Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

International

Elon Musk expresses ‘regret’ over attacks on Trump that ‘went too far’

Published

6 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Calvin Freiburger

It remains to be seen whether the relationship between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump will be mended.

Tech mogul Elon Musk said Wednesday that he regrets “some” of his attacks on President Donald Trump stemming from disagreements with his so-called “Big Beautiful Bill,” though the two men remain far from reconciliation.

Passed last month by the U.S. House of Representatives and now before the Senate for consideration, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (BBB) aims to enact large portions of Trump’s legislative agenda through the budget reconciliation process, which requires only a simple majority vote in the Senate rather than the typical 60-vote threshold for standalone legislation.

It extends the 2017 Trump tax cuts, institutes various other tax changes proposed by Trump on the campaign trail, and includes several other conservative priorities, including funding for border security efforts, defunding Planned Parenthood, eliminating many “green” energy subsidies, and more.

However, it faces conservative opposition over estimates that it will add a minimum of $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade; last week, the bill’s failure to include or be prefaced by codifying the spending cuts of the administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) project led to a dramatic falling out between Trump and former DOGE head Musk.

Musk lobbed numerous posts against Trump last week, primarily focused on the fiscal impact of the BBB, the most eyebrow-raising of which was that “@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,” followed by “Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.” Trump shot back that Musk had “lost his mind” and suggested he was really upset by the prospect of losing electric vehicle subsidies, although Musk was on the record opposing those subsidies.

The Trump Justice Department’s failure so far to release significant new information about dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein has been a source of consternation, renewing speculation that such records might implicate Trump himself. The president was one of Epstein’s many high-profile associates, having flown on Epstein’s private jet, but no evidence linking Trump to Epstein’s crimes has ever emerged, and in fact Trump eventually banned him from his Mar-a-Lago club for assaulting an underage girl.

“I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein’s defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died. He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump,” attorney David Schoen said after Musk’s post.

Musk deleted the charge, and on Wednesday posted, “I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.”

For his part, Trump told New York Post columnist Miranda Devine he has “no hard feelings” with Musk and “could” eventually mend their relationship, “but we have to straighten out the country.” After Musk’s retraction, Trump said, “I thought it was very nice that he did that.”

The administration and its defenders promise that separate legislation to codify DOGE cuts is still coming, starting with a $9.4 billion rescission package that primarily cuts from foreign aid and public broadcasting.

“While $9.4 billion may be small in the context of $7 trillion of annual spending, this practice can help build muscle memory and encourage policymakers to tackle the larger spending programs in the future,” the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget says. “However, we’d be remiss to not point out that this package comes in the context of potential enactment of a reconciliation bill adding $3 trillion to the debt over the next decade – the equivalent of more than 300 times the amount of these rescissions.”

On June 9, House conservatives circulated a memo urging the Senate to make further changes to the BBB before passing it, including deeper spending cuts, closing loopholes in the abortion and green defunding, and eliminating language that would prohibit states and localities from regulating artificial intelligence for 10 years.

International

US Reportedly Weighing Military Strikes On Narco Targets Inside Venezuela

Published on

 

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By Wallace White

The U.S. is mulling military strikes on cartel-associated targets in Venezuela, multiple sources told the Wall Street Journal Thursday.

The possible strikes would reportedly include among the targets Venezuelan military airports and seaports involved in the illicit drug trade. They would serve an additional purpose of warning dictator Nicolás Maduro he should step down from power, sources with knowledge of the matter told the WSJ.

The strikes could reportedly happen in a matter of days or hours, sources with knowledge of the situation told the Miami Herald Friday. President Donald Trump has stepped up his pressure campaign against the South American leader, taking a more forceful military posture than during his first term.

Dear Readers:

As a nonprofit, we are dependent on the generosity of our readers.

Please consider making a small donation of any amount here.

Thank you!

Most recently, the USS Gerald Ford carrier strike group was deployed to the Caribbean Sea October 24, adding to an already impressive U.S. presence off the Venezuelan coast in international waters. The Trump administration deployed naval assets to the southern Caribbean in August following their designation of Latin American cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs).

The White House told the Daily Caller News Foundation that the anonymous sources  reporting the story “don’t know what they’re talking about,” and that “any announcements regarding Venezuela policy would come directly from the President.”

Continue Reading

International

Netanyahu orders deadly strikes on Gaza with over 100 dead despite ceasefire deal

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Patrick Delaney

Despite a majority of national governments and Christian prelates demanding a two-state solution, experts warn that Israel and the US aim to crush all hope for a Palestinian state.

After killing 104 Palestinians, including 46 children and 20 women with aggressive overnight airstrikes, Israel announced Wednesday that it was resuming observation of its ceasefire deal with Hamas that was penned earlier this month.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the Israeli army on Tuesday to “immediately carry out forceful strikes in the Gaza Strip,” signaling a collapse of the October 10 agreement brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump.

Israel claimed the strikes were retaliation for its forces coming under fire from Hamas fighters in the southern city of Rafah. And though Palestinian sources reported hearing gunshots and strikes in the area, Hamas stated they had “no relation to the shooting incident” and reaffirmed their “commitment to the cease-fire agreement.”

