Opinion
Canadians Must Turn Out in Historic Numbers—Following Taiwan’s Example to Defeat PRC Election Interference

Beijing deploys organized crime to sway Taiwan’s elections — and likely uses similar tactics in Canada, Taiwanese official warns
As Canadians head to the polls on Monday, The Bureau is reposting this report, originally filed from Taiwan, in the public interest.
The 2025 federal election has already been confirmed—through official Canadian intelligence disclosures and our reporting—to have been injured by aggressive foreign interference operations emanating from Beijing. These operations include highly coordinated cyberattacks against Conservative candidate Joe Tay, as well as the potential of in-person intimidation during canvassing efforts in Greater Toronto, according to The Bureau’s source awareness.
The scale and impact of Beijing’s interference in Canada’s 2025 election remains under investigation and is not yet fully understood. However, The Bureau believes it is critical to underscore that as voters face disinformation, manipulation, and suppression attempts, and certain candidates evidently receive support from Xi Jinping’s United Front, the best response is robust democratic participation.
Our groundbreaking 2023 report from Taiwan demonstrates that even under greater and more sustained foreign assault—including sophisticated polling manipulation, corrupt media influence, and the use of organized crime to distort public opinion—Taiwanese citizens have consistently defended their democracy by turning out to vote in record numbers.
Buttressing The Bureau’s findings, the Brookings Institution confirmed: “Taiwanese saw the results of this in 2024: China’s interference became more dangerous as it evolved to be more subtle and untraceable. The Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda campaign in Taiwan may have undergone a paradigm shift, as it evolved from a centralized and top-down approach to a more decentralized one.” This United Front work included tactics in which “individuals or groups in Taiwan may receive Chinese funding for election campaigns or to produce fake election polls.”
The Bureau encourages all Canadians, regardless of political preference or predictions from polls and odds-makers, to exercise their democratic right to vote. As Taiwan’s example shows, a free society depends not only on recognizing threats, but on the collective will of its citizens to confront them—at the ballot box.
TAIPEI, Taiwan — Beijing has interfered in Taiwan’s elections by using organized crime networks to influence votes for certain candidates and is likely using the same methods in Canada, a senior Taiwanese official said Tuesday.
Responding to questions from journalists in Taiwan, Jyh-horng Jan, deputy minister of the Mainland Affairs Council, said that Beijing uses “collaborators” including illegal gambling bosses and Taiwanese businessmen to interfere in Taiwan’s elections.
The Bureau asked Jan if he could describe Taiwanese knowledge of Beijing’s election interference methods, in comparison to examples of China’s recent interference in Canadian federal elections through the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front, which has allegedly clandestinely funded Beijing’s favoured candidates, according to Canadian intelligence investigations.
“We’ve been facing China’s United Front for over half a century in Taiwan and I think China’s tactics have been changing all the time,” Jan said. “Since we are in the lead up to a presidential election next January, we know that they have already started the United Front campaign against us.”
The Council is the Taiwanese government arm mandated to deal with all matters related to Beijing, and works with intelligence and police agencies in order to assess and counteract the Chinese Communist Party’s subversion campaigns.
Jan said the Council has already gathered intelligence indicating China is running influence campaigns against certain candidates in Taiwan’s upcoming January 2024 presidential election.
The front-runner in that contest, Taiwanese vice-president William Lai, is viewed by Beijing as a “separatist” and strong opponent of the Chinese Communist Party’s plans to pressure Taiwan into subordination.
Without naming Lai or any other candidates as Beijing’s alleged targets, Jan said the Council has learned wealthy businessmen will be used as fronts for Beijing to criticize candidates the Chinese Communist Party disfavours.
“We recently found out that China don’t like some of our current presidential candidates. So they’re going to use our business associations who are investing in China to make public statements against certain candidates,” Jan said. “By doing this, they want to shape this image that Taiwanese people are expressing opposition to a certain candidate. Whereas it is actually their voice.”
Jan also told a gathering of international journalists of an alleged method of Chinese election interference that focuses on underground gambling networks.
He described a complex scheme in which Beijing funded and used organized crime gambling rings to influence votes for certain candidates in Taiwan.
