Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

Business

Plan to delay federal budget makes it harder for Canadians to track spending and debt

Published

4 minute read

From the Fraser Institute

By Jake Fuss and Grady Munro

Although Parliament is set to return next week for the first time in more than five months, Canadians are being asked for even more patience when it comes to a federal budget.

Last week, after conflicting messages from his finance minister, Prime Minister Mark Carney said his government will table a budget in the fall. While this is better than the government’s original plan to punt the budget into 2026, it’s still a long time to wait. Past federal governments have been able to quickly turn around a budget following an election. There’s no simply no reason why the government can’t deliver a budget within the next few months. Clearly, fiscal transparency and accountability are not high priorities for the Carney government.

While the federal government is not legislatively required to release a budget in the spring—spending is functionally approved in Parliament through periodic votes (the next vote is scheduled for June)—the budget provides a comprehensive and accessible outline of federal spending, taxing and borrowing plans now and for the coming years. In other words, an annual budget is a critically important financial and democratic document that informs Canadians on their government’s fiscal plan.

Budgets also help the public hold the government accountable to its campaign commitments. Without a budget, it’s virtually impossible for Canadians to know whether or not the government is actually staying true to its promises. For instance, the Carney government could run bigger deficits and accumulate more debt than promised, but Canadians would have little way of knowing. This only adds to the uncertainty around the government’s plan for certain key areas of policy—contradicting Prime Minister Carney’s promise of an “action-oriented” government that moves quickly.

The budget also allows parliamentarians to understand how the estimates and policies they vote on will impact the state of federal finances. For instance, the Carney government plans to cut income taxes, which will have a big impact on government finances. But without a timely budget, parliamentarians may not have the necessary information to make informed decisions on behalf of their constituents. Incidentally, the Trudeau government delayed the release of important fiscal documents to push off bad news until it garners less attention from the media and the public, and there’s reason to believe the Carney government is doing the same thing now.

The Liberal election platform—which currently provides the only indication of the new government’s fiscal plan—promises higher spending, larger deficits and more debt than the Trudeau government had planned in its last fiscal update. This flies in the face of Prime Minister Carney’s promise of a “very different approach” to fiscal policy. The Carney government also plans to split federal spending into two separate budgets: an operating budget and capital budget. This will further reduce government transparency by making it more difficult to identify the actual size of the deficit, while also giving the government leeway to get creative with its accounting.

Prime Minister Carney promised a new responsible approach to government finances. However, he’s off to a poor start on delivering this promise.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Business

Bill would prevent congressional members from trading stocks

Published on

From The Center Square

By

U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Arizona, has co-introduced a bill to prevent members of Congress from trading stocks.

The Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act requires all members of Congress, their spouses and dependent children to put their stocks in a qualified blind trust or divest the holding. In doing so, Kelly’s office said this ensures members and their family members cannot use inside information to influence trades and profit off those transactions.

“As Americans work hard to keep up with rising costs, the last thing they should have to worry about is whether their elected representatives are using inside information to make a quick buck,” said Kelly in a press release. “This isn’t rocket science; the only way to stop insider trading in Congress is to stop members of Congress from trading stocks. Period.”

Kelly said he believes he already has the support of the American people.

Pointing to a survey by the Program for Public Consultation at the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy, Kelly said 86% of Americans back such a measure. That includes 88% of Democrats, 87% of Republicans and 81% of Independents.

“Fixing this would go a long way toward restoring trust — and fixing what’s broken in Washington,” said Kelly.

U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Georgia, also introduced the bill. Ossoff said members of congress have “extraordinary access to confidential information” at the same time they are making federal policy. Because of this, Ossoff said members of Congress should not be playing the stock market.

“Stock trading by members of Congress massively erodes public confidence in Congress and creates a serious appearance of impropriety, which is why we should ban stock trading by members of Congress altogether,” said Ossoff.

The bill is co-sponsored by Senators Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisconsin, Jeanne Shaheen, D-New Hampshire, Raphael Warnock, D-Georgia, and Michael Bennet, D-Colorado. Bennett, who is The Center Square for governor of Colorado, said it is “common-sense legislation.”

Kelly has already placed his assets in qualified blind trusts, released his official Senate schedule and refused corporate PAC contributions for his campaign.

Continue Reading

Business

Big Pharma company Regeneron buys 23andMe, set to acquire genetic data of millions

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

Regeneron said it will act ethically when it acquires data on 15 million Americans from 23andMe.

A Big Pharma company will acquire genetic data on 15 million people after purchasing DNA testing company 23andMe in a bankruptcy auction.

“Drugmaker Regeneron Pharmaceuticals will buy genetic testing firm 23andMe for $256 million through a bankruptcy auction,” CNN reported.

“Regeneron said it will comply with 23andMe’s privacy policies and applicable laws with respect to the use of customer data and that it is ready to detail its intended use of the data to a court-appointed overseer,” the news outlet reported.

23andMe already suffered a privacy breach of its sensitive genetic information.

While Regeneron said it will protect data, many people may still have concerns.

Users wishing to delete their genetic data can do so, according to California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who issued a “consumer alert” when 23andMe first filed for bankruptcy in March. He explained how people can log into their account and delete their data.

Continue Reading

Trending

X