National
Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre reacts to new PM and Federal Cabinet

Mark Carney’s Fourth Liberal Term Will Be Just Like Justin’s
The following is a transcript of the Hon. Pierre Poilievre’s remarks from March 14th, 2025. These remarks have been edited for length. Check against delivery.
I begin by congratulating Justin Trudeau’s economic advisor, Mark Carney, on becoming Prime Minister, only 3 months after he moved his company headquarters out of Canada to New York.
Today, Liberals are trying to trick Canadians into electing them to a fourth term in power with a cabinet that is 87% the same as Trudeau’s cabinet.
100% of this Liberal cabinet served as Trudeau MPs. The same Liberal MPs who voted to hike the carbon tax, double the debt, double food bank line ups and double housing costs. The same Liberals all supported blocking pipelines, LNG plants, and passing the anti-energy law C-69 that has made Canada even more reliant on the United States.
Steven Guilbeault, the radical anti-development activist twice arrested for climbing on buildings and homes to protest our resource sector and who calls himself a socialist, has been promoted to minister responsible for Parks and Nature and minister for Quebec–meaning nothing will get built.
Meanwhile, all of Trudeau’s inner circle—Gerald Butts and Tom Pitfield—are now Carney’s top advisors. His chief of staff is a former Trudeau minister forced to resign for lying about moving Paul Bernardo out of a maximum security prison.
Mark Carney thinks Canadians are stupid. That with a little bit of cosmetic surgery, the Liberals will be able to disguise who they are and make people forget what they did for 10 years. It is the same Liberal gang, with the same Liberal agenda, the same Liberal results and the same Liberal promises as the last ten years, only now they are seeking a 4th term in power.
Carbon Tax Carney also tried the same Carbon Tax Con-job I predicted weeks ago he would do. He announced he will hide the tax for the next two months until after the election is over, when he will bring back a bigger “shadow carbon tax” without any rebate. We know this because for the last 5 years, Carney has advised Trudeau to hike the tax. And recently, he said his new tax would hit steel, cars and other things Canadians need.
It is sneaky.
But it will not work.
Canadians know that over 10 years, the Trudeau-Carney Liberals doubled the debt, doubled housing costs and doubled foodbank line ups. They’ve made us weak facing the Americans.
Giving the Liberals a fourth term will not change any of that.
If you cannot afford food a home after three terms of these Liberals, that will not change with a fourth Liberal term.
If you are worried Canada is drowning in debt and taxes after three terms of these Liberals, that will not change with a fourth Liberal term.
If you are afraid of crime and chaos after three terms of Liberals, it will not change with a fourth term of Liberals.
If you are a senior choosing between heating and eating after 3 Liberal terms, there will not be any change with a fourth Liberal term.
If you are worried that Canada can’t get anything built and is more reliant on the U.S. than ever before, there will not be any change with a fourth Liberal term.
And it certainly won’t change with a conflicted Prime Minister who already sold-out Canada to move its headquarters to the United States only days after Trump threatened tariffs to take our jobs.
Carney puts himself first. Conservatives will put Canada first.
Putting Canada first means cutting bureaucracy and taxes. It means confronting President Trump to his face. Hitting back with counter tariffs. But it also means making Canada stronger at home. We will pass a massive Bring it Home Tax Cut on work, investment, energy, homebuilding and making stuff in Canada. We will reward your hard work with an income tax cut, so you bring home more of each dollar you earn.
We will cut bureaucracy, taxes and debt. We will take the GST off new homes to save you up to $50,000 & incentivize municipalities to speed up permits, free up land and cut development charges. We will axe the carbon tax for everyone forever to bring down energy costs for families and businesses.
We will repeal the Liberal No-New Pipelines Law C-69, and instead grant rapid permission to our companies to build more pipelines, more natural gas exports, more data centers, mines, and other natural resources to bring home powerful paychecks and production to our people.
