Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

International

Senate Judiciary Committee approves Kash Patel’s FBI nomination in party-line vote

Published

2 minute read

MXM logo MxM News

Quick Hit:

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 12-10 along party lines to advance Kash Patel’s nomination to lead the FBI. Patel, a close ally of President Donald Trump, now faces a full Senate vote. His nomination has drawn strong support from conservatives and fierce opposition from Democrats.

Key Details:

  • The Judiciary Committee approved Patel’s nomination in a 12-10 vote, with all Republicans in favor and all Democrats opposed.
  • Patel, a former national security official, has vowed to reform the FBI and address allegations of political bias within the agency.
  • Democrats criticized his close ties to Trump and questioned his past role in declassifying intelligence documents.

Diving Deeper:

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s vote clears the way for Patel’s nomination to head to the full Senate, where Republicans hold a narrow majority. If confirmed, Patel would oversee the FBI at a time of heightened scrutiny over its handling of politically sensitive investigations.

Patel has promised to root out what he describes as entrenched political bias within the FBI. He has been a vocal critic of the agency’s past handling of Trump-related investigations, particularly the now-discredited Russia probe. During his confirmation hearing, Patel emphasized the need to restore public trust in federal law enforcement.

Democrats, however, have fiercely opposed his nomination, arguing that Patel’s close relationship with Trump undermines the FBI’s independence. They have pointed to his role in efforts to declassify intelligence documents related to the 2020 election as a sign that he would be a political operative rather than an impartial law enforcement leader.

Despite Democratic resistance, Patel is expected to secure confirmation in the full Senate, barring any unexpected defections. His appointment would mark a major shift in the FBI’s leadership and direction, reflecting the 47th president’s commitment to restructuring federal agencies that conservatives say have been weaponized against them.

Kash Patel” by Gage Skidmore, licensed by CC BY-SA 2.0

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Energy

Poll: Majority says energy independence more important than fighting climate change

Published on

From The Center Square

By 

A majority of Americans say it is more important for the U.S. to establish energy independence than to fight climate change, according to new polling.

The poll from Napolitan News Service of 1,000 registered voters shows that 57% of voters say making America energy independent is more important than fighting climate change, while 39% feel the opposite and 4% are unsure.

Those surveyed also were asked:  Which is more important, reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change, or keeping the price of cars low enough for families to afford them?

Half of voters (50%) said keeping the price of cars low was more important to them than reducing emissions, while 43% said emissions reductions were more important than the price of buying a car.

When asked, “Which is more important, reducing greenhouse gas emissions or reducing the cost and improving the reliability of electricity and gas for American families?”, 59% said reducing the cost and increasing the reliability was more important compared to 35% who said reducing emissions was more important.

The survey was conducted online by pollster Scott Rasmussen on March 18-19. Field work was conducted by RMG Research. The poll has a margin of error of +/- 3.1 percentage points

​Dan McCaleb is the executive editor of The Center Square. He welcomes your comments. Contact Dan at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Business

Trump Reportedly Shuts Off Flow Of Taxpayer Dollars Into World Trade Organization

Published on

 

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By Thomas English

The Trump administration has reportedly suspended financial contributions to the World Trade Organization (WTO) as of Thursday.

The decision comes as part of a broader shift by President Donald Trump to distance the U.S. from international institutions perceived to undermine American sovereignty or misallocate taxpayer dollars. U.S. funding for both 2024 and 2025 has been halted, amounting to roughly 11% of the WTO’s annual operating budget, with the organization’s total 2024 budget amounting to roughly $232 million, according to Reuters.

“Why is it that China, for decades, and with a population much bigger than ours, is paying a tiny fraction of [dollars] to The World Health Organization, The United Nations and, worst of all, The World Trade Organization, where they are considered a so-called ‘developing country’ and are therefore given massive advantages over The United States, and everyone else?” Trump wrote in May 2020.

The president has long criticized the WTO for what he sees as judicial overreach and systemic bias against the U.S. in trade disputes. Trump previously paralyzed the organization’s top appeals body in 2019 by blocking judicial appointments, rendering the WTO’s core dispute resolution mechanism largely inoperative.

But a major sticking point continues to be China’s continued classification as a “developing country” at the WTO — a designation that entitles Beijing to a host of special trade and financial privileges. Despite being the world’s second-largest economy, China receives extended compliance timelines, reduced dues and billions in World Bank loans usually reserved for poorer nations.

The Wilson Center, an international affairs-oriented think tank, previously slammed the status as an outdated loophole benefitting an economic superpower at the expense of developed democracies. The Trump administration echoed this criticism behind closed doors during WTO budget meetings in early March, according to Reuters.

The U.S. is reportedly not withdrawing from the WTO outright, but the funding freeze is likely to trigger diplomatic and economic groaning. WTO rules allow for punitive measures against non-paying member states, though the body’s weakened legal apparatus may limit enforcement capacity.

Trump has already withdrawn from the World Health Organization, slashed funds to the United Nations and signaled a potential exit from other global bodies he deems “unfair” to U.S. interests.

Continue Reading

Trending

X