OTTAWA — The House of Commons ethics committee is calling on the health minister to explain the Public Health Agency of Canada’s collection of data from millions of mobile phones to understand travel patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Opposition MPs on the committee fear the pandemic is being used to undermine the privacy of Canadians who were not aware that a government agency has been collecting mobile-phone data.
During an emergency meeting Thursday, the committee of MPs passed a motion asking Jean-Yves Duclos and Canada’s chief public health officer, Dr. Theresa Tam, to appear before it to answer questions on the policy.
The House is still on its winter break but four opposition MPs on the committee asked for an emergency session after the Public Health Agency published a notice indicating it plans to extend the data-collection practice.
Conservative, Bloc Québécois and NDP MPs on the committee have raised concerns about the privacy implications of the policy.
In December, the Public Health Agency issued a new request for proposals to track countrywide cell tower-based location data between Jan. 1, 2019 and May 31, 2023.
The notice says the data must be accurate, accessible and timely, as well as ensuring privacy and transparency. It must be stripped of all identifying information.
The request for proposals had been due to end before MPs returned to Parliament after their winter break but has now been extended until Feb. 4, said John Brassard, Conservative ethics spokesman and a member of the committee.
Brassard has said the collection of data by the Public Health Agency raises numerous “red flags” about privacy.
Addressing the committee on Thursday, he said the Public Health Agency had been “collecting data without the knowledge of Canadians, effectively doing it in secret.”
“We need to know what security measures were in place to protect the privacy rights of Canadians,” he said.
The Public Health Agency said in a statement that it had informed the privacy commissioner about the process, and has been advised by its own privacy and ethics experts too.
“Minister Duclos has also been in communication with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and has underlined PHAC’s ongoing commitment to protecting and preserving the privacy of citizens and people in Canada while ensuring that Canada has the data needed to understand and inform our ongoing response to the COVID-19 pandemic,” the statement said.
Greg Fergus, a Liberal member of the privacy committee, said that all members of the committee agree it is “important to protect Canadians’ privacy rights.”
But he said that the information was aggregate data which had been “depersonalized so there is no information that can identify individuals.”
“It is unfair to say that we are tracking Canadians. That is not at all the case,” Fergus told the committee. “When we request depersonalized data that cannot identify a person it is simply data.”
The Public Health Agency said that “by analyzing population movement data, we can better understand the public’s responsiveness to public-health directives.”
It said that in December 2020, it established a “sole-source contract” with a telecom operator which expired in October 2021.
“PHAC is now launching a request for proposal process as a means to continue the collection of this data through an open and transparent process,” it said in a statement.
Brassard last week wrote to the privacy commissioner, Daniel Therrien, to ask him to investigate the matter.
In a statement, the commissioner’s office said it had not opened a formal investigation. But it said, after receiving complaints alleging violations of privacy, it would “turn our attention to the means chosen to deidentify the data mobility information.”
In 2020, the commissioner’s office published a document about privacy and initiatives in response to COVID-19 which cautioned institutions to be aware of the risk of reidentifying anonymized information.
The government did not ask the commissioner for specific advice about whether there were “adequate safeguards against reidentification,” it said.
“The government relied on other experts to that end, which is their prerogative,” the commissioner’s office said.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 13, 2022.
Marie Woolf, The Canadian Press
From Cafe Owner to Political Activist at the heart of the Alberta Prosperity Project
The COVID pandemic has turned Central Alberta Cafe Owner Chris Scott into nothing short of a lightning rod.
Many business owners grumbled and suffered through a couple years of mayhem due to wave after wave of COVID and the various restrictions affecting day to day operations. Where most business owners zigged, Scott, as they say… zagged.
Chances are you know something about his story as he’s been in the news and seemingly on a never ending speaking tour ever since this all started.
You likely won’t be surprised to know Chis Scott is still operating his cafe, still facing court charges, and heavily involved in trying to influence Alberta politicians.
No matter what side of this discussion you fall on, no matter what you think of the business owners, doctors, and religious leaders who stood in defiance of covid restrictions, this conversation will help you understand where those who have emerged as leaders of those who stood up to the health restrictions are putting their attention in the summer of 2022.
If you’re interesting in learning more about the Alberta Prosperity Project.
If you’re interested in WS Full Steam Ahead
CDC Quietly Ends Differentiation on Covid Vaccination Status
From the Brownstone Institute
Thursday, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly ended its policy of differentiating within COVID-19 prevention guidance between those who have received Covid vaccines and those who have not.
CDC’s COVID-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate based on a person’s vaccination status because breakthrough infections occur, though they are generally mild, and persons who have had COVID-19 but are not vaccinated have some degree of protection against severe illness from their previous infection.
As explained by the CDC’s Greta Massetti, lead author of the new guidance:
Both prior infection and vaccination confer some protection against severe illness, and so it really makes the most sense to not differentiate with our guidance or our recommendations based on vaccination status at this time.
Someone might want to tell the millions of workers who lost their jobs, the millions of students who received injections out of anticipation for school mandates, and the millions of law-abiding citizens who have been, and often continue to be, excluded from everyday life activities and basic medical care due to their unwillingness to show proof that they received an mRNA shot they neither wanted nor needed, a differentiation that the CDC now admits does not make sense. All cool, I’m sure.
AUDITOR GENERAL MUST INVESTIGATE CASH BONUS SCHEME: NDP
It’s time for the Alberta Sovereignty Act – Red Deer South MLA Jason Stephan
‘Elaborate ruse’: Prosecutor says Saskatoon mother in custody dispute faked deaths
CRA says it has $1.4 billion in uncashed cheques sitting in its coffers
Crime2 days ago
Red Deer RCMP investigate sexual assault involving youth
Crime2 days ago
Wanted man cut through fence to cross U.S. border with children: Border Patrol
Also Interesting2 days ago
Top 6 Remote Holiday Destinations in Canada
Economy2 days ago
Luxury goods tax on super-rich could hit electric vehicles: expert
International2 days ago
Ex-police officer gets 7-plus years in prison in Jan. 6 case
Alberta1 day ago
McTavish puts up six points, Canada crushes Slovakia 11-1 at world juniors
Brownstone Institute24 hours ago
CDC Quietly Ends Differentiation on Covid Vaccination Status
Business1 day ago
Rogers, Shaw, Quebecor sign definitive agreement on planned sale of Freedom Mobile