New survey finds nearly half of Canadians are only $200 from financial ruin

MNP Consumer Debt Index survey indicates that 46% of Canadians are close to financial devastation after years of Justin Trudeau’s policies led to high inflation.

Hot off the heels of a report that Canada’s poverty rate increased for the first time in years due to high inflation spurred by government spending, a new poll shows that nearly half of Canadians are only $200 from complete financial ruin.

According to the MNP Consumer Debt Index survey, which was conducted by Ipsos and released on July 22, 46 percent of Canadians are a few hundred dollars away from not being able to meet their financial obligations.

“Some individuals are living paycheque to paycheque, struggling to make ends meet and cover day-to-day necessities. Others are so deeply indebted that their financial challenges won’t be manageable, regardless of interest rates,” noted Grant Bazian, president of MNP LTD, in the press release.

“Canadians may have hoped for a more significant cut to interest rates or to experience a quicker impact from the reduction.”

Bazian noted that “With the prices of many daily necessities still high, many have not seen the meaningful decrease in their monthly expenses needed to ease their financial burdens.”

According to MNP, Canada’s Consumer Debt Index “has dropped to 85 points, down six points from the previous quarter.”

The survey showed that about one-in-three Canadians, or 29 percent, indicated they can’t cover bill payments, with people who are about $1 to $20 from insolvency increasing by 3 points.

The province with the highest rise in financial duress is Alberta, with about 47 percent of Albertans saying they are just $200 from complete financial ruin.

In June, LifeSiteNews reported that despite decades of progress in lowering the poverty rate in Canada has been wiped out in the last few years under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government, one of his own federal departments has reported.

Under Trudeau, due to excessive COVID money printing, inflation has skyrocketed.

LifeSiteNews reported that fast-rising food costs in Canada have led to many people feeling a sense of “hopelessness and desperation” with nowhere to turn for help, according to the Canadian government’s own National Advisory Council on Poverty.

In 2021, Canada’s Parliament raised the federal debt borrowing amount by a whopping 56 percent under the Borrowing Authority Act. The amount went from $1.168 trillion to $1.831 trillion.

Previously speaking to LifeSiteNews, Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) federal director Franco Terrazzano urged the Trudeau government to cut spending, balance the budget and “completely scrap” the “carbon tax.”

In January, the National Advisory Council on Poverty (NACP) observed to Parliament that fast-rising food costs have led to many people feeling a sense of “hopelessness and desperation.”

Related Topics:#AnthonyMurdoch #CanadaInflation #LifeSiteNews CanadiansDebt MNPConsumerDebtIndex

Up Next

Biden explains why he dropped out of presidential race

Don't Miss

Trudeau gov’t increases funding for residential school ‘grave’ search despite no bodies being found

Todayville

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Looks like the Liberals don’t support their own Pipeline MOU

Alberta / 3 hours ago

They never wanted a pipeline! – Deputy Conservative Leader Melissa Lantsman

Business / 3 hours ago

Canada Can Finally Profit From LNG If Ottawa Stops Dragging Its Feet

Business

Looks like the Liberals don’t support their own Pipeline MOU

Published on December 9, 2025

Todayville

From Pierre Poilievre

Business

Canada Can Finally Profit From LNG If Ottawa Stops Dragging Its Feet

Published on December 9, 2025

Todayville

From the Frontier Centre for Public Policy

By Ian Madsen

Canada’s growing LNG exports are opening global markets and reducing dependence on U.S. prices, if Ottawa allows the pipelines and export facilities needed to reach those markets

Canada’s LNG advantage is clear, but federal bottlenecks still risk turning a rare opening into another missed opportunity

Canada is finally in a position to profit from global LNG demand. But that opportunity will slip away unless Ottawa supports the pipelines and export capacity needed to reach those markets.

Most major LNG and pipeline projects still need federal impact assessments and approvals, which means Ottawa can delay or block them even when provincial and Indigenous governments are onside. Several major projects are already moving ahead, which makes Ottawa’s role even more important.

The Ksi Lisims floating liquefaction and export facility near Prince Rupert, British Columbia, along with the LNG Canada terminal at Kitimat, B.C., Cedar LNG and a likely expansion of LNG Canada, are all increasing Canada’s export capacity. For the first time, Canada will be able to sell natural gas to overseas buyers instead of relying solely on the U.S. market and its lower prices.

These projects give the northeast B.C. and northwest Alberta Montney region a long-needed outlet for its natural gas. Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing made it possible to tap these reserves at scale. Until 2025, producers had no choice but to sell into the saturated U.S. market at whatever price American buyers offered. Gaining access to world markets marks one of the most significant changes for an industry long tied to U.S. pricing.

According to an International Gas Union report, “Global liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade grew by 2.4 per cent in 2024 to 411.24 million tonnes, connecting 22 exporting markets with 48 importing markets.” LNG still represents a small share of global natural gas production, but it opens the door to buyers willing to pay more than U.S. markets.

LNG Canada is expected to export a meaningful share of Canada’s natural gas when fully operational. Statistics Canada reports that Canada already contributes to global LNG exports, and that contribution is poised to rise as new facilities come online.

Higher returns have encouraged more development in the Montney region, which produces more than half of Canada’s natural gas. A growing share now goes directly to LNG Canada.

Canadian LNG projects have lower estimated break-even costs than several U.S. or Mexican facilities. That gives Canada a cost advantage in Asia, where LNG demand continues to grow.

Asian LNG prices are higher because major buyers such as Japan and South Korea lack domestic natural gas and rely heavily on imports tied to global price benchmarks. In June 2025, LNG in East Asia sold well above Canadian break-even levels. This price difference, combined with Canada’s competitive costs, gives exporters strong margins compared with sales into North American markets.

The International Energy Agency expects global LNG exports to rise significantly by 2030 as Europe replaces Russian pipeline gas and Asian economies increase their LNG use. Canada is entering the global market at the right time, which strengthens the case for expanding LNG capacity.

As Canadian and U.S. LNG exports grow, North American supply will tighten and local prices will rise. Higher domestic prices will raise revenues and shrink the discount that drains billions from Canada’s economy.

Canada loses more than $20 billion a year because of an estimated $20-per-barrel discount on oil and about $2 per gigajoule on natural gas, according to the Frontier Centre for Public Policy’s energy discount tracker. Those losses appear directly in public budgets. Higher natural gas revenues help fund provincial services, health care, infrastructure and Indigenous revenue-sharing agreements that rely on resource income.

Canada is already seeing early gains from selling more natural gas into global markets. Government support for more pipelines and LNG export capacity would build on those gains and lift GDP and incomes. Ottawa’s job is straightforward. Let the industry reach the markets willing to pay.

Ian Madsen is a senior policy analyst at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.