“I will share an example that has been happening in Taiwan and probably elsewhere, including Canada,” Jan said. “This is a very classic tactic of China’s election interference.”
According to Jan, the scheme involves underground betting on election candidates, and how the gambling odds can influence actual results at the ballot boxes.
“In the lead up to elections there will always be illegal election operations in Taiwan, so China tends to take advantage of such operations and they will work with the operators from these election gambling rings,” Jan said.
“Beijing will work with such election gambling operators telling them if you can get more people to wager on this specific candidate they will get a very high cash pay off,” Jan said. “And when the operators spread the word [in the betting community] the voters will flock to support this specific candidate.”
Chinese agents also inject funds into these underground betting operations that influence voting results, Jan said.
The Bureau asked Jan to clarify, whether he was alleging that Beijing is systematically using organized crime to influence votes for certain candidates.
“Because this is illegal activity, of course our law enforcement will crack down on such activity and the police were also [able to] issue a fine in this regard,” Jan said. “So this information, regarding illegal election; this is something that is out there, so I can afford confirm that.”
In response to a follow-up question from The Bureau, regarding a ProPublica investigative report that alleged Beijing used Fujian transnational crime suspects in its secret police stations, in Italy, Jan confirmed that his Council recognizes Beijing’s use of transnational crime networks for various objectives.
“So the criminal organization that you were talking about; this criminal organization exists wherever there are overseas Chinese, and one of their responsibilities is to control the activity of overseas Chinese,” Jan said.
(The Bureau reported from Taiwan with international media at the invitation of and with support from Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which has no input on The Bureau’s coverage.)
The Bureau is a reader-supported publication.
To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Invite your friends and earn rewards
National
Talk is cheap, Mister Prime Minister

From the National Citizens Coalition
By Peter Coleman, President, National Citizens Coalition
‘Carney has a choice. He can continue down the path of complacency, recycling failed policies and delaying action, or he can start rebuilding trust and chart a new course.’
It’s been nearly a month since a disappointing federal election that returned Mark Carney and his Liberals to a minority government. Touted by much of the media as the “smartest guy in the room,” Carney was supposed to be the mastermind who could navigate Canada out of the economic and social quagmire left by a decade of deliberate policy missteps—many of which, ironically, he advised on as a global economic insider. Yet, as we approach the one-month mark of his leadership, Canadians are left asking: where’s the urgency? Where’s the vision? And where’s the budget?
Instead of bold action, we see the same tired faces in cabinet, including divisive figures like Steven Guilbeault, now inexplicably tasked as Minister of Canadian Identity. This is the same Guilbeault who championed a carbon tax that hammered Canadian families and businesses while delivering negligible environmental gains. His reappointment, alongside other architects of the past decade’s policy disasters, signals a troubling lack of fresh thinking. If Carney truly believed in change, wouldn’t he have cleaned house?
Parliament’s schedule only deepens the disappointment. Delayed until next week and set to adjourn from June 20 to September 15, the House of Commons will sit for a mere 20 days over six months. This leisurely pace is an insult to Canadians grappling with recession, a federal debt with annual interest costs exceeding $60 billion—more than we spend on healthcare—and businesses laying off workers or eyeing moves south of the border. While Carney’s government takes a summer siesta, Canadians are left to wonder: who’s fighting for us?
Contrast this with the energy of Pierre Poilievre’s campaign, which promised to undo years of damage with decisive action, and promised to keep MPs in Ottawa for the summer. Poilievre vowed to prioritize pipelines, slash bureaucratic red tape, and restore economic vitality. Yet Carney, who leaned on a U.S. administration’s late bluster and interference to bolster his electoral chances, seems content to coast. His vague pronouncements on critical issues—skyrocketing debt, an influx of temporary foreign workers, and stalled energy projects—offer little reassurance. Canadians deserve more than half-promises and word-salads punctuated by countless “umms” and “ahhs.” We need pipelines built, jobs protected, and a government that works as hard as its people.
