Bruce Dowbiggin
Air: How Running Shoes Changed the Sports Business Forever

In Ben Affleck’s terrific film Air, basketball talent scout Jimmy Vaccaro is risking his career on signing Michael Jordan, who’s just been drafted third overall in the 1984 NBA draft. He gambles everything on his company NIKE, not noted for its hoops shoes, winning over Jordan and his family to a radical new design.
When Jordan’s mother, played powerfully by Viola Davis, demands a percentage of every Air Jordan shoe sold, Vacarro balks, thinking his publicly held company will never approve such a radical concept. The deal looks ready to collapse, with Adidas set to move in. As they do throughout the film, viewers are yelling at the NIKE executives on screen, “Trust us! He’s going to be great! Give him what he wants!”
Being onside with history is a wonderful conceit in an era where certainty is lost and liars prosper. The audience knows what will happen if Jordan puts on the NIKE shoes and goes on to become the global sports superstar earning billions. The shoes will generate $162 M the first year in production. Jordan still receives $40 M a year for his share in the shoe. (He’s set to sell the NBA Charlotte Bobcats for $3B.)
So, of course, Jordan signs with NIKE, the shoes sell like crazy and he fulfills his destiny as a great star, winning eight NBA titles and two Olympic gold medals. Affleck (who plays NIKE founder Phil Knight) throws in a rapid slide show on what’s still to come, including the murder of Jordan’s father, James; Michael mysteriously quitting to play baseball for two years and the defining final years of his brilliant career with the Chicago Bulls.
For this reason Affleck has made a wise decision in limiting his business story to the summer of 1984. He knows that the voluminous ten-part documentary series The Jordan Rules has already trod on the dramas of his Bulls career. His straightforward underdog story allows audiences to revel in the birth of their modern culture without any of the attendant culture wars.
Like Moneyball and The Blind Side, Air delivers an uncomplicated sports business story, this time about a prominent black athlete who eschewed politics with the line, “Republicans buy running shoes, too.” It’s what they used to call an all-American story. Like Hoosiers.Thanks to then ultra-competitive Jordan the NBA went from late-night delayed broadcast nowhere in 1980 to a global brand synonymous with wealth and power.
Then Knight stepped back in 2016. By 2017, NIKE was handing out multi-millions to disgruntled NFL QB Colin Kaepernick for disrespecting the national anthem. It led the way in funnelling millions to #BLM, even as the organizers used it to buy Hollywood homes for themselves. Knight’s company will be synonymous with slave labour in China and censoring NBA figures who challenge the proximity of the league and its Chinese paymasters.
None of this is even hinted at in Air. Cause-obsessed critics missed the low-hanging fruit. Instead, Peter Bradshaw of the far-left Guardian trashed the film for “looking like the most expensive in-house corporate promo in history: shallow, parochial and obtuse”. Predictably, the critic from @NPR railed against the film’s embrace of corporate culture. Aisha Harris calls it a “craven exercise in capitalist exaltation”.
The real issue is not capitalism but the corruption of athletics by the paymasters on the Left since 1984. Thanks to the new NIKE management progressive politics ensnare nearly every positive achieved by Jordan’s triumph. Knight’s bold initiatives and unapologetic opportunism have been bled away, replaced by the DEI and ESG and climate radicalism of people who’ve succeeded him in the C suite at NIKE.
If you want to know what that accomplished watch ESPN’s three Rs for about an hour. Race. Resentment. Radical environmentalism. As a result, the second act of this script would be something far more sombre than the giddiness of wooing Jordan and his family. The LeBron James generation of young players following Jordan reject his neutrality for unabashed acceptance of the latest grievance meme. They flaunt their riches even as they toe the line with China.
On the same topic, it would be interesting to see a film about how the NHL exploited— and then squandered— its Jordan Rules moment. Parallel to the Bulls star’s ascension the NHL experienced its own Jordan in Wayne Gretzky. A once-in-a century star, Gretzky possessed all the marketable qualities of Jordan in his NHL career that began in 1979.
Using the new marketing schemes exploited by Jordan and NIKE, L.A. Kings owner Bruce McNall wooed Gretzky to Hollywood in 1988 from remote Edmonton in the most famous trade in NHL history. For a time it seemed the NHL had gotten religion in their marketing, adding Disney as an owner and exploiting the synergies of Gretzky to open up the league to the southern U.S.
But then McNall was sent to prison for fraud, and Gretzky failed to deliver a Stanley Cup to the entertainment capital of the world. He moved twice more to teams that promised a chance at a fifth Cup, but it never worked out. There was no Air Gretzky. Disney and Waste Management, the prize new owners, abandoned the league when commissioner Gary Bettman became more obsessed with labour stoppages than talking up the product to the world.
International play seemed to flourish for a time, but by the 2020s, Gary Bettman’s league was what it had been, an isolated North American operation seemingly uninterested in the global reach enjoyed by the NBA. Blanket expansion of the continent, not the world, seems their goal. Gretzky, who once denied ever betting on sports, now pimps for legalized betting at MGM.
So yes, Jordan’s shoe was a blatant marketing manipulation of the culture. Its controversial China impact is massive. But the net impact of Knight, Vaccaro and the Jordan family living out the American dream puts anything the NHL has managed in its history to shame.
Sign up today for Not The Public Broadcaster newsletters. Hot takes/ cool slants on sports and current affairs. Have the latest columns delivered to your mail box. Tell your friends to join, too. Always provocative, always independent. https://share.hsforms.com/16edbhhC3TTKg6jAaRyP7rActsj5
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, he’s a regular contributor to Sirius XM Canada Talks Ch. 167. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his new book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via http://brucedowbigginbooks.ca/book-personalaccount.aspx
Bruce Dowbiggin
Kirk’s Killing: Which Side Can Count on the Military’s Loyalty Now?

