International
Big tech election interference?
For people who care about fairness and democracy it feels like they just discovered the refs are cheating for the other team.
Videos of people questioning their Amazon Alexa about America’s presidential candidates are going viral. The videos show people asking “Why should I vote for former President Donald Trump/Vice President Kamala Harris?”
The difference in answers coming from big tech behemoth Amazon is highly disturbing proof the field is tilted.
Watch:
“Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump?”
ALEXA: I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate
UNLESS IT’S KAMALA HARRIS‼️
LISTEN & SHARE 🚨👇🏼 pic.twitter.com/UlDSsGBFJY
— TONY™ (@TONYxTWO) September 3, 2024
Comment streams indicate Amazon has “fixed” this glaring glitch. But it was certainly not an isolated incident. Here are a string of videos from people asking similar questions and getting one-way election direction from Amazon.
Amazon's Alexa gives a list of reasons to vote for Kamala, won't do it for Trump: pic.twitter.com/xdAfouSPUd
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 3, 2024
Four years after the 2020 election the media is only recently starting to admit big tech teamed up with the authorities to interfere by denying the Biden laptop videos revealing widespread criminality by the Biden family.
When I was CEO of Parler, I was pressured to take down the Hunter Biden laptop story. I refused, and my company was deplatformed. Now, the censors are going even further, trying to take away Telegram CEO Pavel Durov's freedom. This has to stop! #freespeech pic.twitter.com/Rvb2bwMgfp
— John Matze 💙 (@john_matze) August 30, 2024
With election 2024 on the doorstep, here’s big tech again, seemingly choosing sides and tilting the field. In 2024 big tech seems to have learned there are no consequences for election interference. These videos are also another in a long line of opportunities for the regular media to take a stand for fairness, freedom and democracy. Does anyone think that will happen?
International
Elon Musk, JD Vance, others to appear at Trump’s return rally in Butler, PA, on Saturday
From LifeSiteNews
By Stephen Kokx
Donald Trump is holding a rally on Saturday in Butler, Pennsylvania, at the same location where he was nearly assassinated three months ago, with allies including Elon Musk set to join him.
Saturday afternoon at 5 pm (EST), Donald Trump will hold a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, at the same location he nearly lost his life at just three short months ago.
“I’m going back to Butler because I feel I have an obligation to go back to Butler. We never finished what we were supposed to do,” Trump told NewsNation earlier this week.
Trump will be joined by a literal army of his closest political allies, including running mate JD Vance, son Eric and daughter-in-law Lara Trump — co-chair of the Republican National Committee — and Elon Musk, who shared news of his planned attendance on X.
I will be there to support! https://t.co/nokR0g3dn1
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 4, 2024
Also scheduled to appear is the family of slain firefighter Corey Comperatore, a dozen Pennsylvania sheriffs, multiple congressmen, and many persons who also attended Trump’s last rally at the Butler Farm Show Inc. location on July 13.
Although the Secret Service urged Trump to not hold events outside following the assassination attempt, the former president announced on TRUTH Social just days later that he would not be doing so and that he would be returning to Butler. Some commentators accused the agency’s request of being a form of election interference intended to suppress enthusiasm for Trump.
Security is expected to be extremely tight at the rally. The monumental breakdown in coordination between local police and federal agents that allowed a 20-year-old shooter to fire multiple rounds at Trump’s head while he was on stage has still not been fully clarified, prompting speculation that the effort was an “inside job” carried out by intelligence agencies to replace Trump as the GOP’s nominee with a more pro-war candidate.
After the July shooting, scores of political commentators and religious figures attributed Trump’s survival to God’s protection. Trump himself said as much in his GOP nominee acceptance speech just five days later. “I’m not supposed to be here tonight … I stand before you in this arena only by the grace of Almighty God,” he said.
Trump’s wife Melania, who recently came out in support of a women’s right to an abortion, also described his surviving two assassination attempts as “miracles.” She has also blamed Democrats and liberal media outlets that have labeled him as a “threat to democracy” for why the shootings took place.
On August 8, the state of Pennsylvania published several X posts informing residents that it is likely there won’t be a clear winner on election night.
“Pennsylvanians won’t always know the final results of all races on election night. Any changes in results that occur as counties continue to count ballots are not evidence that an election is ‘rigged’,” said the state, which has faced criticism over election irregularities in recent years.
Without Pennsylvania’s 19 Electoral College votes, Trump would have to win Republican-leaning states like North Carolina and Georgia and pick up Arizona and Nevada, both of which he lost to Joe Biden in 2020. And even then, he would only be at 268. He would still have to win a typically Democratic state like New Hampshire (4 Electoral College votes), Wisconsin (10), or Michigan (15), to surpass the 270 threshold. But with Pennsylvania in his column, all Trump has to do is retain North Carolina and Georgia and he will receive the necessary 270 votes.