The temporary foreign worker and fake-student program, for instance, has ballooned to unsustainable levels. Millions of supposedly temporary workers fill jobs that could—and should—go to Canadians, especially as unemployment skyrockets, particularly among our youth. Companies preaching “Buy Canadian” must be held accountable to “Hire Canadian.” A government serious about recovery would act swiftly to recalibrate this program, lowering numbers substantially, deporting low-skill, non-permanent residents, and prioritizing Canadian workers and addressing the labour market distortions that have left many feeling like strangers in their own economy.
At the National Citizens Coalition, we believe Canada deserves better. Our mission is rooted in common sense, fiscal prudence, free speech, and a national pride not reliant on the prodding of an American president. While Liberal politicians retreat to their cottages this summer, we’ll be working tirelessly to grow the common-sense movement. We’re reaching millions of Canadians through grassroots campaigns, reaching policymakers and stakeholders, and engaging with great Canadian producers and manufacturers to support the jobs and industries this country desperately needs for recovery. Our vision is clear: a Canada that again rewards hard work, champions opportunity, and provides a clear path to prosperity.
Carney’s minority government has a choice. It can continue down the path of complacency, recycling failed policies and delaying action, or it can seize this moment to rebuild trust and chart a new course. Time is of the essence, and working Canadians don’t have long. If Carney truly is the “smartest guy in the room,” it’s time he proves it—not with rhetoric, but with results.
Peter Coleman is the President of the National Citizens Coalition.
National
Blanket Mandate Letter Worrying Sign For Carney Era

From the National Citizens Coalition
By Brian Passifiume
The prime minister’s decision to forego separate mandate letters for his cabinet is being met with raised eyebrows.
Former MP Kevin Vuong told the Toronto Sun the decision to issue a single mandate letter — instead of the customary individual directives to each cabinet minister — is yet another concerning diversion from the norm that’s become typical of the Prime Minister’s Office under Carney.
“No budget, no itineraries and now no mandate letters. Somebody should tell Prime Minister Carney that that’s not how a democracy works,” he said.
“By refusing to share, we have no choice but to ask: What does he have to hide? Is there something in his ministers’ mandate letters that he doesn’t want Canadians to see?”
On Wednesday, Carney issued a single mandate letter — free from Justin Trudeau-era platitudes like diversity, climate change and social justice and instead emphasizing trade, the economy and rebuilding Canada’s relations with the United States.
“This seems to be a government that is running less on emotional intelligence and virtue signalling,” said Stephen Taylor, a partner at Shift Media who nonetheless added Carney’s decision to withhold mandate letters does little but consolidate the power of the PMO.
“There’s some good words in the mandate letter, but a cabinet appointed full of Trudeau ministers just makes it suspect because that’s the government that will be implementing that agenda.”
He said a cabinet boasting members such as Steven Guilbeault and Gregor Robertson should give Canadians pause.
Alex Brown, a director with the National Citizens Coalition, said forgoing mandate letters is another worrying sign of this government’s tendency to err on the side of unaccountability.
“Justin Trudeau produced 38 of these mandate letters in 2021,” he said.
“And yes, all 38 of those ended up being historic dumpster fires, but to just cut the corner here already — by the end of the summer this group will have only sat in the House of Commons for 20 days in total.”
While he said the mandate letter had some encouraging signs, Brown said what it lacked most of all was substance aside from almost peripheral mentions of key issues like immigration and housing.
“It’s as if they ran the Conservative election platform through ChatGPT and asked them to distil it to 1,000 words and then take out the details,” he said.
“It’s so high level it’s almost insulting — it doesn’t get into anything specific.”
-
Alberta1 day ago
SERIOUS AND RECKLESS IMPLICATIONS: An Obscure Bill Could Present Material Challenge for Canada’s Oil and Gas Sector
-
Business2 days ago
High grocery bills? Blame Ottawa, not Washington
-
COVID-192 days ago
Freedom Convoy trucker Harold Jonker acquitted of all charges
-
Alberta1 day ago
Don’t stop now—Alberta government should enact more health-care reform
-
International1 day ago
Trump confronts South African president about widespread killing of White farmers in the country
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day ago
U.S. Voters Smelled A Rat But Canadian Voters Bought The Scam
-
Health2 days ago
RFK calls out World Health Organization directly as a compromised body beholden to China
-
National1 day ago
The State of Confederation: Provinces are pushing back against federal overreach