COVID-19
Dr. Trozzi awaits ruling from Ontario physicians after their meeting to discuss stripping his license
From LifeSiteNews
‘We must have a right to determine the truth ourselves because we can’t always trust the government to tell us the truth,’ Trozzi’s counsel, Michael Alexander, argued.
Ontario pro-freedom Dr. Mark Trozzi risks losing his licence for exposing the truth of the COVID ‘pandemic’ and vaccines.
On November 10, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) Discipline Tribunal met to discuss stripping Dr. Trozzi of his medical licence as he refuses to stop speaking against the dangers of COVID vaccines and the corruption of the medical system.
“I’d love to be wrong about the science,” Trozzi told LifeSiteNews in an exclusive interview. “I can’t tell you how happy I’d be if the injections (…) were safe and effective vaccines, that’d be wonderful. It’d be great. But it’s not true. And power doesn’t change the truth.”
“Persecuting me and all the doctors in the country who insist on the truth of the matters doesn’t change the truth,” he continued.
Trozzi declared that while the tribunal was seeking to punish him for speaking out, he believes that he and other physicians who have spoken out deserve an award, not a penalty.
During the tribunal, Trozzi’s counsel Michael Alexander argued, “We must have a right to determine the truth ourselves because we can’t always trust the government to tell us the truth.”
“Our society gives us the tools to protect ourselves when trust is no longer warranted,” he continued.
CPSO counsel Elisabeth Widner argued that Trozzi deserved to have his licence removed because of the alleged “harmful effects” of his publications on the ‘pandemic’ and vaccines.
However, Alexander pointed out that there is no evidence that Trozzi caused “direct and concrete harm to any of his patients.”
Widner further claimed that keeping Trozzi as part of the college of physicians would undermine public confidence in the profession. She maintained that Trozzi shows “complete lack of insight and a rejection of the college’s authority,” as he continues to spread “misinformation” concerning the COVID situation.
Widner referenced posts on his website that she said “continue the theme that vaccines are unsafe.”
“Dr. Trozzi needs to be removed from the profession to protect the public,” she declared.
Alexander pointed out that Trozzi’s “case is distinguished by the fact that he brought jurisdictive and constitutional issues with the college’s authority.”
“The Charter gives everyone the right to express minority opinions even if they are false and misleading,” he continued.
Alexander pointed out that even the tribunal admitted that punishing minority opinions “creates a chilling effect” on freedom of speech.
He further argued that Trozzi has a right to share his views on his website, as the college did not place restrictions on Trozzi’s publications on his website.
Alexander also explained that Trozzi is “unrefuted” in his reports on COVID and vaccines. He cited several of Trozzi’s findings that revealed the dangers of the vaccine.
However, Widner quickly objected, maintaining that the reports were irrelevant to the case. Trozzi told LifeSiteNews that as far as he can see, the tribunal ignored the 41-page report with 29 scientific references supporting Trozzi’s concerns over COVID vaccines.
Trozzi said he would be “glad to spend another thousand hours studying the science of (…) the genetic sequences and the technology of messenger RNA.”
“I’ll studied the autopsies more, and I’ll study the data and the death statistics and the adverse events. And I could talk to more parents who lost their kids. And I can do more research and report to them,” he continued.
“That’s the only honest thing I can do. They can insist that I take a degree course in genetics if they want to make sure that everything that I learn from all the time with the geneticists working on this was true,” Trozzi declared. “But there’s no solution where we compromise what is true.”
After Alexander and Widner’s arguments, the tribunal concluded. According to Trozzi, the ruling is not expected until December, and there may be a second hearing next week.
Trozzi explained that he had hoped the members of the tribunal would take his case as an opportunity to realize the truth of COVID vaccines, “but they don’t seem to so far have chosen that path.”
Instead, he revealed that the tribunal determined to make an example of him to prevent other doctors from speaking out.
“In the first round of this abuse, most of the doctors were successfully muzzled,” he stated. “But there’s many of us that have spoken up. I’ve been involved in signing, signing documents with like 16,000 international scientists and doctors.”
“They’re making a point to use us to make sure that the other doctors who wouldn’t stand against it before surely won’t,” Trozzi continued, citing cases in Germany where doctors are being sent to prison for writing vaccine exemptions.
“We’re also being used as examples in other ways about how to do the right thing, how not to be a slave to money, still choose truth, and still choose to follow your oaths and follow the golden rule and be kind,” he declared.
