COVID-19
Bombshell long-term study of Pfizer, Moderna COVID shots shows ‘self-assembling nanostructures’
From LifeSiteNews
Researchers have observed with a microscope the self-assembly of nanostructures in the mRNA COVID shots, as well as toxic effects on blood cells from all of the COVID shots, and potential detox mechanisms.
Researchers in Korea have observed what appear to be “self-assembling,” “synthetic” nanostructures such as spirals and tubes that form within the contents of the COVID Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots over the course of months.
Dr. Young Mi Lee and Dr. Daniel Broudy, co-authors of the recently published study of these “artificial constructions,” suggested that their main findings were the direct observation of both “self-assembling entities… of many different shapes,” and of “cellular toxicity” triggered by the COVID shots, “especially” on blood and sperm cells.
In a Korean laboratory, using flu vaccine and normal saline as controls, the researchers incubated Pfizer and Moderna COVID injectables in various fluids, including distilled water, saline, blood plasma, and semen. AstraZeneca and Novavax COVID vaccines were also studied, but they did not develop the “self-assembled” structures seen in the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots.
While no floating particles were observed in the saline control, and only a few floating particles were observed in the flu, Novavax, and AstraZeneca vaccines, “many” entities were seen in “all residual and new” Pfizer injectables. About 30% of these reportedly had a “worm-like shape,” and these combined with “rods, discs, and crystal-like mixtures.” When incubated at body temperature for up to two days, these entities developed into other shapes, including “spheres” and “elongated tube-like objects.”
Each of the Moderna shot contents, by contrast, had “a greater number of particles” and “more artificial moving structures,” including coils and beaded chains.
Over the course of a few weeks, “2 dimensional rectangular shaped structures” appeared at the bottom of the dish in which the COVID Pfizer and Moderna shots were incubated, from which three-dimensional structures seemed to emerge, and then were “dislodged” from the bottom of the dish and rose into the upper fluid layer.
“Amazing self-assembling structures of great diversity became visible by about the fifth week of incubation. They consisted ultimately of ribbons, coils and filament-like structures,” Lee and Broudy wrote.
The “peak” stage of self-assembly of these structures appeared to be around two to six months of incubation, according to the researchers, after which they progressively “disintegrat(ed)” and then “finally disappeared, except for a remnant trace.”
These remarkable nanostructures, which were studied under a microscope at up to 400x magnification for over a year, have not been precisely identified but resemble objects within the COVID shots found by other doctors.
For example, in 2022, Australian Dr. David Nixon found “self-assembling” angular structures within the COVID shots, as well as “wires” with frayed edges, around which apparent “chips” often appeared. He observed similar “wires” in the blood of the vaccinated, and interestingly, one of these “frayed wires,” around which blood cells clumped, resembles the shape of what Lee and Broudy described as a “tripod-like, striated filament” found in the Pfizer shot incubated in normal saline.
Lee and Broudy speculated that the filament structures they observed could be linked to the white clots being found by embalmers in the bodies of the vaccinated, noting, “In analysis of blood clots from vaccinated persons, a few filament-like structures were found attached to brownish homogeneous cloudy white clots extracted from the middle layer of whole blood sediment.”
Remarkably, Dr. Carrie Madej also found in 2021 what she described as “self-assembling” and “synthetic”-looking objects in different COVID injections, including “fibers,” some of which “had a little cube structure on them,” and the emergence of brilliant colors in the Moderna jab after a couple of hours.
Interestingly, while the COVID shot manufacturers have not publicly discussed the presence of self-assembling technology in the mRNA shots, “Self-assembled mRNA vaccines” have been discussed in studies published in 2021, which note that self-assembled structures can be used to deliver COVID proteins, and that protein nanoparticles themselves can be self-assembled. A study was also published last year to the science journal Nature discussing the potential that “immunogenic self-assembling” COVID spike nanoparticles have as a “genetic vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2.
