Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

Energy

How to realize Canada’s ambitions as an energy superpower

Published

10 minute read

From Resource Works

By 

“We are not in an era of energy transition — we are in an era of energy addition”

If Prime Minister Mark Carney is to make good on his promise to make Canada an energy superpower that includes oil and gas, Alberta and B.C. will clearly need to be in the vanguard. But how can Canada accomplish energy superpower status in an era of energy transition and decarbonization — with its attendant promise of peak oil and gas — increasingly strained relations with Canada’s biggest energy trade partner — the U.S. — and domestic regulatory strangulation that has soured Canada’s investment climate? These were some of the topics explored Tuesday morning at the Global Energy Show Canada in Calgary, which organizers said was expected to draw 30,000 attendees. Briefly, the answer to these challenges is that the U.S. will remain a key partner in energy trade, despite Donald Trump’s best efforts to sour U.S.-Canada relations, global demand for oil and gas will continue to grow, and Canada just needs to get out of its own way through deregulation.”There is no peak in oil demand on the horizon,” said Haitham al Ghais, former secretary-general for OPEC. As for liquefied natural gas, Shell Canada president Stastia West said Shell is forecasting 60% growth in demand for LNG, with B.C. now poised to become a significant player. Should all proposed LNG projects and expansions in B.C. get financed, by 2030, Canada will have joined the ranks of a major players in the LNG sector.

B.C.’s two large LNG projects — LNG Canada and Ksi Lisims — and three smaller ones (Cedar, Woodfibre and Tilbury) would produce about 47.5 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). That represents about 28% of the 170 million MPTA of new LNG supply expected to come onto markets by 2030, according to Shell’s 2025 LNG outlook. Despite its raw energy abundance, Canada is emerging from a decade of self-doubt and squelched investment opportunities, driven in no small part by the notion that oil and gas is a sunset industry.

Global Energy Show 2025- Canada energy superpower
Global Energy Show 2025- Canada energy superpower

A global push for an energy transition presumed that the demand for conventional energy would decline. But as a number of speakers noted Tuesday, the role of renewable energy in the “energy transition” is turning out to be additive, not subtractive. Investment in renewables will continue to gain momentum, but not at the expense of conventional oil and gas. “We are not in an era of energy transition — we are in an era of energy addition,” said Clay Sell of X-Energy, a small modular reactor developer. All forms of energy will need to grow, he said, to meet the growing demand for energy. AI alone promises to be a huge new driver of energy demand.

Just four years ago, the International Energy Agency (IEA) pronounced that no new major investments in oil and gas development would be needed, based on net-zero commitments made by Paris Agreement signatories. Al Ghais said OPEC members had noted “serious concern” with the IEA’s “flip-flopping” in its forecasts, noting that, in recent months, the IEA’s executive director “once again stressed the importance of oil industry investments.” “We forecast that global primary energy demand is going to increase by a staggering 24% from now to 2050,” all Ghais said, adding that oil is expected to remain 30% of the energy mix in 2050. “Simply put, ladies and gentlemen, there is no peak in oil demand on the horizon,” al Ghais said. “The fact that oil demand keeps rising, hitting new records year on year, is a clear example. Our projections are that oil demand will surpass 120 million barrels a day by 2050.” He said cumulative investments in the oil sector are expected to total US$17.4 trillion between now and 2050. He added Alberta is well poised to meet some of that demand with lower emission oil, thanks to its leadership in carbon capture and storage.

“Innovation will be critical in assisting this industry in reducing greenhouse gas emissions going forward,” he said. “Canada has been at the forefront of carbon capture utilization and storage. “Alberta specifically is a global leader in harnessing this technology, and the province has extensive energy infrastructure and subsurface geological storage for CCUS.” Gaining and holding market share in a growing market is one of the big challenges for Canada. Its closest energy trade partner has become increasingly hostile, with U.S. President Donald Trump claiming the U.S. does not need Canadian oil and gas. Given that about 90% of Canada’s oil and gas exports currently go to the U.S, that could be a problem — if it were true.