As a trauma physician and frontline doctor during the COVID-19 outbreak, Dr. Trozzi studied the ingredients and effects of the jabs for himself and found that they were not safe or effective, as was being widely proclaimed.
He also noticed that the judgment of doctors about COVID and the shots was being compromised by substantial monetary payoffs. For example, he previously told LifeSiteNews that one of his colleagues knows an ear, nose, and throat surgeon in Germany who stopped doing surgery and explained, “I only do the minimum amount of V.A. specialty work to keep my license because I’m making way more money just giving shots during that peak.”
In the interest of protecting not only his own patients but people everywhere, Dr. Trozzi promoted alternative COVID-19 treatments and publicly explained why the COVID shot is “not a vaccine.”
In retaliation, Dr. Trozzi was barred from issuing medical exemptions for COVID-19 shots, masking requirements and testing in 2021, along with Ontario Dr. Rochagne Kilian.
At the time, CPSO said the interim orders were given in accordance with the Regulated Health Professions Act, which allow restrictions on a member’s license if a regulator believes a certain practice “exposes or is likely to expose patients to harm or injury.”
The CPSO has cracked down on numerous physicians who have failed to comply with standard protocol during the COVID outbreak, so much so that Dr. Robert Malone recently spoke out against what he described as the “re-education” of dissident Canadian doctors.
The CPSO has thus far initiated legal action against Trozzi and at least five other doctors who are committed to their Hippocratic Oath responsibilities related to COVID: Mary O’Connor, Rochangé Kilian, Celeste Jean Thirlwell, Patrick Phillips, and Crystal Luchkiw.
Donations, which are the only source of income for him and his family at this time, can be made via Dr. Trozzi’s website, https://drtrozzi.org.
From LifeSiteNews
When the convoy first came to Ottawa, allegations were floated that the memorial had been desecrated. After learning of this, Evely quickly organized a group of veterans to stand guard around the clock to protect the area.
A Canadian veteran appealed to the Ontario courts after he was convicted for organizing a guard around the National War Memorial during the Freedom Convoy.
In an October press release, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) announced that an appeal has been filed in the Ontario Court of Appeals on behalf of Master Warrant Officer (Ret’d) Jeffrey Evely over his conviction for mischief and obstructing police while on his way to guard the Ottawa War Memorial during the 2022 Freedom Convoy.
“By locking down large sections of downtown Ottawa, the police were effectively preventing all civilians from accessing public areas and greatly exceeded their powers under the common law,” constitutional lawyer Chris Fleury explained.
“This case raises issues that have implications for protests across the province and the country. We are hopeful that the Ontario Court of Appeal will agree and grant leave to appeal,” he added.
The appeal argues that police overstepped their authority in their response to the 2022 protest of COVID mandates. Police actions at the time included locking down the Ottawa core, establishing checkpoints, and arresting protesters.
In September 2024, Everly was convicted of mischief and obstruction after his involvement in the 2022 Freedom Convoy, which protested COVID mandates by gathering Canadians in front of Parliament in Ottawa.
As LifeSiteNews previously reported, when the convoy first came to Ottawa, allegations were floated that the memorial had been desecrated. After learning of this, Evely quickly organized a group of veterans to stand guard around the clock to protect the area.
However, under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act, many parts of downtown Ottawa were blocked to the public, and a vigilant police force roamed the streets.
It was during this time that Evely was arrested for entering a closed off section of downtown Ottawa during the early hours of February 19, 2022. He had been on his way to take the 4:25 a.m. shift protecting the Ottawa War Memorial.
As Evely walked to the memorial, he was allegedly told to stop by police. According to the police, Evely “ran for a short distance before being confronted by two additional police officers.”
He was forcibly pushed to the ground, landing face first. The veteran was then arrested and charged with mischief and obstructing police.
At the time, the use of the EA was justified by claims that the protest was “violent,” a claim that has still gone unsubstantiated.
In fact, videos of the protest against COVID regulations and shot mandates show Canadians from across the country gathering outside Parliament engaged in dancing, street hockey, and other family-friendly activities.
Indeed, the only acts of violence caught on video were carried out against the protesters after the Trudeau government directed police to end the protest. One such video showed an elderly women being trampled by a police horse.
While the officers’ actions were originally sanctioned under the EA, Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley ruled that Trudeau was “not justified” in invoking the EA, forcing Crown prosecutors to adopt a different strategy.