According to Lee and Broudy, the “various kinds of transparent ribbons, films, coils, and spirals” that appeared in the Pfizer shot when incubated in distilled water “were very similar in structure to the micro- and magnetic- nanorobots already presented in numerous scholarly papers.”
Toxic effects on blood
In addition to showing the self-assembly of what appear to be synthetic nanoparticles, Lee and Broudy’s experiments have demonstrated the effect the COVID shots have on blood: Each injectable showed “toxic effects on blood cells,” with Novavax showing particularly rapid cytotoxicity. The researchers found that each shot had a distinct effect on blood cells, with Pfizer triggering “cellular collapse of white blood cells and damaged platelets”; Moderna triggering rouleaux (stacking) of red blood cells; Novavax causing the disintegration of the nucleus of white blood cells and some rouleaux of red blood cells, and AstraZeneca triggering “prominent rouleaux.”
The researchers noted that white blood cell damage can be related to immune suppression, fatigue can be linked to Rouleaux blood formation, and blood clot formations can be related to platelet damage. Their findings are especially significant considering that all of these symptoms have been frequently reported after COVID injections.
For example, a study published earlier this year shows that the COVID shots pose a risk of blood clots to the brain that is 200 times greater than that posed by other vaccines over the past three decades. In addition, increasing evidence is emerging linking the COVID shots to a spike in cancer rates, with studies and doctors finding that the jabs cause immunosuppression. Long-term fatigue is also a commonly reported symptom of the shots. One German doctor, Jörg-Heiner Möller, has described a “PostVac” syndrome he says 120 of his patients have suffered after their COVID shots, which often involves a “severe fatigue syndrome.”
EMFs
Another remarkable observation by Lee and Broudy was that of the effect of electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) on the self-assembly of the COVID shot contents. For example, when the Moderna vial contents were placed on a cell phone in 5G streaming mode over a wireless recharger, “the floating materials abruptly became larger and more numerous with sharper and more rectangular edges.”
According to the researchers, Pfizer’s shot did not demonstrate an immediate effect under the same conditions, but a “delayed effect” of proliferating “filaments” after a month of exposure.
By contrast, while Moderna’s shot showed “no noticeable effects” after exposure to an external hard drive, which emits magnetic fields, the Pfizer shot showed “modest” degradation of its contents. The researchers concluded, “it could be postulated that some kind of electric current can stimulate the nanostructure’s activity, while some conditioned magnetic current can hamper their activity.”
It is noteworthy that Lee and Broudy are not the first to observe that EMFs have an impact on the contents of the COVID shots. Dr. David Nixon found that the formation of “crystalline structures” in the Pfizer COVID shots appeared to depend on their exposure to electromagnetic frequencies. When he put the slide of Pfizer shot fluid “inside a faraday bag” blocking EMFs he said came from his wireless router, he only saw black, round “dots” form within its contents, as opposed to the boxy shapes with sharp right angles that otherwise formed.
In addition, Ecuador-based electrical engineer Matt Taylor has observed striking effects of EMFs on the self-assembly of unidentified objects within the COVID shots. He testified in 2022 that when he put a drop of the COVID jab on a microscope slide and placed that slide on an internet router, he observed the self-assembly of what he believes “look like integrated circuits.”
According to Taylor, when he turned the router off, the objects “immediately” began to break apart. He repeated the experiment three times and “begg[ed]” people to reproduce his investigation to see if his findings can be replicated. In fact, Nixon had indicated that Taylor had inspired his own test with the faraday bag.
“If someone can repeat this, the implications are so incredibly wonderful. We can start to explain clots, we can start to explain detox processes,” said Taylor.
Detox
While EMF-triggered self-assembly of “vaccine” nanomaterials suggests one potential “detox” avenue, Lee and Broudy found what seem to be other ways the mRNA shots’ synthetic-looking contents can be disintegrated, if not excreted from the body.
