Economy
Canada as an energy superpower would empower thousands of families for generations

From Resource Works
By Geoff Russ
What does the future hold if Canada can become an energy superpower?
For the past 40 years, the fortunes of countless Canadian communities have risen and fallen with the strength of our energy sector. Oil booms in Alberta generated enormous prosperity and created hundreds of thousands of jobs, invigorating resource towns and rural Canada more generally. The existence of nuclear energy in Ontario requires thousands of workers, and its future expansion will generate thousands more. Energy is the economic lifeline for thousands of young and maturing families, but they are not invulnerable.
Global market swings have buffeted these jobs, as have changing provincial and federal policies, as well as international political shifts.
In the middle of the 1980s, oil prices collapsed and shocked Alberta and employment rose from four to 10 per cent as oil and gas jobs disappeared overnight. This was echoed in 2008 and 2014 when lurches in oil prices hit communities in places like Fort McMurray in Alberta, Fort St. John in northern British Columbia, and Estevan, Saskatchewan.
Every cycle of boom and bust was accompanied by hardship, but the people in these communities proved their resilience by rallying and holding onto their livelihoods.
Today, the Canadian energy sector still supports about 200,000 workers with direct employment and up to 400,000 more indirectly. However, as in years past, these workers and their families are subject to global tides, and none has been dictating those flows more than President Donald Trump and his wielding of tariffs to reshape the world economy.
The correct response is for Canada to diversify its trade and expand its energy infrastructure to grow the reach of Canadian energy, our most valuable and important export, and one of the most plentiful job creators in our arsenal. Fortunately, both of Canada’s two major parties, the Liberals and Conservatives, have reached a strong measure of agreement on this matter.
Our rookie prime minister, Mark Carney, has put forward a plan to transform Canada into an “Energy Superpower”. His plan is intended to ensure Canada’s economic security through new trade partnerships around the world and make all forms of Canadian energy competitive.
Some provinces are already charging ahead, with Ontario’s provincial government announcing plans to build Canada’s first small modular reactor (SMR) by 2030, which is projected to power over 300,000 homes and create up to 18,000 jobs. The existing Bruce Power facility in Kincardine already supports 4,200 jobs, and is a pillar of the province’s energy grid.
Crucial to Carney’s plan are faster, streamlined project reviews paired with true Indigenous partnerships, along with plans for a national energy corridor. This could have a transformative impact on the security and health of energy-centric communities. Moving beyond the debate about questioning the obvious need for new projects towards focusing on execution is a welcome breath of fresh air.
There are concerns in some communities about how shortcutting the consultation process and existing oversights may impact local communities, especially Indigenous groups. Resolving these in an equitable and permanent manner will be part of this positive transformation, setting new precedents for economic development in Canada that includes meaningful considerations and involvement for the growing Indigenous economies in BC and across the country.
When it comes to people, however, the mounting job losses over the uncertain economic climate make it imperative to protect jobs and clear the way for new ones. The impact of resource projects on communities like Hope have demonstrated how a reliable industry empowers families. Over 5,400 jobs are created for every $1 billion spent in the oil and gas sector.
The route of the Trans Mountain pipeline ran through Hope, and it revitalized the local economy with job creation and renewal. Pipeline workers not only brought money into Hope, but sprang into action to assist in local firefighting and flood repairs, revealing how the energy sector brings far more to communities than money.
Emulating this across the board is a complicated but essential task. The tightrope between environmental protections and resource development is a delicate one, but Canada has no choice but to walk it with purpose.
Prime Minister Carney’s pledge to make Canada an “Energy Superpower” will mean making choices about economic power, job creation, and locking Canada into its seat at the global energy table.
That means collaboration with people, respecting Indigenous rights, and anchoring policy in the experiences of workers and their families. Trump’s shakeup of the global economy is fraught with peril, but for Canada, it should bring opportunity for a fresh start.
Most importantly, however, it would ensure that hundreds of thousands more Canadians and their families, as well as their communities, can look forward to a bright future.
Business
New fiscal approach necessary to reduce Ottawa’s mountain of debt

From the Fraser Institute
By Jake Fuss and Grady Munro
Apparently, despite a few days of conflicting statements from the government, the Carney government now plans to table a budget in the fall. If the new prime minister wants to reduce Ottawa’s massive debt burden, which Canadians ultimately bear, he must begin to work now to reduce spending.
According to the federal government’s latest projections, from 2014/15 to 2024/25 total federal debt is expected to double from $1.1 trillion to a projected $2.2 trillion. That means $13,699 in new federal debt for every Canadian (after adjusting for inflation). In addition, from 2020 to 2023, the Trudeau government recorded the four highest years of total federal debt per person (inflation-adjusted) in Canadian history.
How did this happen?
From 2018 to 2023, the government recorded the six highest levels of program spending (inflation-adjusted, on a per-person basis) in Canadian history—even after excluding emergency spending during COVID. Consequently, in 2024/25 Ottawa will run its tenth consecutive budget deficit since 2014/15.
Of course, Canadians bear the burden of this free-spending approach. For example, over the last several years federal debt interest payments have more than doubled to an expected $53.7 billion this year. That’s more than the government plans to spend on health-care transfers to the provinces. And it’s money unavailable for programs including social services.
In the longer term, government debt accumulation can limit economic growth by pushing up interest rates. Why? Because governments compete with individuals, families and businesses for the savings available for borrowing, and this competition puts upward pressure on interest rates. Higher interest rates deter private investment in the Canadian economy—a necessary ingredient for economic growth—and hurt Canadian living standards.
Given these costs, the Carney government should take a new approach to fiscal policy and begin reducing Ottawa’s mountain of debt.
According to both history and research, the most effective and least economically harmful way to achieve this is to reduce government spending and balance the budget, as opposed to raising taxes. While this approach requires tough decisions, which may be politically unpopular in some quarters, worthwhile goals are rarely easy and the long-term gain will exceed the short-term pain. Indeed, a recent study by Canadian economist Bev Dahlby found the long-term economic benefits of a 12-percentage point reduction in debt (as a share of GDP) substantially outweighs the short-term costs.
Unfortunately, while Canadians must wait until the fall for a federal budget, the Carney government’s election platform promises to add—not subtract—from Ottawa’s mountain of debt and from 2025/26 to 2028/29 run annual deficits every year of at least $47.8 billion. In total, these planned deficits represent $224.8 billion in new government debt over the next four years, and there’s currently no plan to balance the budget. This represents a continuation of the Trudeau government’s approach to rack up debt and behave irresponsibly with federal finances.
With a new government on Parliament Hill, now is the time for federal policymakers to pursue the long-ignored imperative of reducing government debt. Clearly, if the Carney government wants to prioritize debt reduction, it must rethink its fiscal plan and avoid repeating the same mistakes of its predecessor.
Business
Regulatory reform key to Canada’s energy future

