Connect with us
[bsa_pro_ad_space id=12]

COVID-19

Bombshell long-term study of Pfizer, Moderna COVID shots shows ‘self-assembling nanostructures’

Published

1 year ago

13 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Emily Mangiaracina

Researchers have observed with a microscope the self-assembly of nanostructures in the mRNA COVID shots, as well as toxic effects on blood cells from all of the COVID shots, and potential detox mechanisms.

Researchers in Korea have observed what appear to be “self-assembling,” “synthetic” nanostructures such as spirals and tubes that form within the contents of the COVID Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots over the course of months.

Dr. Young Mi Lee and Dr. Daniel Broudy, co-authors of the recently published study of these “artificial constructions,” suggested that their main findings were the direct observation of both “self-assembling entities… of many different shapes,” and of “cellular toxicity” triggered by the COVID shots, “especially” on blood and sperm cells. 

In a Korean laboratory, using flu vaccine and normal saline as controls, the researchers incubated Pfizer and Moderna COVID injectables in various fluids, including distilled water, saline, blood plasma, and semen. AstraZeneca and Novavax COVID vaccines were also studied, but they did not develop the “self-assembled” structures seen in the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots.

While no floating particles were observed in the saline control, and only a few floating particles were observed in the flu, Novavax, and AstraZeneca vaccines, “many” entities were seen in “all residual and new” Pfizer injectables. About 30% of these reportedly had a “worm-like shape,” and these combined with “rods, discs, and crystal-like mixtures.” When incubated at body temperature for up to two days, these entities developed into other shapes, including “spheres” and “elongated tube-like objects.”

Each of the Moderna shot contents, by contrast, had “a greater number of particles” and “more artificial moving structures,” including coils and beaded chains.

Over the course of a few weeks, “2 dimensional rectangular shaped structures” appeared at the bottom of the dish in which the COVID Pfizer and Moderna shots were incubated, from which three-dimensional structures seemed to emerge, and then were “dislodged” from the bottom of the dish and rose into the upper fluid layer.

“Amazing self-assembling structures of great diversity became visible by about the fifth week of incubation. They consisted ultimately of ribbons, coils and filament-like structures,” Lee and Broudy wrote.

These remarkable nanostructures, which were studied under a microscope at up to 400x magnification for over a year, have not been precisely identified but resemble objects within the COVID shots found by other doctors.

For example, in 2022, Australian Dr. David Nixon found “self-assembling” angular structures within the COVID shots, as well as “wires” with frayed edges, around which apparent “chips” often appeared. He observed similar “wires” in the blood of the vaccinated, and interestingly, one of these “frayed wires,” around which blood cells clumped, resembles the shape of what Lee and Broudy described as a “tripod-like, striated filament” found in the Pfizer shot incubated in normal saline.

Lee and Broudy speculated that the filament structures they observed could be linked to the white clots being found by embalmers in the bodies of the vaccinated, noting, “In analysis of blood clots from vaccinated persons, a few filament-like structures were found attached to brownish homogeneous cloudy white clots extracted from the middle layer of whole blood sediment.”

Remarkably, Dr. Carrie Madej also found in 2021 what she described as “self-assembling” and “synthetic”-looking objects in different COVID injections, including “fibers,” some of which “had a little cube structure on them,” and the emergence of brilliant colors in the Moderna jab after a couple of hours.

Interestingly, while the COVID shot manufacturers have not publicly discussed the presence of self-assembling technology in the mRNA shots, “Self-assembled mRNA vaccines” have been discussed in studies published in 2021, which note that self-assembled structures can be used to deliver COVID proteins, and that protein nanoparticles themselves can be self-assembled. A study was also published last year to the science journal Nature discussing the potential that “immunogenic self-assembling” COVID spike nanoparticles have as a “genetic vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2.

According to Lee and Broudy, the “various kinds of transparent ribbons, films, coils, and spirals” that appeared in the Pfizer shot when incubated in distilled water “were very similar in structure to the micro- and magnetic- nanorobots already presented in numerous scholarly papers.”

