Business
Canada deserves a project approval process that is swift by default, not by exception

The 20 projects currently undergoing a federal impact assessment have been in it for an average of 2.8 years
Federal impact assessments should be fair, transparent, and swift for all projects, not just the few favoured by Ottawa under Bill C-5, states the MEI in a new publication released this morning.
“Bill C-5 is a clear admission that the current project approval process is broken,” says Krystle Wittevrongel, director of research at the MEI and author of the report. “Plagued by a lack of predictability, investors have found the process unreliable, and creating a bypass for a few projects favoured by politicians does not fix that.”
In late June, Ottawa passed Bill C-5, an omnibus bill that included the Building Canada Act. The law gives the government the ability to bypass existing legislation in order to fast-track the approval process for projects it deems to be in the national interest.
Under the current assessment process, project approvals have been scarce. Since the Impact Assessment Act was passed in 2019, only a single project—Cedar LNG—has been successful in navigating the process from start to finish.
There are currently 20 projects undergoing this assessment review, 12 of which are in the second phase, five are in the first phase, and three are being assessed under BC’s substitution agreement. Not a single project is in the final stages of assessment.
Over this period, investment in key sectors like energy has declined.
In 2015, the value of projects in Natural Resources Canada’s major projects inventory stood at $711 billion. By 2023, it had dropped to $572 billion.
Adjusted for inflation, Canada should have had $886 billion in planned investments—a $314-billion gap, according to the researcher.
Upstream oil and gas investment was expected to increase by seven per cent in 2024 worldwide.
Since 2022, heads of state from Japan, South Korea, Germany, Poland, and Greece have indicated their interest in Canadian energy.
“If this government wants to get things built, it should overhaul the process to benefit all projects and sectors, rather than having everything hinge on its discretion,” notes Ms. Wittevrongel.
The MEI proposes the following policy recommendations to institute a federal assessment process that is swift by default:
- Set firm deadlines: All projects, not just those deemed in the national interest, should be reviewed within a hard 18-month cap. Politicians should not be able to extend these timelines or suspend the process.
- Respect constitutional limits: Federal assessments should focus strictly on areas of federal jurisdiction in order to reduce scope creep and legal uncertainty.
- Limit the scope of considerations: Avoid overly subjective criteria like impacts based on sex and gender intersections, which risk further complicating and delaying approvals.
- Eliminate duplication: If a province has already completed a rigorous assessment, the federal government should automatically accept its findings.
“Ministerial meddling is no fix for Canada’s protracted and opaque approval process,” concludes Ms. Wittevrongel. “Only a system that is swift by default will draw the investment Canada desperately needs to unlock its full potential.”
The MEI Viewpoint is available here.
* * *
The MEI is an independent public policy think tank with offices in Montreal, Ottawa, and Calgary. Through its publications, media appearances, and advisory services to policymakers, the MEI stimulates public policy debate and reforms based on sound economics and entrepreneurship.
Alberta
Albertans should question any calls for more money from municipal governments

From the Fraser Institute
By Ben Eisen and Austin Thompson
In Cochrane, an ordinary park bench costs between $5,000 and $7,000. The City of Calgary will spend $515 million of taxpayer money to build a new arena for the Flames. Edmonton fire stations cost 63 per cent more than comparable facilities elsewhere—an independent report suggests “the largest portion of the cost premium… is attributed to the City of Edmonton’s Climate Resilience policy.”
According to our recent study, from 2008 (the earliest year of available data) to 2023 (the latest year of data), total spending by municipal governments around the province increased from $3,187 per person to $3,750. That’s an increase of 18 per cent (inflation-adjusted). During the same period, total municipal property tax revenue increased by 13 per cent (inflation-adjusted).
In light of these spending and tax increases, it’s fair to ask—have your local municipal services improved in recent years?
Well, it depends on who you ask. But a 2025 survey conducted by the City of Calgary found that only 46 per cent of residents said they receive “good” value for their property tax dollars (rather than “neutral” or “poor”). Satisfaction with the overall level and quality of municipal services declined from 76 per cent in 2017 to 61 per cent in 2025. And only about 9 per cent of Calgarians want the city to increase taxes beyond the current inflation rate to expand services, with the rest preferring to maintain or reduce taxes.
Albertans in other municipalities share similar concerns. According to a 2024 city survey, the vast majority of Edmontonians said winter road maintenance is “very important” but only 45 per cent report being satisfied with this municipal service. And according to a 2023 survey of citizen satisfaction, only 11 per cent of the residents of Grande Prairie County want to “increase taxes to expand services.”
Meanwhile, evidence of municipal waste is not hard to find.
In Cochrane, an ordinary park bench costs between $5,000 and $7,000. The City of Calgary will spend $515 million of taxpayer money to build a new arena for the Flames—this is splashy corporate welfare with dubious public benefits. Edmonton fire stations cost 63 per cent more than comparable facilities elsewhere—an independent report suggests that “the largest portion of the cost premium… is attributed to the City of Edmonton’s Climate Resilience policy.”
In short, municipal spending has increased significantly but many Albertans do not see how this increase translated into better services that have improved their lives. This should make taxpayers and senior levels of governments skeptical of claims from municipalities that they need even more money to help deliver core services. (For example, Alberta’s municipalities claim they need an additional $30 billion to maintain local infrastructure such as roads, wastewater systems and recreational facilities.)
Are you getting good value for your property tax dollars? For many Albertans, the answer appears to be “no.” Until municipalities can demonstrate that existing resources are being used effectively, calls for even more funding should be met with healthy skepticism.
Business
Congressional Republicans introduce bill targeting riot funders

