Conservatives finally enter the climate fight armed with science

Todayville

Published

2 months ago

5 minute read

Quick Hit:

In a move rattling the climate establishment, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced steps to repeal the Obama-era “endangerment” finding. The announcement coincided with the release of a landmark Energy Department report aiming to reintroduce scientific uncertainty into the climate conversation. The Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley A. Strassel praised the effort as a pivotal moment in the rise of a “scientifically armed and debate-ready climate right.”

Key Details:

Chris Wright stated, “Climate change is real, and it deserves attention,” but urged a reassessment of alarmist narratives.
The report was authored by five respected scientists, including a former Obama administration official.
Findings include that climate change poses risks but also benefits, such as improved agricultural productivity, and that extreme weather events show no historical increase.

Diving Deeper:

Writing in The Wall Street Journal, columnist Kimberley A. Strassel hailed the July 29 remarks by Energy Secretary Chris Wright and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin as the long-overdue “rise…of a scientifically armed and debate-ready climate right.” The pair’s announcement in Indiana—targeting the 2009 “endangerment” finding that empowered sweeping climate regulations—was paired with the release of a new Energy Department report that confronts the so-called climate “consensus” with sober scientific inquiry.

The report, titled A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate, has already triggered an outcry from mainstream media, especially The New York Times, which denounced the authors as “skeptics” who “misrepresent” data and “undermine” established views. But as Strassel points out, the attack conspicuously avoided using the favorite pejorative of climate alarmists—“denier.” Why? Because, she writes, “the report…doesn’t deny the climate is changing.”

Indeed, as Secretary Wright explained in his introduction, “Climate change is real, and it deserves attention.” Yet the report emphasizes what’s often excluded from public discourse: uncertainty. The analysis argues that models are “all over the map,” that human impact on warming remains difficult to isolate due to “natural variability, data limitations, uncertain models and fluctuations in solar activity,” and that U.S. climate policy—even drastic measures—will yield “negligible effect on global temperatures.”

Among the report’s conclusions—backed by peer-reviewed literature—are that global warming carries benefits (such as enhanced crop yields), and that there’s no discernible increase in the intensity or frequency of extreme weather events across the U.S. It also states that “climate change is likely to have little effect on economic growth.” These facts run counter to the doomsday narratives pushed by leftist bureaucrats and Biden-aligned media outlets, which have relentlessly portrayed climate change as an “existential” threat to justify government overreach.

Strassel frames the shift as a necessary realignment of the GOP’s climate posture. For years, she notes, conservatives tried various angles—denying warming, focusing on the economic toll of leftist policies, promoting an “all of the above” energy mix—but were marginalized as unserious. Wright’s move, she argues, signals a return to fundamentals: “challenge the notion of ‘consensus’… reinject forgotten factors into the debate (cost, competing priorities) and in general ensure Americans have the whole picture.”

This realignment, Strassel contends, couldn’t come at a more crucial time. “What’s become obvious in recent years—thanks to the taste of it we got with the Biden administration—is that climate hysteria is one of the greatest threats to freedom in modern times.” She warns that Biden’s climate agenda has been used as a Trojan horse for central control—over vehicles, food, consumer goods, and even where Americans are permitted to live.

Strassel concludes with a hopeful note: “The right this week debuted its new strategy, and Americans received the bigger scientific picture. Long may that healthy, vigorous debate—the essence of good science—continue.” The effort by Wright and Zeldin may mark a turning point, not just in energy policy, but in the fight for scientific integrity and political freedom.

Up Next

Federal climate plan could trigger Alberta recession

Don't Miss

Chinese Couple Renting American Women’s Wombs Exposes Dark Side Of Surrogacy Industry

Todayville

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

AI chatbots a child safety risk, parental groups report

Business / 1 hour ago

LA skyscrapers for homeless could cost federal taxpayers over $1 billion

Alberta / 1 hour ago

Alberta’s E3 Lithium delivers first battery-grade lithium carbonate

Economy

Reconciliation means clearing the way for Indigenous leadership

Published on October 1, 2025

Todayville

From the Resource Works team.

On Truth and Reconciliation Day, Canadians are asked to honour residential school survivors and to support the families and communities who must live with that history.

It also calls for action, not mere commemoration. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission called for structural change in Canada, and that means clearing the way for Indigenous leadership across this country.

Economic reconciliation is a practical journey that shifts decision-making and ownership towards First Nations and Indigenous people more generally.

Throughout B.C., First Nations are already practicing what that looks like. The Osoyoos Indian Band has built a diverse economy in tourism, wine, and recreation that has sustained steady jobs and revenue.