Haitham Al Ghais at the Global Energy Show 2025
Haitham Al Ghais at the Global Energy Show 2025- NB

Jon McKenzie, CEO of Cenovus Energy, said Canada should try to diversify Canada’s energy markets, but said it also needs to preserve its relations with the U.S. The two countries are simply too integrated to sever ties. “The reality is we are hard-wired into the U.S. system,” McKenzie said. “What we really need to do is be the adult in the room as these discussions continue. Because President Trump says he doesn’t need Canadian oil and gas, that doesn’t make it true. They need our oil and gas as much today as they have over the prior decades.” And increasingly, other countries will need Canadian oil and gas as well, underscoring the need for export infrastructure, like pipelines.B.C. is well-positioned to capture the Asia market for natural gas through LNG exports.

This summer, Canada will begin exporting LNG to Asia, as LNG Canada in Kitimat is commissioned. Shell’s 2025 LNG outlook notes investment in various natural gas infrastructure in India and China — new connections to the gas grid, regasification facilities and LNG fueling for heavy duty trucking — are driving demand growth for natural gas. While the outlook forecasts demand for LNG in Europe, Japan and South Korea will peak around 2035 and begin to decline, it forecasts demand growth in China, India and other parts of Asia, as well as growth overall in the marine sector through fuel switching. “Our view of demand growth is up to 60% by 2040,” said Stastia West, Canadian president and country chair of Shell Canada.

The billion-dollar question on many minds in B.C. is whether the partners in LNG Canada will pull the trigger on a final investment decision for a Phase 2 expansion, and whether the Ksi Lisims LNG project north of Prince Rupert will be approved and financed. Shell is one of the five partners in LNG Canada. Asked what the timelines might be for an FID on Phase 2, West said that decision depends on competitiveness, affordability and “stakeholder needs.”

“At the end of the day, for us at Shell…it will depend on how that decision fits into the portfolio of opportunities that we have ahead of us to make decisions on at the time. But I think we’re excited about the opportunity, and we’re happy with how all of that is progressing.”

While there has been an encouraging vibe shift in Canada for the oil and gas sectors, barriers to investment in energy remain. Some of the barriers cited Tuesday include Bill C-69, oil and gas emissions caps, a West Coast oil tanker ban, and provincial opposition to new oil and gas pipelines. Lisa Baiton, CEO of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), offered a prescription for regulatory bottlenecks. “Let’s get out of our own way here in Canada,” she said.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Energy

Minus Forty and the Myth of Easy Energy

Published on

It’s not about ideology at  forty degrees below zero. It’s about survival

When the thermometer plunges to forty below, ideology no longer matters. Survival does.

That lesson was driven home in January 2024, when a brutal cold snap swept across America’s Pacific Northwest and western Canada. For four days, the region’s interconnected energy system teetered on the brink of collapse. Power lines snapped, gas pipelines strained, and four states of emergency were declared. In Portland, a falling power line killed three people and injured a baby.

This was no ordinary winter storm. It quickly became known as the January 2024 Event – a capital-letter crisis that planners are still analyzing nearly two years later. As recently as August 2025, experts continued to hold panels to ask the same question: how did the grid survive? Their verdict is grim.

Hydropower, long the Northwest’s reliable backup, faltered. Wind turbines stood still as the winds died at exactly the wrong time. Solar panels offered little under heavy gray skies. Natural gas supplied about two-thirds of the energy as furnaces worked around the clock – but even gas has limits.

The Real Problem: Capacity, Not Cold

Here’s the twist: post-event analysis shows the real problem wasn’t the cold. It was demand growth colliding with a system stripped of firm capacity. The cold snap may not have been unprecedented, but the risks were, BC Hydro’s Powerex reported.

