Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

International

Carney’s Canada has recognized a psycho “state” that doesn’t exist

Published

1 day ago

10 minute read

The Rewrite 

By Peter Stockland

Senseless gesture quickly followed by reports of “another blood drenched summary execution ordered by the devotees of the death cult that mindlessly and pointlessly slaughtered 1,200 Israelis”

Well, that latest Canadian adventure in diplomatic Boy Scoutism certainly went sideways, quickly, didn’t it?

Within hours of Prime Minister Carney joining France, the U.K. Australia and others in formally “recognizing” a Palestinian state that has neither territory nor working government nor respect for the existence of its neighbouring state’s borders, The Telegraph reported Hamas had carried out public executions of accused Israeli “collaborators.”

Almost every Canadian news platform is now dependent on government subsidies.

To help us keep them honest please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The executed were all Palestinians. They will now never enjoy the utopia dreamed (fantasized?) of by Canada recognizing, in Carney’s words, “the State of Palestine and offer(ing) our partnership in building the promise of a peaceful future for both the State of Palestine and the State of Israel.”

Here’s the reality of that “peaceful future,” according to the Telegraph report.

“Footage posted (by) Hamas…showed armed and masked members of the group lining up three blindfolded Palestinians in a public square in Gaza. Chants of ‘Allahu Akbar’ were heard among the crowd as they gathered to watch and film the public execution. The three men were ordered to kneel before three executioners shot them in their heads and upper bodies….”

Here, from a day earlier, is the Canadian Prime Minister’s text blaming Israel for “working methodically to prevent the prospect of a Palestinian state from ever being established… (and carrying out a) sustained assault in Gaza (that) has killed tens of thousands of civilians (and) displaced well over one million people.”

Compare that caustic criticism with the words of a Hamas official at the execution, as reported by the Telegraph.

“Pursuant to the content of Palestinian revolutionary law and based on the Palestinian revolutionary court, a death sentence was decided against those who betrayed the homeland….”

Wait? Revolutionary court?? Does anyone have a street address for the Palestinian Revolutionary Courthouse? I wouldn’t mind going on Google Earth to admire its early medieval architecture and look for the signs of its substrate tunnelling.

I know. I know. There’s no such thing. This was yet another blood drenched summary execution ordered by the devotees of the death cult that mindlessly and pointlessly slaughtered 1,200 Israelis almost exactly two years ago. Hamas then subsequently turned the deaths of those “tens of thousands of (Palestinian) civilians” into the most vile, immoral global propaganda campaign in recent memory.

Just how politically and morally repulsive is Hamas? Even Prime Minister Carney, in a truly pathetic gesture of pseudo even-handedness before launching into his excoriation of Israel, had to come clean. He acknowledged it has “terrorized the people of Israel and oppressed the people of Gaza, wreaking horrific suffering. It is imperative that Hamas release all hostages, fully disarm, and play no role in the future governance of Palestine.”

Yes, well, good luck with that, unless the Israelis succeed in their admittedly excruciating mission of rooting out Hamas from Gaza and defeating it beyond the possibility of resurrection. It’s a point made repeatedly by the Netanyahu government but one Canada’s diplomatic Boy Scouts just can’t seem to grasp.

Instead, Prime Minister Carney sees hope on the horizon in the form of 89-year-old Palestinian National Authority dictator-for-life Mahmoud Abbas. He, the PM says in his declaration of recognition, “has provided direct commitments to Canada and the international community on much-needed reforms, including to fundamentally reform its governance, to hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part, and to demilitarize the Palestinian state.”

Direct commitments, you say? Well, well. The PA, whose former President was the dashing terrorist Yasser Arafat, has never lied before, now has it? And who wouldn’t implicitly trust the commitments of a near-nonagenarian whose name has been on Middle East assassins’ hit lists for decades? But, errr, who exactly is going to oversee this long-desired “demilitarizing” of Gaza and the “Palestinian state?”

Would it be the very same Mahoud Abbas who lost a civil war to Hamas in 2007, clearing the way for the victors to launch a pogrom that effectively divided the Palestinian territory and entrenched their rule-by-murder in Gaza?

