From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By David Blackmon

An Aug. 18 New York Times story detailing hard times for the nation’s environmental groups in this second presidency of Donald Trump contains a clear lesson in the perils that come with basing an entire movement on crony capitalist federal policies.

That lesson is this: What the government gives, it can also take away. 

Headlined “Environmental Groups Face ‘Generational’ Setbacks Under Trump,” the story’s writers bemoan hardships now being faced by major environmental groups like the Sierra Club, the NRDC, Greenpeace and others, who have watched as the President and his team of disruptors have dismantled much of the Biden agenda in just eight months. Worse, they now face the horror of watching EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin go after the very foundation of climate alarm orthodoxy, the agency’s Obama-era 2010 endangerment finding on greenhouse gases.

One former Sierra Club president, Ramon Cruz, says the morale across the entire movement “is destroyed” as members have watched their IRA subsidy-fueled house of cards come tumbling down. Things have turned so sour at the Sierra Club that the group’s board of directors abruptly fired Executive Director Ben Jealous earlier in August after what was said to have been “an extensive evaluation of his conduct.” The move came after Jealous had taken the Club through several rounds of layoffs amid struggles to maintain money flows.

Much of the pain being felt by these alarmist groups today stems from the provisions contained in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act phasing out green energy subsidies.

Ruthy Gourevitch, a policy director at the Climate and Community Institute, bemoans the movement’s new reality under Trump. “With one election and one bill, most of the signature climate work that organizations, advocates and movements have been working toward is largely undone,” he says, perhaps unwittingly saying the quiet part about the government-forced nature of his own movement out loud.

Someone really should inform these leaders of the modern environmental movement that they live in a constitutional republic which holds elections every four years. If your movement’s “signature work” is based almost entirely on a single massive power grab by a single federal agency and a single overreaching bill signed by a single-term president, then yes, a single election can undo it all fairly rapidly.

The pain is especially hard for groups who beefed up staff based on the promise of millions, even billions, of dollars coming in from all the grants that were shoved out the door at the EPA and Department of Energy in the final weeks of the Biden presidency. Faced with the effort by Zeldin to claw back $27 billion of such grants, Rewiring America cut 28% of its staff recently.

Those $27 billion in grants were handed out under an IRA-established Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, a huge pot of money the Competitive Enterprise Institute describes as “an EPA slush fund that requires the agency to create slush funds for nonprofits.” Now deprived of those funds, the climate alarm non-profits find themselves in a heap of unfunded trouble.

The question for these groups now becomes one of finding the best way to shift tactics. The Times quotes billionaire and former Democratic presidential contender Tom Steyer as writing on Facebook, “If we want to win, we need a fundamental recalibration. Climate can no longer be a separate cause. It must be the context for making people’s lives better. It has to feel like relief. Like opportunity.”

To do that, someone will need to inform residents of tiny towns like Taft, Texas, how those hundreds of giant windmills surrounding their city represent relief and opportunity.

That seems like a big lift, one that only seems larger without all those gold bars from the government to help pay for it all.

David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By Wallace White

President Donald Trump suggested Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy give up on Ukrainian membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and retaking the Crimean Peninsula ahead of Monday’s visit with European leaders at the White House.

Trump said Zelenskyy could end the war “almost immediately” if he agreed to drop both his NATO membership pursuit and aspirations to retake Crimea after Russia seized the region in 2014, the president posted on Truth Social Sunday night. The Ukrainian president is set to meet with Trump and European leaders at the White House on Monday afternoon to discuss Trump’s Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,” Trump said on Truth Social. “Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!”

The White House did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Russia has maintained control of the Crimean peninsula since 2014, although few nations recognize its formal claim on the region. As part of current negotiations, Putin has reportedly demanded the annexation of the Russian-speaking Donbas region, which is already mostly occupied by Russian forces.

Putin has long said that Ukrainian NATO membership would be unacceptable to Russia. NATO previously attempted to fast-track Ukraine’s membership into the alliance in 2023 amid Russia’s invasion.

U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff has also proposed a workaround to Ukraine not joining NATO, saying the U.S. alone could offer “Article 5-like protection” instead of Kiev’s official membership.

Zelenskyy will be joined by an entourage of European leaders at the White House, including NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, French President Emmanuel Macron, and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Secretary of State Marco Rubio denied Sunday that the extra attendees were brought in to keep Zelenskyy from being “bullied” by Trump into an unfavorable deal.