Lee and Broudy wrote that in the “later stage” following injection, at least three weeks afterward, “colloidal gold or silver (3-5 nm in diameter and 10-20 ppm) has been observed to attach to, disrupt, actively degrade, and ultimately dissolve various nanostructures.” They added that ongoing experiments are examining the longer-term results of such protocols, and postulated that gold or silver could help in the recovery of damaged organs and normal blood flow.
The researchers also speculated that “routine exposure to heat saunas” may cause the shots’ nanomaterials to “dislodge from tissues and escape through sweat gland pores.” Reduction or even elimination of the use of personal electronics was also recommended, although Lee and Broudy did not mention the potential helpful effects of wearing EMF shielding devices after vaccination.
They concluded by calling for a worldwide moratorium on the COVID shots: “until the components can be verified and their long-term effects understood, a necessity flouted by calls for Emergency Use Authorization, an immediate global ban is needed.”
From LifeSiteNews
Receiving four or more COVID shots was associated with 559% higher likelihood of cold in children, a new study found, and another one linked the shots to higher risk of renal dysfunction.
Two major new studies have been published sounding the alarm about the COVID-19 shots potentially carrying risks of not only respiratory diseases but even kidney injury.
The Washington Stand first drew attention to the studies, published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) and International Journal of Medical Science (IJMS), respectively.
The first examined insurance claims and vaccination records for the entire population of South Korea, filtering out cases of infection prior to the start of the outbreak for a pool of more than 39 million people. It reported that the COVID shots correlated with mixed impacts on other respiratory conditions. A “temporary decline followed by a resurgence of URI [upper respiratory infections] and common cold was observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic,” it concluded. “In the Post-pandemic period (January 2023–September 2024), the risk of URI and common cold increased with higher COVID-19 vaccine doses,” it noted.
Children in particular, who are known to face the lowest risk from COVID itself, had dramatically higher odds of adverse events the more shots they took. Receiving four or more was associated with 559% higher likelihood of cold, 91% higher likelihood of pneumonia, 83% higher likelihood of URI, and 35% higher likelihood of tuberculosis.
The second study examined records of 2.9 million American adults, half of whom received at least one COVID shot and half of whom did not.
“COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a higher risk of subsequent renal dysfunction, including AKI [acute kidney injury] and dialysis treatment,” it found, citing 15,809 cases versus 11,081. “The cumulative incidence of renal dysfunction was significantly higher in vaccinated than in unvaccinated patients […] At the one-year follow-up, the number of deaths among vaccinated individuals was 7,693, while the number of deaths among unvaccinated individuals was 7,364.” Notably, the study did not find a difference in the “type of COVID-19 vaccine administered.”
The researchers note that this is not simply a matter of correlation, but that a causal mechanism for such results has already been indicated.
“Prior studies have indicated that COVID-19 vaccines can damage several tissues,” they explain.
“The main pathophysiological mechanism of COVID-19 vaccine-related complications involve vascular disruption. COVID-19 vaccination can induce inflammation through interleukins and the nod-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3, an inflammatory biomarker. In another study, thrombosis episodes were observed in patients who received different COVID-19 vaccines. Additionally, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been associated with the development of myocarditis and related complications […] The development of renal dysfunction can be affected by several biochemical factors [26]. In turn, AKI can increase systemic inflammation and impair the vasculature and red blood cell aggregation. Given that the mechanism underlying COVID-19 vaccine-related complications corresponds to the pathophysiology of kidney disease, we hypothesized that COVID-19 vaccination may cause renal dysfunction, which was supported by the results of this study.”
Launched in the final year of President Donald Trump’s first term in response to COVID-19, Operation Warp Speed (OWS) had the COVID shots ready for use in a fraction of the time any previous vaccine had ever been developed and tested. As LifeSiteNews has extensively covered, a body of evidence steadily accumulated over the following years that they failed to prevent transmission and, more importantly, carried severe risks of their own. COVID was a sticking point for many in Trump’s base, yet he doggedly refused to disavow OWS.
