Health
Canadian pediatrics group tells doctors to affirm gender confusion in children as young as 6
 
																								
												
												
											From LifeSiteNews
The article conveniently failed to reference U.K.’s Cass Review, which exposed the dangers of “transitioning” children, including with mutilating pharmaceutical drugs and surgeries.
Canadian doctors are being told to encourage children as young as six in their gender dysphoria.
A brief paper in the Canadian Paediatric Society’s flagship journal advises pediatricians to “affirm” gender-confused children in their confusion, even to the point of prescribing irreversible puberty blockers.
The journal directs pediatricians to “support menstrual suppression/hormone blockers, if appropriate and desired by the patient.”
“Menstruation can be a source of significant gender dysphoria for some TGD [so-called ‘transgender’ or ‘gender-diverse’] youth,” the article continued.
Menstrual suppression “can be achieved using various forms of contraception, such as hormonal intrauterine systems, depot injections, continuous use of oral contraceptive pills, contraceptive patches, and rings, or hormone blockers,” it added.
The article was co-authored by Investigator and Adolescent Medicine Physician at BC Children’s Hospital Basil Kadoura, Dr. Rubaina Farin, and staff paediatrician in at The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) Ashley Vandermorris.
The authors advised doctors to give young children “timely access” to dangerous puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones rather than referring them to a speciality facility, due to long wait times.
The article further noted how doctors are expected to promote “social transitioning,” noting, “For many [gender-confused] children and youth (e.g., case 1), there may only be an interest in/need to discuss social transition, which might include using an affirmed name and pronouns and exploring clothing and hairstyles that align with their experienced gender.”
“As puberty progresses (e.g., case 2), [gender-confused] youth might explore binding, tucking, padding, or packing, and may request your support in doing so safely,” it continued.
The paper cited the case of a gender-confused six-year-old boy who asked to be called by female pronouns and wore a dress.
In this case, the paper told doctors to “provide the family with appropriate resources to talk about gender, connect them to a local parent support group, and describe the many benefits that an affirming social environment has on [gender-confused] children and youth.”
The article conveniently failed to reference U.K.’s Cass Review, which exposed the dangers of “transitioning” children, including with mutilating pharmaceutical drugs and surgeries. The review has led government agencies to rethink their transgender policies.
LifeSiteNews has compiled a list of medical professionals and experts who have warned about transgender procedures and their irreversible harms and lifelong side effects.
In fact, in addition to asserting a false reality that one’s sex can be changed, transgender surgeries and drugs have been linked to permanent physical and psychological damage, including cardiovascular diseases, loss of bone density, cancer, strokes and blood clots, infertility, and suicidality.
There is also overwhelming evidence that those who undergo “gender transitioning” are more likely to commit suicide than those who are not given irreversible surgery. A Swedish study found that those who underwent “gender reassignment” surgery ended up with a 19.2 times greater risk of suicide.
Indeed, the most loving and helpful approach to people who think they are a different sex is not to validate them in their confusion but to show them the truth.
A new study on the side effects of transgender “sex change” surgeries discovered that 81 percent of those who had undergone “sex change” surgeries in the past five years reported experiencing pain simply from normal movement in the weeks and months that followed — and that many other side effects manifest as well.
Health
Leslyn Lewis urges Canadians to fight WHO pandemic treaty before it’s legally binding
 
