Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

Business

China still squeezing rare-earth exports despite U.S. pact

Published

5 minute read

MXM logo MxM News

Quick Hit:

Weeks after agreeing to ease restrictions, China continues to stall rare-earth magnet exports, causing Western manufacturers to scramble for critical components and raising fears that Beijing is weaponizing its supply chain leverage.

Key Details:

  • Applications for rare-earth magnet exports are being delayed or denied despite a U.S.-China agreement to resume trade.
  • Western firms report that supply remains critically low, with some forced to redesign products or ship components by air to avoid shutdowns.
  • China’s approval process demands sensitive commercial data, fueling concerns of industrial espionage and political pressure.

Diving Deeper:

Despite pledging to ease export restrictions on rare-earth magnets in a deal with the United States earlier this month, China continues to strangle the flow of these critical components, leaving Western industries on edge and trade tensions simmering.

Western companies say the situation has barely improved since China’s Ministry of Commerce promised to accelerate export license approvals. In practice, approvals remain rare, applications take weeks to process, and many are outright rejected. The bottleneck is hitting manufacturers hard—particularly automakers and electronics producers—who rely on China’s near-monopoly of the world’s most powerful rare-earth magnets.

“It’s hand to mouth—the normal supply-chain scrambling that you have to do,” said Lisa Drake, Ford’s VP of industrial planning for EVs. Though she acknowledged some improvement, she made clear the shortages are forcing operational gymnastics to avoid production halts.

The restrictions stem from export controls Beijing implemented in April, shortly after President Donald Trump imposed heavy tariffs on Chinese goods. While China claimed the license system was meant to regulate military-use exports, the real-world effect has been a sharp drop in rare-earth magnet shipments to the U.S.—down 93% in May compared to last year.

Although the White House announced that China had agreed to resume exports in exchange for reduced U.S. restrictions on certain American goods, the ground reality tells a different story. Export licenses are now limited to six months, and applicants must submit highly sensitive commercial details—such as magnet integration designs and buyer contacts—raising red flags for many Western firms. When companies decline to provide such data, licenses are often denied or stalled for 45 days or more.

“Yes, the export restrictions have been paused on paper. However, ground reality is completely different,” said Neha Mukherjee of Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, citing chronic bureaucratic delays.

Chinese officials claim they’ve approved “a certain number” of licenses, but industry insiders say approvals favor large, state-backed magnet companies. Smaller Chinese producers are suffering under the export squeeze and some are trying to collaborate with foreign buyers to bypass restrictions—such as promoting less-powerful magnets not subject to the controls.

However, these substitutes are often inadequate for high-performance applications like automotive motors, AI servers, and defense systems. Some manufacturers have begun redesigning their products, while others are resorting to expensive airfreight to keep assembly lines alive. As one U.S. importer put it, “These are the things you don’t hear about, how much money it is taking to keep these factories running, you know, limping along.”

Meanwhile, Europe is growing more vocal. Germany’s top industry association recently called on its government to challenge Beijing’s tactics, warning that “licensing procedures must not be used as a means of exerting political pressure.”

All signs point to a calculated effort by Beijing to maintain leverage over the West—despite public commitments to ease trade. With China controlling 90% of global supply for these crucial materials, the U.S. and its allies are now forced to confront a familiar truth: when it comes to rare earths, China holds the cards, and it’s not afraid to play them.

Business

Trans Mountain executive says it’s time to fix the system, expand access, and think like a nation builder

Published on

Mike Davies calls for ambition and reform to build a stronger Canada

A shift in ambition

A year after the Trans Mountain Expansion Project came into service, Mike Davies, Senior Director of Marine Development at Trans Mountain, told the B.C. Business Summit 2025 that the project’s success should mark the beginning of a new national mindset — one defined by ambition, reform, and nation building.

“It took fifteen years to get this version of the project built,” Davies said. “During that time, Canadian producers lost about $50 billion in value because they were selling into a discounted market. We have some of the world’s largest reserves of oil and gas, but we can only trade with one other country. That’s unusual.”

With the expansion now in operation, that imbalance is shifting. “The differential on Canadian oil has narrowed by about $13 billion,” he said. “That’s value that used to be extracted by the United States and now stays in Canada — supporting healthcare, reconciliation, and energy transformation. About $5 billion of that is in royalties and taxes. It’s meaningful for us as a society.”

Davies rejected the notion that Trans Mountain was a public subsidy. “The federal government lent its balance sheet so that nation-building infrastructure could get built,” he said. “In our first full year of operation, we’ll return more than $1.3 billion to the federal government, rising toward $2 billion annually as cleanup work wraps up.”

At the Westridge Marine Terminal, shipments have increased from one tanker a week to nearly one a day, with more than half heading to Asia. “California remains an important market,” Davies said, “but diversification is finally happening — and it’s vital to our long-term prosperity.”

Fixing the system to move forward

Davies said this moment of success should prompt a broader rethinking of how Canada approaches resource development. “We’re positioned to take advantage of this moment,” he said. “Public attitudes are shifting. Canadians increasingly recognize that our natural resource advantages are a strength, not a liability. The question now is whether governments can seize it — and whether we’ll see that reflected in policy.”

