From the Fraser Institute

By Mackenzie Moir

It’s unusual to see a provincial government take on health-care reform. But not so in Alberta, where major reforms have been underway for almost a year. The province has long struggled with lengthy waits for non-emergency care and a majority (58 per cent) of Albertans last year were unsatisfied with the government’s handling of health care.

And who could blame them?

The median wait last year in Alberta was 19.2 weeks to see a specialist (after getting a referral from a family doctor) followed by the same amount of time to receive treatment. This combined 38.4-week wait marked the longest delay for non-emergency care in Alberta since data were first published more than 30 years ago. Also last year, an estimated 208,000 patients waited for care in Alberta. These waits are not benign and can result in prolonged pain and discomfort, psychological distress, and can impact our ability to work and earn money.

In fact, according to our new study, last year health-care wait times in Alberta cost patients $778 million—or more than $3,700 per-patient waiting. This estimate, however, doesn’t include leisure time after work or on weekends. When this time was included in the calculation, the total cost of these waits balloons to more than $2.3 billion or around $11,000 per patient.

Again, to its credit, the Smith government has not shied away from reform. It’s reorganized one of province’s largest employers (Alberta Health Services) with the goal of improving health-care delivery, it plans to change how hospitals are funded to deliver more care, and it continues to contract out publicly funded surgeries to private clinics. Here, the government should look at expanding, based on the success the Saskatchewan Surgical Initiative (SSI), which helped increase that province’s surgical capacity by delivering publicly funded surgeries through private clinics and shortened the median health-care wait from 26.5 weeks in 2010 to 14.2 weeks by 2014.

The SSI also “pooled” referrals in Saskatchewan together and allowed patients to choose which specialist they wanted to see for treatment, and patients received estimates of how long they would wait before choosing.

In Alberta, however, family doctors still refer patients to one specific specialist at a time yet remain potentially unaware of other appropriate doctors with shorter waits. But if Alberta also put specialist wait lists and referrals into one list, and provided updated wait times information, a family doctor could help patients choose a specialist with a shorter wait time. Or better yet, if Albertans could access that information online with an Alberta health card, they could make that decision on their own while working with their family doctor.

Make no mistake, change is in the air for health care in Alberta. And while key policy changes are now underway, the Smith government should consider more options while this window for reform remains open.

From LifeSiteNews

By Emily Mangiaracina

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. criticized the WHO for suppressing reports of human transmission of COVID-19 and promoting the ‘fiction’ that the virus came from bats and not a biolab.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. slammed the World Health Organization (WHO) as a compromised institution that has capitulated to Chinese political interests in a Tuesday video address to the WHO’s governing body.

Months after President Donald Trump’s withdrawal of the United States from the WHO, the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary called out the WHO for its control by China, its mismanagement of the COVID outbreak, and its lack of transparency.

“Like many legacy institutions, the WHO has become mired in bureaucratic bloat, entrenched paradigms, conflicts of interest, and international power politics,” Kennedy said Tuesday.

“While the United States has provided the lion’s share of the organization’s funding historically, other countries such as China have exerted undue influence over its operations in ways that serve their own interests and not particularly the interests of the global public.”

This “became obvious,” said Kennedy, during the COVID outbreak, when the WHO suppressed reports of human transmission of COVID-19 “under pressure from China,” and helped “promote the fiction” that the virus came from bats and not from “Chinese government-sponsored” work at a biolab in Wuhan.

“Not only has the WHO capitulated to political pressure from China, it’s also failed to maintain an organization characterized by transparency and fair governance by and for its Member States,” Kennedy continued. “The WHO often acts like it has forgotten that its members must remain accountable to their own citizens and not to transnational or corporate interests.”

Kennedy criticized the international body for failing to uphold its purpose of promoting public health in other ways, such as pushing “harmful gender ideology” and the agenda of “corporate medicine” in general.

Kennedy went on to note that far from reforming itself, the WHO has “doubled down” on its mistakes, such as by adopting a “pandemic agreement” to regulate countries’ responses to future pandemics.

Kennedy highlighted the U.S. health system’s new focus on “chronic health issues” as a model for health policy, citing his department’s move to remove harmful dyes and additives from food, investigate autism and other chronic illnesses, and reduce the “consumption of ultra-processed foods.”

“I urge the world’s health ministers and the WHO to take our withdrawal from the organization as a wake-up call,” Kennedy exhorted.