Toxic effects on blood 

In addition to showing the self-assembly of what appear to be synthetic nanoparticles, Lee and Broudy’s experiments have demonstrated the effect the COVID shots have on blood: Each injectable showed “toxic effects on blood cells,” with Novavax showing particularly rapid cytotoxicity. The researchers found that each shot had a distinct effect on blood cells, with Pfizer triggering “cellular collapse of white blood cells and damaged platelets”; Moderna triggering rouleaux (stacking) of red blood cells; Novavax causing the disintegration of the nucleus of white blood cells and some rouleaux of red blood cells, and AstraZeneca triggering “prominent rouleaux.”

The researchers noted that white blood cell damage can be related to immune suppression, fatigue can be linked to Rouleaux blood formation, and blood clot formations can be related to platelet damage. Their findings are especially significant considering that all of these symptoms have been frequently reported after COVID injections.

For example, a study published earlier this year shows that the COVID shots pose a risk of blood clots to the brain that is 200 times greater than that posed by other vaccines over the past three decades. In addition, increasing evidence is emerging linking the COVID shots to a spike in cancer rates, with studies and doctors finding that the jabs cause immunosuppression. Long-term fatigue is also a commonly reported symptom of the shots. One German doctor, Jörg-Heiner Möller, has described a “PostVac” syndrome he says 120 of his patients have suffered after their COVID shots, which often involves a “severe fatigue syndrome.”

EMFs

Another remarkable observation by Lee and Broudy was that of the effect of electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) on the self-assembly of the COVID shot contents. For example, when the Moderna vial contents were placed on a cell phone in 5G streaming mode over a wireless recharger, “the floating materials abruptly became larger and more numerous with sharper and more rectangular edges.”

According to the researchers, Pfizer’s shot did not demonstrate an immediate effect under the same conditions, but a “delayed effect” of proliferating “filaments” after a month of exposure.

By contrast, while Moderna’s shot showed “no noticeable effects” after exposure to an external hard drive, which emits magnetic fields, the Pfizer shot showed “modest” degradation of its contents. The researchers concluded, “it could be postulated that some kind of electric current can stimulate the nanostructure’s activity, while some conditioned magnetic current can hamper their activity.”

It is noteworthy that Lee and Broudy are not the first to observe that EMFs have an impact on the contents of the COVID shots. Dr. David Nixon found that the formation of “crystalline structures” in the Pfizer COVID shots appeared to depend on their exposure to electromagnetic frequencies. When he put the slide of Pfizer shot fluid “inside a faraday bag” blocking EMFs he said came from his wireless router, he only saw black, round “dots” form within its contents, as opposed to the boxy shapes with sharp right angles that otherwise formed.

In addition, Ecuador-based electrical engineer Matt Taylor has observed striking effects of EMFs on the self-assembly of unidentified objects within the COVID shots. He testified in 2022 that when he put a drop of the COVID jab on a microscope slide and placed that slide on an internet router, he observed the self-assembly of what he believes “look like integrated circuits.”

According to Taylor, when he turned the router off, the objects “immediately” began to break apart. He repeated the experiment three times and “begg[ed]” people to reproduce his investigation to see if his findings can be replicated. In fact, Nixon had indicated that Taylor had inspired his own test with the faraday bag.

“If someone can repeat this, the implications are so incredibly wonderful. We can start to explain clots, we can start to explain detox processes,” said Taylor.

Detox

While EMF-triggered self-assembly of “vaccine” nanomaterials suggests one potential “detox” avenue, Lee and Broudy found what seem to be other ways the mRNA shots’ synthetic-looking contents can be disintegrated, if not excreted from the body.

Lee and Broudy wrote that in the “later stage” following injection, at least three weeks afterward, “colloidal gold or silver (3-5 nm in diameter and 10-20 ppm) has been observed to attach to, disrupt, actively degrade, and ultimately dissolve various nanostructures.” They added that ongoing experiments are examining the longer-term results of such protocols, and postulated that gold or silver could help in the recovery of damaged organs and normal blood flow.