Though the Israeli army has currently taken control of 58% of the Gaza Strip, local media reported a decision of the prime minister to expand its occupation to more land in response to the reported attack.

Following Netanyahu’s order, a series of Israeli strikes were reported in Gaza City, Rafah and later Khan Younis. These included one “massive” explosion near al-Shifa Hospital with and Al Jazeera correspondent reporting from the ground “major activity in the air over Gaza’s skies, with drones hovering above.”

Israeli bombardment targets also included a refugee camp in central Gaza, homes and tents with additional injury numbers logged at 253, including 78 children. With no medical supplies or medicines to treat the wounded, the hospital director at al-Shifa said the health situation was “catastrophic.”

Netanyahu’s strike order also followed an accusation from the Israeli government that Hamas was in violation of the ceasefire due to their delaying the return of bodies of deceased hostages. But before the agreement being signed, Israeli officials acknowledged it may take significant time to locate and return these corpses and CNN quoted Israeli officials who acknowledged some of the bodies may never be returned.

Additionally, according to Al Jazeera, while Israel maintains pressure on Hamas to return these bodies, the Palestinian militant group continues to call on Israel to allow the entry of heavy bulldozer equipment for facilitating this process since some of these bodies are believed to be buried deep under the rubble of buildings destroyed by Israeli bombardments.

Israel violates ceasefire 125 times, kills hundreds with Trump’s support

Israel has additionally violated the ceasefire agreement by allowing only a fraction of the agreed-upon number of humanitarian aid trucks to enter the enclave that had been officially declared by a UN agency in August to be suffering under a man-made famine.

A further violation of the deal includes Israel’s decision to keep the Rafah crossing with Egypt closed preventing tens of thousands of critically wounded Palestinians to seek medical treatment abroad because Israel has all but completely destroyed the health care system in Gaza. According to reports, thus far 983 patients have died while waiting for the permission from Israel to travel abroad for treatments.

Trump backed Israel’s massive strikes, which killed dozens of children, saying they had a “right to (retaliate)” due to the killing of the Israeli soldier, maintaining that these many violations would not jeopardize the ceasefire agreement.

Ceasefire deal ‘scam’ to retrieve Israeli hostages; Trump complicit with genocide

In a Wednesday interview with Judge Andrew Napolitano, former U.S. Marines Officer, author, and military commentator, Scott Ritter classified the Tuesday bombings as Israel sending “a signal that they are the permanent occupiers, that even under ceasefire conditions, Israel retains the right to strike anytime, anyplace against anyone without any fear of consequence.”

He expressed his belief that Hamas is “serious about this ceasefire agreement” while Israel is not, that the current ceasefire plan is merely a “scam to get the Israeli hostages home” before “finish(ing) the job,” of genocide in Gaza as a means of preventing any possibility of a Palestinian state.

He further assessed that since “the genocide that Netanyahu is carrying out in Gaza couldn’t have been done without the support of Donald Trump and the United States. So, Donald Trump is as guilty for the deaths of the Gazans in Palestine and Gaza as Netanyahu is.”

Solution to conflict affirmed by 96% of world’s nations: establishment of sovereign State of Palestine

In initially evaluating the current ceasefire agreement on October 9, Columbia University economist and senior UN adviser Jeffrey Sachs stated that the solution to the conflict is “very straightforward” and has been affirmed by the “the world community, overwhelmingly, for decades” and this is the call “for a State of Palestine.”

By “massive votes” in the UN General Assembly “more than 90% of the world community” has consistently demanded the establishment of the State of Palestine for many years.

With an overwhelming majority of UN member states (81.3%) formally recognizing the State of Palestine (157 of 193), Sachs has said elsewhere that nations demanding the full establishment of such a sovereign state is even much higher, including 185 of these national governments (95.8%) who have consistently voiced support for this two-state-solution.

This also means these nations demand an end to the ongoing 58-year brutal military occupation of internationally recognized Palestinian territory that was also confirmed as illegal by the International Court of Justice just last year.

Holy Land prelates: Only by ending Israel’s illegal occupation can ‘lasting peace be established’

Consistently affirming and echoing this overwhelming consensus is the Catholic Church, including the unanimous and constant voices of her bishops in the Middle East, those from around the world, and with statements from the Vatican as well. Indeed, in June, the Holy See commemorated the 10th anniversary of its formal recognition of the State of Palestine in 2015 after welcoming UN recognition of the state “with favour” in 2012.

In a formal joint statement celebrating the enactment of the ceasefire earlier this month, the Patriarchs and Heads of Churches in the Holy Land, including Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, rejoiced at the expected ceasing of hostilities, expressed hope for the future and appealed for the international community to “widen the scope of the current negotiations to include an end of the Occupation of both the West Bank and Gaza, leading to the establishment of a Palestinian state living side-by-side in peace with the present State of Israel.”

“Only in this way, we believe, will a just and lasting peace be truly established in the Holy Land and throughout the larger Middle East,” they concluded.

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending

X