Connect with us
[the_ad id="89560"]

COVID-19

Canada approves Moderna’s latest experimental COVID shot starting after 6 months old

Published

4 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Clare Marie Merkowsky

Health Canada’s decision to approve the shots follows a bombshell study of Pfizer and Moderna COVID shots that shows “self-assembling nanostructures.”

Health Canada approved Moderna’s new MRNA COVID-19 vaccine for all Canadians over six months of age.

On September 17th, Moderna announced that its latest COVID-19 vaccine, targeting the KP.2 variant of SARS-COV-2, was approved by Health Canada, despite overwhelming evidence of the dangers of the shots.

“With vaccines ready, Moderna will begin delivery of updated doses to the Public Health Agency of Canada, ensuring supply is available in time for provincial and territorial vaccination campaigns,” the company said in a news release.

“Receiving the most recently updated COVID-19 vaccine is expected to provide a better immune response against circulating COVID-19 strains compared to earlier vaccines,” Moderna claimed. “It is especially important for those at increased risk for COVID-19 infection or severe COVID-19 illness.”

The promotion of the experimental shot comes over three years after government officially declared a COVID “pandemic” and forced Canadians to take the vaccine. Additionally, there has been no outbreak of COVID for several years.

Health Canada’s decision to approve the shots follows a bombshell study of Pfizer and Moderna COVID shots that shows “self-assembling nanostructures.”

According to the report, researchers in Korea observed what appear to be “self-assembling,” “synthetic” nanostructures such as spirals and tubes that form within the contents of the COVID Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots over the course of months.

Canada’s promotion of the vaccine also comes as Canada’s program to compensate those injured by the COVID vaccines has reached $14 million, but the vast majority of claims remain unpaid.

Despite the need for a federal program to address those injured by the vaccines once mandated by the Trudeau government, Health Canada still says “it’s safe to receive a COVID-19 vaccine following infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. Vaccination is very important, even if you’ve had COVID-19.”

The federal government is also continuing to purchase COVID jabs despite the fact the government’s own data shows that most Canadians are flat-out refusing a COVID booster injection.

Some people who were successful in getting payouts from VISP have said that the compensation awarded was insufficient considering the injuries sustained from the COVID shots.

As reported by LifeSiteNews last year, 42-year-old Ross Wightman of British Columbia launched a lawsuit against AstraZeneca, the federal government of Canada, the government of his province, and the pharmacy at which he was injected after receiving what he considers inadequate compensation from VISP.

He was one of the first citizens in Canada to receive federal financial compensation due to a COVID vaccine injury under VISP. Wightman received the AstraZeneca shot in April 2021 and shortly after became totally paralyzed. He was subsequently diagnosed with Guillain-Barré Syndrome.

Wightman was given a one-time payout of $250,00 and about $90,000 per year in income replacement but noted, as per a recent True North report, that he does not even know if those dollar amounts “would ease the pain.”

LifeSiteNews has published an extensive amount of research on the dangers of receiving the experimental COVID mRNA jabs, which include heart damage and blood clots.

The mRNA shots have also been linked to a multitude of negative and often severe side effects in children.

COVID-19

New studies provide ‘irrefutable’ grounds for immediate withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA shots

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Doug Mainwaring

International evidence has concluded that mRNA injections are unsafe, ineffective, contaminated, and in violation of international law.

Three recent peer-reviewed studies, including two published this week, provide “IRREFUTABLE Grounds for Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA Injections,” according to a leading expert on the dangers of mRNA vaccines.

“Two MAJOR papers were just published in the past 48 hours, building directly on our recent landmark study,” wrote Nicolas Hulscher, an epidemiologist and administrator at the McCullough Foundation.

“Together, the international evidence has converged: mRNA injections are unsafe, ineffective, contaminated, and in violation of international law,” Hulscher said.