We will carry out the biggest crackdown on crime, the borders and drugs. We will be self-reliant, sovereign and stand on our own feet. To stand up to the Americans. And stand up for ourselves.
We will reward work, unleash entrepreneurs, harvest our resources, make our own goods, trade with each other, build homes for our youth, rebuild our borders and military, honour history and raise our flag.
And to restore Canada’s promise: where hard work gets you a great life in a beautiful house on a safe street protected by brave troops under a proud flag. In Canada.
Let’s bring it home.
Business
Canada’s attack on religious charities makes no fiscal sense
This article supplied by Troy Media.
By Lee Harding
Ottawa is targeting the charitable tax status of faith-based groups. The fallout could hit every Canadian community
The possibility that Canadian religious organizations will lose their charitable status has never been more real.
On Jan. 6, Parliament’s Standing Committee on Finance recommended numerous changes, including Recommendation 430: “Amend the Income Tax Act to define a charity, which would remove the privileged status of ‘advancement of religion’ as a
charitable purpose, meaning faith-based organizations could lose access to tax benefits.”
The B.C. Humanist Association, a secular advocacy group, has long advocated for removing religion as a stand-alone charitable purpose. That idea is reflected in Recommendation 430. Before adopting such a proposal, the finance committee should have reviewed a study published last November by Cardus, a Canadian think tank focused on faith, civil society and public policy.
The Cardus study examined 64 Christian congregations in various provinces to assess the socio-economic value of their impact. It suggested that congregations make an $18.2-billion socioeconomic contribution to Canadian society, well in excess of tax exemptions and rebates equal to $1.7 billion. The net positive result of $16.5 billion—a “halo effect”—is more than 10
times the value of the tax exemptions.
The implications are clear: society will be worse off if the loss of religious charitable status leads to a drop of more than 10 per cent in donations to affected charities. Why risk it?
When congregations unravel, society follows in ways that go beyond mere economics. As Cardus explains, churches often provide space, often at no cost or below-market rates, for cultural and artistic events, recreation and sports, education, social services and other community activities. They also deliver addiction recovery, counselling and mental-health support, child care, refugee sponsorship and settlement services for newcomers, education and food banks.
Whether institutionally or personally, helping people is often an integral extension of religious belief. A 2012 Statistics Canada study found that the 14 per cent of Canadians who attend church weekly offer 29 per cent of the nation’s volunteer hours and provide 45 per cent of all charitable donations.
No party has explicitly endorsed removing charitable status for religion. But the Bloc Québécois, NDP and Liberals dominated the committee recommendation to remove religion as a charitable purpose. The Conservative Party, which held a minority on the committee, was alone in opposing it outright.
Randy Crosson, executive director of Freedoms Advocate, is organizing a national pushback. In a speech given Oct. 1 to the Regina Civic Awareness and Action Network, he said the recommendation was a “shot across the bow” to gauge public reaction.
“This isn’t just about donors losing tax receipts. It’s about churches losing buildings, staff losing jobs, and ministries being forced to shut down due to reduced donations. This is a direct threat to the future of faith in Canada, and it’s happening fast,” Crosson explained in an online video.
Crosson said religion enjoys less participation and more opposition than in previous decades. Church attendance has slumped since the pandemic, and some Canadians continue to criticize churches for their historical involvement in residential schools.
The Quebec government has also pursued a strongly secular approach to public policy. In 2019, Quebec’s Bill 21 used the notwithstanding clause of the Constitution to ban public servants from wearing religious symbols, such as hijabs, turbans or crucifixes. In August, Quebec’s secularism minister, Jean François Roberge, said that the “proliferation of street prayer is a serious and sensitive issue” and promised to bring legislation to ban it.
That’s why Crosson is urging religious leaders to launch a three-part campaign.
“First, an open letter drafted with legal and faith leaders to show government and the media the real value of the church in Canadian society. Second, mass signatures. We need churches, leaders and individuals to sign the letter,” Crosson says in a video appeal. “And third, a national documentary based on the open letter. This will be released publicly and spread through churches, media and social platforms.”