He argued that governments have come to view regulation as a “free good,” without acknowledging its economic consequences. “Over the past decade, we’ve seen policy focus almost exclusively on environmental and reconciliation objectives,” he said. “Those are vital, but the public interest extends well beyond that — to include security, economic welfare, the rule of law, transparency, and democratic participation.”

Davies said good policy should not need to be bypassed to get projects built. “I applaud the creation of a Major Projects Office, but it’s a disgrace that we have to end run the system,” he said. “We need to fix it.”

He called for “deep, long-term reform” to restore scalability and investment confidence. “Linear infrastructure like pipelines requires billions in at-risk capital before a single certificate is issued,” he said. “Canada has a process for everything — we’re a responsible country — but it doesn’t scale for nation-building projects.”

Regulatory reform, he added, must go hand in hand with advancing economic reconciliation. “The challenge of our generation is shifting Indigenous communities from dependence to participation,” he said. “That means real ownership, partnership, and revenue opportunities.”

Davies urged renewed cooperation between Alberta and British Columbia, calling for “interprovincial harmony” on West Coast access. “I’d like to see Alberta see B.C. as part of its constituency,” he said. “And I’d like to see B.C. recognize the need for access.”

He summarized the path forward in plain terms: “We need to stem the exit of capital, create an environment that attracts investment, simplify approvals to one major process, and move decisions from the courts to clear legislation. If we do that, we can finally move from being a market hostage to being a competitor — and a nation builder.”

Continue Reading

Business

Canada is still paying the price for Trudeau’s fiscal delusions

Published on

This article supplied by Troy Media.

Troy MediaBy Lee Harding

Trudeau’s reckless spending has left Canadians with record debt, poorer services and no path back to a balanced budget

Justin Trudeau may be gone, but the economic consequences of his fiscal approach—chronic deficits, rising debt costs and stagnating growth—are still weighing heavily on Canada

Before becoming prime minister, Justin Trudeau famously said, “The budget will balance itself.” He argued that if expenditures stayed the same, economic growth would drive higher tax revenues and eventually outpace spending. Voila–balance!

But while the theory may have been sound, Trudeau had no real intention of pursuing a balanced budget. In 2015, he campaigned on intentionally overspending and borrowing heavily to build infrastructure, arguing that low interest rates made
it the right time to run deficits.

This argument, weak in its concept, proved even more flawed in practice. Postpandemic deficits have been horrendous, far exceeding the modest overspending initially promised. The budgetary deficit was $327.7 billion in 2020–21, $90.3 billion the year following, and between $35.3 billion and $61.9 billion in the years since.

Those formerly historically low interest rates are also gone now, partly because the federal government has spent so much. The original excuse for deficits has vanished, but the red ink and Canada’s infrastructure deficit remain.

For two decades, interest payments on federal debt steadily declined, falling from 24.6 per cent of government revenues in 1999–2000 to just 5.9 per cent in 2021–22—thanks largely to falling interest rates and prior fiscal restraint. But that trend has reversed. By 2023–24, payments surged past 10 per cent for the first time in over a decade, as rising interest rates collided with record federal debt built up under Trudeau.

Rising debt costs are only part of the story. Federal revenues aren’t what they could have been because Canada’s economy has stagnated. High immigration, which drives productivity down, is the only thing masking our lacklustre GDP growth. Altogether, Canada was 35th among 38 countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for per capita GDP growth from 2014 to 2022 at just 0.2 per cent. By comparison, Ireland led at 45.2 per cent, followed by the U.S. at 20.8 per cent.

Why should a country like Canada, so blessed with natural resources and knowhow, do so poorly? Capital investment has fled because our government has made onerous regulations, especially hindering our energy industry. In theory, there’s now a remedy. Thanks to new legislation, the Carney government can extend its magic sceptre to those who align with its agenda to fast-track major projects and bypass the labyrinth it created. But unless you’re onside, the red tape still strangles you.

But as the private sector withers under red tape, Ottawa’s civil service keeps ballooning. Some trimming has begun, rattling public sector unions. Still, Canada will be left with at least five times as many federal tax employees per capita as the U.S.

Canada also needs to ease its hell-bent pursuit of net-zero carbon emissions. Hydrocarbons still power the Canadian economy—from vehicles to home heating—and aren’t practically replaceable. Canada has already proven that chasing net zero leads to near-zero per capita growth. Despite high immigration, the OECD projects Canada to have the lowest overall GDP growth between 2021 and 2060.

The Nov. 4 release of the federal budget is better late than never. So would be a plan to grow the economy, slash red tape and eliminate the deficit. But we’re unlikely to get one.

Trudeau may be gone, but his legacy of fiscal recklessness is alive and well.

Lee Harding is a research fellow with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

Troy Media empowers Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in helping Canadians stay informed and engaged by delivering reliable content that  strengthens community connections and deepens understanding across the country

Continue Reading

Trending

X