They also warned that fashionable fixes like batteries and pumped hydro aren’t the cavalry many hope for. These technologies can even worsen shortages by competing for scarce electricity when it’s needed most. One Alberta utility estimated it would take a battery bigger than 13 years of the world’s entire EV battery output to cover its customers’ electricity needs for those few days.

Meanwhile, the renewables lobby was left scrambling for answers. Investigations by ProPublica and Oregon Public Broadcasting highlighted the obvious: Oregon and Washington had set “100% green” targets without solving the transmission bottlenecks needed to deliver that power. Instead of addressing the flaw, advocates doubled down, calling for more wind, more solar, more batteries without any credible plan for the impossibly large quantities required.

And so, in the depths of that frigid January, reality intruded. Gas-fired generation carried the essential load. Imports were pulled in. Utilities called for conservation, and households responded. System operators dug deep, showing remarkable resilience under pressure. Heroic efforts kept the lights on. But it should never have come to that.

The lesson is not that renewables are bad or that we should cling to the past. It is that energy policy must begin with humility. Weather is unpredictable. In a cross-border region of 26 million people, demand is also growing much faster than once forecast.

A Wake-Up Call Ignored

When lives are on the line, nothing replaces firm, dispatchable power. A balanced system – yes, with more renewables, but anchored by natural gas and supported by robust transmission – is essential. Pretending we can run an advanced economy on press releases and hope is how ideology masquerades as policy, and how families end up shivering in the dark.

The January 2024 event should have been a wake-up call. Yet too many leaders remain captivated by slogans and blind to physics. The grid doesn’t read legislation. It doesn’t listen to speeches. It responds only to supply, demand, and the weather. And when the weather turns deadly, the reckoning is swift.

Dreamers will keep promising a painless transition. British Columbia, for example, is shutting down domestic gas generation in what’s branded a “pivot” to renewables – even as the province ships its first LNG cargoes to a world hungry for reliable gas. At the same time, the explosive growth of data centres driven by artificial intelligence has experts agog at what this means for an already strained system.

Eighteen months after the event, the people we expect to have answers are still asking questions.

Questions Still Unanswered

Here’s one more: is our energy system’s fragility the result of wishful thinking colliding with reality? To many experts, the answer seems obvious.

At minus forty, there is no spin, no ideology—only survival.

If Canada and the Northwest want to avoid a repeat of January 2024, the path is clear: double down on reliability, build the neglected transmission, and keep firm power in the system. Because the next deep freeze—or heat wave—will not wait for us to get our politics straight.

References

LA Times (Jan 17, 2024). Pacific Northwest ice storm kills three.

NewsData (Aug 2025). Panelists: January 2024 gas shortage sparked conversations on coordination.

USACE (2024). Don’t bet on the weather: the role hydropower plays in balancing the grid.

Western Power Pool (2024). Assessment of January 2024 Cold Weather Event.

Powerex (Mar 2024). Analysis of the January 2024 Winter Weather Event.

ProPublica/OPB (May 2025). How the Pacific Northwest’s dream of green energy fell apart.

NW Energy Coalition (2024). Customer-side resources critical to reliability.

Continue Reading

Alberta

Busting five myths about the Alberta oil sands

Published on

Construction of an oil sands SAGD production well pad in northern Alberta. Photo supplied to the Canadian Energy Centre

From the Canadian Energy Centre

By Deborah Jaremko

The facts about one of Canada’s biggest industries

Alberta’s oil sands sector is one of Canada’s most important industries — and also one of its most misunderstood.

Here are five common myths, and the facts behind them.

Myth: Oil sands emissions are unchecked

Steam generators at a SAGD oil sands production site in northern Alberta. Photo courtesy Cenovus Energy

Reality: Oil sands emissions are strictly regulated and monitored. Producers are making improvements through innovation and efficiency.

The sector’s average emissions per barrel – already on par with the average oil consumed in the United States, according to S&P Global – continue to go down.

