Business
Biden’s $20B grant to climate groups involved “self-dealing”

Quick Hit:
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has raised concerns about the Biden administration’s $20 billion in climate project grants, alleging “a lot of self-dealing” and potential conflicts of interest. Zeldin pointed to the $2 billion allocated to Power Forward Communities (PFC), a group linked to Stacey Abrams, as a clear example of waste and abuse.
Key Details:
- Zeldin questioned the $2 billion grant to PFC, noting the group only reported $100 in revenue within its first three months after being founded in late 2023.
- He criticized the grant agreement, which gave PFC three weeks to distribute the funds and 90 days to complete a training course on budget development.
- Zeldin stated the Justice Department has been investigating the issue, thanking the EPA for its cooperation in tracking the funds.
At the EPA, we are dialed in on efficiently delivering on our core mission and Powering the Great American Comeback. America’s Golden Age is upon us. pic.twitter.com/lUOKoJ53Cr
— Lee Zeldin (@epaleezeldin) February 23, 2025
Diving Deeper:
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin appeared on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo to discuss his concerns about the Biden administration’s $20 billion climate grant program. He alleged that the grant distribution involved “a lot of self-dealing” and lacked proper oversight, leading to potential conflicts of interest. Zeldin pointed to a specific case involving Power Forward Communities (PFC), a group linked to former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, which received $2 billion in grants despite only reporting $100 in revenue during its first three months.
Zeldin criticized the grant’s terms, which allowed PFC three weeks to distribute the $2 billion and required the group to complete a budget development training course within 90 days. “I would say that any entity that needs training on how to develop a budget shouldn’t be actually distributing money before they take that training,” Zeldin argued. He further alleged that the rapid distribution of funds resembled a “gold bar scheme,” citing a leaked video where a Biden EPA political appointee described the process as “throwing gold bars off the Titanic.”
When asked about the potential for criminal activity, Zeldin suggested the Department of Justice would need to investigate but characterized the grant to PFC as “a clear cut case of waste and abuse.” He noted that the Justice Department had been actively investigating the matter and expressed appreciation for the EPA’s cooperation in tracking down the missing funds.
Zeldin also mentioned his discussions with President Donald Trump, emphasizing their shared commitment to restoring accountability at the EPA. The controversy has drawn attention from other lawmakers, including Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL), who questioned why PFC received $2 billion when its reported revenue was only $100.
Business
Potential For Abuse Embedded In Bill C-5

From the National Citizens Coalition
By Peter Coleman
“The Liberal government’s latest economic bill could cut red tape — or entrench central planning and ideological pet projects.”
On the final day of Parliament’s session before its September return, and with Conservative support, the Liberal government rushed through Bill C-5, ambitiously titled “One Canadian Economy: An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act.”
Beneath the lofty rhetoric, the bill aims to dismantle interprovincial trade barriers, enhance labour mobility, and streamline infrastructure projects. In principle, these are worthy goals. In a functional economy, free trade between provinces and the ability of workers to move without bureaucratic roadblocks would be standard practice. Yet, in Canada, decades of entrenched Liberal and Liberal-lite interests, along with red tape, have made such basics a pipe dream.
If Bill C-5 is indeed wielded for good, and delivers by cutting through this morass, it could unlock vast, wasted economic potential. For instance, enabling pipelines to bypass endless environmental challenges and the usual hand-out seeking gatekeepers — who often demand their cut to greenlight projects — would be a win. But here’s where optimism wanes, this bill does nothing to fix the deeper rot of Canada’s Laurentian economy: a failing system propped up by central and upper Canadian elitism and cronyism. Rather than addressing these structural flaws of non-competitiveness, Bill C-5 risks becoming a tool for the Liberal government to pick more winners and losers, funneling benefits to pet progressive projects while sidelining the needs of most Canadians, and in particular Canada’s ever-expanding missing middle-class.
Worse, the bill’s broad powers raise alarms about government overreach. Coming from a Liberal government that recently fear-mongered an “elbows up” emergency to conveniently secure an electoral advantage, this is no small concern. The lingering influence of eco-radicals like former Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault, still at the cabinet table, only heightens suspicion. Guilbeault and his allies, who cling to fantasies like eliminating gas-powered cars in a decade, could steer Bill C-5’s powers toward ideological crusades rather than pragmatic economic gains. The potential for emergency powers embedded in this legislation to be misused is chilling, especially from a government with a track record of exploiting crises for political gain – as they also did during Covid.
For Bill C-5 to succeed, it requires more than good intentions. It demands a seismic shift in mindset, and a government willing to grow a spine, confront far-left, de-growth special-interest groups, and prioritize Canada’s resource-driven economy and its future over progressive pipe dreams. The Liberals’ history under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, marked by economic mismanagement and job-killing policies, offers little reassurance. The National Citizens Coalition views this bill with caution, and encourages the public to remain vigilant. Any hint of overreach, of again kowtowing to hand-out obsessed interests, or abuse of these emergency-like powers must be met with fierce scrutiny.
Canadians deserve a government that delivers results, not one that manipulates crises or picks favourites. Bill C-5 could be a step toward a freer, stronger economy, but only if it’s wielded with accountability and restraint, something the Liberals have failed at time and time again. We’ll be watching closely. The time for empty promises is over; concrete action is what Canadians demand.
Let’s hope the Liberals don’t squander this chance. And let’s hope that we’re wrong about the potential for disaster.
Peter Coleman is the President of the National Citizens Coalition, Canada’s longest-serving conservative non-profit advocacy group.
Business
Canada should already be an economic superpower. Why is Canada not doing better?

