Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

Energy

How to realize Canada’s ambitions as an energy superpower

Published

10 minute read

From Resource Works

By 

“We are not in an era of energy transition — we are in an era of energy addition”

If Prime Minister Mark Carney is to make good on his promise to make Canada an energy superpower that includes oil and gas, Alberta and B.C. will clearly need to be in the vanguard. But how can Canada accomplish energy superpower status in an era of energy transition and decarbonization — with its attendant promise of peak oil and gas — increasingly strained relations with Canada’s biggest energy trade partner — the U.S. — and domestic regulatory strangulation that has soured Canada’s investment climate? These were some of the topics explored Tuesday morning at the Global Energy Show Canada in Calgary, which organizers said was expected to draw 30,000 attendees. Briefly, the answer to these challenges is that the U.S. will remain a key partner in energy trade, despite Donald Trump’s best efforts to sour U.S.-Canada relations, global demand for oil and gas will continue to grow, and Canada just needs to get out of its own way through deregulation.”There is no peak in oil demand on the horizon,” said Haitham al Ghais, former secretary-general for OPEC. As for liquefied natural gas, Shell Canada president Stastia West said Shell is forecasting 60% growth in demand for LNG, with B.C. now poised to become a significant player. Should all proposed LNG projects and expansions in B.C. get financed, by 2030, Canada will have joined the ranks of a major players in the LNG sector.

B.C.’s two large LNG projects — LNG Canada and Ksi Lisims — and three smaller ones (Cedar, Woodfibre and Tilbury) would produce about 47.5 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). That represents about 28% of the 170 million MPTA of new LNG supply expected to come onto markets by 2030, according to Shell’s 2025 LNG outlook. Despite its raw energy abundance, Canada is emerging from a decade of self-doubt and squelched investment opportunities, driven in no small part by the notion that oil and gas is a sunset industry.

Global Energy Show 2025- Canada energy superpower
Global Energy Show 2025- Canada energy superpower

A global push for an energy transition presumed that the demand for conventional energy would decline. But as a number of speakers noted Tuesday, the role of renewable energy in the “energy transition” is turning out to be additive, not subtractive. Investment in renewables will continue to gain momentum, but not at the expense of conventional oil and gas. “We are not in an era of energy transition — we are in an era of energy addition,” said Clay Sell of X-Energy, a small modular reactor developer. All forms of energy will need to grow, he said, to meet the growing demand for energy. AI alone promises to be a huge new driver of energy demand.

Just four years ago, the International Energy Agency (IEA) pronounced that no new major investments in oil and gas development would be needed, based on net-zero commitments made by Paris Agreement signatories. Al Ghais said OPEC members had noted “serious concern” with the IEA’s “flip-flopping” in its forecasts, noting that, in recent months, the IEA’s executive director “once again stressed the importance of oil industry investments.” “We forecast that global primary energy demand is going to increase by a staggering 24% from now to 2050,” all Ghais said, adding that oil is expected to remain 30% of the energy mix in 2050. “Simply put, ladies and gentlemen, there is no peak in oil demand on the horizon,” al Ghais said. “The fact that oil demand keeps rising, hitting new records year on year, is a clear example. Our projections are that oil demand will surpass 120 million barrels a day by 2050.” He said cumulative investments in the oil sector are expected to total US$17.4 trillion between now and 2050. He added Alberta is well poised to meet some of that demand with lower emission oil, thanks to its leadership in carbon capture and storage.

“Innovation will be critical in assisting this industry in reducing greenhouse gas emissions going forward,” he said. “Canada has been at the forefront of carbon capture utilization and storage. “Alberta specifically is a global leader in harnessing this technology, and the province has extensive energy infrastructure and subsurface geological storage for CCUS.” Gaining and holding market share in a growing market is one of the big challenges for Canada. Its closest energy trade partner has become increasingly hostile, with U.S. President Donald Trump claiming the U.S. does not need Canadian oil and gas. Given that about 90% of Canada’s oil and gas exports currently go to the U.S, that could be a problem — if it were true.

