.”
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, his new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
Bruce Dowbiggin
Ken Dryden: Hockey’s Diogenes. He Called Them As He Saw Them

There is much talk about the Canadian identity in these days of mass immigration , diversity and refusal to integrate. The 1970s were a simpler time for such rumination on culture, however. Riding the new global identity of Pierre Trudeau (soon to be regretted), the times were fired by the 1972 hockey summit win by Canada over the Soviet Union.
The series contained many of the self-held perceptions of the nation. Plucky underdog. Tenacious competitor in global affairs. Limitless possibilities. All seemingly rolled up into two weeks 53 years ago this month. Many of these notions were still manifest in the 2025 federal election when Boomers had a conniption fit over Donald Trump and withdrew into their Elbows Up phase.
So it should come as no surprise that one of the stars of that 1972 team was goalie Ken Dryden. While not being dominant throughout against the shifty Soviets, Dryden peaked at the right moments (in tandem with Tony Esposito) to snatch the eight-game series at absolutely the final possible moment.

It’s hardly an exaggeration that, while a number of the Canadian players lost their minds in the tense fortnight, Dryden carried himself with cool dignity. There were no Phil Esposito jeremiads. Not Jean Paul Parisé stick wielding. No Bobby Clare two-handers to the ankles of his opponents. Just the emerging figure of the lanky goalie resting his chin on his stick as he waited in the net for Kharlamov and Yakushev.
For the generation that watched him develop he was likely the quintessential modern Canadian. Son of a charitable community figure. Educated in the Ivy League. Obtained his law degree. Served as a federal cabinet minister. Author of several definitive hockey books (The Game is perhaps the best sports non-fiction in the English language). Executive of the Toronto Maple Leafs. And more.
He was on the American telecast of the 1980 U.S. Miracle On Ice at Lake Placid. And the radio broadcast of the 1976 Canada Cup. Ubiquitous media source. Loyal to Canada. And crucially, a son, husband, father and grandfather. If you’d created a model for the citizen of Canada of his times it was Ken.
He could be cranky and verbose, yes. His books often took issue with the state of the modern game. Concussions. The Trap. Excessive goalie pads. But his defining moment may have come in 1973 when, upset with Sam Pollock’s contract offer, he left the Montreal Canadiens to finish his law degree in Toronto. It’s important to note that his reputation at the time was a goalie carried by the Jean Beliveau super teams. Yet the Canadiens allowed 56 more goals in the 1973–74 season than they had the year before with Dryden. Plus they lost in the semifinals after winning the Cup the previous spring. Karma.
When he returned the Habs ripped off four consecutive Stanley Cups. Phil Esposito praised him as that “f’ing giraffe” who stole at least two Cups from the Bruins. He retired for good in 1979, and the Canadiens didn’t win another Cup till 1986. Which enhanced his reputation. His combination of tenacity, independence and integrity made him many fans. And launched a generation of goalies who broke the mould.

So his passing in the year that Boomers exercised their cultural privilege one last time is a fitting codicil to an era that held so much promise and has ended in a lost culture and renewed talk of separation in Quebec and Alberta. Many have emotional memories of Dryden, and social media has exploded with them on the news Friday of his death at 78.
For us, our quintessential Dryden moment came in 2001 at the NHL Draft. We were working for the Calgary Herald, he was an executive with the Maple Leafs. As we arrived at the Miami airport in a torrential rainstorm who was standing in the car rental lobby but the unmistakable No. 29? As fellow authors, we’d met many times, and we had quoted him so often we can’t count the times. So there was no fan-boy encounter.
This day he was a lost soul whose car rental had fallen through. Could we give him a ride to the media hotel? Sure. The company was welcome. As we rolled along though the pelting rain, searching for the right highway (this was pre-Waze) we talked about family and background. How were my kids? How was his wife now that he was hearing it from Maple Leafs fans?
Above the machine-gunning of the rain we then pivoted to hockey. He wanted to know what was going on with the Flames (they were mediocre at the time). And he wanted to talk about the state of trap hockey which was then choking the art of the game. Where was the beauty, the artistry in a league dumbed-down by clutch ‘n grab?
After chatting and squinting through the sheets of rain for 45 minutes we finally arrived at the hotel in Sunrise. As we walked into the lobby Ken thanked us for the ride and gave us $40 for gas. Media colleagues watching the scene were flabbergasted. Ken had a reputation as being frugal, and here he’d readily given me $40! U.S.! What could this mean? Did we get as scoop they’d have to chase. Ken blandly shooed them away, saying he had to check in.
We didn’t get a hot tip on a story. But we did get several gems to use in our next book Money Players, a finalist for the 2004 Canadian Business Book of the year. We meant to thank him for the material. Somehow the moment was never right. Now we won’t get that chance.
We might say the same for Canada. Somehow the moment was never right. Now we won’t get that chance. RIP Ken.
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, his new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
-
Crime1 day ago
Former NYPD Inspector Breaks Down How Charlie Kirk’s Shooter Will Be Caught
-
Crime1 day ago
Surveillance video shows Charlie Kirk’s killer slipping away moments after shooting
-
Crime1 day ago
Arrest made in Charlie Kirk assassination
-
Crime2 days ago
FBI offering $100,000 reward for information leading to arrest of Charlie Kirk Assassin
-
Censorship Industrial Complex2 days ago
UK’s top cop wants to ‘stop policing tweets’: report
-
Alberta2 days ago
Equalization program disincentivizes provinces from improving their economies
-
Crime24 hours ago
“Hey fascist! Catch!”: Authorities confirm writing on alleged Kirk killer’s bullet casings
-
COVID-191 day ago
The Persecution of Canada’s “Other” Freedom Convoy Truckers