Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

COVID-19

Protests are done. Covid is endemic. This is what is really behind Canada’s Emergency Measures Act

Published

3 years ago

6 minute read

Canada’s MP’s have given approval to the Emergency Measures Act.  The federal government has sweeping powers to kill any protest it wishes. As harsh as that sounds a much more powerful tool has also been officially approved.  The federal government can now literally starve to death any Canadian who dares to oppose the government mandates on vaccination by freezing their bank accounts so they will not be able to purchase, anything.

Over the last week, police officers were bused or perhaps flown into Ottawa to crack down on the flag waving, horn beeping hordes who were enjoying themselves at the expense of the eardrums of many in downtown Ottawa.  This Parliament Hill protest was the last of three which were cited as “THE” reason for the invocation of the Emergency Measures Act.  The blockade protest at Windsor was ended before the Emergency Measures Act was even invoked.  The blockade protest at Coutts shut down when organizers became concerned it might turn violent.  The Ottawa protest lasted a few more days before it wrapped up over this weekend.  In other words, even if one agreed these measures were necessary, they certainly aren’t anymore.

So why was the vote on the EMA even necessary?  The protest blockades cited as the reason for the invocation have ended. The omicron virus has effectively turned the pandemic into an endemic all over the world.  So what is this all about?

Could it be that the EMA is not really about protests, or even Covid-19?  That certainly sounds like a conspiracy theory to most Canadians, but there are a few million now (and the number grows daily) who have been seeking to inform themselves beyond what they’re being told by the legacy media. What a few million Canadians are putting together, and what most are still completely ignorant about, is that the fight against mandates is actually critically important to the future of democracy in this country.

All over the country, friends and family have been fracturing over a dangerous division in society.  Many will incorrectly call this a fight between left and right.  It is not.  It all comes down to where you get your information from.  If you rely solely on the media sources of information that we’ve always depended upon, you simply don’t know the whole story.  Not your fault, but you owe it to yourself, your family, your community, and your country to become informed beyond what we’re being told by the regular media.

The following snippets and full interview are shocking and disturbing even to those who’ve been searching for the truth through alternative media and some incredibly well informed interviews NOT featured by legacy media.  To those who have for whatever reason, hesitated to venture beyond regular legacy media outlets, this will be even harder to take in.  But.  Perhaps you’re finally tired of trying to make sense out of the ridiculous and flawed pandemic response.  If you are trying to understand why this Emergency Measures Act was invoked. This conversation will start to put it all together for you.

This conversation outlines how the World Economic Forum has managed to “penetrate” (in their own words) Canada’s federal cabinet as well as several other nations.   Check out this snippet of a much longer conversation between journalist Maajid Nawaz and Joe Rogan.

 

If you wish to confirm for yourself that several of Canada’s Federal Cabinet Ministers, including Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, as well as NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh are active or alumni members of the World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders group.. Here’s a link to the list of Active and Alumni members of the World Economic Forums, Forum of Young Global Leaders from North America.  You can click through the active and alumni members.

 

Here’s further discussion on how the WEF is infiltrating governments in an effort to introduce digital passes which will feature Chinese style social governance scores.

If you don’t have 3 hours to watch / listen to this today, you could cut that commitment in half if you start at the 1 hr and 25 minute mark. There you can begin at the point in this conversation when Maajid Nawaz  really begins to outline how Covid-19 is being used by the World Economic Forum, many of the world’s richest companies, and by China, to secure their stranglehold on power and wealth permanently.

Related Topics:

After 15 years as a TV reporter with Global and CBC and as news director of RDTV in Red Deer, Duane set out on his own 2008 as a visual storyteller. During this period, he became fascinated with a burgeoning online world and how it could better serve local communities. This fascination led to Todayville, launched in 2016.

Follow Author

More from this author
Duane Rolheiser / 2 days ago

Carney Wins: What now Alberta?

Dan McTeague / 3 days ago

My fellow boomers, Carney’s ‘Green’ obsessions are bad for all of us!

2025 Federal Election / 7 days ago

Polls say Canadians will give Trump what he wants, a Carney victory.

COVID-19

Study finds Pfizer COVID vaccine poses 37% greater mortality risk than Moderna

Published on May 1, 2025

By

From LifeSiteNews

By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A study of 1.47 million Florida adults by MIT’s Retsef Levi and Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo finds significantly higher all-cause mortality after Pfizer vaccination compared to Moderna

A new study of 1.47 million Florida adults by MIT’s Retsef Levi and Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo finds significantly higher all-cause, cardiovascular, and COVID-19 mortality after Pfizer vaccination.

The study titled “Twelve-Month All-Cause Mortality after Initial COVID-19 Vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech or mRNA-1273 among Adults Living in Florida” was just uploaded to the MedRxiv preprint server. This study was headed by MIT Professor Retsef Levi, with Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo serving as senior author:

Study Overview

  • Population: 1,470,100 noninstitutionalized Florida adults (735,050 Pfizer recipients and 735,050 Moderna recipients).
  • Intervention: Two doses of either:
    • BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech)
    • mRNA-1273 (Moderna)
  • Follow-up Duration: 12 months after second dose.
  • Comparison: Head-to-head between Pfizer vs. Moderna recipients.
  • Main Outcomes:
    • All-cause mortality
    • Cardiovascular mortality
    • COVID-19 mortality
    • Non-COVID-19 mortality

All-cause mortality

Pfizer recipients had a significantly higher 12-month all-cause death rate than Moderna recipients — about 37% higher risk.