Haitham Al Ghais at the Global Energy Show 2025
Haitham Al Ghais at the Global Energy Show 2025- NB

Jon McKenzie, CEO of Cenovus Energy, said Canada should try to diversify Canada’s energy markets, but said it also needs to preserve its relations with the U.S. The two countries are simply too integrated to sever ties. “The reality is we are hard-wired into the U.S. system,” McKenzie said. “What we really need to do is be the adult in the room as these discussions continue. Because President Trump says he doesn’t need Canadian oil and gas, that doesn’t make it true. They need our oil and gas as much today as they have over the prior decades.” And increasingly, other countries will need Canadian oil and gas as well, underscoring the need for export infrastructure, like pipelines.B.C. is well-positioned to capture the Asia market for natural gas through LNG exports.

This summer, Canada will begin exporting LNG to Asia, as LNG Canada in Kitimat is commissioned. Shell’s 2025 LNG outlook notes investment in various natural gas infrastructure in India and China — new connections to the gas grid, regasification facilities and LNG fueling for heavy duty trucking — are driving demand growth for natural gas. While the outlook forecasts demand for LNG in Europe, Japan and South Korea will peak around 2035 and begin to decline, it forecasts demand growth in China, India and other parts of Asia, as well as growth overall in the marine sector through fuel switching. “Our view of demand growth is up to 60% by 2040,” said Stastia West, Canadian president and country chair of Shell Canada.

The billion-dollar question on many minds in B.C. is whether the partners in LNG Canada will pull the trigger on a final investment decision for a Phase 2 expansion, and whether the Ksi Lisims LNG project north of Prince Rupert will be approved and financed. Shell is one of the five partners in LNG Canada. Asked what the timelines might be for an FID on Phase 2, West said that decision depends on competitiveness, affordability and “stakeholder needs.”

“At the end of the day, for us at Shell…it will depend on how that decision fits into the portfolio of opportunities that we have ahead of us to make decisions on at the time. But I think we’re excited about the opportunity, and we’re happy with how all of that is progressing.”

While there has been an encouraging vibe shift in Canada for the oil and gas sectors, barriers to investment in energy remain. Some of the barriers cited Tuesday include Bill C-69, oil and gas emissions caps, a West Coast oil tanker ban, and provincial opposition to new oil and gas pipelines. Lisa Baiton, CEO of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), offered a prescription for regulatory bottlenecks. “Let’s get out of our own way here in Canada,” she said.

Alberta

Albertans need clarity on prime minister’s incoherent energy policy

Published on

From the Fraser Institute

By Tegan Hill

The new government under Prime Minister Mark Carney recently delivered its throne speech, which set out the government’s priorities for the coming term. Unfortunately, on energy policy, Albertans are still waiting for clarity.

Prime Minister Carney’s position on energy policy has been confusing, to say the least. On the campaign trail, he promised to keep Trudeau’s arbitrary emissions cap for the oil and gas sector, and Bill C-69 (which opponents call the “no more pipelines act”). Then, two weeks ago, he said his government will “change things at the federal level that need to be changed in order for projects to move forward,” adding he may eventually scrap both the emissions cap and Bill C-69.

His recent cabinet appointments further muddied his government’s position. On one hand, he appointed Tim Hodgson as the new minister of Energy and Natural Resources. Hodgson has called energy “Canada’s superpower” and promised to support oil and pipelines, and fix the mistrust that’s been built up over the past decade between Alberta and Ottawa. His appointment gave hope to some that Carney may have a new approach to revitalize Canada’s oil and gas sector.

On the other hand, he appointed Julie Dabrusin as the new minister of Environment and Climate Change. Dabrusin was the parliamentary secretary to the two previous environment ministers (Jonathan Wilkinson and Steven Guilbeault) who opposed several pipeline developments and were instrumental in introducing the oil and gas emissions cap, among other measures designed to restrict traditional energy development.

To confuse matters further, Guilbeault, who remains in Carney’s cabinet albeit in a diminished role, dismissed the need for additional pipeline infrastructure less than 48 hours after Carney expressed conditional support for new pipelines.

The throne speech was an opportunity to finally provide clarity to Canadians—and specifically Albertans—about the future of Canada’s energy industry. During her first meeting with Prime Minister Carney, Premier Danielle Smith outlined Alberta’s demands, which include scrapping the emissions cap, Bill C-69 and Bill C-48, which bans most oil tankers loading or unloading anywhere on British Columbia’s north coast (Smith also wants Ottawa to support an oil pipeline to B.C.’s coast). But again, the throne speech provided no clarity on any of these items. Instead, it contained vague platitudes including promises to “identify and catalyse projects of national significance” and “enable Canada to become the world’s leading energy superpower in both clean and conventional energy.”

