Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]


Parks Canada puts brakes on Icefields Parkway bike trail in Alberta



If you like this, share it!

  • Parks Canada says it won’t go ahead with a plan to build a bike trail along the scenic highway that connects Banff and Jasper national parks.

    The federal agency had budgeted about $66 million to build a 107-kilometre route, along with parking lots, campsites and washrooms.

    “Parks Canada is committed to the ecological integrity of its parks and historical sites,” the agency said in a news release Wednesday. “Preliminary feedback from the consultation process expressed concerns over the potential environmental impact and high cost associated with the project.”

    It said that the money will be spent elsewhere in the national parks system.

    The Icefields Parkway is considered a classic cycling tour, but riders are restricted to its narrow shoulder.

    Parks Canada had proposed a separate, paved route buffered from the busy road by 10 to 20 metres of trees.

    Environmental groups had voiced serious concerns about the project. They said it would cut through critical habitat for caribou, grizzly bears and migratory birds.

    Kecia Kerr, executive director of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society for northern Alberta, applauded Parks Canada’s decision to cancel the project.

    “The price tag on the trail was really high,” she said. “It was going to be going through some pretty important grizzly bear habitat.”

    Kerr said the bike trail was often compared to one in the Bow Valley through Banff National Park.

    “It’s really not the same,” she said. “In that area, there is a fence along the highway and so the trail is inside that fence. In this case, there was not going to be a fenced-off trail along the highway.

    “It was going to increase the likelihood that people would be winding up face-to-face with grizzly bears … trying to be feeding.”

    Parks officials had acknowledged in a background document that the trail would have safety risks and induce further development.

    It showed pullouts and rest stops would need to be built every five to 10 kilometres. The trail would have had to be connected by pavement to campgrounds and other infrastructure.

    It would have wound through critical habitat for bats, olive-sided flycatchers and two endangered species — the mountain caribou and the whitebark pine.

    Officials acknowledged in the document that the trail could create encounters between grizzly bears and cyclists, who are less likely to carry bear spray and who travel quietly at much higher speeds than hikers.

    “Some mitigation measures could have relatively significant costs which should be factored into decision-making,” the document said.

    Bob Weber & Colette Derworiz, The Canadian Press

    If you like this, share it!


    Jason Kenney, Rachel Notley begin formal transfer of power in Alberta



    If you like this, share it!

  • EDMONTON — Premier Rachel Notley and incoming premier Jason Kenney began the formal transfer of power in Alberta on Thursday, with Notley saying Kenney is already getting real-life lessons on the difference between political grandstanding and governing.

    The NDP’s Notley said that since the United Conservative leader won Tuesday’s Alberta election, Quebec has rebuffed his public pitch to accept new pipelines and the B.C. government officially endorsed this week a federal bill to formalize a tanker ban off its northern coast.

    “What it does demonstrate is it’s not as simple as having press conferences and expressing people’s outrage over and over,” Notley told reporters after meeting with Kenney at Government House.

    “This is a complicated country. It involves considered diplomacy and strategic pressure in a thoughtful way.

    “We will be keeping a close eye to making sure that he engages in that considered diplomacy/strategic pressure for the benefit of the pipeline — not grandstanding for the benefit of political outcomes.”

    Kenney, a former federal Conservative cabinet minister, won a strong majority in the election on a get-tough policy toward any and all oil and gas opponents. He has long criticized Notley’s government as an enabler of federal policies detrimental to Alberta’s oil and gas industry.

    He said the NDP’s passivity was deliberate to gain federal approval of the Trans Mountain pipeline project, which got the green light in 2016 to ship more Alberta oil to the B.C. coast but, due to legal challenges and reversals in court, has yet to see shovels in the ground.

    Kenney has promised to fight Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in court on multiple fronts, including the federal carbon tax, and has promised to do what he can to get Trudeau defeated in the fall national election.

    Notley said she discussed a number of issues with Kenney on Thursday, including Bill 12, which Notley’s government introduced and passed but never proclaimed into law. The bill gives Alberta power to restrict oil shipments to B.C. if that province continues to resist Trans Mountain.

    Kenney has said the first act of his government will be to proclaim Bill 12 into law to send a strong message that Alberta will protect its oil and gas. Legal experts say it’s also a move that could give B.C. the opening it needs to successfully challenge the bill’s constitutionality in court.

    Notley said Kenney’s promise to lift her government’s cap on Alberta oilsands emissions could also threaten Trans Mountain approval, given the cap was a key reason why Ottawa approved the multibillion-dollar project in the first place.

    Kenney has said his approach will be one of cooperation and diplomacy with all political leaders, but that he will leave no doubt about Alberta’s determination to stand up for its bread and butter industry, particularly against those who benefit from it while opposing its growth.

    As part of that fight-back plan, Kenney has pledged to create a government communications “war room” to challenge oil and gas opponents and those who spread misinformation about the industry.

    It will have an initial budget of $30-million, Kenney said Thursday, and it will be staffed with communications professionals who are creative and, more importantly, nimble and quick to fight rhetorical fire with fire.

    “Both the industry and governments of different partisan stripes have not been fast enough to respond to the incoming attacks,” said Kenney.