Since leaving office, Trump repeatedly promoted the shots as “one of the greatest achievements of mankind.” The negative reception to such comments got him to drop the subject for a while, but in July 2022, he complained that “we did so much in terms of therapeutics and a word that I’m not allowed to mention. But I’m still proud of that word, because we did that in nine months, and it was supposed to take five years to 12 years. Nobody else could have done it. But I’m not mentioning it in front of my people.”
So far, Trump’s second administration has rolled back several recommendations for the shots but not yet pulled them from the market, despite hiring several vocal critics of the COVID establishment and putting the Department of Health & Human Services under the leadership of America’s most prominent anti-vaccine activist, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Most recently, the administration has settled on leaving the current vaccines optional but not supporting work to develop successors.
In early August, Kennedy announced the government would be “winding down” almost $500 million worth of mRNA vaccine projects and rejecting future exploration of the technology in favor of more conventional vaccines. Last week, HHS revoked emergency use authorizations (EUA) for the COVID shots, which were used to justify the long-since-rescinded mandates and sidestep other procedural hurdles, and in its place issued “marketing authorization” for those who meet a minimum risk threshold for the following mRNA vaccines: Moderna (6+ months), Pfizer (5+), and Novavax (12+).
“These vaccines are available for all patients who choose them after consulting with their doctors,” Kennedy said, making good on his pledge to “end COVID vaccine mandates, keep vaccines available to people who want them, especially the vulnerable, demand placebo-controlled trials from companies,” and “end the emergency.”
From the Daily Caller News Foundation
By Emily Kopp
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s (ODNI) hub for foreign biological threats dismissed the intelligence pointing to a lab accident in Wuhan as “misinformation” in January 2021, two former government sources who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive internal meetings told the Daily Caller News Foundation. New documents show that intelligence risked implicating ODNI’s own bioengineering advisor — University of North Carolina professor Ralph Baric.
Baric, who engineered novel coronaviruses with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), advised ODNI four times a year on biological threats, according to documents released Oct. 30 by Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul.
Dear Readers:
As a nonprofit, we are dependent on the generosity of our readers. \
Please consider making a small donation of any amount here.
Thank you!
Baric did not respond to the DCNF’s requests for comment.
The professor’s ties to American intelligence may run even deeper, the documents reveal, as ODNI facilitated a meeting between the CIA and Baric about a project on coronaviruses in September 2015.
The email exchange with the subject line “Request for Your Expertise” shows an unnamed government official with a CIA-affiliated email address pitching a “possible project” to Baric relating to “[c]oronavirus evolution and possible natural human adaptation.”
The new documents shed a bit of light on a question members of Congress have posed for years: Whether our own intelligence agencies knew more about the likelihood of a lab origin of COVID than they told the public.
“Director Ratcliffe has been on the forefront of this issue since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and has been committed to transparency and accountability on this issue,” a CIA spokesperson said in a statement. “In January – as one of the Director’s first actions at Langley – CIA made public its assessment that a research-related origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is more likely than a natural origin. CIA will continue to evaluate any available credible new intelligence reporting as appropriate.”
Paul is seeking more documents from ODNI on potential ties between U.S. intelligence and the research in Wuhan as part of an ongoing investigation by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and has promised public hearings in the coming months.
Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard disbanded the ODNI biological threats office earlier this year following questions from the DCNF about its suppression of COVID origins intelligence in August. Gabbard and a dedicated working group have also been quietly investigating the origins of COVID.
Protecting Their Own
Baric gave a presentation to the ODNI in January 2020 showing that he advised American intelligence that COVID may have emerged from a lab, the documents also indicate. Baric shared that the WIV had sequenced thousands of SARS-like coronaviruses, including strains capable of epidemics, the slides show.
Baric noted that the Wuhan lab does this work under low biosafety levels despite the ability of some of these viruses to infect and grow in human lung cells.
What Baric omitted: He had submitted a grant application in 2018 with intentions to conduct research to make coronaviruses with the same rare features seen in COVID while concealing the Wuhan lab’s low biosafety level, jotting in the margins of a draft of the grant application that Americans would “freak out” if they knew about the shoddy standards.