The researchers also speculated that “routine exposure to heat saunas” may cause the shots’ nanomaterials to “dislodge from tissues and escape through sweat gland pores.” Reduction or even elimination of the use of personal electronics was also recommended, although Lee and Broudy did not mention the potential helpful effects of wearing EMF shielding devices after vaccination.

They concluded by calling for a worldwide moratorium on the COVID shots: “until the components can be verified and their long-term effects understood, a necessity flouted by calls for Emergency Use Authorization, an immediate global ban is needed.”

Related Topics:

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

More from this author
International / 4 hours ago

Daughter convinces healthy father to die in double assisted suicide with mother

Alberta / 4 hours ago

Click here to help choose Alberta’s new licence plate design

National / 6 hours ago

Democracy Watch Renews Push for Independent Prosecutor in SNC-Lavalin Case

COVID-19

The Trials of Liberty: What the Truckers Taught Canada About Power and Protest

Published on October 13, 2025

By

Half the country still believes the convoy was a menace; the other half thinks it was a mirror that showed how fragile our freedoms had become.

This Thanksgiving I am grateful for many things. The truckers who stood up to injustice are among them.

When the first rigs rolled toward Ottawa in January 2022, the air was sharp, but not as sharp as the mood of the men and women behind the wheels. They were not radicals. Seeing a CBC a campaign of disinformation about them begin as soon as their trek started, even when Ottawa political operatives hadn’t yet heard, I started following several of them on their social media.

They were truckers, small business owners, independent contractors, and working Canadians who had spent two years hauling the essentials that kept a paralyzed nation alive. They were the same people politicians, including Prime Minister Trudeau, had called “heroes” in 2020. By 2022, they had become “threats.”

The Freedom Convoy was born from exhaustion with naked hypocrisy. The federal government that praised them for risking exposure on the road now barred the unvaccinated from crossing borders or even earning a living. Many in provincial governments cheered Ottawa on. The same officials who flew to foreign conferences maskless or sat in private terraces to dine, let’s recall, still forced toddlers to wear masks in daycare. Public servants worked from home while police fined citizens for walking in parks.

These contradictions were not trivial; they were models of tyrannical rule. They told ordinary people that rules were for the ruled, not for rulers.

By late 2021, Canada’s pandemic response had hardened into a hysterical moral regime. Compliance became a measure of virtue, not prudence. Citizens who questioned the mandates were mocked as conspiracy theorists. Those who questioned vaccine efficacy were treated as fools; those who refused vaccination were treated as contagious heretics. Even science was no longer scientific. When data showed that vaccines did not prevent transmission, officials changed definitions instead of policies. The regime confused authority with truth. One former provincial premier just this week was still hailing the miracle of “life-saving” COVID vaccines.

For truckers, the breaking point came with the federal vaccine mandate for cross-border transport. Many had already complied with provincial rules and workplace testing. Others had recovered from COVID and had natural immunity that the government refused to recognize. To them, the new rule was not about safety; it was about humiliation. It said, “Obey, or you are unfit to work.”

So they drove.

Donna Laframboise, one of the rare journalists who works for citizens instead of sponsors, described the convoy in her book Thank You, Truckers! with gratitude and awe. She saw not a mob but a moral statement. She showcased for us Canadians who refused to live by lies. Their horns announced what polite society whispered: the emergency had become a creepy habit, and the habit had become a tool of control.

When the convoy reached Ottawa, it was messy, loud, and human. There was singing, prayer, laughter, dancing and some foolishness, but also remarkable discipline. For three weeks, amid frigid temperatures and rising tension, there were no riots, no arsons, no looting. In a country that once prized civility, that should have earned respect.

Instead, it attracted the media’s and government’s contempt.

The Trudeau government, rattled by its own public failures, sprung to portray the protest as a national security threat. Ministers invoked language fit for wartime. The Prime Minister, who had initially fled the city claiming to have tested positive, returned to declare that Canadians were under siege by “racists” and “misogynists.” The accusations were as reckless as they were false. The government’s real grievance was not chaos but defiance.