Until the Carney government provides a clear plan to address the roadblocks facing Canada’s energy industry, private investment will remain on the sidelines, or worse, flow to other countries. Put simply, time is up. Albertans—and Canadians—need clarity. No more flip flopping and no more platitudes.

Tegan Hill

Tegan Hill

Director, Alberta Policy, Fraser Institute
Continue Reading

Canadian Energy Centre

Cross-Canada economic benefits of the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline project

Published on

From the Canadian Energy Centre

Billions in government revenue and thousands of jobs across provinces

Announced in 2006, the Northern Gateway project would have built twin pipelines between Bruderheim, Alta. and a marine terminal at Kitimat, B.C.

One pipeline would export 525,000 barrels per day of heavy oil from Alberta to tidewater markets. The other would import 193,000 barrels per day of condensate to Alberta to dilute heavy oil for pipeline transportation.

The project would have generated significant economic benefits across Canada.

Map courtesy Canada Energy Regulator

The following projections are drawn from the report Public Interest Benefits of the Northern Gateway Project (Wright Mansell Research Ltd., July 2012), which was submitted as reply evidence during the regulatory process.

Financial figures have been adjusted to 2025 dollars using the Bank of Canada’s Inflation Calculator, with $1.00 in 2012 equivalent to $1.34 in 2025.

Total Government Revenue by Region

Between 2019 and 2048, a period encompassing both construction and operations, the Northern Gateway project was projected to generate the following total government revenues by region (direct, indirect and induced):

British Columbia

  • Provincial government revenue: $11.5 billion
  • Federal government revenue: $8.9 billion
  • Total: $20.4 billion

Alberta

  • Provincial government revenue: $49.4 billion
  • Federal government revenue: $41.5 billion
  • Total: $90.9 billion

Ontario

  • Provincial government revenue: $1.7 billion
  • Federal government revenue: $2.7 billion
  • Total: $4.4 billion

Quebec

  • Provincial government revenue: $746 million
  • Federal government revenue: $541 million
  • Total: $1.29 billion

Saskatchewan

  • Provincial government revenue: $6.9 billion
  • Federal government revenue: $4.4 billion
  • Total: $11.3 billion

Other

  • Provincial government revenue: $1.9 billion
  • Federal government revenue: $1.4 billion
  • Total: $3.3 billion

Canada

  • Provincial government revenue: $72.1 billion
  • Federal government revenue: $59.4 billion
  • Total: $131.7 billion

Annual Government Revenue by Region

Over the period 2019 and 2048, the Northern Gateway project was projected to generate the following annual government revenues by region (direct, indirect and induced):

British Columbia

  • Provincial government revenue: $340 million
  • Federal government revenue: $261 million
  • Total: $601 million per year

Alberta

  • Provincial government revenue: $1.5 billion
  • Federal government revenue: $1.2 billion
  • Total: $2.7 billion per year

Ontario

  • Provincial government revenue: $51 million
  • Federal government revenue: $79 million
  • Total: $130 million per year

Quebec

  • Provincial government revenue: $21 million
  • Federal government revenue: $16 million
  • Total: $37 million per year

Saskatchewan

  • Provincial government revenue: $204 million
  • Federal government revenue: $129 million
  • Total: $333 million per year

Other

  • Provincial government revenue: $58 million
  • Federal government revenue: $40 million
  • Total: $98 million per year

Canada

  • Provincial government revenue: $2.1 billion
  • Federal government revenue: $1.7 billion
  • Total: $3.8 billion per year

Employment by Region

Over the period 2019 to 2048, the Northern Gateway Pipeline was projected to generate the following direct, indirect and induced full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs by region:

British Columbia

  • Annual average:  7,736
  • Total over the period: 224,344

Alberta

  • Annual average:  11,798
  • Total over the period: 342,142

Ontario

  • Annual average:  3,061
  • Total over the period: 88,769

Quebec

  • Annual average:  1,003
  • Total over the period: 29,087

Saskatchewan

  • Annual average:  2,127
  • Total over the period: 61,683

Other

  • Annual average:  953
  • Total over the period: 27,637

Canada

  • Annual average:  26,678
  • Total over the period: 773,662
Continue Reading

Trending

X