The Frontier Centre for Public Policy has also come out publicly against the proposed change. A report by Senior Fellow Pierre Gilbert entitled Revoking the Charitable Status for the Advancement of Religion: A Critical Assessment makes a case for the status quo, pointing to benefits such as those mentioned above.
For now, at least, the idea is on hold. A published email response by Liberal MP Karina Gould, the chair of the House of Commons’ Standing Committee on Finance, said the charitable status of faith-driven non-profits will not be revoked in the Nov. 4 budget.
That’s good news. Faith is a big motivator of charity, and it’s hard to see how a less charitable society is a better one. If governments want to balance the books, they should rein in spending, not put faith-based charities at risk.
Lee Harding is a research fellow for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.
Troy Media empowers Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in helping Canadians stay informed and engaged by delivering reliable content that strengthens community connections and deepens understanding across the country
Bruce Dowbiggin
Get Ready: Your House May Not Be Yours Much Longer
As political scientist Philip Kaufman explains, “If you keep saying you are on stolen land, don’t be surprised when judges give it away to the natives you said you stole it from.”
“At Dodger Stadium on Monday night, singer JP Saxe re-wrote the lyrics of O Canada. The Toronto pop singer swapped the official “our home and native land” for “our home on native land.”
All things considered the land acknowledgement by Saxe (born Jonathan Percy Starker) is pretty tame stuff in today’s climate where some Canadians are suddenly learning they may not own their homes. But like Justin Trudeau washing “genocidal” Canadian laundry at the UN Saxe’s stunt at the Series is just another sign that Canada’s clever folk remain all-in on humiliating themselves in front of the world over reconciliation.
The latest acknowledgements go beyond an off-key pop singer toying with a song lyric. Just ask citizens of Richmond, B.C. which has sent a letter to residents warning that their property may not belong to them. This after a B.C. Supreme Court judge ruled the Vancouver Island First Nation have won back fishing rights and title for part of the land its ancestors used as a summer home in British Columbia’s Lower Mainland— despite opposition by two other Indigenous communities.
The gormless BC NDP government, which brought on the crisis by refusing to legally challenge native demands in the Blueberry River dispute, says it’s monitoring the Richmond file, admitting “owning private property with clear title is key to borrowing for a mortgage, economic certainty, and the real estate market.” But no promises, folks.
Naturally the locals are not amused. One Richmond property owner, who says he’s owned and paid taxes on his home since 1975, has been told by his lender they won’t be renewing his mortgage after First Nations land claim.

The Eby government settlement— called by Bruce Pardy “an existential threat to the future of his own province”— is part of a wave of claims both written and oral gaining momentum across the nation. As we wrote in August, “Among those properties in question is the Vancouver International Airport in Richmond, B.C.. How slick is that? A Carney government that ran on protecting Boomers’ primary residence cashboxes has now managed to put the entire notion of fee simple home ownership at risk.
As blogger Liam Harlow writes, “Indigenous people will now have an unprecedented, parallel title to private property in that area, a legal first of its kind in a court declaration. This title is declared a ‘prior and senior right to land,’ implying a stronger claim, with the court fundamentally asking “what remains of fee simple title after Aboriginal title is recognized in the same lands?”
It doesn’t stop there. Under UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples) the UN will hold any properties acquired “in trust” for all “aboriginals” as they bicker among themselves for supremacy. Whether Canada’s natives will actually get the land, they will have served as a convenient vehicle for the progressive Left to expand its jurisdiction.
The glass half full on reconciliation holds that Canada’s politicians negotiate a fee with the new native owners to stay on these properties. (Good luck getting a mortgage with the Haida Gwai as co-owners on title.) The glass half empty is your equity goes bye-bye. The decision shocked many earnest Elbows Up types who had no idea their elected governments had fumbled the ball this way.

