Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

Automotive

Canada’s EV programs are crashing out

Published

5 minute read

Fr0m Resource Works

By

Consumer appetites and changes in the global economy are outpacing government incentives.

Canada’s bold electric vehicle (EV) plan was once the big deal in the country’s climate policy, but now that reality has set in, it looks like the program is going to fail.

For years, Canadian politicians proudly led the country towards an electric future with strong rebates, strict rules, and a commitment to meeting tough emission reduction targets. But recent events have revealed serious problems that have sent the country’s electric vehicle plans into a tailspin.

The first cracks showed up earlier this year when the federal and provincial rebate programs ended. The iZEV program in Ottawa, which gave up to $5,000 per vehicle, ended suddenly in January 2025 when the money ran out. Quebec followed suit and stopped its provincial rebates for a short time.

They came back at a much lower rate, dropping from $7,000 to $4,000 in April 2025. British Columbia ended its popular rebate program completely after making it harder to qualify, which meant about 75 percent of EV models were no longer eligible. This makes it much harder for people thinking of switching to electric vehicles to make a financial case for it.

The market reacted quickly and strongly. EV sales, which had been increasing, stopped right away. Statistics Canada says EV sales reached their highest point in December 2024 when they made up about 18.29 percent of all sales in Canada. By April 2025, they had dropped to 7.53 percent.

British Columbia, which used to be the leader in EV adoption, saw its market share drop from almost 25 percent in mid-2024 to about 15.4 percent by June 2025. Quebec, which is now the leader in Canada, had similar problems, with sales dropping sharply even though the province has always been enthusiastic about electrification.

There are harsh economic facts behind these numbers. People who want to buy electric vehicles say cost is the biggest problem. Middle-class Canadians can no longer afford electric vehicles because the rebates were taken away. Infrastructure problems make this worse; public charging networks are still not good enough or reliable enough, which makes owning an electric vehicle impractical for many potential buyers.

Even though the government has been working to install thousands of new charging stations, a recent survey found 41 percent of British Columbians thought the current infrastructure was not enough.

The Canadian government’s EV sales mandate has become the big problem, making things even worse. The mandate was meant to ensure 20 percent of all new cars sold by 2026 would be zero-emission and 100 percent by 2035. Now most people think this is impossible.

Auto industry representatives, including the CEOs of Ford, GM, and Stellantis Canada, have told Prime Minister Mark Carney in no uncertain terms that the targets can’t be met in the current market. They say enforcing these rules without any incentives could cost automakers up to $20,000 per vehicle and mean fewer jobs and less production in Canada.

At the same time, geopolitical factors have made things even tougher. The Trump administration’s U.S. tariffs and the end of U.S. EV incentives and mandates have had a huge impact on the Canadian auto industry, which sends 85 percent of its production to the U.S. market.

Critics say Canada’s whole EV policy is a case of good intentions running into hard economic and practical realities. The Fraser Institute says directly that the EV mandate is the wrong way to choose which technologies will succeed and which will fail, hurting markets and putting an unfair burden on lower-income people.

Even people who care about sustainability agree the mandates as they currently stand don’t fit the market and consumer behaviour.

Canada’s EV program needs major policy changes now if it’s to survive and grow. Barry Penner of the Energy Futures Institute and other industry leaders say a more gradual and flexible approach is better. This would include bringing back rebates, improving charging infrastructure, and making sure the mandates match market conditions.

If these changes aren’t made, the good intentions behind Canada’s EV plans will be derailed, and economic stability and real environmental progress will be at risk.

Photo credit to the Province of British Columbia

Automotive

Canada’s EV subsidies are wracking up billions in losses for taxpayers, and not just in the auto industry

Published on

CAE Logo

By Dan McTeague

To anyone who thought that the Liberals’ decision to postpone enforcement of their Electric Vehicle (EV) mandate by one year was part of a well-thought-out plan to get that disastrous program back on track, well, every day brings with it news that you were wrong. In fact, the whole project seems to be coming apart at the seams.

Here’s the latest crisis Mark Carney and his carnival of ideologues are having to deal with. Late last year, the Liberal party instituted a 100% tariff on Chinese-made EVs. The idea was to protect the Canadian EV industry from China dumping their vehicles into our country, at prices far lower than Canadian companies can afford due to their massive state subsidies. This has been a major problem in the EU, which is also attempting to force a transition to EVs.

But Beijing wasn’t going to take that lying down. Taking advantage of Western environmentalist sentiment is an important part of their economic plans — see, for instance, how they’ve cornered the global solar panel market, though the factories making them are powered by massive amounts of coal. So they retaliated with a 75% duty on Canadian canola seed and a 100% tariff on canola oil and canola meal.

This was big enough to really hurt Canadian farmers, and Ottawa was forced to respond with more than $300 million in new relief programs for canola producers. Even so, our farmers have warned that short-term relief from the government will do little if the tariffs are here for the long-term.

With pressure on Carney mounting, his Industry Minister Melanie Joly announced that the government was “looking at” dropping tariffs on Chinese EVs in the hope that China would ease off on their canola tariffs.

That may be good news for canola producers, but how about the automotive companies? They’ve grown increasingly unhappy with the EV mandate, as Canadian consumers have been slow to embrace them, and they’ve been confronted with the prospect of paying significant fines unless they raise prices on the gas-and-diesel driven vehicles which consumers actually want to make the EVs that they don’t really want more attractive.

That’s the context for Brian Kingston, CEO of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers’ Association, saying that dropping these tariffs “would be a disaster.”

