Business
Chinese firm unveils palm-based biometric ID payments, sparking fresh privacy concerns

By Ken Macon
Alipay’s biometric PL1 scanner uses vein and palm-print data for processing payments, raising security concerns over the storage and use of permanent biometric data.
Alipay, the financial arm of Alibaba, has introduced a new palm-based biometric terminal, dubbed the PL1, which enables individuals to make purchases simply by presenting their hand – no phone, card, or PIN required. Positioned as a faster, touch-free alternative for payment, this system reflects a growing industry shift toward frictionless biometric transactions.
At the core of the PL1 is a dual-mode recognition system that combines surface palm print detection with internal vein mapping. This multi-layered authentication relies on deeply unique biological signatures that are significantly harder to replicate than more common methods like fingerprints or facial scans. Alipay reports that the device maintains a false acceptance rate of less than one in a million, suggesting a substantial improvement in resisting identity spoofing.
Enrollment is designed to be quick: users hover their palm over the sensor and link their account through a QR code. Once registered, purchases are completed in around two seconds without physical interaction. During early trials in Hangzhou, this system reportedly accelerated checkout lines and contributed to more hygienic point-of-sale environments.
The PL1 arrives at a time of rapid expansion in the biometric payments sector. Forecasts estimate that more than 3 billion people will use biometrics for transactions by 2026, with total payments surpassing $5 trillion. Major players are already onboard: Amazon has integrated palm authentication across U.S. retail and healthcare facilities, while JP Morgan is gearing up for a national deployment in the same year.
Alipay envisions the PL1’s use extending well beyond checkout counters. It is exploring applications in public transit, controlled access facilities, and healthcare check-ins, reflecting a broader trend toward embedding biometric systems in daily infrastructure. However, while domestic deployment benefits from favorable policy conditions, international expansion may be constrained by differing legal standards, particularly in jurisdictions that enforce stringent rules on biometric data usage and consent.
Despite the technological advancements and convenience the PL1 offers, privacy remains a major point of contention. Unlike passwords or cards that can be reset or replaced, biometric data is immutable. If compromised, individuals cannot simply “change” their palm patterns or vein structures. This permanence heightens the stakes of any potential data breach and raises long-term concerns about identity theft and surveillance.
Alipay’s approach, storing encrypted biometric templates locally on devices and restricting data flow within national border, does address certain regulatory demands, especially within China, but the broader implications of biometrics are likely to be a growing privacy and surveillance concern in the coming years.
Business
Inquiry discloses Canada providing a reported $2.5 million in aid to Chinese universities

From LifeSiteNews
The Department of Foreign Affairs refused to say how much money went to schools in China after Conservative MP Lianne Root asked for a dollar amount.
Canadian taxpayers are out millions of dollars that went to aid universities in Communist China, records show.
An Inquiry of Ministry, which was brought forth in the House of Commons at the request of Conservative MP Lianne Rood, shows that the Department of Foreign Affairs refused to say how much money was given to schools in China.
“The department concluded that producing and validating a comprehensive response to this question would require a collection of information that is not possible in the time allotted and could lead to disclosure of incomplete and misleading information,” the department said.
As noted by Blacklock’s Reporter, over the past five years, $2.5 billion was allocated in foreign aid to schools outside of Canada, with educational grants totaling $1,116,507, including $806,257 for postsecondary campuses, primarily directed to China.
“The department undertook an extensive preliminary search to determine the amount of information that would fall within the scope of the question and prepare a comprehensive response,” the department wrote in an Inquiry of Ministry tabled in the House of Commons.
Rood, not happy with the information from the report, asked at a recent meeting, “About Canadian funding for education in developing countries, how much was spent?”
Opposition House leader Andrew Scheer told reporters he is of the view that no money should be going to fund schools in “Communist” China.
“I don’t believe Canadian taxpayers should be sending any money to China,” he said.
“We’re talking about a Communist dictatorial government that abuses human rights, quashes freedoms, violates the rights of its citizens, and has a very aggressive foreign policy throughout the region.”
Scheer called upon the Liberal government of Prime Minister Mark Carney to “stand up for itself, stand up for Canadians, stop being bullied and pushed around on the world stage, especially by China.”
During a 2025 federal election campaign debate, Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre called out Carney for his ties to Communist China.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, the Foreign Interference Commission concluded that operatives from China may have had a hand in helping to elect a handful of MPs in both the 2019 and 2021 Canadian federal elections. It also determined that China was the primary foreign interference threat to Canada.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, a new exposé by investigative journalist Sam Cooper has claimed there is compelling evidence that Carney and former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau are strongly influenced by an “elite network” of foreign actors, including those with ties to China and the World Economic Forum.
Business
UK Government Dismisses Public Outcry, Pushes Ahead with Controversial Digital ID Plan

Over 2.7 million signatures couldn’t move the needle on a dystopian plan already set in motion.
A UK government plan to introduce a nationwide digital identification system is moving ahead, despite a public backlash that saw more than 2.7 million people sign a petition urging its cancellation.
The proposal, first announced by Labour in September, would provide a digital ID to every UK citizen and legal resident aged 16 and above.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer claimed the new system would help strengthen border enforcement and reduce illegal employment, describing the ID, dubbed the “Brit Card,” as a tool to “make it tougher to work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure.”
The public response was overwhelmingly opposed. Warnings about centralized data collection, privacy intrusions, and increased state surveillance flooded public discourse.
Descriptions of the proposal ranged from a “dystopian nightmare” to fears of a gateway to “digital control.”
Not long after Labour’s announcement, a petition was created on the official UK Government and Petitions website.
|
![]() |
It quickly gathered enough signatures to qualify for parliamentary debate, a 100,000-signature benchmark, and within days surged past two million.
Despite reaching over 2.7 million signatures, the government issued a formal response rejecting the petition and restating its commitment to the scheme.
According to the response, published by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, the new ID system is part of Labour’s wider aim to modernize public services.
“We will introduce a digital ID within this Parliament to help tackle illegal migration, make accessing government services easier, and enable wider efficiencies. We will consult on details soon,” the government wrote.
Although a formal consultation process is expected in the coming weeks, involving employers, unions, and civil society organizations, the government made it clear that legislation to support the digital ID system is on the way.
Over time, it is expected to serve as a single access point for government services like benefits, tax records, and other official interactions, potentially eliminating the need for physical documents or multiple logins.
The government’s decision to push ahead with a national digital ID comes in the shadow of the recently enacted Online Safety Act, which has already laid the groundwork for sweeping identity checks across the internet.
That law, marketed as a way to protect children from harmful content, gave regulators broad authority to demand age verification for accessing a wide range of online services.
The result is an emerging digital framework where proving who you are, even just to browse or communicate, is becoming a condition of access.
|
-
Alberta2 days ago
Alberta’s E3 Lithium delivers first battery-grade lithium carbonate
-
Automotive2 days ago
Canada’s EV subsidies are wracking up billions in losses for taxpayers, and not just in the auto industry
-
Business2 days ago
LA skyscrapers for homeless could cost federal taxpayers over $1 billion
-
Crime1 day ago
The “Strong Borders Act,” Misses the Mark — Only Deep Legal Reforms Will Confront Canada’s Fentanyl Networks
-
Agriculture18 hours ago
“We Made it”: Healthy Ostriches Still Alive in Canada
-
Business1 day ago
UK Government Dismisses Public Outcry, Pushes Ahead with Controversial Digital ID Plan
-
Energy2 days ago
Nuclear power outperforms renewables every time
-
Artificial Intelligence2 days ago
AI chatbots a child safety risk, parental groups report