Business
Real Challenges Await Carney

From the National Citizens Coalition
By Peter Coleman, President, National Citizens Coalition
Carney’s Washington Trip: A Low Bar Cleared, But Real Challenges Await
The legacy media circus surrounding Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent trip to Washington was predictable, wasn’t it? The Liberal-subsidized press, ever eager to prop up their chosen darlings, couldn’t stop fawning over how Carney “stood up” to President Donald Trump. As someone who’s never been accused of waving a Liberal flag, I’ll admit it was refreshing to see a Canadian leader who could string two coherent sentences together without embarrassing us on the world stage. After years of Justin Trudeau sullying our nation with his very presence, Carney’s performance cleared the lowest of bars. But let’s not break out the champagne just yet.
NCC and Western Standard readers—hard-working folks who value straight talk over CBC’s syrupy narratives, or the Globe and Mail’s elitist drivel—know better than to judge a politician by their words. Carney’s entire election pitch boiled down to terrifying voters with a hyperbolic “Orange Man bad, vote for me” message. It was a message tailor-made for naive leftists glued to legacy media, blissfully unaware of the real world. Meanwhile, those of us reading outlets like this one, where ideas are challenged and truths are unearthed, saw through the bombast and the cynical “elbows up” campaign strategy, and we know to judge leaders by what they do, not what they say to get elected. On that front, Carney’s still got a steep hill to climb.
So let’s give credit where it’s due—not to Carney, but to Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. Her recent press conference was a masterclass in clarity and conviction, laying out conditions for a new relationship with a federal government that’s long treated Alberta with disdain. For too many in Ottawa, Alberta’s nothing more than a cash cow to prop up Quebec through equalization payments while dismissing the West’s reasonable concerns as backwater griping. Smith’s demands were practical and rooted in the reality that Alberta’s contributions deserve more respect, not contempt. So, how did the so-called “smartest guy in the room”—as Carney and his media cheerleaders love to proclaim—respond to these demands? Crickets. No answers, no action, just the same old Liberal sidestep.
Meanwhile, while Carney basks in the afterglow of his Washington photo-op, the world isn’t waiting for Canada to get its act together. As I write this, the United States and the United Kingdom have just announced the framework for a historic free trade agreement. Remember Carney’s campaign promises? He was supposed to be the guy securing “historic” trade deals with the UK and the EU. Yet here we are, watching the UK cozy up to the U.S. while Canada’s left on the sidelines. What happened? Could it be that Carney’s thinly veiled carbon tax obsession and climate change dogma—kept under wraps during the campaign—are already scaring off potential partners? Or perhaps our allies see what millions in Canada have already noticed: a leader surrounded by the same incompetent Trudeau-era cabinet, who may still be destined to recycle the same tired and destructive ideas that have held Canada back for a decade.
Time will tell, but the clock is ticking, and Canada’s still moving in slow motion. Carney will soon learn the hard way that governing is a far cry from glad-handing in Beijing, benefiting from President Trump’s election interference, or fear-mongering on the campaign trail. Most Canadians aren’t interested in more rhetoric; we want results. With our vast resources, we should be the richest country on Earth, yet for ten years, we’ve been sliding backward. Our economy is stagnant, our global influence is waning, and Ottawa’s obsession with centralized control and woke policies have left us ill-equipped to compete. The time for change isn’t tomorrow—it’s now.
Carney’s got a chance to prove he’s more than a slick operator, but he’s got to deliver. Alberta’s demands, as articulated by Smith, aren’t just a wishlist; they’re a pre-requisite to restoring fairness and unleashing our potential. Ignore them, and Carney risks alienating the real economic engine of this country. Canadians deserve better than another decade of mismanagement and excuses. Here at the National Citizens Coalition, we’ve been around since 1967, and we’ve seen governments come and go. Through it all, we’ve stayed true to our mission: advocating for freedom and common sense, and a Canada that lives up to its promise. Mark Carney is on notice—words won’t cut it anymore. It’s time to act.
But more than anything, it’s time for government to get out of the way.
Peter Coleman is the President of the National Citizens Coalition, Canada’s pioneer conservative non-profit advocacy group.
Alberta
Calgary taxpayers forced to pay for art project that telephones the Bow River