“After every armistice, you want to put us away in mothballs, like the fleet. When it comes to a little dying you’ll be sure to put us in a uniform…” Seven Days in May
In the 1964 political film Seven Days in May, a rogue Director of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff conspires to launch a coup against a failing president who’s just signed a nuclear disarmament treaty with the Soviets. The plot is uncovered by a Marine Corps colonel, and the coup is barely averted with all the conspirators apprehended.
In 1964 the notion that the loyalty of the military/ intelligence services might be compromised was a hot topic in the days afterJFK’s assassination. After calming down in the Reagan days— remember Woody Allen’s revolution spoof Bananas?— it has now returned.
How likely is a military/ intelligence coup? Loyalty of troops has been crucial in many coups and insurrections around the world. Famously the socialist regime of Salvador Allende was crushed in 1973 when the Chilean military staged a bloody coup. Allende and thousands were murdered as General Augusto Pinochet took over the country.
Still, the conceit in Western nations has always been “It can’t happen here”. The institutions of government are believed too strong and independent to allow themselves to be taken over by their militaries. The chattering classes prefer to see their military as Stanley Kubrick did in Dr. Strangelove— bumbling buffoons, lackeys led by General Buck Turgidson.

Certainly in Canada, where successive Liberal government culminated with Justin Trudeau, the Kubrick model is closer to reality. DEI hiring, cuts to budgets and a slavish reliance on America to protect Canada for free have produced a Canadian military with more in common with HMS Pinafore than Vimy Ridge. From the world’s third-largest navy in 1945, Canada is now a boat that can’t float.
But something seems to have changed with the Tuesday murder of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. It seems a massive provocation by people who want to destroy the American society. It’s not helped by the voices on the Left claiming he brought it on himself with hate speech. @punishedmother “Maybe Charlie Kirk shouldn’t have spent years being a hateful demagogic fascist and this wouldn’t have happened. Maybe he should take some personal responsibility.It will take careful leadership to prevent this boiling over.”
This growing intolerance between the political sides exposed yet again by Kirk’s assassination has made people consider the Armed Forces’ loyalty in a crisis. As in, who has it? (In pacifist Canada the current clash of cultures is that support of the military might be necessary in resisting the conservative right. Despite Bill C-23 disarming Canadians the unarmed Left might face a large, well-armed rightwing population brandishing weapons.)
In a divided America think of Tom Cruise’s JAG character in A Few Good Men confronting hardened Marine commandant played by Jack Nicholson— and you have the conflict. “You can’ t take the truth!” Fighting generals are a thing of the past when Democrats are in power. Successive presidents have used DEI to create desk generals and commanders who reflect good taste over good planning.