Then came the Emergencies Act. Designed for war, invasion, or insurrection, it was now deployed against citizens with flags and thermoses. Bank accounts were frozen without charge or trial. Insurance policies were suspended. Police weilding clubs were unleashed against unarmed citizens. The federal government did not enforce the law; it improvised it.

A faltering government declared itself the victim of its citizens. The Emergency declaration was not a reaction to danger; it was a confession of political insecurity. It exposed a leadership that could not tolerate dissent and recast obedience for peace.

Haultain Research is a reader-supported publication.

To receive new posts, express your gratitude and support our work, consider becoming a a paid subscriber.

The convoy’s organizers, who kept the protest largely peaceful, were arrested and prosecuted as though they had plotted sedition. They were charged for holding the line, not for breaking it. The state’s behaviour was vindictive, not judicial. Prosecutors went along with it, and so did courts.

In a healthy democracy, such political trials would have shaken Parliament to its core. Legislators would have demanded justification for the use of emergency powers. The press would have asked precisely which law had been broken. Citizens would have debated the limits of government in times of fear, times which seem to continue just under the radar.

Not much of that happened.

Canada’s institutions have grown timid. The press is subsidized and more subservient. The courts happily defer to the administrative state. Law enforcement has learned to follow politics before principle. Academics have been lost for about generation. Under such conditions, how can citizens object to unscientific and coercive policies? What options remain when every channel of dissent—media, science, judiciary, and law enforcement—is captured or cowed?

The convoy’s protest, let’s remember, was not the first major disruption in the Trudeau years. A year earlier, Indigenous activists blocked rail lines and highways in solidarity with Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs opposed to a pipeline. The blockades cost the economy millions. They were called “a national conversation.” Few arrests, no frozen accounts, no moral panic.

In 2020, Black Lives Matter marches were cheered by politicians and news anchors. Some protests were peaceful, others destructive. Yet they were treated as expressions of justice, not extremism.

Even today, pro-Hamas Palestinian demonstrations that include violence and intimidation of Jewish citizens are tolerated with a shrug. The police stand back, bring them coffee, citing “the right to protest.”

Why, then, was the Freedom Convoy treated as a crisis of state?

In a liberal democracy, protest is not rebellion. It is a civic instrument, a reminder that authority is contingent. When a government punishes peaceful protest because it disapproves of the message, it turns democracy into décor.

The trials of the convoy organizers are therefore not about law but about legitimacy. Each conviction signals that protest is permitted only when it pleases the powerful. This is the logic of every soft tyranny: it criminalizes opposition while decorating itself with the vocabulary of rights. I see this daily in Nicaragua, my native land.

The truckers’ protest revealed what the pandemic concealed. The COVID regime was unscientific and incoherent. It punished truckers who worked alone in their cabs while allowing politicians to mingle maskless at conferences. It barred unvaccinated Canadians from air travel but allowed infected citizens to cross borders with the proper paperwork. It closed playgrounds and churches while keeping liquor stores open.

These contradictions were not mistakes; they were instruments of obedience. Each absurd rule tested how much submission people would endure.

The truckers said, “Enough.” I am grateful that they did.

For that, Chris Barber (Big Red) and Tamara Lich 🇨🇦 are still being punished. Their trials have now concluded, save for possible appeals, yet their quiet defiance remains one of the few honest moments in recent Canadian history. It showed that courage is still possible, even the state seems to forbid reason.

The government’s response revealed the opposite: that fear, once politicized, is never surrendered willingly. The state that learned to rule through emergency will not soon unlearn it. They cling to its uses still.

Canada lives with the legacy of that winter today. The trials are finished, but the divisions persist. Half the country still believes the convoy was a menace; the other half thinks it was a mirror that showed how fragile our freedoms had become.

Trudeau’s government is no more, yet the spirit of his politics lingers. He did not create the divisions by accident. He cultivated them as a strategy of control. The country that left him behind is also less free, less trusting, and less united than it was before the horns sounded in Ottawa. Carney’s government is Trudeau’s heir.