This article supplied by Troy Media.
By Lisa Baiton
Canada has the resources to lead globally in energy, but outdated rules and investment barriers are holding us back
Canada stands at a pivotal moment. A new federal government offers an opportunity to rejuvenate the economy and rethink our approach to natural
resource development.
Prime Minister Mark Carney’s plan to build Canada into the best-performing economy in the Group of Seven (G7) is achievable, as is his ambition to build from this country’s energy resource-rich foundation. This aligns with the oil and natural gas industry’s calls to play to our strengths in responsible energy development and exports. To succeed, we need a clear, practical strategy that reflects the realities of investment capital in today’s
unpredictable global economy.
Canada has all the ingredients to become the next global energy superpower. What’s missing is the right recipe. Over the past decade, a layering of policies has reduced investor confidence and made Canadian projects less attractive than those in other countries. Billions in capital have shifted to places like the United States, Brazil and Norway, where regulatory processes are clearer, faster and more investor-friendly.
It’s time to rebuild investor confidence and demonstrate that Canada is open for business. That begins with overhauling the regulatory and fiscal frameworks that govern major energy projects. Current regulations are too often unpredictable, excessively long and vulnerable to legal challenges. For example, some Canadian energy projects can take seven to 10 years to gain approval, compared to three to five years in competing jurisdictions. Approval timelines must be firm, reliable and competitive. Projects of national significance need clear, coordinated assessments that uphold environmental integrity while respecting the jurisdictional roles of provincial governments and Indigenous communities. And we must take the politics out of the regulatory process.
It also means rethinking carbon policy. The current system—layered with federal and provincial rules and complex compliance requirements— is inefficient and uncertain. It needs to be reviewed and reformed, together with provinces and industry, to ensure it is competitive with policies in other top oil- and natural gas-producing nations. A model tailored to regional realities and industrial needs, and one that respects provincial jurisdiction, could restore both flexibility and investor confidence. A national policy should drive investment into emissions reduction, not through
production caps, but by simplifying regulation, creating an attractive fiscal environment and protecting export industries while enabling innovation and growth
Let’s be clear: this is not a call to abandon climate goals or environmental commitments. Canadians care deeply about the environment. But they also care about job security, affordable living and Canada’s place in a rapidly evolving global economy. These values are not in conflict. In fact, the Canadian way—our high standards, our innovation, our sense of fairness—can show the world a model of responsible oil and natural gas development.
We must also ensure Indigenous communities are true partners in growth. Expanding Indigenous loan guarantees at scale will help create infrastructure ownership opportunities that generate long-term prosperity. These guarantees enable First Nations to access affordable financing to invest in projects like pipelines and power generation. But such programs will only succeed if Canada is seen as a competitive place to invest. That foundation must come first.
The mood across Canada has shifted. There is broad public support for oil and natural gas development, not just because of the jobs and revenue, but because Canadians understand the role energy plays in our national and economic sovereignty. Recent polling shows most Canadians believe energy development and climate action can go hand in hand, especially when projects support economic growth.
Amid growing instability in the United States—Canada’s biggest competitor for capital—we have a chance to stand out as a stable and trusted economic partner. But this window of opportunity won’t stay open for long.
We must act decisively. That includes eliminating unnecessary barriers such as production caps and embracing investment in technologies that reduce emissions while growing output.
Canadians are ready. Industry is ready. The time has come to build.
Lisa Baiton is President and CEO of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.
Troy Media empowers Canadian community news outlets by providing independent, insightful analysis and commentary. Our mission is to support local media in helping Canadians stay informed and engaged by delivering reliable content that strengthens community connections and deepens understanding across the country
-
espionage18 hours ago
Canada’s Missing Intelligence Command: Convoy Review Takes on New Relevance After FBI Warnings
-
COVID-191 day ago
Will Chris Barber be jailed for peacefully protesting? Court to decide soon
-
Alberta2 days ago
Canmore attempting to tax its way out of housing crisis
-
Addictions2 days ago
News For Those Who Think Drug Criminalization Is Racist. Minorities Disagree
-
Alberta2 days ago
Boreal forests could hold the key to achieving Canada’s climate goals
-
Business2 days ago
The Oracle of Omaha Calls it a Career
-
Business2 days ago
Carney’s cabinet likely means more of the same on energy and climate
-
International1 day ago
Work underway – Trump’s Golden Dome defense shield to be done within four years