National
EXCLUSIVE: Charges Dropped Against Chinese Scientist in Vancouver Tied to Xi’s “Talents” Program and Canada’s Synthetic Drug Pipeline
																								
												
												
											The Bureau uncovers how a CCP-linked academic hired under China’s “Talents” plan evaded prosecution after allegedly being caught with precursors shipped from PRC
Canadian prosecutors have quietly dropped charges against a Chinese scientist in Vancouver accused of importing more than 100 kilograms of a narcotics precursor, raising serious questions about her connections to Chinese academic programs and networks suspected of links to espionage, foreign interference, and transnational crime, The Bureau has learned.
The 57-year-old chemist, referred to here as Dr. X due to the unusual termination of the case, has documented affiliations with Chinese institutions flagged for military research and intelligence collaboration. According to filings from a bio-pharmaceutical company with ties to the University of British Columbia that hired her to lead large-scale cannabinoid extraction, Dr. X was reportedly working within Canadian universities under Beijing’s “Talents” plan—a recruitment initiative expanded under President Xi Jinping and described by U.S. intelligence as a platform for espionage and dual-use technology transfer.
British Columbia court records confirm that Dr. X, a graduate of Zhejiang University—an institution associated with China’s Ministry of State Security—was charged in June 2022 with importing and exporting a controlled substance.
Sources familiar with the court file informed The Bureau that Dr. X was accused of importing over 100 kilograms of PMK ethyl glycidate, a synthetic chemical widely used in the production of MDMA (ecstasy). Dr. X was allegedly caught retrieving the shipment in Richmond, British Columbia.
The Bureau’s investigation into her international academic, corporate, and legal affiliations reveals links to suspects, residences, and shipping hubs in Vancouver associated with the Sam Gor syndicate—a sprawling transnational drug cartel including triad leaders based in Vancouver and Toronto, with documented ties to Chinese Communist Party–aligned foreign influence networks operating across North America.
Despite the gravity of the charges and over ten court appearances for Dr. X within three years, the Public Prosecution Service of Canada issued a stay of proceedings on March 31, 2025, quietly shelving the unreported case without public explanation.
“The Crown has an ongoing obligation to assess its cases to ensure they continue to meet the standard for prosecution,” a spokesperson for the prosecution service in Ottawa told The Bureau. “In this case, the Crown determined that the standard was no longer met and, in accordance with Section 579 of the Criminal Code, directed a stay of proceedings.”
The timing of the decision is troubling.
This year U.S. authorities have increasingly identified Vancouver as a global hub for precursor chemical smuggling and lab production for synthetic narcotics—including fentanyl, MDMA, and methamphetamine. The opaque dismissal of such a serious case raises urgent public interest concerns about legal failures, political reluctance, and Canada’s lack of enforcement tools to dismantle foreign-linked criminal networks operating across the nation with near-total impunity.
In a parallel case that sources say is linked to a major superlab investigation in British Columbia, stemming from U.S. DEA probes, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control in October 2023 sanctioned Vancouver-based businessman Bahman Djebelibak and his companies—Valerian Labs Inc. and Valerian Labs Distribution Corp.—for their alleged role in a China-based network trafficking precursors for fentanyl, methamphetamine, and MDMA.
According to Treasury, the Port Coquitlam firms were major clients of Jinhu Minsheng Pharmaceutical Machinery, a Chinese supplier of pill presses and dies used to manufacture counterfeit oxycodone tablets. Valerian Labs allegedly received shipments of methylamine hydrochloride, a chemical precursor for meth and MDMA.
Djebelibak has denied the allegations, stating that his companies legally produced health supplements under Health Canada licences.
The Bureau’s deeper investigation into Dr. X’s career reveals a complex web of institutional and corporate ties—spanning academic programs and research partnerships with universities in Ontario, Sweden, and the University of British Columbia, as well as a cluster of bio-pharma ventures in Vancouver, Oregon, and Suzhou, China.
Some of the most concerning connections emerge from a detailed review of filings from a now-delisted Canadian cannabinoid extraction company—referred to here as Company A. Once licensed by Health Canada, the firm was suspended from trading on Canadian stock exchanges amid a $50-million investment fraud scandal involving a Chinese family from West Vancouver, accused of operating illegal cannabis dispensaries in British Columbia and Ontario, with reported ties to organized crime.
A 2016 corporate filing shows that Company A appointed Dr. X as Director of Science and Technology, citing her portfolio of more than 20 patents and her work assisting manufacturers worldwide with securing financing, project evaluation, equipment procurement, and the design and construction of extraction facilities. The same filing disclosed that Dr. X was “currently appointed as overseas talent for the Chinese government” and identified her as an expert consultant for the Zhejiang University Innovation Research Institute.