The trials and sentencing measure the distance between the Canada we imagined and the one we inhabit.

The truckers’ convoy was imperfect, yet profoundly democratic. It stood for the right of citizens to say no to a government that had forgotten how to hear them. The echo of that refusal still moves down the Trans-Canada Highway. It is the sound of liberty idling in the cold, waiting for a green light that will not soon come.

This Thanksgiving, I am grateful for the abounding love and understanding in my life. I am grateful for my spirited children and their children. I am grateful for my nonagenarian father and for my siblings. I’m grateful for the legion of aunts, uncles, cousins, nieces and nephews on all sides of the family. I am grateful for loyal friendships and for my colleagues and coworkers who share the quest for a freer country. I’m grateful to my adoptive Alberta, and Albertans, also struggling to be strong and free.

I am grateful for the Truckers, wherever they came from, for their courage.

Share Haultain Research

Haultain Research is a reader-supported publication.

To receive new posts, express your gratitude and support our work, consider becoming a a paid subscriber.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

Tamara Lich says she has no ‘remorse,’ no reason to apologize for leading Freedom Convoy

Published on October 10, 2025

By

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

‘To whom shall I apologize? Thousands of Canadians who stopped planning to take their own lives or were able to return to their jobs, kiss dying loved ones or have families over for Thanksgiving?’

Freedom Convoy leader Tamara Lich, reflecting on her recent house arrest verdict, said she has no “remorse” and will not “apologize” for leading a movement that demanded an end to all COVID mandates.

Lich revealed in an X post this week that in conversations with her lawyer, Lawrence Greenspon, over the past few months, she told him, “I would not, and could not, express remorse as it would be dishonest and disingenuous.”

“To whom shall I apologize? The thousands of Canadians who stopped planning to take their own lives when the convoy started? To the thousands of Canadians who were able to return to their jobs? Or should I apologize to all the Canadians who can kiss their dying loved ones or have their families over for Thanksgiving?” she observed.

On October 7, Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey sentenced Lich and Chris Barber to 18 months’ house arrest after being convicted earlier in the year convicted of “mischief.”

As reported by LifeSiteNews, the Canadian government was hoping to put Lich in jail for no less than seven years and Barber for eight years for their roles in the 2022 protests against COVID mandates.

Interestingly, Perkins-McVey said about Lich and Barber during the sentencing, “They came with the noblest of intent and did not advocate for violence.”

In Lich’s X post, she noted that while she has “no doubt” some citizens of Ottawa “felt afraid, threatened and terrorized” by the protests, she blamed the Liberal government under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

“How could they not when their mayor and politicians were labeling us as an angry mob coming to overthrow the government before we even left Alberta?” she wrote.

“Do I feel bad for these people? Of course I do. I wish no ill will upon anyone. However, it was their very own leaders who lied to them and misled them. There are citizens in Ottawa genuinely afraid of working-class Canadians, who had never met a trucker or an oil patch worker.”

Specifically, Barber was handed an 18-month conditional sentence, with a concurrent three-month sentence for counseling disobedience of a court order that can be served in the community.

Lich was given 18 months less time already spent in custody, amounting to 15 1/2 months.

Both Lich and Barber must remain in their house for the first 12 months except for medical emergencies and certain appointments. They are allowed to work and can leave their house for certain permitted activities for up to five hours once a week. They were also given a curfew and 100 hours of community service.

As reported by LifeSiteNews, Barber thanked Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis for “speaking up” in support of him and Canadians’ freedom rights after he and Lich were sentenced.

LifeSiteNews reported that Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre offered his thoughts on the sentencing, wishing them a “peaceful” life while stopping short of blasting the sentence as his fellow MPs did.

In early 2022, the Freedom Convoy saw thousands of Canadians from coast to coast come to Ottawa to demand an end to COVID mandates in all forms. Despite the peaceful nature of the protest, Trudeau’s government enacted the never-before-used Emergencies Act (EA) on February 14, 2022.

Continue Reading

Trending

X