This DEI mission creep in the military was one of Donald Trump’s strongest planks in defeating hapless Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Canadian Liberals, meanwhile, managed to dodge their pathetic defence shortcomings only by making the 2025 election all about Trump and a 51st state, not defence or Chinese influence.
There has been evidence that some at the highest levels of the U.S. military, CIA and FBI have already shown a bias toward Democrats. In the waning days of Trump 45 Chief of Staff Mark Milley told the Chinese leadership— America’s No. 1 global rival— that he would personally tip them off if Trump launched a surprise attack on China.
In another time (or movie) Milley’s treachery would been seen as treasonous, punishable by a life in the stockade or, possibly, execution. In the hands of the DC Media Party, however, Milley’s partisan gambit was buried in the run-up to the 2020 election. As with the concurrent Hunter Biden laptop scandal, the story was made to disappear in a welter of Trump demonization and legal harassment
Now we must wonder again. Sadly for Harris, Milley and Team Obama, the Democrats were thrashed by the Trump agenda. POTUS 45—now 47— quickly began replacing lifetime loyalists in the military and bureaucrats, stifling for now the urge to purge,
Again this scenario was unthinkable a generation ago, a plot in a movie. But the governments of Barack Obama and Joe Biden (Trudeau in Canada) have created a social schism that has turned politics into a blood sport. As we know there were two attempts on Trump in the election campaign by deranged radicals. The defeated Democrats’ obsession over who controls the Supreme Court and Congress in Trump’s presidency, the repeated comparisions to Hitler, are producing greater and more strident anything-is-accepted calls from the radical Left to take to the streets and pursue civil disobedience.
In Canada Mark Carney’s Elbows Up gambit is dissipating rapidly since the election, producing active discussion of separation in Alberta and Quebec (again). This raises questions about what the military might do in the aftermath of a vote by either side to leave Canada. Might they intervene? Would they stand aside? Will tanks roll to protect a Carney Canada?
No doubt Charlie Kirk’s death will be mobilized by both sides in their appeals for the loyalty of the military should a civil war break out in the U.S. Get your generals in a row. MSNBC’s Jen Psaki has declared Trump’s tribute to Kirk “an escalation” Says legal expert Jonathan Turley, “We are already at political assassinations, so I am not sure how much more room for escalation there may be for Psaki or MSNBC.”
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, his new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
Bruce Dowbiggin
Ken Dryden: Hockey’s Diogenes. He Called Them As He Saw Them

There is much talk about the Canadian identity in these days of mass immigration , diversity and refusal to integrate. The 1970s were a simpler time for such rumination on culture, however. Riding the new global identity of Pierre Trudeau (soon to be regretted), the times were fired by the 1972 hockey summit win by Canada over the Soviet Union.
The series contained many of the self-held perceptions of the nation. Plucky underdog. Tenacious competitor in global affairs. Limitless possibilities. All seemingly rolled up into two weeks 53 years ago this month. Many of these notions were still manifest in the 2025 federal election when Boomers had a conniption fit over Donald Trump and withdrew into their Elbows Up phase.
So it should come as no surprise that one of the stars of that 1972 team was goalie Ken Dryden. While not being dominant throughout against the shifty Soviets, Dryden peaked at the right moments (in tandem with Tony Esposito) to snatch the eight-game series at absolutely the final possible moment.