From Resource Works
Tej Parikh of the Financial Times‘s says Canada has the minerals but not the plan
Tej Parikh is the economics editorial writer for The Financial Times, a British daily newspaper. He joins our Stewart Muir for a Power Struggle interview. And we include in the following report some points from a guest column by Parikh in Canada’s National Post, which carried the headline ‘How Canada can unlock its economic superpower potential.’
Parikh begins the Power Struggle interview with this: “There’s an enormous economic potential here, very much the same geographic advantages that have underpinned America’s economic emergence over the last 100 years. . . . Given everything we understand about the advantages that countries need to grow, why is Canada not doing better economically?” He added: “When you break it down and you look at why income per capita in Canada has perhaps not increased as fast as we might expect on the basis of those advantages, it really kind of breaks down to three components. One is investment, so how much capital goes into the country?
The second is labour, and not just the amount, the size of the workforce you have, but how well you utilize the workforce. And then the third component is something that economists like to call a total-factor productivity, which is essentially your innovative ability and your ability to bring together capital and people. “And when you look at Canada as opposed to other large economies . . . you begin to see that actually there are a lot of restrictions in Canada, not just because of its vast geography but because of regulation, that it actually can’t combine its capital and labour as productively as it could.
“It’s about creating those supply chains and critical minerals that the Western world is currently short of. Given it (Canada) has these vast raw material resources, there is a massive scope for it to become even more integrated into Western supply chains in particular and to become a supplier of these things.” From Parikh’s National Post column: “The country is energy independent, with the world’s largest deposits of high-grade uranium and the third-largest proven oil reserves. It is also the fifth-largest producer of natural gas.Canada boasts a huge supply of other commodities too, including the largest potash reserves (used to make fertilizer), over one-third of the world’s certified forests and a fifth of the planet’s surface freshwater. Plus, it has an abundance of cobalt, graphite, lithium and other rare earth elements, which are used in renewable technologies. “But the nation has lacked the visionary leadership and policy framework to capitalize on its advantages.”
Watch the full interview here:
-
Bruce Dowbiggin2 days ago
What Connor Should Say To Oilers: It’s Not You. It’s Me.
-
Business2 days ago
Federal fiscal anchor gives appearance of prudence, fails to back it up
-
conflict2 days ago
How Iran Could Shake Up Global Economy In Response To US Strikes
-
Business2 days ago
The U.S. Strike in Iran-Insecurity About Global Oil Supply Suddenly Makes Canadian Oil Attractive
-
illegal immigration2 days ago
Heightened alert: Iranians in U.S. previously charged with support for terrorism
-
Business22 hours ago
Younger Casino Bettors Are Upping the Ante on Risky Gambling in British Columbia, Documents Show
-
Business16 hours ago
While China Hacks Canada, B.C. Sends Them a Billion-Dollar Ship Building Contract
-
Business2 days ago
The Passage of Bill C-5 Leaves the Conventional Energy Sector With as Many Questions as Answers