Alberta
A Toronto Take on the United We Roll Convoy
When you live in the world’s second largest country it’s easy to understand how people from one part might have difficulty understanding people from another region thousands of kilometres away. Undoubtedly that’s one of the issues facing the United We Roll Convoy. Oilfield workers from the prairies just don’t make a lot of sense to, say a banker from Toronto. What does that banker think when dozens of big trucks clog up traffic in front of the Parliament Buildings in Ottawa? Is that person likely to take a bit of time and get to know why they’ve taken their big trucks half way across the continent? Or is that banker just appalled at them for promoting the oil industry in such a demonstrative manner.
The brave workers (and former workers) who headed out on the United We Roll Convoy knew they were taking a substantial risk before setting out. They knew this could go sideways, but they were desperate to send a message. Alberta’s oil is landlocked and certainly hundreds of thousands of people are affected. Families, businesses, and communities wait for an indeterminate amount of time for Canada’s pipeline issues to work themselves out with no guarantee it will ever happen. So they gassed up and gathered at Gorts Truckwash in Red Deer and they launched this project. They didn’t have a marketing firm formulate a message for them. They didn’t clamp down on any of their drivers and insist that their messaging go through a single spokesperson. They just hoped..
Their reception was not what they were dreaming of. But they did get a few chances to get their message worked in there with whatever the nation’s media wanted to talk about. It may be that the passing of time will help Canadians focus in on what it was that they wanted to say. But there’s no guarantee that it will ever get through to that banker in Toronto. Well. That’s not totally true. There’s one banker from Toronto who really backs these people. That’s because like a reporter embedded with a military battalion, he’s been embedded in the middle of Alberta’s Oil Country for some time now. Here’s an opinion Canadians haven’t heard yet. From a banker. From Toronto.
Alberta
Alberta government should create flat 8% personal and business income tax rate in Alberta
From the Fraser Institute
By Tegan Hill
If the Smith government reversed the 2015 personal income tax rate increases and instituted a flat 8 per cent tax rate, it would help restore Alberta’s position as one of the lowest tax jurisdictions in North America
Over the past decade, Alberta has gone from one of the most competitive tax jurisdictions in North America to one of the least competitive. And while the Smith government has promised to create a new 8 per cent tax bracket on personal income below $60,000, it simply isn’t enough to restore Alberta’s tax competitiveness. Instead, the government should institute a flat 8 per cent personal and business income tax rate.
Back in 2014, Alberta had a single 10 per cent personal and business income tax rate. As a result, it had the lowest top combined (federal and provincial/state) personal income tax rate and business income tax rate in North America. This was a powerful advantage that made Alberta an attractive place to start a business, work and invest.
In 2015, however, the provincial NDP government replaced the single personal income tax rate of 10 percent with a five-bracket system including a top rate of 15 per cent, so today Alberta has the 10th-highest personal income tax rate in North America. The government also increased Alberta’s 10 per cent business income tax rate to 12 per cent (although in 2019 the Kenney government began reducing the rate to today’s 8 per cent).
If the Smith government reversed the 2015 personal income tax rate increases and instituted a flat 8 per cent tax rate, it would help restore Alberta’s position as one of the lowest tax jurisdictions in North America, all while saving Alberta taxpayers $1,573 (on average) annually.
And a truly integrated flat tax system would not only apply a uniform tax 8 per cent rate to all sources of income (including personal and business), it would eliminate tax credits, deductions and exemptions, which reduce the cost of investments in certain areas, increasing the relative cost of investment in others. As a result, resources may go to areas where they are not most productive, leading to a less efficient allocation of resources than if these tax incentives did not exist.
Put differently, tax incentives can artificially change the relative attractiveness of goods and services leading to sub-optimal allocation. A flat tax system would not only improve tax efficiency by reducing these tax-based economic distortions, it would also reduce administration costs (expenses incurred by governments due to tax collection and enforcement regulations) and compliance costs (expenses incurred by individuals and businesses to comply with tax regulations).