Los Angeles Police struggled to maintain order Saturday night as fires and destruction continued.
From The Center Square
By
Senators from Alabama, Missouri, NC, Tenn., Texas, Utah want to expand RICO
U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and several Republican cosponsors, introduced the Stop Financial Underwriting of Nefarious Demonstrations and Extremist Riots (Stop FUNDERs) Act to hold accountable financiers of rioters and vandals.
The one page bill would amend 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) to add “rioting,” as defined in the Anti-Riot Act, to the list of racketeering predicate offenses. Doing so would enable the Department of Justice “to use the full suite of RICO tools against entities who fund or coordinate violent interstate riots,” Cruz said.
He’s referring to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, which allows for extended criminal penalties for those involved in racketeering. Racketeering involves “any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical,” as well as numerous fraud-related crimes, including gambling, mail fraud, wire fraud, immigration fraud, among others, Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute explains.
“Every American has the right to freedom of speech and peaceful protest, but not to commit violence. Domestic NGOs and foreign adversaries fund and use riots in the United States to undermine the security and prosperity of Americans,” Cruz said.
His bill would give the DOJ added RICO tools that could be used against organizations and individuals who repeatedly fund or coordinate violent interstate riots. They include joint liability and group prosecution, conspiracy charges, asset forfeiture, and enhanced criminal penalties, Cruz said. The goal is also to “deter abuse of nonprofit status and expose hidden financial pipelines behind politically motivated violence,” he said.
Only Republicans in the Senate signed on as cosponsors: Sens. John Cornyn of Texas, Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, Bill Hagerty of Tennessee, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Mike Lee of Utah and Josh Hawley of Missouri.
“Radical, left-wing groups who fund acts of violence, coordinate attacks against law enforcement, and spearhead the destruction of property must be stopped,” Cornyn said. “This legislation would add rioting to the list of racketeering offenses to crack down on this lawless behavior while ensuring the First Amendment rights of free speech and peaceful protest are protected.”
U.S. Rep. Beth Van Duyn, R-Texas, filed companion legislation in the House.
“It is time we empower our law enforcement with a commonsense tool to treat these violent mobs, their funding sources, and their organizers as the criminal enterprises they are by passing the Stop FUNDERS Act,” she said. “Since the days of the George Floyd riots, to the violence we see across American cities and college campuses today, it is obvious there are well funded, well outfitted, and highly coordinated efforts to plan and execute violent and potentially deadly missions of chaos and mayhem. This is organized crime, and we need to attack it as such.”
The bill was filed after organized anti-Israel riots exploded across college campuses nationwide after the Oct. 7, 2023. Hamas terrorist attack against Israel. Training manuals were published by pro-Palestinian groups to take over U.S. college campuses, rioters targeted Jewish students, locked them out of classrooms and buildings and physically assaulted them, resulting in lawsuits and congressional investigations.
Under President Donald Trump, Ivy League colleges where significant antisemitism was reported were threatened with losing hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money, accreditation, cancellation of visa approvals among other actions if they didn’t change their policies to protect Jewish students. In response, some universities sued, others complied.
Cruz, Hawley and others also called for foreign students’ visas to be revoked who were involved in riots and advocating antisemitism, a policy their former colleague and now Secretary of State Marco Rubio began implementing.
More recently, riots against ICE officers in the last few months also appear to be coordinated and financed by several groups, prompting a Department of Justice investigation. Hawley is leading an investigation into the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles, arguing the violence wasn’t “spontaneous.”
Within the first six months of the Trump administration, attacks against ICE officers have increased by 830% from California to Nebraska to New York, The Center Square reported.
Recent examples include threats to kill or physically harm federal agents and their family members, with recent shootings targeting ICE officers and Border Patrol facilities in Texas, and ICE officers in California and New York, The Center Square reported.
-
Addictions2 days ago
Toronto offering free drug kits with pipes, syringes across city
-
Alberta24 hours ago
$602,000 of contraband tobacco seized in Red Deer
-
COVID-192 days ago
American lawyer calls on Trump to sanction Canada if Freedom Convoy leaders are jailed
-
COVID-192 days ago
Prosecutors claim Lich, Barber led occupation of Ottawa during Freedom Convoy protests
-
Alberta5 hours ago
Albertans should question any calls for more money from municipal governments
-
Frontier Centre for Public Policy1 day ago
The RCMP Used To Uphold The Law. Now It’s Enforcing An Ideology
-
Health2 days ago
Patients are being taken for organ retrieval while still alive
-
Housing21 hours ago
Trump executive order moves get homeless off the streets