														From LifeSiteNews
Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis is urging Canadians to demand a parliamentary debate on the WHO Pandemic Agreement, highlighting risks to national sovereignty.
Conservative Member of Parliament (MP) Leslyn Lewis called on Canadians to petition against the World Health Organization’s (WHO) pandemic treaty before it becomes legally binding.
In an October 23 post on X, Lewis encouraged Canadians to demand that politicians debate the WHO Pandemic Agreement before it becomes law after warnings that the treaty could undermine national freedom and lead to global surveillance.
“I have raised red flags about its implications on Canada’s health sovereignty and the federal government’s willingness to enter a legally binding treaty of this weight without any input from Parliament,” she declared.
In May, Canada, under Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney, adopted the treaty despite warnings that the agreement gives the globalist entity increased power in the event of another “pandemic.”
However, Lewis revealed that since the agreement has yet to be officially signed, Canada is not bound to it and can still make amendments.
“We are now in a critical window of opportunity to ask tough questions and debate the treaty before it is signed by the Minister of Foreign Affairs and binds our nation,” she explained.
Lewis encouraged Canadians to sign a petition calling for a debate of the agreement as well as contacting their local MPs to request a parliamentary review of the treaty.
Lewis revealed that Canadians’ persistent opposition to the treaty has already resulted in some of the more dangerous clauses, including restricting free speech, freedom of movement, and government surveillance, being removed from the final agreement.
“Thanks to the engagement of countless Canadians and concerned citizens around the world, the most extreme provisions in the WHO Pandemic Treaty were removed — these measures would have undermined national healthcare sovereignty and given international bureaucrats sweeping powers,” Lewis declared.
“The removal of provisions on vaccine mandates, misinformation and disinformation, censorship requirements, travel restrictions, global surveillance, and mandatory health measures happened because people paid attention and spoke up,” she continued.
Among the most criticized parts of the agreement is the affirmation that “the World Health Organization is the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, including on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”
While the agreement claims to uphold “the principle of the sovereignty of States in addressing public health matters,” it also calls for a globally unified response in the event of a pandemic, stating plainly that “(t)he Parties shall promote a One Health approach for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”
Business
Bill Gates walks away from the climate cult
 
														Billionaire Bill Gates — long one of the loudest voices warning of climate catastrophe — now says the world has bigger problems to worry about. In a 17-page memo released Tuesday, the Microsoft co-founder called for a “strategic pivot” away from the obsessive focus on reducing global temperatures, urging leaders instead to prioritize fighting poverty and eradicating disease in the developing world. “Climate change is a serious problem, but it’s not the end of humanity,” Gates wrote.
Gates, 70, argued that global leaders have lost perspective by treating climate change as an existential crisis while millions continue to suffer from preventable diseases like malaria. “If I had to choose between eradicating malaria and preventing a tenth of a degree of warming, I’d let the temperature go up 0.1 degree,” he told reporters ahead of next month’s U.N. climate conference in Brazil. “People don’t understand the suffering that exists today.”
For decades, Gates has positioned himself as a leading advocate for global climate initiatives, investing billions in green energy projects and warning of the dangers of rising emissions. Yet his latest comments mark a striking reversal — and a rare admission that the world’s climate panic may have gone too far. “If you think climate is not important, you won’t agree with the memo,” Gates told journalists. “If you think climate is the only cause and apocalyptic, you won’t agree with the memo. It’s a pragmatic view from someone trying to maximize the money and innovation that helps poor countries.”
The billionaire’s change in tone is sure to raise eyebrows ahead of the U.N. conference, where climate activists plan to push for new emissions targets and wealth transfers from developed nations. Critics have long accused Gates and other elites of hypocrisy for lecturing the public about fossil fuels while traveling the globe on private jets. Now, Gates himself appears to be distancing from the doomsday rhetoric he once helped spread, effectively admitting that humanity faces more immediate moral imperatives than the weather.
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Stunning Climate Change pivot from Bill Gates. Poverty and disease should be top concern.
- 
																	   Internet2 days ago Internet2 days agoMusk launches Grokipedia to break Wikipedia’s information monopoly 
- 
																	   Business2 days ago Business2 days agoBill Gates walks away from the climate cult 
- 
																	   Alberta23 hours ago Alberta23 hours agoNobel Prize nods to Alberta innovation in carbon capture 
- 
																	   Censorship Industrial Complex1 day ago Censorship Industrial Complex1 day agoPro-freedom group to expose dangers of Liberal ‘hate crime’ bill before parliamentary committee 
- 
																	   Business13 hours ago Business13 hours agoCanada’s attack on religious charities makes no fiscal sense 
- 
																	   Health1 day ago Health1 day agoLeslyn Lewis urges Canadians to fight WHO pandemic treaty before it’s legally binding 
- 
																	   Business1 day ago Business1 day agoFord’s Liquor War Trades Economic Freedom For Political Theatre 
- 
																	   Banks1 day ago Banks1 day agoBank of Canada Cuts Rates to 2.25%, Warns of Structural Economic Damage 
 
								

 
																	
 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											