By Calvin Freiburger
Even happy, healthy lives without major issues can warrant needless ending if they are ‘complete.’
Notorious secular āethicistā Peter Singer has co-authored an opinion piece in The New York TimesĀ positing a chilling new rationale for assisted suicide: the determination that oneās life is simply ācomplete.ā
Princeton psychologist Daniel KahnemanĀ died in March 2024 at age 90. His cause of death was not disclosed at the time, but a year later,Ā TheĀ Wall Street JournalĀ revealed that Kahneman had emailed friends the day before to tell them he was traveling to Switzerland to avail himself of the countryās legal physician-assisted suicide.
āI think Danny wanted, above all, to avoid a long decline, to go out on his terms, to own his own death,āĀ WSJĀ journalist and longtime friend of the deceased Jason Zweig wrote. āMaybe the principles of good decision-making that he had so long espoused ā rely on data, donāt trust most intuitions, view the evidence in the broadest possible perspective ā had little to do with his decision.ā
On April 14,Ā TheĀ New York TimesĀ published aĀ guest essayĀ by the infamous Singer, aĀ pro-infanticideĀ Princeton bioethics professor, and philosophy professor Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek, who shared that they too knew of Kahnemanās plans and that days before he had told them, āI feel Iāve lived my life well, but itās a feeling. Iām just reasonably happy with what Iāve done. I would say if there is an objective point of view, then Iām totally irrelevant to it. If you look at the universe and the complexity of the universe, what I do with my day cannot be relevant.ā
āI have believed since I was a teenager that the miseries and indignities of the last years of life are superfluous, and I am acting on that belief,ā Kahneman reportedly said. āI am still active, enjoying many things in life (except the daily news) and will die a happy man. But my kidneys are on their last legs, the frequency of mental lapses is increasing, and I am 90 years old. It is time to go.ā
Singer and de Lazari-Radek argued that this was an eminently reasonable conclusion. ā(I)f, after careful reflection, you decide that your life is complete and remain firmly of that view for some time, you are the best judge of what is good for you,ā they wrote. āThis is especially clear in the case of people who are at an age at which they cannot hope for improvement in their quality of life.ā
ā(I)f we are to live well to the end, we need to be able to freely discuss when a life is complete, without shame or taboo,ā the authors added. āSuch a discussion may help people to know what they really want. We may regret their decisions, but we should respect their choices and allow them to end their lives with dignity.ā
Pro-lifers have longĀ warnedĀ that the euthanasia movement devalues life and preys on the ill and distraught by making serious medical issues (even non-terminal ones) into grounds to end oneās life. But Singer and de Lazari-Radekās essay marks a new extreme beyond that point by asserting that even happy, healthy lives without major issues can warrant needless ending.
āInstead of seeing every human life as having inherent value and dignity, Singer sees life as transactional: something you are allowed to keep by being happy, able-bodied, and productive ā and something to be taken away if you are not,ā Cassy CookeĀ wroteĀ at Live Action News.
In America, nine states plus the District of ColumbiaĀ currently allowĀ assisted suicide. In March, DelawareĀ tookĀ a step closer to becoming the 10th with its own legalization bill, although it has yet to become law. Another billĀ recently failed in Maryland.
Support is available to talk those struggling with suicidal thoughts out of ending their lives. TheĀ Suicide & Crisis LifelineĀ can be reached by calling or texting 988.
Related