Now, Crown prosecutors allege that the common law granted police the authority to stop and detain Evely, regardless of the EA.
However, Evely and his lawyers have challenged this argument under section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, insisting that his “arrest and detention were arbitrary.”
Earlier this month, Freedom Convoy organizers Tamara Lich and Chris Barber were sentenced to 18-month house arrest after a harrowing 25-month trial process. Many have condemned the sentence, warning it amounts to “political persecution” of those who stand up to the Liberal government.
COVID-19
Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich says ‘I am not to leave the house’ while serving sentence
From LifeSiteNews
‘I was hoping to be able to drop off and pick up my grandsons from school, but apparently that request will have to go to a judge’
Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich detailed her restrictive house arrest conditions, revealing she is “not” able to leave her house or even pick up her grandkids from school without permission from the state.
Lich wrote in a X post on Wednesday that this past Tuesday was her first meeting with her probation officer, whom she described as “fair and efficient,” adding that she was handed the conditions set out by the judge.
“I was hoping to be able to drop off and pick up my grandsons from school, but apparently that request will have to go to a judge under a variation application, so we’ll just leave everything as is for now,” she wrote.
Lich noted that she has another interview with her probation officer next week to “assess the level of risk I pose to re-offend.”
“It sounds like it’ll basically be a questionnaire to assess my mental state and any dangers I may pose to society,” she said.
While it is common for those on house arrest to have to ask for permission to leave their house, sometimes arrangements can be made otherwise.
On October 7, Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey sentenced Lich and Chris Barber to 18 months’ house arrest after being convicted earlier in the year convicted of “mischief.”
Lich was given 18 months less time already spent in custody, amounting to 15 1/2 months.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, the Canadian government was hoping to put Lich in jail for no less than seven years and Barber for eight years for their roles in the 2022 protests against COVID mandates.
Interestingly, Perkins-McVey said about Lich and Barber during the sentencing, “They came with the noblest of intent and did not advocate for violence.”
Lich said that her probation officer “informed me of the consequences should I breach these conditions, and I am not to leave the house, even for the approved ‘necessities of life’ without contacting her to let her know where I’ll be and for how long,” she wrote.
“She will then provide a letter stating I have been granted permission to be out in society. I’m to have my papers on my person at all times and ready to produce should I be pulled over or seen by law enforcement out and about.”
Lich said that the probation officer did print a letter “before I left, so I could stop at the optometrist and dentist offices on my way home.”
She said that her official release date is January 21, 2027, which she said amounts to “1,799 days after my initial arrest.”
As reported by LifeSiteNews, Lich, reflecting on her recent house arrest verdict, said she has no “remorse” and will not “apologize” for leading a movement that demanded an end to all COVID mandates.
LifeSiteNews reported that Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre offered his thoughts on the sentencing, wishing them a “peaceful” life while stopping short of blasting the sentence as his fellow MPs did.
In early 2022, the Freedom Convoy saw thousands of Canadians from coast to coast come to Ottawa to demand an end to COVID mandates in all forms. Despite the peaceful nature of the protest, Trudeau’s government enacted the never-before-used Emergencies Act (EA) on February 14, 2022.
Trans Mountain executive says it’s time to fix the system, expand access, and think like a nation builder
Trump Admin Establishing Council To Make Buildings Beautiful Again
B.C. would benefit from new pipeline but bad policy stands in the way
Coutts border officers seize 77 KG of cocaine in commercial truck entering Canada – Street value of $7 Million
Top Scientists Deliberately Misrepresented Sea Level Rise For Years
Churches Are All That Stands Between Canada And Tyranny
CAPP calls on federal government to reset energy policy before it’s too late
-
Business2 days agoBill Gates walks away from the climate cult
-
Internet2 days agoMusk launches Grokipedia to break Wikipedia’s information monopoly
-
Alberta1 day agoNobel Prize nods to Alberta innovation in carbon capture
-
Censorship Industrial Complex2 days agoPro-freedom group to expose dangers of Liberal ‘hate crime’ bill before parliamentary committee
-
Business16 hours agoCanada’s attack on religious charities makes no fiscal sense
-
Health2 days agoLeslyn Lewis urges Canadians to fight WHO pandemic treaty before it’s legally binding
-
International5 hours agoPrince Andrew banished from the British monarchy
-
Business4 hours ago“We have a deal”: Trump, Xi strike breakthrough on trade and fentanyl