    “I want a unit in the government that will be on that (factual errors and lies) the moment it is published, demanding a correction.”

    Kenney and his new government are to be sworn in April 30, with a spring legislature sitting starting a few weeks after that.

    Notley is staying on as Opposition Leader, but wouldn’t say Thursday whether this will be short-term while a successor is groomed or if she plans to stay the full four years and lead the NDP into the next election.

    “That’s a little bit premature,” she said.

    “My intention to lead Alberta’s Official Opposition and to stand up for the things that we fought for in the election.”

    Dean Bennett, The Canadian Press

    If you like this, share it!
    Continue Reading


    Ontario’s challenge of carbon-pricing law wraps up; judges reserve decision



    If you like this, share it!

  • TORONTO — Ontario’s constitutional challenge to Ottawa’s imposition of a carbon charge was left in the hands of five Appeal Court justices on Thursday after the hearing wrapped up with each side pressing the court to find in its favour.

    In closing submissions, a federal lawyer warned that climate change posed an urgent threat. Ottawa, she said, has addressed an issue of national concern in a manner that respects provincial jurisdiction.

    Ontario, however, stood by its view that the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act  — if deemed constitutional — would undermine co-operative federalism by allowing Ottawa to overstep the dividing line between federal and provincial spheres of authority.

    “It governs a broad range of activities that are in provincial jurisdiction,” Ontario lawyer Josh Hunter said Thursday in his closing comments. “It is not appropriate for a federation.”

    The judges, who peppered the various counsel with questions throughout the proceedings, reserved their decision.

    Over the course of the four-day hearing, Ontario’s highest court heard warnings about the dangers of unchecked greenhouse gas emissions. Indigenous groups, for example, stressed their vulnerability to global warming they said could destroy their way of life.

    Federal lawyers argued the act is a legitimate response to potentially catastrophic climate change. The act, which only applies in Ontario, New Brunswick, Manitoba and Saskatchewan — four provinces Ottawa says don’t meet national standards — imposes a levy on gasoline, other fossil fuels, and industry.

    The law, federal lawyer Sharlene Telles-Langdon said, would not result in an expansion of constitutional powers that would give Ottawa carte blanche to regulate issues that fall squarely within provincial jurisdiction — a claim made by Ontario and its supporters.

    The federal government maintains the levy in Ontario — currently four cents a litre on gasoline — is a regulatory charge designed to change behaviour in favour of lower greenhouse gas emissions. Ontario calls the charge an illegal tax — another violation of the Constitution — a position it repeated in final submissions.

    During the hearing, opponents of the act raised scenarios in which Ottawa could now ban wood-burning fireplaces, limit how warm or cool people could keep their homes, or when they could drive. Proponents of the law denounced those notions as “alarmist.”

    In all, 14 interveners — among them some provinces, Indigenous groups and environmental and business organizations — lined up to defend or attack the federal law, with most siding with Ottawa.

    One supporter, British Columbia, argued the act does not prevent provinces from adopting their own approaches to climate change. For its part, Saskatchewan, which is awaiting its own Appeal Court ruling on a similar challenge, maintained the Liberal government in Ottawa was using a “big stick” to force its will on four Conservative provinces for purely political reasons.

    While the intricate constitutional issues at play over federal and provincial division of powers and Ottawa’s ability to levy the carbon charge were fought in the legal arena, some observers said the case was as much about politics and ideology as it was about law.

    “Wherever there is a thorny political problem, and this is very much one in Canada, it’s common for politicians to say, ‘We should let the courts decide’,” said Simon Archer, a Toronto lawyer with expertise in environmental law. “It’s a government saying, ‘We want the court to take the heat for this problem and not us’.”

    It will likely take several months for the judges to rule.

    Colin Perkel, The Canadian Press

    If you like this, share it!
    Continue Reading

    april, 2019

    fri8mar - 30aprmar 85:30 pmapr 30Real Estate Dinner Theatre(march 8) 5:30 pm - (april 30) 10:00 pm

    sat20apr1:00 pm- 4:00 pmMAGSaturday @ the MuseumMAGnificent Saturdays welcomes all ages and abilities to participate in a fun art project every week! 1:00 pm - 4:00 pm

    tue23apr5:30 pm- 7:00 pmLiving Life to the FullCanadian Mental Health Association5:30 pm - 7:00 pm

    thu25apr8:30 am- 4:30 pmApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Canadian Mental Health Association8:30 am - 4:30 pm

    fri26apr8:30 am- 4:30 pmApplied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST)Canadian Mental Health Association8:30 am - 4:30 pm

    sat27apr1:00 pm- 4:00 pmMAGSaturday @ the MuseumMAGnificent Saturdays welcomes all ages and abilities to participate in a fun art project every week! 1:00 pm - 4:00 pm

    mon29apr1:30 pm- 4:00 pmWellness Recovery Action PlanningCanadian Mental Health Association1:30 pm - 4:00 pm

    tue30apr5:30 pm- 7:00 pmLiving Life to the FullCanadian Mental Health Association5:30 pm - 7:00 pm