Connect with us

Community

THE OCTOBER 16, 2017 ELECTION will be about “CHANGE” and the”DOWNTOWN”

Published

9 minute read

The question arose, on election issues in regard to the upcoming October 16 2017 Alberta’s municipal elections, and what they may be. The first word that comes to mind is; “Change” and the second word is ; “Downtown”.
The past few elections, provincially, federally and even the US presidential election has been about change. The average person against the political insiders and dynasties, the opportunity to be heard, to stir things up and to give notice that the average citizen is not benefiting by the decisions being made by political leaders. The same thing in all levels of governance, even at city hall and the school boards.
We have been dealing with the development of the Riverlands for decades. First it was a no brainer, move the public works yard to a more obscure location and develop and sell the prime real estate and come out ahead. Then we just simply moved it and over the river, built the new yard at a cost recently estimated at over $138 million, Add in the new roads, services, and it has been over $200 million. Now they are spending millions on the Riverwalk, and still talking about a $20 million dollar footbridge a few hundred metres from Taylor bridge which already has a pedestrian walkway. Another $4.8 million for Ross Street, more money for Alexander Way, and then after about a quarter of a billion dollars we only have a 22 acre empty lot.
How many years have we been talking about building a competitive pool? At least a dozen, if I am not mistaken. I think they discussed wanting Collicutt to incorporate a 50m pool about 20 years ago. The last few years they have been discussing spending $88 million to build the Aquatic Centre downtown, and that did not include the cost of demolition, roadway redesigning and meeting Leed building standards. That was also in 2013 construction dollars. Unless City Hall has a time machine, it won’t be built in 2013. Total costs in 2013 would have been closer to $100 million in 2013 all inclusive, now it will be closer to $130 million but the old guard keeps parading the $88 million dollar figure, as if by repeating it will make it true.
The city recently acquired Central Elementary School and will spend millions on it for the Canada Games, will spend $220,000 on studies telling us that it would make a great concert hall and performing arts centre.
If you look at comparable concert halls and performing arts centres you will believe that the costs will exceed 78 million dollars before opening.
Concert hall, swimming pool, bus terminal, arena, road re-alignments, river lands and we are talking about a half billion dollars into our downtown. $5,000 from every man woman and child in Red Deer or $12,500 from every home in Red Deer. Did we lose our way?
When the arena was originally built, it was located away from downtown for strategic reasons, as was the Westerner, the Collicutt Centre, the College, but there was no recent public discussion about possibly looking at rebuilding the arena in a more appropriate location.
The city will not give serious discussion about building the competitive pool anywhere but downtown. You can argue about accessibility, traffic, parking, and location and the city will tell you they have no choice. They do not own Michener grounds, new builds are too expensive, there is no land available large enough to accommodate it. Excuse me but there is 3.000 acres north of 11A available. There is also a lake, Hazlett Lake, available to accentuate the Aquatic Centre. What would be more logical than building an Aquatic Centre on a lake.
We built the Collicutt Centre in South East corner and it helped spur construction in the south east. We could build the Aquatic Centre in the north-west to spur construction. Hazlett Lake is visible from Hwy 2 and could be a tourist draw for that increasingly important tourist money. The city leaders won’t even discuss it, they will just demolish the Recreation Centre so the indoor pool can be made larger and the outdoor pool made smaller, and thereby putting residents in the position of having no pool downtown for a couple of years.
Remember when the Red Deer Lodge had to rebuild their pool? They offered free passes to the Rec Centre to their guests and got almost no response.
After all this, the city will not budge, so perhaps there does need some changes made to wake them up. Perhaps a half a billion dollars downtown may be incentive to get out and vote.
The same can be said about the school boards. Are they listening? Are they aware of the needs of all citizens? One third of the city usually resides north of the city. The school boards have thought that one third of the city does not need a high school while the other two thirds needs 6 high schools, with 5 high schools along 30 avenue. The school boards believe that it is okay for one third of their students should commute across the city during rush hour traffic at twice everyday. That one third of the students can travel across the city again for sports and extra-curricular activities.
Red Deer lost over 900 residents last year, built fewer homes than Blackfalds, has the highest unemployment in Alberta, was deemed the second most dangerous city in Canada after Grande Prairie, seeing increases in crime rates, and looking at increasing taxes, so is it any wonder that I believe that “Change” would be an issue in the upcoming municipal election.
$500,000,000.00 on downtown will also be on the minds of many voters, even after the expected shell game of hiding expenses in different budgets. Blind commitment to the downtown and little if any vision for the whole city.
The campaign starts in 9 months, and things may change before then. The city might realize that the status quo isn’t cutting it. They may realize that there are people living north of the river, and that there is more to the city than the downtown bubble. School boards might decide that with 3,000 acres opening up, north of 11a, with possibly 20,000 new residents that perhaps they should build a high school north of the river.
Tourism might enter the city’s economic vision and the Hazlett Lake might be seen as an economic booster and open eyes to the rationale of building an Aquatic Centre on a lake.
I am hopeful but very doubtful, that much will change, but the other elections previously mentioned were eye openers and October 16, 2017 may be one for the history books, yet.

Follow Author

Community

SPARC Red Deer – Caring Adult Nominations open now!