Or would it be the Mahoud Abbas who, two years ago, one month prior to the Oct. 7 atrocity against Israel, suffered global condemnation for an anti-Semitic rant in which he claimed that Hitler launched the Holocaust against Jews – all 6 million of them – because they were money lenders, not because of their faith?

Hey, who wouldn’t back such a trusted, eloquent political warhorse in rebuilding a “peaceful future” for Israelis and Palestinians? Okay. I wouldn’t.

Neither, it seems, would Mosab Yousef, who happens to be the eldest son of Hassan Yousef, a co-founder of Hamas. In a Telegraph story published Sunday, Yousef the younger condemns what he calls “Palestinianism,” by which he means a “cultish curse that threatens not just Israel but the wider world,” in the words of the Telegraph’s Global Health Security Editor, Paul Nuki.

“Palestinianism is a political violent movement, and self-proclaimed Palestinians are those who are profiting out of the Palestinian cause,” Yousef told the Telegraph.

As the son of a founder of that politically violent movement, and an active participant in it until he was sickened by the mind-numbing atrocities he witnessed, Yousef makes a claim so shocking and impolitic that few without his pedigree would dare raise it even as speculation. While Hamas is everything its detractors say, he asserts, it is not the master but a creature of the Palestinian people themselves who have been generationally distorted by decades of resorting to bloodshed.

“Nowadays I make no distinction between Hamas and Palestinians,” he is quoted. “Most of the rapes, atrocities, beheadings, burning people, burning corpses…were committed by Gaza civilians, not the Hamas (military wing). The truth is, Hamas couldn’t control it.”

The Telegraph’s Nuki notes that Yousef’s personal story is a fascinating one whether we accept or reject his point of view. I want to come back to it in a follow-up Substack column to explore how a Son of Hamas, as his autobiography is called, became an Israeli spy in order to avert the terrorist destruction dished out by the death cult. Beyond that, why is his astonishingly well-informed perspective not a central part of the Israeli-Palestinian media narrative?

I want to leave this column, however, on the following note: A) How on earth did Canadian Boy Scout diplomacy become so perversely persuasive as to draw an intelligent man like Mark Carney into such a prime ministerial morass? And B) How is the “recognition” of such a territory-less, government-less, lawless “state” going to play out for federalism when the Parti Quebecois regains power and launches a third independence referendum for Quebec?

Be prepared for that to go sideways, too.

(Peter Stockland is a former Editor-in-Chief of the Montreal Gazette)

Share

Subscribe to The Rewrite.

For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Related Topics:

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

More from this author
Crime / 22 mins ago

1 dead, 2 injured after shooting at Dallas ICE facility

Business / 31 mins ago

WEF has a plan to overhaul the global financial system by monetizing nature

Autism / 4 hours ago

Secretary Kennedy’s Key Remark at Autism Press Conference

Crime

1 dead, 2 injured after shooting at Dallas ICE facility

Published on September 24, 2025

By

From LifeSiteNews

By Doug Mainwaring

An ‘anti-ICE’ message was written on one of the rounds discovered near the shooter’s body, according to an image posted by FBI Director Kash Patel.

Just two weeks after the assassination of Charlie Kirk by a sniper’s bullet, one person was shot dead Wednesday morning by a “possible sniper” outside a Dallas ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) facility. At least two others were injured.

The shooter, who had positioned himself on a nearby rooftop, died by a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

According to early reports, none of the killed or injured are ICE agents.

FBI Director Kash Patel posted to X an image of rounds allegedly found by the shooter’s body, one of which included an “anti-ICE” message.

“This is the third shooting in Texas directed at ICE or CBP [Border Patrol]. This must stop,” said Sen. Ted Cruz.

“To every politician who is using rhetoric demonizing ICE and demonizing CBP – stop. To every politician demanding that ICE agents be doxxed and calling for people to go after their families – stop. This has very real consequences.”

Vice President JD Vance said, “The obsessive attack on law enforcement, particularly ICE, must stop. I’m praying for everyone hurt in this attack and for their families.”

On July 4, a police officer was shot in the neck at the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, southwest of Dallas.  Eleven people have been charged in connection with that attack.

On August 25, a 36-year-old man was arrested for making a bomb threat against the Dallas ICE facility where Wednesday morning’s shooting took place.