  • Pfizer Risk: 847.2 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Moderna Risk: 617.9 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Risk Difference:
    ➔ +229.2 deaths per 100,000 (Pfizer excess)
  • Risk Ratio (RR):
    ➔ 1.37 (i.e., 37% higher mortality risk with Pfizer)
  • Odds Ratio (Adjusted):
    ➔ 1.384 (95% CI: 1.331–1.439)

Cardiovascular mortality

Pfizer recipients had a 53% higher risk of dying from cardiovascular causes compared to Moderna recipients.

  • Pfizer Risk: 248.7 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Moderna Risk: 162.4 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Risk Difference:
    ➔ +86.3 deaths per 100,000 (Pfizer excess)
  • Risk Ratio (RR):
    ➔ 1.53 (i.e., 53% higher cardiovascular mortality risk)
  • Odds Ratio (Adjusted):
    ➔ 1.540 (95% CI: 1.431–1.657)

COVID-19 mortality

Pfizer recipients had nearly double the risk of COVID-19 death compared to Moderna recipients.

  • Pfizer Risk: 55.5 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Moderna Risk: 29.5 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Risk Difference:
    ➔ +26.0 deaths per 100,000 (Pfizer excess)
  • Risk Ratio (RR):
    ➔ 1.88 (i.e., 88% higher COVID-19 mortality risk)
  • Odds Ratio (Adjusted):
    ➔ 1.882 (95% CI: 1.596–2.220)

Non-COVID-19 mortality

Pfizer recipients faced a 35% higher risk of dying from non-COVID causes compared to Moderna recipients.

  • Pfizer Risk: 791.6 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Moderna Risk: 588.4 deaths per 100,000 people
  • Risk Difference:
    ➔ +203.3 deaths per 100,000 (Pfizer excess)
  • Risk Ratio (RR):
    ➔ 1.35 (i.e., 35% higher non-COVID mortality risk)
  • Odds Ratio (Adjusted):
    ➔ 1.356 (95% CI: 1.303–1.412)

Biological explanations

The findings of this study are surprising, given that Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine contains approximately three times more mRNA (100 µg) than Pfizer’s BNT162b2 vaccine (30 µg). This suggests that the higher mortality observed among Pfizer recipients could potentially be related to higher levels of DNA contamination — an issue that has been consistently reported worldwide:

The paper hypothesizes differences between Pfizer and Moderna may be due to:

  • Different lipid nanoparticle compositions
  • Differences in manufacturing, biodistribution, or storage conditions

Final conclusion

Florida adults who received Pfizer’s BNT162b2 vaccine had higher 12-month risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, COVID-19, and non-COVID-19 mortality compared to Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients.

Unfortunately, without an unvaccinated group, the study cannot determine the absolute increase in mortality risk attributable to mRNA vaccination itself. However, based on the mountain of existing evidence, it is likely that an unvaccinated cohort would have experienced much lower mortality risks. It’s also important to remember that Moderna mRNA injections are still dangerous.

As the authors conclude:

These findings are suggestive of differential non-specific effects of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines, and potential concerning adverse effects on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. They underscore the need to evaluate vaccines using clinical endpoints that extend beyond their targeted diseases.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal accounton X (formerly Twitter) for further content.

Reprinted with permission from Focal Points.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

Canada’s health department warns COVID vaccine injury payouts to exceed $75 million budget

Published on April 30, 2025

By

Fr0m LifeSiteNews

By Clare Marie Merkowsky

A Department of Health memo warns that Canada’s Vaccine Injury Support Program will exceed its $75 million budget due to high demand, with $16 million already paid out.

COVID vaccine injury payments are expected to go over budget, according to a Canadian Department of Health memo.

According to information published April 28 by Blacklock’s Reporter, the Department of Health will exceed their projected payouts for COVID vaccine injuries, despite already spending $16 million on compensating those harmed by the once-mandated experimental shots.

“A total $75 million in funding has been earmarked for the first five years of the program and $9 million on an ongoing basis,” the December memo read. “However the overall cost of the program is dependent on the volume of claims and compensation awarded over time, and that the demand remains at very high levels.”

“The purpose of this funding is to ensure people in Canada who experience a serious and permanent injury as a result of receiving a Health Canada authorized vaccine administered in Canada on or after December 8, 2020 have access to a fair and timely financial support mechanism,” it continued.

Canada’s Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) was launched in December 2020 after the Canadian government gave vaccine makers a shield from liability regarding COVID-19 jab-related injuries.

While Parliament originally budgeted $75 million, thousands of Canadians have filed claims after received the so-called “safe and effective” COVID shots. Of the 3,060 claims received to date, only 219 had been approved so far, with payouts totaling over $16 million.

Since the start of the COVID crisis, official data shows that the virus has been listed as the cause of death for less than 20 kids in Canada under age 15. This is out of six million children in the age group.

The COVID jabs approved in Canada have also been associated with severe side effects such as blood clots, rashes, miscarriages, and even heart attacks in young, healthy men.

Additionally, a recent study done by researchers with Canada-based Correlation Research in the Public Interest showed that 17 countries have found a “definite causal link” between peaks in all-cause mortality and the fast rollouts of the COVID shots as well as boosters.

Interestingly, while the Department of Health has spent $16 million on injury payouts, the Liberal government spent $54 million COVID propaganda promoting the vaccine to young Canadians.

The Public Health Agency of Canada especially targeted young Canadians ages 18-24 because they “may play down the seriousness of the situation.”

The campaign took place despite the fact that the Liberal government knew about COVID vaccine injuries, according to a secret memo.

Continue Reading

Trending

X