One year after Baric’s presentation, ODNI had hardened against the lab leak hypothesis.
When State Department officials pushed to declassify certain intelligence related to a plausible lab leak in January 2021, the ODNI expressed concerns that it would “call out actions that we ourselves are doing.”
Former ODNI National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center (NCBC) Director Kathryn Brinsfield, a medical doctor, also dismissed a January 2021 presentation by government officials about a plausible lab origin of COVID as “misinformation,” two sources told the DCNF. Her top aide Zach Bernstein, who possesses a master’s degree in security studies but no scientific credentials, also dismissed the presentation, according to three sources.
Gabbard disbanded NCBC in August following questions from the DCNF about its role in suppressing COVID origins intelligence.
But in the years preceding Gabbard’s takeover of the intelligence community’s central office, the ODNI’s public reports omitted any analysis of COVID’s viral genome. One intelligence agency filed a formal complaint about this glaring omission, the DCNF reported.
Scientists often received fierce pushback from former National Intelligence Council official Adrienne Keen, who helped steward former President Joe Biden’s 90-day review into COVID’s origins, an official told the DCNF. Paul’s request for records from ODNI includes a request for some of Keen’s communications.
Brinsfield and Keen did not respond to requests for comment.
Unanswered Questions
Despite the new disclosures, the precise nature of the CIA’s interest in Baric’s coronavirus work remains unknown. The documents do not include any further details about the work that the CIA and Baric may or may not have undertaken.
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) funded the discovery of novel coronaviruses and shipped the samples to Wuhan through a 2009-2020 program called PREDICT, the DCNF reported in July. USAID sometimes acted as a CIA front before Trump dismantled it earlier this year — but no evidence exists that the CIA directed PREDICT.
An unnamed FBI special agent was in communication with Baric about responding to public requests for his research and emails with the Wuhan lab through the North Carolina Freedom of Information Act, according to a 2024 congressional letter, but details about the contact between the FBI and Baric also remain uncertain.
The CIA was slow to acknowledge that a lab was the pandemic’s most likely source, an assessment that the CIA made public more than five years after the pandemic emerged and well after the FBI and the Department of Energy.
In early 2020, when Trump’s Deputy National Security Advisor Matt Pottinger tasked CIA analysts to dig into the matter, they came up empty, according to a New York Times report. Instead, anonymous sources smeared Pottinger as having a “conspiratorial view” of the Chinese Communist Party.
Trump’s current CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who served as the DNI from May 2020 to January 2021, revealed in a 2023 Wall Street Journal op-ed that he had pushed for the declassification of COVID origins intelligence as the DNI but that he “faced constant opposition, particularly from Langley.”
Bovaer Backlash Update: Danish Farmers Get Green Light to Opt Out as UK Arla Trial Abruptly Ends!
Carney’s Floor-Crossing Campaign. A Media-Staged Bid for Majority Rule That Erodes Democracy While Beijing Hovers
Canada moves forward with digital identification for federal benefits seekers
Chinese-Owned Trailer Park Beside U.S. Stealth Bomber Base Linked to Alleged Vancouver Repression Case
-
Frontier Centre for Public Policy2 days agoRichmond Mayor Warns Property Owners That The Cowichan Case Puts Their Titles At Risk
-
Alberta2 days agoHow economic corridors could shape a stronger Canadian future
-
Daily Caller2 days agoLaura Ingraham’s Viral Clash With Trump Prompts Her To Tell Real Reasons China Sends Students To US
-
Business1 day agoP.E.I. Moves to Open IRAC Files, Forcing Land Regulator to Publish Reports After The Bureau’s Investigation
-
Business1 day agoMark Carney Seeks to Replace Fiscal Watchdog with Loyal Lapdog
-
Energy1 day agoCanada’s oilpatch shows strength amid global oil shakeup
-
COVID-191 day ago
Major new studies link COVID shots to kidney disease, respiratory problems
-
International23 hours agoIs America drifting toward civil war? Joe Rogan thinks so