Finally, a flat tax system would also help avoid negative incentives that come with a progressive marginal tax system. Currently, Albertans are taxed at higher rates as their income increases, which can discourage additional work, savings and investment. A flat tax system would maintain “progressivity” as the proportion of taxes paid would still increase with income, but minimize the disincentive to work more and earn more (increasing savings and investment) because Albertans would face the same tax rate regardless of how their income increases. In sum, flat tax systems encourage stronger economic growth, higher tax revenues and a more robust economy.
To stimulate strong economic growth and leave more money in the pockets of Albertans, the Smith government should go beyond its current commitment to create a new tax bracket on income under $60,000 and institute a flat 8 per cent personal and business income tax rate.
Author:
Alberta
Province to stop municipalities overcharging on utility bills
Making utility bills more affordableAlberta’s government is taking action to protect Alberta’s ratepayers by introducing legislation to lower and stabilize local access fees. Affordability is a top priority for Alberta’s government, with the cost of utilities being a large focus. By introducing legislation to help reduce the cost of utility bills, the government is continuing to follow through on its commitment to make life more affordable for Albertans. This is in addition to the new short-term measures to prevent spikes in electricity prices and will help ensure long-term affordability for Albertans’ basic household expenses.
Local access fees are functioning as a regressive municipal tax that consumers pay on their utility bills. It is unacceptable for municipalities to be raking in hundreds of millions in surplus revenue off the backs of Alberta’s ratepayers and cause their utility bills to be unpredictable costs by tying their fees to a variable rate. Calgarians paid $240 in local access fees on average in 2023, compared to the $75 on average in Edmonton, thanks to Calgary’s formula relying on a variable rate. This led to $186 million more in fees being collected by the City of Calgary than expected.
To protect Alberta’s ratepayers, the Government of Alberta is introducing the Utilities Affordability Statutes Amendment Act, 2024. If passed, this legislation would promote long-term affordability and predictability for utility bills by prohibiting the use of variable rates when calculating municipalities’ local access fees. Variable rates are highly volatile, which results in wildly fluctuating electricity bills. When municipalities use this rate to calculate their local access fees, it results in higher bills for Albertans and less certainty in families’ budgets. These proposed changes would standardize how municipal fees are calculated across the province, and align with most municipalities’ current formulas.
If passed, the Utilities Affordability Statutes Amendment Act, 2024 would prevent municipalities from attempting to take advantage of Alberta’s ratepayers in the future. It would amend sections of the Electric Utilities Act and Gas Utilities Act to ensure that the Alberta Utilities Commission has stronger regulatory oversight on how these municipal fees are calculated and applied, ensuring Alberta ratepayer’s best interests are protected.
If passed, this legislation would also amend sections of the Alberta Utilities Commission Act, the Electric Utilities Act, Government Organizations Act and the Regulated Rate Option Stability Act to replace the terms “Regulated Rate Option”, “RRO”, and “Regulated Rate Provider” with “Rate of Last Resort” and “Rate of Last Resort Provider” as applicable. Quick facts
Related information |
-
Brownstone Institute2 days ago
Deborah Birx Gets Her Close-Up
-
Alberta2 days ago
Coutts Three verdict: A warning to protestors who act as liaison with police
-
Alberta2 days ago
Alberta moves to protect Edmonton park from Trudeau government’s ‘diversity’ plan
-
Energy2 days ago
Canada Has All the Elements to be a Winner in Global Energy — Now Let’s Do It
-
espionage2 days ago
Canada’s intelligence chief says he personally warned Trudeau about China’s election meddling
-
Business2 days ago
Maxime Bernier warns Canadians of Trudeau’s plan to implement WEF global tax regime
-
Freedom Convoy2 days ago
Ottawa spent “excessive” $2.2 million fighting Emergencies Act challenge
-
Brownstone Institute2 days ago
A Coup Without Firing a Shot