“I think all Native leadership need to get the economic development focus going on and make the economy the number one issue. It’s the economy that looks after everything,” Chief Clarence Louie has said. That sense of mission, along with assets like Nk’Mip Cellars and Spirit Ridge, has helped to turn Osoyoos into a B.C. success story.

On the coast, the Haisla Nation is leading in innovation in the LNG sector. In 2024, the Cedar LNG facility was granted a positive final investment decision, along with the Haisla’s majority ownership of the $4 billion project.

“Today is about changing the course of history for my Nation and Indigenous peoples,” said Haisla Chief Councillor Crystal Smith during the long approval process. By seeing the project through, Haisla ownership has created the means to fund language, health care, and opportunity for generations that had found all of that out of reach.

In the Lower Mainland, the Squamish Nation’s Sen̓áḵw development is one of the biggest projects in the Vancouver real estate market, and will become an asset for decades to come.

“This project is not just about buildings, it’s about bringing the Squamish People back to the land, making our presence felt once again in the heart of our ancestral territory, and creating long term wealth for the Squamish Nation,” said Council Chairperson Khelsilem.

The Squamish recently restructured the partnership so Squamish holds half of phases one and two and all of phases three and four, while welcoming OPTrust to a 50 percent stake in the early phases. Indigenous leadership is not just transforming the rural resource economy, but the urban one as well.

Chief Ian Campbell of the Squamish Nation, former chair of the Indigenous Partnerships Success Showcase event in Vancouver, has said that economic reconciliation is essential to the future of Canada.

“To move forward and reframe that complex dynamic, and put the lens on economic reconciliation, to me, is the path forward to create mutual benefits and values that benefit all Canadians, which includes Indigenous people,” said Campbell.

For governments and industry, there is a duty to align policy, permitting, and capital flows with Indigenous-led priorities. Beyond benefits agreements, reconciliation requires listening both early and attentively, and ensuring cooperation every step of the way.

The Bank of Canada itself has noted that “tremendous untapped potential exists”, but only when private firms and public agencies commit to economic reconciliation.

Listening also means resisting the temptation to cast Indigenous peoples as either monolithic supporters or opponents of development. Figures like Ellis Ross, former Chief Councillor of the Haisla, and his successor Crystal Smith have challenged these narratives, pointing instead to Haisla and neighbouring Nations’ experience with real jobs, careers, and community services tied to LNG and related infrastructure.

The Haisla message is straightforward: the path to revitalized language and culture runs through sustained opportunity and self-determination.

Truth and Reconciliation Day is a reminder that the past matters, and this is evident in the inequities of the present and in the possibilities now being realized by Nations that are reclaiming jurisdiction and building enterprises on their own terms.

Our task is to ensure public policy and corporate practice do not get in the way. On September 30, we remember, and then on October 1 and every day after, we have work to do.

Alberta

Taxpayers: Alberta must scrap its industrial carbon tax

Published on October 1, 2025

Todayville

Carney praises carbon taxes on world stage
Alberta must block Carney’s industrial carbon tax

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is calling on the government of Alberta to completely scrap its provincial industrial carbon tax.

“It’s baffling that Alberta is still clinging to its industrial carbon tax even though Saskatchewan has declared itself to be a carbon tax-free zone,” said Kris Sims, CTF Alberta Director. “Prime Minister Mark Carney is cooking up his new industrial carbon tax in Ottawa and Alberta needs to fight that head on.

“Alberta having its own industrial carbon tax invites Carney to barge through our door with his punishing industrial carbon tax.”

On Sept. 16, the Alberta government announced some changes to Alberta’s industrial carbon tax, but the tax remains in effect.

On Friday night at the Global Progress Action Summitt held in London, England, Carney praised carbon taxes while speaking onstage with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

“The direct carbon tax which had become a divisive issue, it was a textbook good policy, but a divisive issue,” Carney said.

During the federal election, Carney promised to remove the more visible consumer carbon tax and change it into a bigger hidden industrial carbon tax. He also announced plans to create “border adjustment mechanisms” on imports from countries that do not have national carbon taxes, also known as carbon tax tariffs.

“Carney’s ‘textbook good policy’ comments about carbon taxes shows his government is still cooking up a new industrial carbon tax and it’s also planning on imposing carbon tax tariffs,” Sims said. “Alberta should stand with Saskatchewan and obliterate all carbon taxes in our province, otherwise we are opening the door for Ottawa to keep kicking us.”