“China has engaged in state-supported industrial policy to create massive overcapacity in EV production, and that plan is coming to fruition now,” Kingston said. “When you combine that with weak labour and environmental standards, Chinese manufacturers are not competing with Canadian, American, or Mexican manufacturers on a level playing field. We simply cannot allow those vehicles to be dumped into the Canadian market.”

The auto manufacturers Kingston represents are understandably upset about suddenly having to compete with underpriced Chinese EVs. After all, with the government forcing everyone to buy a product they really don’t want, are most people going to patriotically pay more for that product, or will they just grab whichever one is cheaper? I know which one I think is more likely.

And then there’s a related problem — the federal and provincial governments have “invested” somewhere in the neighborhood of $52.5 billion to make Canada a cog in the global EV supply chain. In response to Joly’s announcement, Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who has gone “all in” on EVs, wrote an open letter to the prime minister saying that canceling the tariffs would mean losing out on that “investment,” and put 157,000 Canadian automotive jobs at risk.

Now, it’s worth noting that automakers all over Ontario have already been cutting jobs while scaling back their EV pledges. So even with the tariffs, this “investment” hasn’t been paying out particularly well. Keeping them in place just to save Doug Ford’s bacon seems like the worst of all options.

But it seems to me that the key to untangling this whole mess has been the option I’ve been advocating from the beginning: repeal the EV mandate. That makes Canada less of a mark for China. It benefits the taxpayers by not incentivizing our provincial and federal governments to throw good money after bad, attempting to subsidize companies to protect a shrinking number of EV manufacturing jobs.

The heart of this trade war is an entirely artificial demand for EVs. Removing the mandate from the equation would lower the stakes.

In the end, the best policy is to trust Canadians to make their own decisions. Let the market decide.

Support Dan’s Work to Keep Canadian Energy Affordable!

Canadians for Affordable Energy is run by Dan McTeague, former MP and founder of Gas Wizard. We stand up and fight for more affordable energy.

Donate Now

Continue Reading

Automotive

America’s Troubled EV Industry Loses Its Subsidized Advantage – Now What?

Published on

 

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By David Blackmon

The Environmental Protection Agency announced Monday that it has assumed responsibility for what it says is the “Largest Lithium-Ion Battery Cleanup in Agency History” at the Moss Landing facility outside San Francisco.

Crews supervised by the EPA entered the facility this week to begin cleaning out the remains of the fire damaged batteries, which the agency says will be recycled at EPA-approved recycling facilities.

As has happened far too frequently, the retired batteries erupted spontaneously in January, leading authors of MIT’s weekly climate newsletter to speculate about what this latest conflagration would mean for the future of the electric vehicle and stationary battery storage industries going forward.

Dear Readers:

As a nonprofit, we are dependent on the generosity of our readers.

Please consider making a small donation of any amount here.

Thank you!

“With the growing number of electric vehicles and batteries for energy storage on the grid,” the authors wrote, “more high-profile fires have hit the news, like last year’s truck fire in LA, the spate of e-bike battery fires in New York City, or one at a French recycling plant last year.”

The parade of troubling incidents related to these batteries has continued throughout 2025. In June, for example, a large container ship called the Morning Midas, operated by Zodiac Maritime, sank into the Pacific Ocean after batteries in EVs it was carrying to Alaska spontaneously combusted, forcing the crew to abandon ship. A month later, U.S.-based shipper Matson announced it would no longer transport EV cargoes due to the obvious dangers involved. Three weeks later, Alaska Marine Lines put a similar policy in place.

All of these inconvenient news stories come at an already troubling time for the U.S. EV industry, given that its huge $7,500 per car federal subsidy expired at midnight, Sept. 30. That subsidy was enacted in the Orwellian-named Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and subsequently repealed in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4 of this year.

Sales have spiked in the run-up to the subsidy expiration, to no one’s real surprise. But EV makers now face the troubling prospect of having to compete in the U.S. market absent that significant price advantage, leading many to anticipate a significant drop-off in sales.

Some carmakers have already begun to scale back operations. Stellantis announced the cancellation of a planned all-electric Dodge Ram pickup model on Sept.12, citing slowing demand for such trucks in a field already dominated by the Ford F-150 Lightning and the Tesla Cyber Truck. The fact that sales of those competing models are already coming in well below projections this year was another obvious motivating factor.

Ford, meanwhile, said in August it would delay the introduction of what it refers to as “next generation” updates to its Lightning pickup and full-sized electric van for two years due to the same challenging market conditions. “F-150 Lightning, America’s best-selling electric truck, and E-Transit continue to meet today’s customer needs,” the company said in what can only be described as an understatement.

Competitor GM announced it would take similar action on Sept. 4, saying it was suspending production of a pair of Cadillac SUVs – the mid-size Lyriq and the full-size Vistiq – at its assembly plant in Spring Hill, Tenn., effective in December. The company also said it would indefinitely delay the start of a second shift at an assembly plant near Kansas City.

Amid the frequent big fire events involving EV batteries and the industry’s fallout from the loss of a federal subsidy, it must be repeated here that the electric vehicle industry is not “new” or even a young one. It is in fact well over a century old, with the first electric cars introduced in the U.S. in the 1890s, during the same period when gas-powered cars started to come onto the market. In those early years, in fact, many experts insisted that electric cars would ultimately render gas-powered cars obsolete and become the dominant force in American transportation.

But makers of EVs then found themselves suffering from the same set of limitations that plague the industry well over a century later: Range anxiety, lack of infrastructure, and persistent unreliability.

The fact that an industry this old has still not solved for the same set of issues after so much time makes it reasonable to question whether it ever will.

David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.

Continue Reading

Trending

X