The province reports that oil sands emissions per barrel declined by 26 per cent per barrel from 2012 to 2023. At the same time, production increased by 96 per cent.

Analysts with S&P Global call this a “structural change” for the industry where production growth is beginning to rise faster than emissions growth.

The firm continues to anticipate a decrease in total oil sands emissions within the next few years.

The Pathways Alliance — companies representing about 95 per cent of oil sands activity — aims to significantly cut emissions from production through a major carbon capture and storage (CCS) project and other innovations.

Myth: There is no demand for oil sands production

Expanded export capacity at the Trans Mountain Westridge Terminal. Photo courtesy Trans Mountain Corporation

Reality: Demand for Canadian oil – which primarily comes from the oil sands – is strong and rising.

Today, America imports more than 80 per cent more oil from Canada than it did in 2010, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).

New global customers also now have access to Canadian oil thanks to the opening of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion in 2024.

Exports to countries outside the U.S. increased by 180 per cent since the project went into service, reaching a record 525,000 barrels per day in July 2025, according to the Canada Energy Regulator.

The world’s appetite for oil keeps growing — and it’s not stopping anytime soon.

According to the latest EIA projections, the world will consume about 120 million barrels per day of oil and petroleum liquids in 2050, up from about 104 million barrels per day today.

Myth: Oil sands projects cost too much

Heavy haulers at an oil sands mining operation in northern Alberta. Photo courtesy Suncor Energy

Reality: Operating oil sands projects deliver some of the lowest-cost oil in North America, according to Enverus Intelligence Research.

Unlike U.S. shale plays, oil sands production is a long-life, low-decline “manufacturing” process without the treadmill of ongoing investment in new drilling, according to BMO Capital Markets.

Vast oil sands reserves support mining projects with no drilling, and the standard SAGD drilling method involves about 60 per cent fewer wells than the average shale play, BMO says.

After initial investment, Enverus says oil sands projects typically break even at less than US$50 per barrel WTI.

Myth: Indigenous communities don’t support the oil sands 

Chief Greg Desjarlais of Frog Lake First Nation signs an agreement in September 2022 whereby 23 First Nations and Métis communities in Alberta acquired an 11.57 per cent ownership interest in seven Enbridge-operated oil sands pipelines for approximately $1 billion. Photo courtesy Enbridge

Reality: Indigenous communities play an important role in the oil sands sector through community agreements, business contracts and, increasingly, project equity ownership.

Oil sands producers spent an average of $1.8 billion per year with 180 Indigenous-affiliated vendors between 2021 and 2023, according to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.

Indigenous communities are now owners of key projects that support the oil sands, including Suncor Energy’s East Tank Farm (49 per cent owned by two communities); the Northern Courier pipeline system (14 per cent owned by eight communities); and the Athabasca Trunkline, seven operating Enbridge oil sands pipelines (~12 per cent owned by 23 communities).

These partnerships strengthen Indigenous communities with long-term revenue, helping build economic reconciliation.

Myth: Oil sands development only benefits people in Alberta 

The Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) on Bay St. Getty Images photo

Reality: Oil sands development benefits Canadians across the country through reliable energy supply, jobs, taxes and government revenues that help pay for services like roads, schools and hospitals.

The sector has contributed approximately $1 trillion to the Canadian economy over the past 25 years, according to analysis by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI).

That reflects total direct spending — including capital investment, operating costs, taxes and royalties — not profits or dividends for shareholders.

More than 2,300 companies outside of Alberta have had direct business with the oilsands, including over 1,300 in Ontario and almost 600 in Quebec, MLI said.

Energy products are by far Canada’s largest export, representing $196 billion, or about one-quarter of Canada’s total trade in 2024, according to Statistics Canada.

Led by the oil sands, Canada’s energy sector directly or indirectly employs more than 445,000 people across the country, according to Natural Resources Canada.

Continue Reading

Trending

X