National
B.C. court upholds extradition of pair accused of ‘honour killing’ in India
VANCOUVER — Two British Columbia residents accused of hiring assailants to kill a relative in India because she married a poor rickshaw driver must be extradited to face murder charges, the province’s top court has ruled.
The B.C. Court of Appeal has denied Malkit Kaur Sidhu and Surjit Singh Badesha’s request for a stay of proceedings and a judicial review, which their lawyers filed as the RCMP escorted them onto a Delhi-bound plane last fall.
Indian authorities allege the pair were involved in the so-called “honour killing” of Sidhu’s daughter and Badesha’s niece, Jaswinder Kaur Sidhu, in 2000 after she married a man from a lower socio-economic class against her family’s wishes.
An RCMP operation to remove the two was halted in Toronto’s airport in September 2017 when Mounties learned lawyers for the accused had filed court applications for judicial review moments earlier.
The applications argued Sidhu and Badesha weren’t given the chance to review the federal justice minister’s decision to extradite them and that they were denied access to counsel.
In a written decision Tuesday, the court concluded the minister’s conduct did amount to an abuse of process, but it does not warrant a stay of proceedings.
“This is a close case but we conclude the balance favours denying the stay,” wrote Chief Justice Robert Bauman and Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein on behalf of a three-judge panel.
“The charges these applicants face are the most serious in our criminal justice system and the interests of India, and of our own community, in seeing them heard in court on their merits is very substantial.”
The pair have enjoyed a very “long and full day in court,” the judges added, noting their case has been considered by two justice ministers, the provincial appeal court and the Supreme Court of Canada.
Sidhu and Badesha have long opposed their surrender to India, arguing they would face violence and torture in Indian prisons. The country is seeking their extradition for the offence of conspiracy to commit murder.
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in September 2017 to set aside a previous B.C. Court of Appeal ruling that had stopped extradition proceedings.
In 2017, after the Supreme Court held a hearing but before it made its decision, Sidhu and Badesha both filed new affidavits to the federal justice minister and requested she reconsider their removal from Canada.
The affidavits included statements from two of their co-accused in India who had been convicted at trial but acquitted on appeal. The men described “shocking” prison conditions and included allegations by one of the accused of being beaten and tortured.
The federal justice minister had not yet responded to their reconsideration request on Sept. 20, 2017, when the RCMP commenced a covert operation to fly the pair to India. Police flew them from Vancouver to Toronto and they were scheduled to board a flight to Delhi that night.
When news of their extradition broke in Indian media outlets that day, counsel for Sidhu and Badesha contacted a lawyer for the Department of Justice.
The lawyer wrote in an email that afternoon that the pair would not be surrendered until the justice minister made a decision on their reconsideration request. However, if Wilson-Raybould decided not to reconsider the decision, the pair may be “immediately removed,” the lawyer said.
Sidhu and Badesha’s lawyers filed an application for judicial review in the B.C. Court of Appeal at 6:30 p.m. Pacific time, prompting the pair to be stopped while boarding a plane that was scheduled to leave just 30 minutes later.
The appeal court found that the minister planned to refuse their reconsideration request that day and intended for the pair to be removed from Canada immediately afterward, without giving them an opportunity to consult counsel or file for a judicial review.
The department and minister failed to exercise their authority with restraint, even-handedness and fair-mindedness, and as a result there has been a “very serious adverse impact on the integrity of the justice system,” the judges wrote.
“Looked at holistically, this conduct might be justified by some as ‘just desserts’ for two applicants who had their day in this country’s highest court and were filing a weak case for reconsideration in an effort to frustrate their timely extradition to India. They were dragging out the process with delay, delay, delay,” the judges wrote.
“That motivation would be understandable in a segment, perhaps a large one of Canadian society. But, respectfully, it is not one that can motivate the Department of Justice or the Minister of Justice.”
Neither Bedesha nor Sidhu’s lawyers responded to a request for comment.
In a statement issued Wednesday, the Department of Justice said it was pleased to see that the surrender order had been validated by the court. The department noted that Badesha and Sidhu may still elect to seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.
— Follow @ellekane on Twitter.
Laura Kane, The Canadian Press
COVID-19
‘Freedom Convoy’ organizers’ trial on scheduled break until after Thanksgiving

Tamara Lich arrives for her trial at the courthouse in Ottawa, on Tuesday, Sept. 19, 2023. Lich and fellow Freedom Convoy organizer Chris Barber are charged with mischief, obstructing police, counselling others to commit mischief and intimidation. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang
The trial of “Freedom Convoy” organizers Tamara Lich and Chris Barber has begun a scheduled break that will continue until after Thanksgiving.
The court finished hearing the testimony of Serge Arpin, the chief of staff to Ottawa’s former mayor, on Friday.
He spoke about how the city responded to the protest that overwhelmed the downtown core for three weeks in early 2022.
Arpin also testified about his interactions with convoy organizers while working out a deal with former mayor Jim Watson to move big-rig trucks out of residential neighbourhoods.
The evidence was originally due to be wrapping up by this point in the trial, which had been scheduled to last 16 days, but Arpin is just the fourth witness to finish his testimony.
The trial was expected to hear from 22 witnesses, leaving the court to ponder how much more time will be needed to reach the finish line.
Justice Heather Perkins-McVey, who is overseeing the trial, has identified several dates in October and November.
Lawrence Greenspon, the lawyer representing Lich, said he does not want to set new court dates until the Crown has established a new, more accurate time estimate for its case.
As of Friday, the trial is expected to resume Oct. 11.