Continue Reading

Business

WEF has a plan to overhaul the global financial system by monetizing nature

Published on September 24, 2025

By

From LifeSiteNews

By Tim Hinchliffe of The Sociable

The WEF is plowing full steam ahead with the globalist agenda to monitor and monetize everything in nature, including the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the very earth we walk upon.

With billionaires Larry Fink and Andre Hoffmann as the new co-chairs, the World Economic Forum (WEF) publishes a 50-page blueprint on how to monetize everything in nature.

The WEF’s latest insight report, “Finance Solutions for Nature: Pathways to Returns and Outcomes,” provides “stakeholders” with dozens of financial solutions for monetizing everything in nature.

Nature pricing, biodiversity crediting schemes, natural asset companies, debt-for-nature swaps, and so much more are all packed into this agenda to overhaul the global financial system with nature-based activities:

The landscape of nature finance is rapidly evolving. From sovereign debt instruments and blended capital platforms to biodiversity credits and emerging asset classes, a growing range of mechanisms is being deployed to fund, finance and de-risk nature-positive action.

The WEF leadership page says that in their work on the board of trustees, “members do not represent any personal or professional interests.”

However, the target audiences for latest WEF insight report are “institutional investors, banks, asset managers, and development actors” – the very business interests that Hoffmann and Fink represent.

WEF interim co-chairs Larry Fink and Andre Hoffmann have everything to gain in their business dealings should the documentation, monetization, and tokenization of everything in nature ever come to full fruition.

And they are well on their way.

Hoffmann is also a key player in a whole host of so-called green financing initiatives, including biodiversity crediting schemes, through his various roles as founder, president, and chairman at several companies and NGOs such as: Innovate 4 Nature – the “accelerator for nature-positive solutions” and Systemiq – the “system change company” established specifically to advance U.N. Agenda 2030.

“The economy depends on natural resources. Their value derives not only from their use as direct inputs to production – such as timber for construction – but also for their benefits to society like living trees that help clean the air. Economists use the term “natural capital” to refer to the total value that natural resources provide to the economy and to people.” — BlackRock, Capital at risk: nature through an investment lens, August 2024

“Debt-for-nature swaps [DNS] are a financial mechanism that allow countries to restructure bilateral or multilateral debt in exchange for commitments to fund local conservation and restoration. They are also known as ‘debt-for-nature conversion.’” — WEF, Finance Solutions for Nature: Pathways to Returns and Outcomes, September 2025

Is your country millions, billions, or trillions in debt? No problem!

With debt-for-nature swaps, you can restructure your nation’s debt just by letting somebody else come in and take control of your natural resources under the guise of conservation and restoration, but what they’ll really be doing is forcing you to “take out private insurance policies to ‘mitigate the financial impact of natural disasters‘ as well as ‘political risk,’” as investigative journalists Whitney Webb and Mark Goodwin report in Bitcoin Magazine.

Don’t have any money, but want to create value out of thin air, water, soil, or trees? You can set up natural asset companies that can “convert the full economic value of nature into financial flows via equity models.”

Want to help asset managers, bankers, and hedge fund execs get extremely rich while leaving you with only a tiny fraction? Go ahead and get involved in a Payment for Environmental Services (PES) scheme, where financial incentives are provided to individuals or communities in exchange for maintaining or restoring ecosystem services, like carbon sequestration or biodiversity conservation

And if you’re compliant with their rules, you can be rewarded by producing “positive nature and biodiversity outcomes (e.g. species, ecosystems and natural habitats) through the creation and sale of either land or ocean-based biodiversity units over a fixed period” with biodiversity credits, aka “environmental credits.”

Prefer to be left alone and live on the property that you worked hard for all your life? You better be compliant with all the environmental regulations that are coming in the name of preserving biodiversity, so that the $44 trillion of economic value generated by nature doesn’t diminish.