Published on

Red Deer community let’s give a round of applause to the incredible adults shaping the future of our kids. Whether they’re a coach, neighbour, teacher, mentor, instructor, or someone special, we want to know about them!

Tell us the inspiring story of how your nominee is helping kids grow up great. We will honour the first 100 local nominees for their outstanding contributions to youth development. It’s time to highlight those who consistently go above and beyond!

To nominate, visit Events (sparcreddeer.ca)

Continue Reading

Addictions

‘Harm Reduction’ is killing B.C.’s addicts. There’s got to be a better way

Published on

From the Frontier Centre for Public Policy

By Susan Martinuk 

B.C. recently decriminalized the possession of small amounts of illicit drugs. The resulting explosion of addicts using drugs in public spaces, including parks and playgrounds, recently led the province’s NDP government to attempt to backtrack on this policy

Since 2016, more than 40,000 Canadians have died from opioid drug overdoses — almost as many as died during the Second World War.
Governments, health care professionals and addiction experts all acknowledge that widespread use of opioids has created a public health crisis in Canada. Yet they agree on virtually nothing else about this crisis, including its causes, possible remedies and whether addicts should be regarded as passive victims or accountable moral agents.

Fuelled by the deadly manufactured opioid fentanyl, Canada’s national drug overdose rate stood at 19.3 people per 100,000 in 2022, a shockingly high number when compared to the European Union’s rate of just 1.8. But national statistics hide considerable geographic variation. British Columbia and Alberta together account for only a quarter of Canada’s population yet nearly half of all opioid deaths. B.C.’s 2022 death rate of 45.2/100,000 is more than double the national average, with Alberta close behind at 33.3/100,00.

In response to the drug crisis, Canada’s two western-most provinces have taken markedly divergent approaches, and in doing so have created a natural experiment with national implications.

B.C. has emphasized harm reduction, which seeks to eliminate the damaging effects of illicit drugs without actually removing them from the equation. The strategy focuses on creating access to clean drugs and includes such measures as “safe” injection sites, needle exchange programs, crack-pipe giveaways and even drug-dispensing vending machines. The approach goes so far as to distribute drugs like heroin and cocaine free of charge in the hope addicts will no longer be tempted by potentially tainted street drugs and may eventually seek help.

But safe-supply policies create many unexpected consequences. A National Post investigation found, for example, that government-supplied hydromorphone pills handed out to addicts in Vancouver are often re-sold on the street to other addicts. The sellers then use the money to purchase a street drug that provides a better high — namely, fentanyl.

Doubling down on safe supply, B.C. recently decriminalized the possession of small amounts of illicit drugs. The resulting explosion of addicts using drugs in public spaces, including parks and playgrounds, recently led the province’s NDP government to attempt to backtrack on this policy — though for now that effort has been stymied by the courts.

According to Vancouver city councillor Brian Montague, “The stats tell us that harm reduction isn’t working.” In an interview, he calls decriminalization “a disaster” and proposes a policy shift that recognizes the connection between mental illness and addiction. The province, he says, needs “massive numbers of beds in treatment facilities that deal with both addictions and long-term mental health problems (plus) access to free counselling and housing.”

In fact, Montague’s wish is coming true — one province east, in Alberta. Since the United Conservative Party was elected in 2019, Alberta has been transforming its drug addiction policy away from harm reduction and towards publicly-funded treatment and recovery efforts.

Instead of offering safe-injection sites and free drugs, Alberta is building a network of 10 therapeutic communities across the province where patients can stay for up to a year, receiving therapy and medical treatment and developing skills that will enable them to build a life outside the drug culture. All for free. The province’s first two new recovery centres opened last year in Lethbridge and Red Deer. There are currently over 29,000 addiction treatment spaces in the province.

This treatment-based strategy is in large part the work of Marshall Smith, current chief of staff to Alberta’s premier and a former addict himself, whose life story is a testament to the importance of treatment and recovery.

The sharply contrasting policies of B.C. and Alberta allow a comparison of what works and what doesn’t. A first, tentative report card on this natural experiment was produced last year in a study from Stanford University’s network on addiction policy (SNAP). Noting “a lack of policy innovation in B.C.,” where harm reduction has become the dominant policy approach, the report argues that in fact “Alberta is currently experiencing a reduction in key addiction-related harms.” But it concludes that “Canada overall, and B.C. in particular, is not yet showing the progress that the public and those impacted by drug addiction deserve.”

The report is admittedly an early analysis of these two contrasting approaches. Most of Alberta’s recovery homes are still under construction, and B.C.’s decriminalization policy is only a year old. And since the report was published, opioid death rates have inched higher in both provinces.

Still, the early returns do seem to favour Alberta’s approach. That should be regarded as good news. Society certainly has an obligation to try to help drug users. But that duty must involve more than offering addicts free drugs. Addicted people need treatment so they can kick their potentially deadly habit and go on to live healthy, meaningful lives. Dignity comes from a life of purpose and self-control, not a government-funded fix.

Susan Martinuk is a senior fellow at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy and author of the 2021 book Patients at Risk: Exposing Canada’s Health Care Crisis. A longer version of this article recently appeared at C2CJournal.ca.

Continue Reading

Trending

X