Zhejiang University is designated high-risk in the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s Defence Universities Tracker, due to its links to military laboratories, cyber-espionage programs, and China’s defense industrial base. A 2012 U.S. Congressional report identified the university as a recipient of research funding from the Ministry of State Security (MSS), China’s sprawling civilian intelligence agency. The MSS is now widely described as the world’s most aggressive and expansive foreign interference entity, with an estimated hundreds of thousands of officers and affiliated operatives.
In 2013, U.S. officials arrested cancer researcher Huajun Zhao for attempting to send proprietary biomedical materials from the Medical College of Wisconsin to Zhejiang University—an alleged act of espionage.
Notably, Dr. X’s patent portfolio spans a broad range of technologies, including chemical extraction and separation for cannabinoid pill and vape applications, novel cancer research, and electroluminescent devices used in display technologies.
By 2017, Dr. X’s Vancouver-based Company A had partnered with a biotech and pharmaceutical firm in Suzhou, China, importing proprietary machinery and processing technology to its Vancouver facility. Internal documents outlined plans to process 50,000 kilograms of hemp biomass per day, with a 600-ton extraction plant under construction to produce 150 tons of purified CBD isolate annually for export to Europe, Asia, and Australia.
In an investor briefing that same year, Dr. X described the Suzhou equipment as “the only extraction technology capable of processing industrial-scale volumes” of hemp, capable of isolating its compounds to achieve high purity levels.
Also in that briefing, a clinical researcher and assistant professor from the University of British Columbia who had joined Company A’s board, stated: “We are eager to bring this technology to [Company A’s] lab to verify its capabilities.”
In 2018, Dr. X co-founded a nearly identical company outside Portland, Oregon, operating a hemp extraction facility licensed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture. The company, reportedly processing 1,000 kilograms of hemp biomass daily, is listed as a subsidiary of a Chinese biotechnology firm directed by Chinese nationals—raising further questions about cross-border chemical flows and Dr. X’s ongoing ties to Chinese pharmaceutical supply chains.
Further review of Company A’s board and Canadian court filings reveals that one director was a key business associate of a Richmond-based lawyer implicated in the RCMP’s largest-ever money laundering investigation, Project E-Pirate. That probe uncovered a vast underground banking network tied to the Sam Gor syndicate, which allegedly moved hundreds of millions—if not several billion—in drug proceeds through British Columbia government casinos, hundreds of Chinese bank accounts, and interconnected cash pools stretching across diaspora communities in Canada and Latin America.
Canada’s Border Blind Spot
The Bureau’s investigation into Dr. X’s case and related networks in British Columbia reveals a sweeping failure in Canada’s border controls and financial oversight of chemical precursor imports—an unchecked vulnerability that has drawn no acknowledgment or scrutiny from Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government, even as President Donald Trump threatens staggering trade tariffs and presses Ottawa to confront its role in the global fentanyl trade.
This regulatory vacuum has allowed Chinese, Mexican, and Iranian threat networks to exploit Vancouver as a global hub for narcotics precursor production and transshipment.
Official data underscores the scale of the problem. Between 2013 and 2018, Canada issued 11,774 Business Numbers (BNs) to Non-Resident Importers (NRIs)—foreign entities with no Canadian physical presence—representing a 75 percent increase in just five years. According to Canada Border Services Agency analysis, entities from China and Hong Kong accounted for 2,045 unauthorized registrations during that period.
While data beyond 2018 remains unpublished, expert sources told The Bureau that NRI-linked imports of precursor chemicals for fentanyl, MDMA, and methamphetamine have exploded since 2021. The volume of such imports flowing into Vancouver’s ports now far exceeds Canada’s domestic drug demand, indicating that exports to the U.S., Europe, Australia, and Japan are being routed through Canadian infrastructure tied to China’s narcotics supply chain.
CBSA reporting reveals widespread non-compliance, including false declarations, misclassification of goods, and undervaluation. Many Non-Resident Importer entities lack GST tax accounts, submit incomplete or fraudulent data, and fail to disclose beneficial ownership or corporate control—making criminal risk assessments virtually impossible.
These vulnerabilities mirror the same regulatory loopholes exploited by the Sam Gor syndicate and its casino and banking clients to penetrate Canadian-regulated financial systems with fraudulent identify filings.
With Canada’s border business number system routinely missing critical client information—and the Canada Border Services Agency unable to verify the legitimacy of foreign importers or their Canadian consignees—the border remains deeply porous. The result: foreign nationals can register companies in Canada and use them to import goods from abroad, often with little more than a proxy name and mailing address. In most cases, CBSA approval is a rubber-stamp process with no meaningful verification or follow-up.