Lich and Barber are charged with mischief and counselling others commit offences such as mischief and intimidation for their role in organizing and prolonging the demonstration.
The defence questioned Arpin Friday about how city council and staff attempted to put an end the protest. As the mayor’s chief of staff, Arpin told the court he sat in on every council meeting.
He was grilled about a bylaw change on Feb. 9 last year that banned idling in a vehicle unless the temperature fell at or below -15 C. The bylaw originally allowed idling if the temperature was below 5 C.
“City council … was attempting to freeze out the truckers and their families,” Greenspon told the court.
Arpin said he believed the intention was to bring the demonstration to an end.
Arpin was also involved in the deal between Watson, Lich and other organizers to move trucks out of residential neighbourhoods and onto Wellington Street, in front of Parliament Hill.
He texted back and forth with the convoy organizers’ lawyer Keith Wilson on Feb. 14 and 15 in an exchange that was filed as evidence in the trial.
The texts suggest city staff did not give protest organizers or their lawyers a heads-up about plans to file a court injunction against demonstrators who violated city bylaws.
“Just so you know, it is highly irregular for the city’s lawyers to have done this without providing us lawyers here with notice,” Wilson wrote to Arpin on Feb. 15.
“This could change everything.”
Arpin told Wilson he was under the impression they knew about the court filing, but said in court that he never informed them himself until after the injunction was granted by a judge.
Lawyers representing the convoy organizers were not given an opportunity to oppose the application in court at the time.
The deal between Lich and the mayor fell apart later that day when police would no longer allow trucks to move closer to Parliament.
Arpin confirmed the police service underwent a change in command that day as a result of the police chief’s resignation.
He apologized to Wilson at the time, the text messages show.
“Our goal has always been de-escalation and I know you share this goal,” he texted to Wilson on the 16th.
The Crown hopes to pick up its case in October with eight local witnesses from Ottawa who lived or worked downtown during the Freedom Convoy protest.
Lich and Barber have already admitted that there was mischief taking place in the protest zone.
Greenspon has argued that the testimony of those witnesses would be akin to victim impact statements, and therefore shouldn’t be allowed to be heard during the trial.
P
International
B.C. premier suspects Ottawa holding back information about foreign interference

A flock of birds flies past as Moninder Singh, front right, a spokesperson for the British Columbia Gurdwaras Council (BCGC), waits to speak to reporters outside the Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara Sahib in Surrey, B.C., on Monday, September 18, 2023, where temple president Hardeep Singh Nijjar was gunned down in his vehicle while leaving the temple parking lot in June. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck
Vancouver
British Columbia Premier David Eby said he “strongly” suspects that the federal government is holding back information that could help the province protect its residents who have connections to India from foreign interference.
Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc has reached out, saying Ottawa wants to make sure the provincial government has the details it needs to keep B.C. residents safe, “but there has not been good information sharing,” the premier said Friday.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau revealed in Parliament on Monday that Canadian intelligence services were investigating “a potential link” between the Indian government and the fatal shooting of Sikh advocate Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Surrey, B.C., last June.
In response to the killing, Eby said on Friday that the priority should be protecting the criminal prosecution process so people can be held accountable for the killing.
But on the broader issue of ensuring community safety, he said there’s “a long way to go to share that information.”
Eby said people in B.C. have been “feeling pressure from India,” and he believes Ottawa has information through agencies including the RCMP and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service that could help respond to foreign interference.
The premier’s initial statement in response to Trudeau’s announcement called on Ottawa to “share all relevant information” related not only to foreign interference, but also to “transnational organized crime threats” in the province.
He said Friday that the prime minister had reached out before telling Parliament about the probe based on “credible” information about the potential link between India and Nijjar’s killing.
Eby accepted Trudeau’s offer for a briefing by CSIS, but everything the premier knows about the situation is “in the public realm,” he said.
“I expressed my frustration in the meeting with the CSIS director about our inability to get more concrete information,” Eby said.
He made the remarks during a media question-and-answer session after addressing local politicians at the Union of BC Municipalities conference.
Eby said he understands there may need to be reform around the law governing CSIS in order for the agency to share the kind of information he’s looking for.
“If that’s what’s required, let’s make it happen, because the only way that we’re going to make traction on this is by the federal government trusting the provincial government with information and being able to act on it in our local communities,” he said.
Nijjar was a prominent supporter of the Khalistan separatism movement that advocates for a Sikh homeland in India’s Punjab province. He had been working to organize an unofficial referendum among the Sikh diaspora on independence from India at the time of his killing.
India designated Nijjar as a terrorist in 2020, an accusation he had denied.
Canada and India expelled each other’s diplomats in the fallout of Trudeau’s announcement, and India has halted visa services in Canada.
India’s government has denied the accusation as “absurd and motivated.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 22, 2023.
-
COVID-192 days ago
Emergency manager to take the stand for third day at ‘Freedom Convoy’ trial
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day ago
If You Don’t Hear From Me, It’s Because I Don’t Hear From You.
-
Business1 day ago
Alberta deserves more than half CPP assets if it exits program: report
-
Alberta2 days ago
Alberta set to release report on whether to ditch CPP for provincial pension plan
-
Alberta1 day ago
Alberta to debate Canada Pension Plan, says it deserves half of fund if it leaves
-
Red Deer1 day ago
The Red Deer Polytechnic Alumni Association is inviting you to Palate: A Taste of Local
-
COVID-191 day ago
COVID-19 lawsuit too broad, paints all Quebec care homes with same brush: lawyer
-
Disaster1 day ago
Destructive West Kelowna, B.C., wildfire now considered ‘held’