It’s hardly an exaggeration that, while a number of the Canadian players lost their minds in the tense fortnight, Dryden carried himself with cool dignity. There were no Phil Esposito jeremiads. Not Jean Paul Parisé stick wielding. No Bobby Clare two-handers to the ankles of his opponents. Just the emerging figure of the lanky goalie resting his chin on his stick as he waited in the net for Kharlamov and Yakushev.
For the generation that watched him develop he was likely the quintessential modern Canadian. Son of a charitable community figure. Educated in the Ivy League. Obtained his law degree. Served as a federal cabinet minister. Author of several definitive hockey books (The Game is perhaps the best sports non-fiction in the English language). Executive of the Toronto Maple Leafs. And more.
He was on the American telecast of the 1980 U.S. Miracle On Ice at Lake Placid. And the radio broadcast of the 1976 Canada Cup. Ubiquitous media source. Loyal to Canada. And crucially, a son, husband, father and grandfather. If you’d created a model for the citizen of Canada of his times it was Ken.
He could be cranky and verbose, yes. His books often took issue with the state of the modern game. Concussions. The Trap. Excessive goalie pads. But his defining moment may have come in 1973 when, upset with Sam Pollock’s contract offer, he left the Montreal Canadiens to finish his law degree in Toronto. It’s important to note that his reputation at the time was a goalie carried by the Jean Beliveau super teams. Yet the Canadiens allowed 56 more goals in the 1973–74 season than they had the year before with Dryden. Plus they lost in the semifinals after winning the Cup the previous spring. Karma.
When he returned the Habs ripped off four consecutive Stanley Cups. Phil Esposito praised him as that “f’ing giraffe” who stole at least two Cups from the Bruins. He retired for good in 1979, and the Canadiens didn’t win another Cup till 1986. Which enhanced his reputation. His combination of tenacity, independence and integrity made him many fans. And launched a generation of goalies who broke the mould.

So his passing in the year that Boomers exercised their cultural privilege one last time is a fitting codicil to an era that held so much promise and has ended in a lost culture and renewed talk of separation in Quebec and Alberta. Many have emotional memories of Dryden, and social media has exploded with them on the news Friday of his death at 78.
For us, our quintessential Dryden moment came in 2001 at the NHL Draft. We were working for the Calgary Herald, he was an executive with the Maple Leafs. As we arrived at the Miami airport in a torrential rainstorm who was standing in the car rental lobby but the unmistakable No. 29? As fellow authors, we’d met many times, and we had quoted him so often we can’t count the times. So there was no fan-boy encounter.
This day he was a lost soul whose car rental had fallen through. Could we give him a ride to the media hotel? Sure. The company was welcome. As we rolled along though the pelting rain, searching for the right highway (this was pre-Waze) we talked about family and background. How were my kids? How was his wife now that he was hearing it from Maple Leafs fans?
Above the machine-gunning of the rain we then pivoted to hockey. He wanted to know what was going on with the Flames (they were mediocre at the time). And he wanted to talk about the state of trap hockey which was then choking the art of the game. Where was the beauty, the artistry in a league dumbed-down by clutch ‘n grab?
After chatting and squinting through the sheets of rain for 45 minutes we finally arrived at the hotel in Sunrise. As we walked into the lobby Ken thanked us for the ride and gave us $40 for gas. Media colleagues watching the scene were flabbergasted. Ken had a reputation as being frugal, and here he’d readily given me $40! U.S.! What could this mean? Did we get as scoop they’d have to chase. Ken blandly shooed them away, saying he had to check in.
We didn’t get a hot tip on a story. But we did get several gems to use in our next book Money Players, a finalist for the 2004 Canadian Business Book of the year. We meant to thank him for the material. Somehow the moment was never right. Now we won’t get that chance.
We might say the same for Canada. Somehow the moment was never right. Now we won’t get that chance. RIP Ken.
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, his new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
-
Alberta2 days ago
Alberta deserves a police force that actually reflects its values
-
Crime23 hours ago
Former NYPD Inspector Breaks Down How Charlie Kirk’s Shooter Will Be Caught
-
Alberta2 days ago
OPEC+ chooses market share over stability, and Canada will pay
-
Crime1 day ago
FBI offering $100,000 reward for information leading to arrest of Charlie Kirk Assassin
-
International2 days ago
A social media crackdown sparked the revolution but government corruption set Nepal’s youth on fire
-
Censorship Industrial Complex1 day ago
UK’s top cop wants to ‘stop policing tweets’: report
-
COVID-192 days ago
Canada’s COVID mandates linked to rise in ‘unexplained deaths’: new report
-
Crime24 hours ago
Surveillance video shows Charlie Kirk’s killer slipping away moments after shooting