International
Multiple women’s college volleyball teams forfeit matches rather than face male opponent
From LifeSiteNews
Southern Utah, Boise State, and Wyoming universities forfeited women’s volleyball matches against San José State over the inclusion of a male on the female team, sparking Christian non-profit Concerned Women for America to launch a lawsuit against San José State.
Both Southern Utah University (SUU) and Boise State University’s (BSU) female volleyball teams made the decision to refuse competing against a team with a male-born player.
San José State University’s (SJSU) Blaire Fleming (born Brayden Fleming) is the 6’1 biological male competing on the SJSU female volleyball team – the individual various outlets have attributed to the school’s undefeated winning streak. However, after reassessing their initial decision, the University of Wyoming (UW) has added itself to the list of schools demanding fairness and safety in women’s sports.
When UW first learned of the transgender-identifying opponent, they first decided to move forward with their October 5 game. But not long after BSU chose to forfeit, “It appears [UW] … had a change-of-heart,” wrote OutKick’s Dan Zaksheske in response to the team announcing they would, in fact, not compete.
SUU was the first school to opt out of play against SJSU in a preseason matchup and BSU was the first to cancel conference play. Both teams did not explicitly state their reason for forfeiting, and UW also kept their public statement vague. They shared in a statement from Tuesday:
After a lengthy discussion, the University of Wyoming will not play its scheduled conference match against San Jose State University. Per Mountain West Conference policy, the conference will record the match as a forfeit and a loss for Wyoming.
But as Zaksheske added, “While Wyoming is the latest school to cancel a match against San Jose State, don’t be surprised if more schools follow suit.”
It turns out SJSU chose to initially hide the fact that Fleming is a biological male – from both his own teammates and other competitors. This reality, alongside an increasing number of colleges refusing to compete, has not merely sparked controversy, but action as well.
The conservative Christian non-profit Concerned Women for America (CWA) has filed a complaint against SJSU. “We want to protect the integrity of women’s sports but also the safety of these female athletes,” said Macy Petty, a CWA legislative assistant and a NCAA volleyball athlete.
According to Petty, the issue is rooted in the fact that “many of these schools were unaware that there was a male athlete on” the female team. “We just want to make sure that these schools know exactly what is going on in this athletic program because the NCAA and SJSU had not previously given them the decency to even let them know what was happening.”
Ultimately, Petty pointed out, “There’s no informed consent for the schools or for the female athletes here. They’re totally blindsided when they walk up to the court and they see that there’s a male athlete on the other side.” As Fox News reported, CWA’s “federal civil rights complaint [alleged] female discrimination and [argued] that the California university allowed a male athlete to hold a female roster spot as well as a female athletic scholarship.”
In a comment to The Washington Stand, Doreen Denny, CWA senior advisor, stated, “What is happening in NCAA women’s volleyball is a game changer.” As she went on to say, this is the first time we’re seeing “NCAA member institutions … taking a stand against the NCAA’s trans athlete policy that directly discriminates against female athletes and are upholding the integrity of women’s sports.”
CWA CEO Penny Nance also praised UW’s decision in a statement, emphasizing her gratitude that the university “has taken seriously the issues of unfairness and discrimination against female athletes when males compete in women’s sports.” She added, “No NCAA member institution should have to be making this choice.”
In addition to CWA’s complaint, former University of Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines has filed a lawsuit against SJSU. Included as a plaintiff in this lawsuit is Brooke Slusser, a player on the SJSU volleyball team. The document reads:
Due to the NCAA’s Transgender Eligibility Policies which permit Fleming to play on the SJSU women’s volleyball team and which led to SJSU recruiting Fleming, giving Fleming a scholarship, and allowing Fleming to be in positions to violate Brooke’s right to bodily privacy, Brooke has suffered physical and emotional injuries, embarrassment, humiliation, emotional distress, mental anguish and suffering.
In comments shared with OutKick, Slusser said, “It’s crazy to say, but it was an easy decision for me to join because it’s something I truly believe in.… This is something that so many people do care about. It’s just that so many people are scared to talk about it.”
“While these schools have not given a full explanation for their decisions to forfeit matches against San Jose State University,” concluded Denny, “their actions are speaking louder than words.”
This article is reprinted with permission from the Family Research Council, publishers of The Washington Stand at washingtonstand.com.
-
Alberta2 days ago
Danielle Smith delivers on promise to protect gender-confused children in Alberta
-
Alberta15 hours ago
Alberta rail hub doubling in size to transport plastic from major new carbon-neutral plant
-
Alberta1 day ago
Chris Scott and Rebecca Ingram attempting Class Action Lawsuit against Province for COVID restrictions
-
Brownstone Institute1 day ago
The FOIA Lady Pleads the Fifth
-
Economy12 hours ago
Ottawa’s proposed ‘electricity’ regulations may leave Canadians out in the cold
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
Bureaucrats Worry Democracy Will Get In The Way Of Their Climate Agenda
-
National12 hours ago
Parliament’s Debate on Bill 377: A Battle for Transparency, Accountability, and the Control of National Security
-
DEI22 hours ago
CA school taught 5th graders gender identity, had them teach it to kindergartners