“Environmental credits are verified units of positive environmental outcomes, including biodiversity, water, carbon and nutrient credits. Though developed independently, projects increasingly blend credits via stacking, bundling or stapling.” — WEF, Finance Solutions for Nature: Pathways to Returns and Outcomes, September 2025

“Nature is rapidly emerging as a strategic investment frontier and more institutional capital is flowing into new business models and projects.” — WEF, Finance Solutions for Nature: Pathways to Returns and Outcomes, September 2025

In keeping with the own self-interests of the co-chairs and their business relations, the report highlights “10 priority financial solutions” for these stakeholders to implement:

  1. Sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs):
    • Commercial bonds tying coupon rates to nature-related targets for corporates or governments.
  2. Thematic (or use-of-proceeds) bonds:
    • Bonds with proceeds earmarked for nature projects. Scaling-up requires clearer guidance and aggregation to improve outcomes for issuers and investors.
  3. Sustainability-linked loans (SLLs):
    • Flexible debt, linking interest rates to nature-related targets. SLLs need simpler verification, standardized metrics and stronger triggers to drive nature-positive lending.
  4. Thematic (or use-of-proceeds) loans:
    • Loans for specific nature-related projects. Greater clarity on taxonomies and aggregation is needed to enhance capital flows.
  5. Impact funds:
    • Funds investing in nature-positive outcomes, often accepting higher risk or longer pathways to returns.
  6. Natural asset companies (NACs):
    • Publicly and privately listed companies that convert the full economic value of nature into financial flows via equity models. NACs hold significant potential but need more transactions for price discovery and replicable investment blueprints.
  7. Environmental credits:
    • Tradeable certificates for verified environmental benefits, used in compliance or voluntary markets.
  8. Debt-for-nature swaps (DNS):
    • Mechanisms to restructure sovereign debt in exchange for conservation or restoration commitments, with investable components including bonds and loans.
  9. Payments for ecosystem services (PES):
    • Contracts rewarding conservation for specific ecosystem services, driven by the public sector. Private sector schemes require longer contracts, aggregation and supply chain integration to scale up.
  10. Internal nature pricing (INP):
    • Unexplored, voluntary shadow pricing or fee-based tools to incentivize nature-positive performance in companies or across investment portfolios, similar to internal carbon pricing (ICP).

“While some components of nature – such as food, timber and ecotourism are priced and traded in global markets, the value of many critical ecosystem services remains undervalued….

Carbon sequestration, water filtration, flood protection and pollination are often treated as ‘free’ inputs, despite underpinning our economies and societies.” — WEF, Finance Solutions for Nature: Pathways to Returns and Outcomes, September 2025

“The natural capital approach extends the economic concept of capital to the environment, conceptualizing stocks of natural resources as conventional goods worth restoring, maintaining and enhancing for their productive flows.

This approach includes both accounting – embedding nature in national and corporate balance sheets – and valuation – pricing nature’s contributions into cost-benefit and investment analysis.” — WEF, Finance Solutions for Nature: Pathways to Returns and Outcomes, September 2025

Putting prices on water, air, and soil is a hot topic among globalists at the U.N., the G20, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the COP meetings.

At the WEF Annual Meeting in Davos this year, Singapore’s President Tharman Shanmugaratnam said that water credits and biodiversity credits should be “stapled” on to carbon credits.

The year prior, at the 2024 WEF Annual Meeting of the New Champions, aka “Summer Davos” meeting in communist China, University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership CEO Lindsay Hooper told the panel on “Understanding Nature’s Ledger” that every part of the economy depends on nature, and that in order to protect natural systems, one solution would be to “bring nature onto the balance sheet.”

In addition to putting “nature on the balance sheet,” another proposal coming at the end of the panel discussion suggested putting a tax on natural systems like water in the same vein as carbon taxes.

With putting prices on nature comes tokenization and derivatives.

At least that’s what former Bank of England adviser Michael Sheren said at COP27 in November 2022.

“Carbon, we already figured out, and carbon is moving very quickly into a system where it’s going to be very close to a currency, basically being able to take a ton of absorbed or sequestered carbon and being able to create a forward-pricing curve, with financial service architecture, documentation,” said Sheren.

And with carbon being close to a currency, “There are going to be derivatives.”

Now, under the newfound leadership of Fink and Hoffmann, whose personal business dealings stand everything to gain, the WEF is plowing full steam ahead with the globalist agenda to monitor and monetize everything in nature, including the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the very earth that we walk upon.

Reprinted with permission from The Sociable.

Continue Reading

Trending

X