This is the culmination of decades of federal Liberal acquiescence on the Indigenous file, incompetence highlighted by Trudeau’s pandering visit to a graveyard that contained no alleged murdered babies. Or his refusal to re-open the main rail lines in 2020 when natives blocked the CP tracks.”
Citizens losing their homes in legal disputes should lead every newscast in the nation. Good luck sparking debate on these onrushing crises. As members of the B.C. legislature discovered when they were fired by their party for articulating a few inconvenient facts on reconciliation. The paid-off media, meanwhile, are too obsessed with Trudeau dating celebrity Katy Perry.
The reconciliation fatwa imposed by the Canadian Left powers the ludicrous ongoing spectacle over the Rez School graves. Based on verbal tradition alone, the prime minister of Canada staged pictures with teddy bears when there has never been a murder charge or a family searching for a dead child ever registered in Canada.
Multi-million dollar payouts by the Canadian government to investigate graves produced no evidence of any bodies— mostly because no effort was made. Evidence shows that children in Rez schools might have had a lower mortality rate from TB than those children in their residences. Or even in the general public.
Anyone challenging this reconciliation orthodoxy is fired from teaching positions, expelled from mainline political parties and banned from polite society. No one in Laurentian media seems willing to touch the hot skillet. No wonder polling in 2024 showed 60 percent of Canadians still believe the genocide claim.
Using this blank cheque indigenous radicals demanded land acknowledgements before meetings, political rallies and sports events. To which Woke Canada has caved. A bill in the BC legislature to ban acknowledgements “that deny the sovereignty of the Crown within British Columbia or that attribute collective guilt to individuals based on race, ancestry or the actions of Canadian historical figures” was quashed (88 of 93 MLAs voting no) The MLA behind the bill, Dallas Brodie, was instructed by a fellow PC MLA to get on the “right side of history.”
Meanwhile activists are in classrooms repeating the sanctity of land acknowledgements, ignoring that these lands had turned over many times in tribal warfare. To take just one example, the Comanche used the horse to go from a Canadian tribe to conquering multiple tribes and civilizations across the continent, stealing land and enslaving women and children. But new history mandates that it was their “ancestral” land. The pattern is repeated across North America.
Canadian liberals shrug at this as all just words and theatre. But as political scientist Philip Kaufman explains, “If you keep saying you are on stolen land, don’t be surprised when judges give it away to the natives you said you stole it from.” The BC NDP government’s guilt trip is now producing land claims across the country with warning home owners that, guess what, you may not own your home, either. Like this aboriginal challenge over lands in western Quebec.
There may be better ways to inspire radicalism among normally placid Canadians than kicking people out of homes they’ve bought, but for the moment we can’t think of any. And that’s nothing to sing about.
Bruce Dowbiggin @dowbboy is the editor of Not The Public Broadcaster A two-time winner of the Gemini Award as Canada’s top television sports broadcaster, his new book Deal With It: The Trades That Stunned The NHL And Changed hockey is now available on Amazon. Inexact Science: The Six Most Compelling Draft Years In NHL History, his previous book with his son Evan, was voted the seventh-best professional hockey book of all time by bookauthority.org . His 2004 book Money Players was voted sixth best on the same list, and is available via brucedowbigginbooks.ca.
-
National18 hours agoCanadian MPs order ethics investigation into Mark Carney’s corporate interests
-
Business2 days agoCanada has given $109 million to Communist China for ‘sustainable development’ since 2015
-
Banks23 hours agoBank of Canada Cuts Rates to 2.25%, Warns of Structural Economic Damage
-
Business24 hours agoFord’s Liquor War Trades Economic Freedom For Political Theatre
-
Opinion2 days agoBritish Columbians protest Trump while Eby brings their province to its knees
-
International2 days agoStrongest hurricane in 174 years makes landfall in Jamaica
-
Alberta13 hours agoNobel Prize nods to Alberta innovation in carbon capture
-
Business1 day agoBill Gates walks away from the climate cult