From the Canadian Taxpayers Federation
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is calling on the City of Calgary to scrap the Calgary Arts Development Authority after it spent $65,000 on a telephone line to the Bow River.
“If someone wants to listen to a river, they can go sit next to one, but the City of Calgary should not force taxpayers to pay for this,” said Kris Sims, CTF Alberta Director. “If phoning a river floats your boat, you do you, but don’t force your neighbour to pay for your art choices.”
The City of Calgary spent $65,194 of taxpayers’ money for an art project dubbed “Reconnecting to the Bow” to set up a telephone line so people could call the Bow River and listen to the sound of water.
The project is running between September 2024 and December 2025, according to documents obtained by the CTF.
The art installation is a rerun of a previous version set up back in 2014.
Emails obtained by the CTF show the bureaucrats responsible for the newest version of the project wanted a new local 403 area code phone number instead of an 1-855 number to “give the authority back to the Bow,” because “the original number highlighted a proprietary and commercial relationship with the river.”
Further correspondence obtained by the CTF shows the city did not want its logo included in the displays, stating the “City of Calgary (does NOT want to have its logo on the artworks or advertisements).”
Taxpayers pay about $19 million per year for the Calgary Arts Development Authority. That’s equivalent to the total property tax bill for about 7,000 households.
Calgary bureaucrats also expressed concern the project “may not be received well, perceived as a waste of money or simply foolish.”
“That city hall employee was pointing out the obvious: This is a foolish waste of taxpayers’ money and this slush fund should be scrapped,” said Sims. “Artists should work with willing donors for their projects instead of mooching off city hall and forcing taxpayers to pay for it.”
Automotive
Supreme Court Delivers Blow To California EV Mandates

From the Daily Caller News Foundation
“The Supreme Court put to rest any question about whether fuel manufacturers have a right to challenge unlawful electric vehicle mandates”
The Supreme Court sided Friday with oil companies seeking to challenge California’s electric vehicle regulations.
In a 7-2 ruling, the court allowed energy producers to continue their lawsuit challenging the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to approve California regulations that require manufacturing more electric vehicles.
“The government generally may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected bystanders,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the majority opinion. “In light of this Court’s precedents and the evidence before the Court of Appeals, the fuel producers established Article III standing to challenge EPA’s approval of the California regulations.”
Kavanaugh noted that “EPA has repeatedly altered its legal position on whether the Clean Air Act authorizes California regulations targeting greenhouse-gas emissions from new motor vehicles” between Presidential administrations.
“This case involves California’s 2012 request for EPA approval of new California regulations,” he wrote. “As relevant here, those regulations generally require automakers (i) to limit average greenhouse-gas emissions across their fleets of new motor vehicles sold in the State and (ii) to manufacture a certain percentage of electric vehicles as part of their vehicle fleets.”
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals previously rejected the challenge, finding the producers lacked standing to sue.
“The Supreme Court put to rest any question about whether fuel manufacturers have a right to challenge unlawful electric vehicle mandates,” American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) President and CEO Chet Thompson said in a statement.
“California’s EV mandates are unlawful and bad for our country,” he said. “Congress did not give California special authority to regulate greenhouse gases, mandate electric vehicles or ban new gas car sales—all of which the state has attempted to do through its intentional misreading of statute.”
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
Unanimous Supreme Court Ruling Inspires Hope For Future Energy Project Permitting
-
espionage1 day ago
FBI Buried ‘Warning’ Intel on CCP Plot to Elect Biden Using TikTok, Fake IDs, CCP Sympathizers and PRC Students—Grassley Probes Withdrawal
-
Agriculture1 day ago
Unstung Heroes: Canada’s Honey Bees are not Disappearing – They’re Thriving
-
espionage1 day ago
From Sidewinder to P.E.I.: Are Canada’s Political Elites Benefiting from Beijing’s Real Estate Reach?
-
International2 days ago
Judiciary explores accountability options over Biden decline ‘coverup’
-
conflict10 hours ago
Victor Davis Hanson Makes a Disturbing Prediction About What Happens If Iran Survives
-
Energy1 day ago
Who put the energy illiterate in charge?
-
Automotive10 hours ago
Supreme Court Delivers Blow To California EV Mandates