Worsening the problem, several massive warehouse complexes in China have been granted special logistics status with North American shipping companies. These facilities consolidate shipments from multiple origins, re-label the cargo, and fly it directly to Canada. The consequence for Canadian law enforcement and border agents is stark: they are effectively blind to the true origin or contents of these packages.
National targeting centres in Ottawa do not flag these shipments until they are physically scanned at the Canada Border Services Agency’s commercial facility at Vancouver International Airport—by which point, tens of thousands of parcels may already be moving through the system unchecked.
As a result, CBSA seizures of precursors for fentanyl, methamphetamine, and MDMA—not to mention the lab equipment and pill press machines used to manufacture these deadly narcotics in Canada—often come down to a game of chance, occasionally aided by strong intelligence sharing and effective policing.
The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.
To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Invite your friends and earn rewards
Censorship Industrial Complex
Pro-freedom group warns Liberal bill could secretly cut off Canadians’ internet access
														From LifeSiteNews
“The minister could order this dissident’s internet and phone services be cut off and require that decision remain secret”
Free speech advocates have warned that the Liberals’ cybersecurity bill would allow them to block any individual’s internet access by secret order.
During an October 30 Public Safety committee meeting in the House of Commons, Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) counsel Josh Dehaas called for Liberals to rewrite Bill C-8, which would allow the government to secretly cut off Canadians access to the internet to mediate “any threat” to the telecommunications system.
“It is dangerous to civil liberties to allow the minister the power to cut off individual Canadians without proper due process and keep that secret,” Dehaas testified.
“Consider for example a protestor who the minister believes ‘may’ engage in a distributed denial of service attack, which is a common form of civil disobedience employed by political activists,” he warned.
“The minister could order this dissident’s internet and phone services be cut off and require that decision remain secret,” Dehaas continued, adding that the legislation does not require the government to obtain a warrant.
In response, Liberal MP Marianne Dandurand claimed that the legislation is aimed to protect the government form cyberattacks, not to limit freedom of speech. However, Dehaas pointed out that the vague phrasing of the legislation allows Liberals to censor Canadians to counter “any threat” to the telecommunications system.
Bill C-8, which is now in its second reading in the House of Commons, was introduced in June by Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree and contains a provision in which the federal government could stop “any specified person” from accessing the internet.
The federal government under Prime Minister Mark Carney claims that the bill is a way to stop “unprecedented cyber-threats.”
The bill, as written, claims that the government would need the power to cut someone off from the internet, as it could be “necessary to do so to secure the Canadian telecommunications system against any threat, including that of interference, manipulation, disruption, or degradation.”
Many Canadians, including Conservative MPs and freedom groups, have condemned the legislation, along with several other new Liberal bills which aim to censor internet content as well as go after people’s ability to speak their minds.
“Experts and civil society have warned that the legislation would confer ministerial powers that could be used to deliberately or inadvertently compromise the security of encryption standards within telecommunications networks that people, governments, and businesses across Canada rely upon, every day,” the Canadian Civil Liberties Association wrote in a recent press release.
Similarly, Canada’s own intelligence commissioner has warned that the bill, if passed as is, could potentially be unconstitutional, as it would allow for warrantless seizure of a person’s sensitive information.
Automotive
Canada’s EV experiment has FAILED
														By Dan McTeague
The government’s attempt to force Canadians to buy EVs by gambling away billions of tax dollars and imposing an EV mandate has been an abject failure.
GM and Stellantis are the latest companies to back track on their EV plans in Canada despite receiving billions in handouts from Canadian taxpayers.
Dan McTeague explains in his latest video.
- 
																	
										
																			Business2 days agoYou Won’t Believe What Canada’s Embassy in Brazil Has Been Up To
 - 
																	
										
																			Censorship Industrial Complex2 days agoSenate Grills Meta and Google Over Biden Administration’s Role in COVID-Era Content Censorship
 - 
																	
										
																			Business2 days agoMystery cloaks Doug Ford’s funding of media through Ontario advertising subsidy
 - 
																	
										
																					Environment2 days agoThe era of Climate Change Alarmism is over
 - 
																	
										
																			Automotive2 days agoCarney’s Budget Risks Another Costly EV Bet
 - 
																	
										
																			Crime1 day agoPublic Execution of Anti-Cartel Mayor in Michoacán Prompts U.S. Offer to Intervene Against Cartels
 - 
																	
										
																			Aristotle Foundation1 day agoB.C. government laid groundwork for turning private property into Aboriginal land
 - 
																	
										
																			Justice1 day agoA Justice System That Hates Punishment Can’t Protect the Innocent
 