One study published this week, “COVID-19 Injections: Harms and Damages, a Non-Exhaustive Conclusion,” found that the injections contain engineered elements in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention. The study found that the COVID-19 jabs had damaging effects on recipients’ cardiovascular, reproductive, and immune systems:

  • Cardiovascular system: strong links to myocarditis, heart attacks, strokes, and arrhythmias
  • Reproductive system: high rates of pregnancy loss, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths
  • Immune system: collapse marked by viral reactivation, autoimmune disease, and cancer acceleration

The second study published this week, “Regulatory and Safety Assessment of COVID-19 mRNA-LNP Genetic Vaccines in Japan: Evidence for Revocation of Approval and Market Withdrawal,” noted that 103 million people in that country were injected without any nationwide safety investigation or long-term monitoring.

Researchers concluded that the COVID-19 shots were “misclassified as ‘vaccines’  rather than gene therapy products, allowing the product to bypass stricter regulatory standards.

“Critical studies (were) never conducted,” according to the study authors, who documented legal and ethical breaches, including concealment of harms, suppression of mortality data, and approvals granted without clinical trials.

The two new studies confirm a report earlier this year produced by Hulscher, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, and Dr. Peter McCullough, published in the journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, that claimed risks from COVID-19 vaccines “far outweigh theoretical benefits.”

“COVID-19 vaccination campaigns around the globe have failed to meet fundamental standards of safety and efficacy, leading to mounting evidence of significant harm,” the researchers explained.

“Together, these three studies converge on the same conclusion: Immediate global withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA injections is essential to prevent further loss of life,” Hulscher declared on X.

“Now is the time to stand on the right side of history — or be remembered by future generations as complicit in one of the greatest tragedies of our time,” he added.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

RFK Jr. revokes emergency use authorization for COVID shots

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Emily Mangiaracina

CDC Director Susan Monarez was fired from her position the same day the EUA repeal was announced.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under the leadership of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., revoked emergency use authorizations for the COVID-19 shots, including the experimental mRNA jabs.

“The emergency use authorizations (EUA) for Covid vaccines, once used to justify broad mandates on the general public during the Biden administration, are now rescinded,” Kennedy announced Wednesday on X.

Instead, the FDA has issued “marketing authorization” for those who meet a minimum risk threshold for the following mRNA “vaccines”: Moderna (6+ months), Pfizer (5+), and Novavax (12+), Kennedy shared.

“These vaccines are available for all patients who choose them after consulting with their doctors,” the HHS Secretary explained.

He pointed out that this decision was the result of his pledge to accomplish the following four things as head of HHS: “end covid vaccine mandates, keep vaccines available to people who want them, especially the vulnerable, demand placebo-controlled trials from companies,” and “end the emergency.”

The repeal of the COVID “vaccine” EUA is long overdue considering that former President Joe Biden ended the COVID-19 “national emergency” in April 2023, about seven months after Biden admitted to 60 Minutes that the COVID-19 “pandemic” was “over.”

A large, growing body of evidence shows that the experimental mRNA shots were dangerous to human health in a wide variety of ways and caused deaths at a rate far exceeding usual safety standards for vaccines. As Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, an ear, nose and throat specialist in Houston, Texas, explained to Tucker Carlson in April:

Normally, the FDA will put a black box warning on a medication if there have been five deaths. They will pull it off the market if there have been 50. Well, according to VAERS, (the) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System — and it’s vastly under-reported, which I have seen firsthand — there have been 38,000 deaths from these COVID shots.

That number has since increased according to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which now reports 38,742 deaths, 221,113 hospitalizations, 22,346 heart attacks, and 28,995 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis due to the COVID shot as of July 25, among other ailments.

Despite the outrageously high number of reported deaths due to the COVID shots — which were produced in a fraction of the time ordinarily required to bring a vaccine to market — instead of pulling the shots, the FDA “doubled down” on them, Bowden noted, including by placing them on the childhood vaccine schedule. However, under Kennedy, the CDC has since removed the COVID mRNA shot recommendation for healthy children and pregnant women.

“Susan Monarez is no longer director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We thank her for her dedicated service to the American people. @SecKennedy has full confidence in his team at @CDCgov who will continue to be vigilant in protecting Americans against infectious diseases at home and abroad,” the HHS X account wrote Wednesday.

Continue Reading

Trending

X